An interventional study of Premex Protocol in Newborn, Extreme Prematurity and Pretrm Infants, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-20.
Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
The intervention proposed is a new organization of care, based on the EXPRIM (EXtrem PRematurity Innovative Management) protocol, involving early, standardized, and multidisciplinary management of women hospitalized for a risk of extremely preterm birth and their children. It will take place in each perinatal network for all pregnant women hospitalized between 22 and 26 weeks with a risk of preterm delivery.
Setting up the protocol requires taking into account the parents' time and timing issues, and its potential for change, to plan the implementation of the protocol, especially the degree of emergency of the situation and the probability of imminent delivery.
The follow-up collected for this study will take place:
At the child's discharge from the hospital, or if he or she dies in the hospital:
When the child reaches the corrected age of 2 years:
Extremely preterm infants, those born between 22 and 26 weeks of gestation, are at very high risk of neonatal death, severe morbidity, and disabilities. These children's survival basically depends on the obstetric-pediatric team's willingness to provide active care. In France, practices vary strongly according to the child's place of birth. The rates of active antenatal care (reflects the intention to manage the child actively at birth), standardized by gestational age, vary from 22% to 61% between regions. One of the consequences of this heterogeneity is that the survival rate in France of these extremely premature infants is much lower than that of countries offering similar levels of care. Among the children live-born in France, survival rates at hospital discharge were 0% at 22 weeks, 1% at 23, 31% at 24, 59% at 25, and 75% at 26 weeks. Survival in the USA, Great Britain, Japan, Australia, and Sweden ranges from 10 to 50% higher than in France.
The great variability of antenatal practices for the management of extremely preterm infants reflects the disarray of medical teams. In the absence of consensus and written decision-making processes, this uncertainty culminates in management decisions based at best on local habits and at worst on the individual habits of the clinician present. These habits vary with the physicians' beliefs or convictions, and their level of knowledge and experience of extremely preterm births. This variability of practices between hospitals presents a problem of equity.
The hypothesis is that standardization of the management of extremely preterm infants, from the moment that the pregnant woman is hospitalized until the child's birth should improve survival without severe morbidity in this group of children at very high risk
The intervention proposed is a new organization of care, based on the EXPRIM (EXtrem PRematurity Innovative Management) protocol (MC Lamau, et al, PMID: 34059380), involving early, standardized, and multidisciplinary management of women hospitalized for a risk of extremely preterm birth and their children. It will take place in each perinatal network for all pregnant women hospitalized between 22 and 26 weeks with a risk of preterm delivery.
Setting up the protocol requires taking into account the parents' time and timing issues, and its potential for change, to plan the implementation of the protocol, especially the degree of emergency of the situation and the probability of imminent delivery.
Complex intervention, named the EXPRIM protocol, aimed at standardizing the organization of care. It is based on the following principles:
An interview with the parents to:
If the hospitalization takes place in a level-1 or 2 hospital: after general information about preterm delivery, a proposal to transfer the woman to the perinatal network's level-3 hospital, starting at 23 weeks
The choice of a stepped-wedge cluster randomization design allows all perinatal networks to implement the intervention.
After the random drawing of clusters for the intervention, the teams will be trained in the EXPRIM protocol and then will undergo a 3-month transition period (not considered either a control or intervention period) to learn the protocol thoroughly. The data collected during this period will not be used in the analysis. In summary, the 3 stages before recruitment during the intervention are:
No specific follow-up visit for the purposes of the study is planned. The hospital staff physicians will perform follow-up as part of the standard usual care for women and their newborns.
The follow-up collected for this study will take place:
At the child's discharge from the hospital, or if he or she dies in the hospital:
When the child reaches the corrected age of 2 years:
At the time of inclusion, the contact data of the parents taking part in the study (e-mail address, telephone number and postal address) were collected on contact forms by the clinical teams of each maternity unit and kept in the medical files.
As part of the 2-year follow-up of these children, the coordinating midwife and/or CRT centralized will collect this contact data from the maternity units via a secure.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,505 studies on the registry; 1,006 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Mothers:
Children: all newborns (live- and stillborn) delivered between 22 and 26 weeks.
Exclusion Criteria
a new organization of care, based on the EXPRIM (EXtrem PRematurity Innovative Management) protocol, involving early, standardized, and multidisciplinary management of women hospitalized for a risk of extremely preterm birth and their children
Other: Premex Protocol
This protocol presupposes stages during which staff are informed and trained. It is based on the following principles: * Administration of corticosteroid therapy to all eligible women, independent of the decision about active or palliative care * A prognostic evaluation in a non-emergency meeting of the obstetricians and neonatologists/pediatricians involved, no longer based only on gestational age, and enabling the team to provide consistent, consensual, and individualized information to parents; * A joint decision about the obstetric and neonatal (active or palliative) care to be proposed to parents at the end of this evaluation; * An interview with parents, also on non-emergency basis, to give them information about the child's prognosis and the management proposed, to answer their questions, and to obtain their opinion; * Management at birth consistent with that decided in consultation with the parents.
survival at hospital discharge without severe morbidity (composite outcome)
Severe morbidity is a composite criterion assessed up to 40 post-menstrual age (PMA) and defined by at least one of the following severe neonatal morbidities: * Severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia, defined by the need for oxygen therapy and/or mechanical ventilatory support (endotracheal or noninvasive) at 36 weeks PMA (Jobe 2001). * Severe intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), defined by IVH of either grade 3, associated with ventricular dilation, or grade 4, which is associated with a hemorrhagic lesion of the adjacent parenchyma) (Volpe 2009). * Severe retinopathy, defined as retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) of type 3 or higher according to the international classification (ICCROP 2005) and/or need for laser treatment. * Severe enterocolitis, defined as types 2 and 3 in the modified Bell's classification (Bell, 1978). * Periventricular leukomalacia, defined by cavities in the periventricular white matter on ultrasound.
Time frame: Up to 24 Weeks
Child's survival at hospital discharge
Number of living children
Time frame: Up to 24 Weeks
Neurosensory condition ( composite outcome)
Neurosensory condition, assessed by the pediatrician responsible for monitoring the child * cerebral palsy, defined by the European classification (European Cerebral Palsy Network 2000) as any permanent motor deficiency resulting from a nonprogressive lesion of the immature brain. This term makes it possible to cover all motor impairments. The severity of the motor impairment will be assessed by the 5-level international GMFCS (classification system of gross motor function, Ghassabian 2016): the child walks w/o limitations (level 1), walks w/ limitations (level 2), walks using a handheld mobility device (level 3), has self-mobility w/ limitations (level 4), is transported in a manual wheelchair (level 5). Cerebral palsies of level 1 are minor, those of level 2 moderate, and those of levels 3-5 severe; * visual deficiency is defined by unilateral (moderate) or bilateral (severe) blindness * auditory deficiency is defined by unilateral (moderate) or bilateral (severe) deafness
Time frame: at a corrected age of 2 years.
child's global development
Assessment of the child's global development will be based on a standardized parent-completed questionnaire: the PArent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R). This questionnaire is a validated parent report instrument measuring the child's non-verbal cognition (communication, gross motor skills, fine motor skills, problem resolution, and social relations). This questionnaire includes a series of 34 questions and is valid over a four-month window from 23.5 to 27.5 months of corrected age. The questionnaire has been age-standardised and results are provided in percentiles relative to norms in the term population.
Time frame: at a corrected age of 2 years.
Medical economics:
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) defined by the ratio of the cost difference from the hospital's oint of view to the difference in survival, both overall and without severe morbidity; budgetary impact, assuming the widespread dissemination of these practices throughout France.
Time frame: at a corrected age of 2 years
Parents' experience of the information they received, their involvement in decision making, and the decisions made
This experience will be assessed by 10 simple questions to obtain responses on a scale ranging from 0 ("No, not at all") to 10 ("Yes, agree completely").
Time frame: on day 4
Parents' implication in Neonatal individualized developmental care
This experience will be assessed by 10 simple questions to obtain responses on a scale ranging from 0 ("No, not at all") to 10 ("Yes, agree completely").
Time frame: on day 28
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris