CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05244447Updated Oct 1, 2025Results posted

IVROP ReadyforLIFE Program Evaluation

An interventional study of Primary Services in Youth, sponsored by Midwest Evaluation & Research. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-01.

Sponsored by Midwest Evaluation & Research · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2021, registered Feb 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,054
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
14 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the Imperial Valley Regional Occupational Program (IVROP) ReadyforLIFE program evaluation is to determine whether primary (i.e., behaviors) and secondary (i.e., attitudes) outcomes improve for youth participants after completing the ReadyforLIFE program. Understanding the ways in which the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program supports healthy partner relationships and economic stability is important for those providing services to at-risk youth populations.

Read the detailed description

After being informed about the study and giving consent, participants will enroll in a program that collects data at enrollment, at the end of the program, and 12 months following program enrollment. The length of the program ranges from four weeks up to one year, depending on the setting and the number of optional workshops students opt to receive. Research questions in this study are framed by a descriptive evaluation design to assess whether outcomes improve for at-risk youth who participate in the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program. Primary and secondary outcomes are assessed before and one year after participants complete core curricula - Relationships Smart Plus, Mind Matters, and Money Habitudes (pre to follow-up). Primary outcome measures will indicate whether behavior improved for healthy partner relationships and financial stability. Secondary outcome measures will indicate whether improvements were made in the attitudes and expectations that facilitate and reflect behavior for healthy partner relationships and financial stability.

02

Conditions studied

  • Youth
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Midwest Evaluation & Research is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • At-risk youth (foster/justice involved, immigrant household, undocumented, LGBTQ)
  • High school age
  • Residing in the Imperial Valley, CA

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals who are 18 and above and out of high school
  • Individuals who reside outside of Imperial Valley, CA
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,054 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Primary Services

    Primary services: Participants receive 12 hours of Relationships Smarts Plus, 3 hours of Mind Matters and 1 hour of Money Habitudes workshops over the course of 6 weeks. Participants also receive life coaching and on-going job readiness support.

    Other: Primary Services

Interventions

  • OtherPrimary Services

    Primary services: Participants receive 12 hours of Relationships Smarts Plus, 3 hours of Mind Matters and 1 hour of Money Habitudes workshops over the course of 6 weeks. Participants also receive life coaching and ongoing job readiness support.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Healthy Partner Relationship Behavior Measurement #1

    Will participants report significantly healthier relationship behaviors one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 5 items: levels of reported skill with key relationship behaviors (categories, 4-point scale); measured on the Healthy Relationship Behavior Scale #1 as: 1 = I am extremely good at this 2 = I am good at this 3 = I am bad at this 4 = I am extremely bad at this Lower scores indicate a higher perceived skill in healthy relationship behaviors, so the lower the rating, the better the score. The 5 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 5 to create the construct score. The lower the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 4.0, minimum score of 1.0.

    Time frame: Change from baseline in behavior in relationship behavior (interaction with romantic partner at 12 months from enrollment

  2. Healthy Partner Relationship Behavior Measurement #2

    1B) Will participants report significantly healthier relationship behaviors one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 6 items: frequency of engaging in key relationship behaviors (categories, 5-point scale); measured on the Healthy Relationship Behavior Scale #2 as: 1 = None of the time 2 = Some of the time 3 = Half of the time 4 = Most of the time 5 = All of the time Higher scores indicate a higher perceived frequency of engaging in unhealthy relationship behaviors, so the higher the rating, the worse the score. Reverse scoring will have the higher score always equal to showing improvement. The 6 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 6 to create the construct score. The lower the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 5.0, minimum score of 1.0

    Time frame: change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion

  3. Money Management Scale (Financial Behavior Measurement #1)

    Will participants report significantly healthier financial behavior one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 4 items: frequency of engaging in healthy money management behaviors (categories, 5-point scale); measured on the Money Management Scale #1 as: 1 = Never 2 = Rarely 3 = Sometimes 4 = Often 5 = Always Higher scores indicate a greater frequency of engaging in healthy money management behaviors, so the higher the rating, the better the score. The 4 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 4 to create the construct score. The higher the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 5.0, minimum score of 1.0

    Time frame: change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Healthy Partner Relationship Attitudes Measurement #1

    Will participants report significantly healthier partner relationship attitudes one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 9 items: levels of agreement with relationship beliefs (categories, 4-point); measured on the Healthy Relationship Attitudes #1 Scale as: 1 = Strongly Agree 2 = Agree 3 = Disagree 4 = Strongly Disagree Higher scores indicate a higher disagreement with unhealthy relationship attitudes, so the higher the rating, the better the score. The 9 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 9 to create the construct score. The higher the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 4.0, minimum score of 1.0.

    Time frame: change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion

  2. Healthy Partner Relationship Attitudes Measurement #2

    Will participants report significantly healthier partner relationship attitudes one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 3 items: future-oriented self-reported beliefs in key relationship events likely to occur (categories, 5-point scale); measured on the Healthy Partner Relationship Attitudes Measurement #2 as: 1 = Almost no chance 2 = Some chance but probably not 3 = A 50-50 chance 4 = A good chance 5 = Almost certain Higher scores indicate a greater perceived likelihood of key relationship events to occur in the future. Two items will be reverse coded so that for all items, a higher rating will indicate a better score. The 3 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 8 to create the construct score. The higher the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 5.0, minimum score of 1.0.

    Time frame: change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion

  3. Financial Attitudes Measurement #1

    Do participants report significantly healthier financial attitudes one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 7 items: levels of agreement with key financial attitudes (categories, 5-point scale); measured on the Financial Attitudes Scale as: 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Higher scores indicate a higher positive attitude towards healthy financial management, so the higher the rating, the better the score. The 7 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 7 to create the construct score. The higher the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 5.0, minimum score of 1.0.

    Time frame: change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion

07

Results

Posted Oct 1, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePrimary Services
Started1054
Completed1054
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryHealthy Partner Relationship Behavior Measurement #1

Will participants report significantly healthier relationship behaviors one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 5 items: levels of reported skill with key relationship behaviors (categories, 4-point scale); measured on the Healthy Relationship Behavior Scale #1 as: 1 = I am extremely good at this 2 = I am good at this 3 = I am bad at this 4 = I am extremely bad at this Lower scores indicate a higher perceived skill in healthy relationship behaviors, so the lower the rating, the better the score. The 5 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 5 to create the construct score. The lower the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 4.0, minimum score of 1.0.

Time frame:
Change from baseline in behavior in relationship behavior (interaction with romantic partner at 12 months from enrollment
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Healthy Partner Relationship Behavior Measurement #1
score on scalePrimary Services
Mean at baseline2.93 ± .4847
Mean at follow-up2.97 ± .4834
PrimaryHealthy Partner Relationship Behavior Measurement #2

1B) Will participants report significantly healthier relationship behaviors one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 6 items: frequency of engaging in key relationship behaviors (categories, 5-point scale); measured on the Healthy Relationship Behavior Scale #2 as: 1 = None of the time 2 = Some of the time 3 = Half of the time 4 = Most of the time 5 = All of the time Higher scores indicate a higher perceived frequency of engaging in unhealthy relationship behaviors, so the higher the rating, the worse the score. Reverse scoring will have the higher score always equal to showing improvement. The 6 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 6 to create the construct score. The lower the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 5.0, minimum score of 1.0

Time frame:
change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Healthy Partner Relationship Behavior Measurement #2
score on scalePrimary Services
Mean at baseline4.17 ± .562
Mean at follow-up4.14 ± .584
PrimaryMoney Management Scale (Financial Behavior Measurement #1)

Will participants report significantly healthier financial behavior one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 4 items: frequency of engaging in healthy money management behaviors (categories, 5-point scale); measured on the Money Management Scale #1 as: 1 = Never 2 = Rarely 3 = Sometimes 4 = Often 5 = Always Higher scores indicate a greater frequency of engaging in healthy money management behaviors, so the higher the rating, the better the score. The 4 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 4 to create the construct score. The higher the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 5.0, minimum score of 1.0

Time frame:
change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Money Management Scale (Financial Behavior Measurement #1)
score on scalePrimary Services
Mean at baseline3.45 ± .861
Mean at follow-up3.54 ± .830
SecondaryHealthy Partner Relationship Attitudes Measurement #1

Will participants report significantly healthier partner relationship attitudes one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 9 items: levels of agreement with relationship beliefs (categories, 4-point); measured on the Healthy Relationship Attitudes #1 Scale as: 1 = Strongly Agree 2 = Agree 3 = Disagree 4 = Strongly Disagree Higher scores indicate a higher disagreement with unhealthy relationship attitudes, so the higher the rating, the better the score. The 9 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 9 to create the construct score. The higher the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 4.0, minimum score of 1.0.

Time frame:
change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Healthy Partner Relationship Attitudes Measurement #1
score on scalePrimary Services
Mean at baseline2.36 ± .376
Mean at follow-up2.40 ± .403
SecondaryHealthy Partner Relationship Attitudes Measurement #2

Will participants report significantly healthier partner relationship attitudes one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 3 items: future-oriented self-reported beliefs in key relationship events likely to occur (categories, 5-point scale); measured on the Healthy Partner Relationship Attitudes Measurement #2 as: 1 = Almost no chance 2 = Some chance but probably not 3 = A 50-50 chance 4 = A good chance 5 = Almost certain Higher scores indicate a greater perceived likelihood of key relationship events to occur in the future. Two items will be reverse coded so that for all items, a higher rating will indicate a better score. The 3 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 8 to create the construct score. The higher the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 5.0, minimum score of 1.0.

Time frame:
change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Healthy Partner Relationship Attitudes Measurement #2
score on scalePrimary Services
Mean at baseline3.45 ± .646
Mean at follow-up3.45 ± .632
SecondaryFinancial Attitudes Measurement #1

Do participants report significantly healthier financial attitudes one year after enrolling into the IVROP ReadyforLIFE program? Items measured include: 7 items: levels of agreement with key financial attitudes (categories, 5-point scale); measured on the Financial Attitudes Scale as: 1 = Strongly Disagree 2 = Disagree 3 = Neither Agree nor Disagree 4 = Agree 5 = Strongly Agree Higher scores indicate a higher positive attitude towards healthy financial management, so the higher the rating, the better the score. The 7 items are measured as a construct. All items are added together and divided by 7 to create the construct score. The higher the score, the better the outcome. maximum score of 5.0, minimum score of 1.0.

Time frame:
change from baseline in behavior to 12-months after program completion
Reported as:
Mean · score on scale
Financial Attitudes Measurement #1
score on scalePrimary Services
Mean at baseline3.71 ± .516
Mean at follow-up3.69 ± .541

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year through study completion. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Primary Services0/1,054 (0%)0/1,054 (0%)0/1,054 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Primary Services
<=18 years1006
Between 18 and 65 years48
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Primary Services
Mean15.2 (13 to 19)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Primary Services
Female526
Male528
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Primary Services
Hispanic or Latino976
Not Hispanic or Latino70
Unknown or Not Reported8
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Primary Services
American Indian or Alaska Native29
Asian12
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander35
Black or African American4
White405
More than one race476
Unknown or Not Reported93
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Imperial Valley Regional Occupational Program Community Foundation (IVROPCF)
    El Centro, California 92243, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Aug 29, 2024
  • Statistical analysis plan · Aug 29, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — All participant data will be confidential and aggregated. No individual participant data will be released unless requested by the courts. This study looks at data as a whole.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05244447
Lead sponsor
Midwest Evaluation & Research
Collaborators
Imperial Valley Regional Occupational Program (IVROP)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2022
Start date
Apr 1, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2024
Completion
Feb 1, 2025
Results posted
Oct 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 1, 2025

Study contacts

Matt D Shepherd, PhD
principal investigator · Midwest Evaluation & Research

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion