CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05243576Updated Feb 17, 2022

A Novel System for Quasi Real-Time Tracking of Neuromuscular Responses During NMES

An observational study in Spinal Cord Injuries and Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by Kessler Foundation. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-17.

Sponsored by Kessler Foundation · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
15
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) remains as one of the effective rehabilitation modalities for addressing recovery of neuromuscular function after a spinal cord injury (SCI). To achieve optimal effects, the NMES interventions that involve or promote voluntary efforts from SCI participants are preferred. However, these interventions are limited by the fact that the active monitoring of voluntary effort, particularly at the stimulated muscle level is unattainable. The objective of the proposed study is to develop SMARTq (Stimulated Muscle Assessment in Real-Time). This novel system will provide a quasi real-time assessment of intrinsic neuromuscular responses of a stimulated muscle during NMES. Specifically, the proposed system will consist of our novel algorithms interfaced with the EMG data acquisition hardware to process the EMG data recorded from a stimulated muscle in real-time during NMES. The term 'quasi' is used to account for the processing delay of approximately 1 to 2 seconds that may potentially occur. The proposed system will be developed and validated using the data collected from the able-bodied (AB) as well as individuals with incomplete SCI (iSCI). The applicability of the system will be evaluated on individuals with complete SCI (cSCI). Our central hypothesis is that the real-time tracking of neuromuscular responses during a train of NMES will provide valuable information on inherent neuromuscular changes, volitional participation, and neuromuscular recovery. The significance of the proposed study is that, if successful, it will deliver a highly novel system which can allow researchers and clinicians to - 1) evaluate the direct electrophysiological effects of varied combination of NMES on a stimulated muscle in real-time; 2) quantify, track and manipulate the levels of voluntary efforts or volitional drive 'on-fly' during NMES for extracting optimal benefits; 3) track the neuromuscular recovery of the stimulated muscle, particularly for cSCI populations, when any functional changes have not been observed yet; and 4) directly observe the neuromuscular fatigue derived from the electrophysiological data at the stimulated muscle. These are highly significant opportunities that can allow the clinicians and researchers to transform the current as well as future NMES interventions into highly effective training modalities as each intervention will be operated at an individual's neuromuscular level.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Keywords

  • Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
  • Electromyography
  • EMG-feedback
  • Spinal cord injury
03

In context

Spinal Cord Injuries

1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 60 across 323 observational studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.

Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Kessler Foundation is the lead sponsor of 170 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

There will be five participants in each of the three study groups: able-bodied (AB), incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI), and complete spinal cord injury (cSCI). All participants will be between the ages of 18 and 60 years old. Individuals will be recruited through the Kessler Institute for Rehabilitation System, which includes 3 hospitals and 75 outpatient clinics.

Inclusion criteria

SCI generic criteria - 1) Be able to tolerate electrical stimulation; 2) Be able and willing to comply with study requirements, procedures and verbal instructions; 3) Have been diagnosed with a spinal cord injury by a physician.

Individuals with complete SCI. 1) Be chronic (≥ 1-year post injury); 2) AIS classified as A or B motor-complete;

Individuals with incomplete SCI. 1) Be motor incomplete; 2) Be AIS classified as C or D; 3) have a neurological level of injury from C6 - T6; 4) Have LEMS score > 10; 5) Have Modified Ashworth Scale ≤ 3 for spasticity.

Inclusion criteria for the able-bodied group. 1) Be able and willing to tolerate electrical stimulation; 2) Be able and willing to comply with study requirements, procedures and verbal instructions.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria for all participants. 1) Pregnancy at time of study; 2) History of femur or tibia fracture; 3) Diagnosis with any major cardiovascular or pulmonary disease; 4) Diagnosis with obesity; 5) Diagnosis of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis; 6) Presence of skin lesions or breakdown; 7) Use of electronic implants; 8) Any history of major gastrointestinal problems; 9) difficulty following or responding to commands that would limit the study participation; 10) Currently enrolled in another research study or therapy (from a licensed physical therapist) that is likely to affect participation in this research study.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • incomplete SCI

    1) Be motor incomplete; 2) Be AIS classified as C or D; 3) have a neurological level of injury from C6 - T6; 4) Have LEMS score \> 10; 5) Have Modified Ashworth Scale ≤ 3 for spasticity. Additional - 1) Be able to tolerate electrical stimulation; 2) Be able and willing to comply with study requirements, procedures and verbal instructions; 3) Have been diagnosed with a spinal cord injury by a physician.

  • complete SCI

    1) Be chronic (≥ 1-year post injury); 2) AIS classified as A or B motor-complete; Additional - 1) Be able to tolerate electrical stimulation; 2) Be able and willing to comply with study requirements, procedures and verbal instructions; 3) Have been diagnosed with a spinal cord injury by a physician.

  • Able-bodied

    1) Be able and willing to tolerate electrical stimulation; 2) Be able and willing to comply with study requirements, procedures and verbal instructions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Electromyography (EMG) correlates

    EMG RMS amplitude,

    Time frame: A single timepoint

  2. Torque

    Torque recorded at knee joint using biodex dynamometer

    Time frame: A single timepoint

Secondary outcomes

  1. RMSE

    RMSE between EMG feedback vs torque feedback

    Time frame: single timepoint

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Kessler Foundation
    West Orange, New Jersey 07052, United States
    • Leighann Martinez · Contact · lmartinez@kesslerfoundation.org · 973-324-3557
    • Gail Forrest, Ph.D. · Sub investigator
    • Kamyar Momeni, Ph.D. · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pilkar R, Yarossi M, Ramanujam A, Rajagopalan V, Bayram MB, Mitchell M, Canton S, Forrest G. Application of Empirical Mode Decomposition Combined With Notch Filtering for Interpretation of Surface Electromyograms During Functional Electrical Stimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2017 Aug;25(8):1268-1277. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2016.2624763. Epub 2016 Nov 3. PubMed 27834646 ↗
  • Momeni K, Pilkar R, Ravi M, Forrest GF. Isolating Transcutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulation Artifact to Identify Motor Response during Walking. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:6569-6572. doi: 10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630099. PubMed 34892614 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — as per the funding agency guidelines.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05243576
Lead sponsor
Kessler Foundation
Collaborators
New Jersey Commission on Spinal Cord Research
Responsible party
Rakesh Pilkar (Senior Research Scientist, Kessler Foundation) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 17, 2022
Start date
Dec 9, 2019
Primary completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 17, 2022

Study contacts

Leighann Martinez
Contact
lmartinez@kesslerfoundation.org
973-324-3557

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion