ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05236257EPI VITRAKVIUpdated Dec 10, 2024Results posted

A Study Called EPI VITRAKVI to Compare Treatment Results in Patients With Infantile Fibrosarcoma (IFS), a Type of Connective Soft Tissue Cancer, Who Received a Treatment Called Larotrectinib From a Study Called SCOUT With Patient Data From an External Database

An observational study in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Infantile Fibrosarcoma Harboring an NTRK Gene Fusion and Infantile Fibrosarcoma, sponsored by Bayer. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged Up to 21 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-10.

Sponsored by Bayer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
93
Ages
Up to 21 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is an observational study in which data from the past of children and young people with a specific cancer, called NTRK gene fusion positive infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS) is studied.

IFS is a rare type of childhood cancer that commonly affects legs and arms. IFS cancers typically have specific changes in their building plans (genes) called NTRK gene fusion. NTRK stands for the specific gene that has been altered, the neurotrophic tyrosine kinase (NTRK) gene.

This change to the building plan leads to the creation of an altered protein known as a TRK fusion protein, which can cause cancer cells to grow and to survive. The specific cancer is therefore also called TRK (tropomyosin receptor kinase) fusion-positive IFS.

The study drug, larotrectinib (also called BAY2757556) works by blocking the altered TRK fusion protein. Larotrectinib is already available in Europe and in many other countries and is approved for doctors to prescribe to patients with NTRK gene fusion cancer which has spread to nearby tissues and/or lymph nodes or to other parts of the body.

In France, HAS (the French authority in charge of evaluating health products and technologies) gave a positive opinion for the reimbursement of larotrectinib but only in the pediatric patients with IFS or another STS harboring a NTRK gene fusion, which is locally advanced or metastatic, and refractory or in relapse mainly due to the lack of comparative evidence.

The main purpose of this study is to collect more data to learn how well larotrectinib works compared with current standard of care chemotherapy in people up to 21 years of age with NTRK gene fusion positive IFS that has spread to nearby tissues and/or lymph nodes (locally advanced) or other parts of the body (metastatic).

To see how well larotrectinib works, researchers will make a comparison between

  • how long larotrectinib works well and
  • how long the standard of care works well.

Working well means that the treatments can prevent the following from happening:

  • need for a new treatment for the cancer
  • need for radiation therapy for the cancer
  • need for surgery to treat the cancer, but which causes major damage to body parts
  • death.

In addition to the above, data about medical problems related to the treatments in both groups and that may have required to stop the treatment will be compared.

The data for the comparison will come from

  • an ongoing international study called SCOUT which was started in December 2015 (larotrectinib group)
  • international databases (standard of care chemotherapy group). Data will be from the year 2000 up to the present.

There will be no required visits with a study doctor or required tests in this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Locally Advanced or Metastatic Infantile Fibrosarcoma Harboring an NTRK Gene Fusion
  • Infantile Fibrosarcoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Advanced solid tumors
  • Infantile fibrosarcoma (IFS)
  • Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK)
  • Fusion Positive
  • Tropomyosin Receptor Kinase (TRK) fusion
  • Larotrectinib
  • External control
03

In context

Fibrosarcoma

69 studies on the registry are indexed under Fibrosarcoma; 7 are open to participants now.

Browse Fibrosarcoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Bayer is the lead sponsor of 1,674 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 132 (62%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 21 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population comprises of all pediatric patients in the SCOUT study and the eligible historical cohort(s) with a diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic IFS harboring an NTRK gene fusion.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≤ 21 years old.
  • Locally advanced or Infantile Fibrosarcoma (IFS).
  • Identification of an NTRK gene fusion by a molecular biology assay.
  • Patients with available information on clinical, radiological characteristics of their tumor, therapies administered and outcomes.
  • Patients receiving larotrectinib in the SCOUT trial.
  • Patients receiving at least chemotherapy drugs in the historical control cohort(s).
  • No opposition from the patients and/or representatives for data use.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated with TRK inhibitors in the historical control cohort(s).
  • Patients with documented absence of NTRK gene fusion.
  • Patients participating in an program with interventions outside of routine clinical practice.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
93 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Larotrectinib

    Pediatric patients with IFS harboring an NTRK gene fusion who have been enrolled in the SCOUT study.

    Drug: Larotrectinib (Vitrakvi, BAY2757556)

  • Standard care

    Pediatric patients with IFS harboring an NTRK gene fusion in the eligible external cohort(s).

    Drug: Standard of Care

Interventions

  • Pediatric patients with IFS harboring an NTRK gene fusion.

  • DrugStandard of Care

    Standard of care for the patients from the eligible external cohorts.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Medical Treatment Failure

    Time to medical treatment failure was defined as the time (months) from the start of treatment to the date of the earliest event from: subsequent systemic treatment, radiation therapy, mutilating surgery or death due to any cause.

    Time frame: up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Subsequent Systemic Treatment

    Time to subsequent systemic treatment was defined as the time from start date of Larotrectinib (for SCOUT) or start date of chemotherapy (for historical control cohorts) till the start date of a post-treatment systemic anti-cancer therapy, if any

    Time frame: up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control

  2. Time to Mutilating Surgery Including Limb Amputation

    Time to mutilating surgery including limb amputation was defined as the time from start date of Larotrectinib (for SCOUT) or start date of chemotherapy (for historical control cohorts) till the start date of a mutilating surgery (including limb amputation)

    Time frame: up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control

  3. Time to First Radiation Therapy

    Time to radiation therapy was defined as the time from start date of Larotrectinib (for SCOUT) or start date of chemotherapy(for historical control cohorts) till the start date of a radiation therapy, if any

    Time frame: up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control

  4. Time to Complete Surgical Resection

    Time to complete surgical resection (excluding amputation) was defined as the time from start date of Larotrectinib (for SCOUT) or start date of chemotherapy (for historical control cohorts) till the start date of a complete surgical resection (excluding amputation), if any

    Time frame: up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control

  5. Overall Survival

    Number of participants with death due to any cause, alive, or lost to follow-up.

    Time frame: up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control

  6. Number of Participants With Treatment Discontinuation Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

    Larotrectinib treatment for the SCOUT study and chemotherapy (first line) for the external historical control cohort(s).

    Time frame: up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control

07

Results

Posted Dec 10, 2024

Participant flow

Study was conducted between 10-Mar-2022 (start retrospective observational study) and 13-Sep-2022 (table listing filles final) using secondary data. Three data sources were used in the study including SCOUT study (18 countries worldwide including France) and external historical control cohorts from the Institut Curie database and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) database.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLarotrectinibExternal Controls
Started5142
Completed00
Not completed5142
Withdrew: Ongoing with study treatment291
Withdrew: Discontinued study treatment2241

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Medical Treatment Failure

Time to medical treatment failure was defined as the time (months) from the start of treatment to the date of the earliest event from: subsequent systemic treatment, radiation therapy, mutilating surgery or death due to any cause.

Time frame:
up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Medical Treatment Failure
monthsLarotrectinibExternal Controls
Unweighted sampleNA (NA to NA)NA (57.1 to NA)
Weighted sampleNA (NA to NA)24.0 (3.0 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Cox Proportional Hazards model · p = 0.0058 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.21 · 95% CI 0.07 to 0.63Unweighted
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Log Rank · p = 0.0023Unweighted
SecondaryTime to Subsequent Systemic Treatment

Time to subsequent systemic treatment was defined as the time from start date of Larotrectinib (for SCOUT) or start date of chemotherapy (for historical control cohorts) till the start date of a post-treatment systemic anti-cancer therapy, if any

Time frame:
up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Subsequent Systemic Treatment
monthsLarotrectinibExternal Controls
Unweighted SampleNA (NA to NA)NA (13.0 to NA)
weighted SampleNA (NA to NA)24.0 (24.0 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Cox Proportional Hazards model · p = 0.0703 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.23 · 95% CI 0.05 to 1.13Unweighted
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Log Rank · p = 0.0486Unweighted
SecondaryTime to Mutilating Surgery Including Limb Amputation

Time to mutilating surgery including limb amputation was defined as the time from start date of Larotrectinib (for SCOUT) or start date of chemotherapy (for historical control cohorts) till the start date of a mutilating surgery (including limb amputation)

Time frame:
up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Mutilating Surgery Including Limb Amputation
monthsLarotrectinibExternal Controls
Unweighted SampleNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Weighted SampleNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Cox Proportional Hazards model · p = 0.696 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.23 · 95% CI 0.05 to 1.12Unweighted
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Log Rank · p = 0.0476Unweighted
SecondaryTime to First Radiation Therapy

Time to radiation therapy was defined as the time from start date of Larotrectinib (for SCOUT) or start date of chemotherapy(for historical control cohorts) till the start date of a radiation therapy, if any

Time frame:
up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to First Radiation Therapy
monthsLarotrectinibExternal Controls
Unweighted SampleNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Weighted SampleNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryTime to Complete Surgical Resection

Time to complete surgical resection (excluding amputation) was defined as the time from start date of Larotrectinib (for SCOUT) or start date of chemotherapy (for historical control cohorts) till the start date of a complete surgical resection (excluding amputation), if any

Time frame:
up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control
Reported as:
Median · months
Time to Complete Surgical Resection
monthsLarotrectinibExternal Controls
Unweighted SampleNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Weighted SampleNA (NA to NA)6.1 (5.1 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Cox Proportional Hazards model · p = 0.5713 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.79 · 95% CI 0.36 to 1.77Unweighted
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Log Rank · p = 0.5695Unweighted
SecondaryOverall Survival

Number of participants with death due to any cause, alive, or lost to follow-up.

Time frame:
up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Survival
ParticipantsLarotrectinibExternal Controls
Dead13
Alive5039
Statistical analysis
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Cox Proportional Hazards model · p = 0.3200 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.32 · 95% CI 0.03 to 3.06Unweighted
  • Larotrectinib vs External Controls · Log Rank · p = 0.2940Unweighted
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Discontinuation Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events

Larotrectinib treatment for the SCOUT study and chemotherapy (first line) for the external historical control cohort(s).

Time frame:
up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Discontinuation Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events
ParticipantsLarotrectinibExternal Controls
Number of Participants With Treatment Discontinuation Due to Treatment Emergent Adverse Events01

Adverse events

Collected over up to 5.5 years for participants in SCOUT study and 22.5 years for participants in external historical control. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Larotrectinib1/51 (2%)1/51 (2%)0/51 (0%)
External Controls3/42 (7.1%)3/42 (7.1%)0/42 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventLarotrectinibExternal Controls
DeathGeneral disorders1/513/42

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)LarotrectinibExternal ControlsTotal
Mean2.01 ± 3.490.73 ± 1.811.43 ± 2.91
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LarotrectinibExternal ControlsTotal
Female211536
Male302757
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)LarotrectinibExternal ControlsTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported514293
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Multiple Locations
    Multiple Locations, France
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Availability of this study's data will later be determined according to Bayer's commitment to the EFPIA/PhRMA "Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing". This pertains to scope, timepoint and process of data access. As such, Bayer commits to sharing upon request from qualified researchers patient-level clinical trial data, study-level clinical trial data, and protocols from clinical trials in patients for medicines and indications approved in the US and EU as necessary for conducting legitimate research. This applies to data on new medicines and indications that have been approved by the EU and US regulatory agencies on or after January 01, 2014. Interested researchers can use www.vivli.org to request access to anonymized patient-level data and supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct research. Information on the Bayer criteria for listing studies and other relevant information is provided in the member section of the portal.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2022 to primary completion in Sep 2022, 6 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2024, 2 years 2 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2022
First posted
Feb 11, 2022
StartActual
Mar 10, 2022
Primary completionActual
Sep 13, 2022
CompletionActual
Sep 13, 2022
Results first posted
Dec 10, 2024
Last update
Dec 10, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 10, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05236257
Lead sponsor
Bayer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2022
Start date
Mar 10, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 13, 2022
Completion
Sep 13, 2022
Results posted
Dec 10, 2024
Last update
Dec 10, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion