CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05231993Updated Mar 19, 2025

Clinical Triage and Treatment of Atypical Glandular Cells (AGC) Detected in Screening

An interventional study of Conization and Colposcopy in Uterine Cervical Cancer, sponsored by Karolinska Institutet. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Sweden. Open to female participants aged 23 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-19.

Sponsored by Karolinska Institutet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
280
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
23 Years to 64 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The risk of cervical cancer after diagnosis with atypical glandular cells (AGC) detected by screening is elevated for 15 years after discovery. The current recommendation is that when AGC is detected during screening, referel is made to a gynecologist for colposcopy with biopsy within 3 months after the index test. Repeated tests should be done after one year and after two years and if these are negative, the woman can return to routine screening.

Given the increased risk of cancer associated with AGC a new evaluation of the optimal follow-up and treatment of AGC, which is detected during screening, is carried out. In this randomized study, women with AGC will be randomized to routine treatment according to current guidelines or to conization. The aim of the study is to determine which of the two treatments is most effective.

Read the detailed description

Evidence from a nationwide cohort study demonstrated that the risk of cervical cancer following a diagnosis of AGC detected in screening was elevated for 15 years, particularly the risk of adenocarcinoma. Furthermore, the study suggested that compared to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) management, the management of AGC has been suboptimal in Sweden (Wang et al., BMJ 2016). A study conducted in the greater metropolitan region of Stockholm showed that the PPV for high grade lesions was 60% for Human Papillomavirus (HPV) positive AGC detected in screening (Norman et al., BMJ Open, 2017).

The new guidelines for cervical cancer prevention were adopted in January of 2017 nationally and in December 2017 in county of Stockholm and outline a clinical management strategy for AGC. The recommendation is that AGC detected in screening, regardless of HPV status, should be referred to a gynecologist for colposcopy with biopsy within 3 months of the index test. For women over the age of 40, an ultrasound and endometrial biopsy is also recommended. Repeat tests should be done at one year and two years, if these are negative then the woman can return to routine screening.

The elevated risk for high grade lesions and cancer associated with AGC, coupled with the reality that cervical cancer incidence has increased in Sweden, begs a new evaluation of the optimal clinical management and treatment of AGC detected in screening. Women will be randomized to routine management according to the new guidelines or to an alternative management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Uterine Cervical Cancer

Keywords

  • cervical cancer, atypical glandular cells
03

In context

Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

1,881 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 567 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 280 is above the median of 100 across 1,377 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.

Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Karolinska Institutet is the lead sponsor of 1,113 studies on the registry; 267 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
23 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • give informed consent
  • Women diagnosed with AGC (atypical glandular cells, M69720) and HPV 16/18 positive, detected in cervical screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not give informed consent
  • HPV negative or none-HPV16/18 positive
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
280 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Active comparator

    1. All women ages \<41, women ages ≥41 with TZ1 and TZ2, and women ages ≥41 with a desire for further childbearing Clinical management and follow-up according to the national screening guidelines published in 2017 (same as for the comparator group, see below). 2. Women with TZ3 and women ages ≥41 with no desire for further childbearing a. Referral to (diagnostic) excision. The depth of the diagnostic excision will be clinically determined in the trial. It should be with the intent to treat but no so extensive that the risk for side effects increases. The excision should include a cervical abrasion and endometrial sampling.

    Procedure: Conization

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo comparator

    Clinical management and follow-up according to the national screening guidelines published in 2017: 1. Colposcopy with biopsy within 3 months, endocervical sample, ultrasound and endometrial biopsy if the woman is ≥40 2. Colposcopy after 12 months if the first colposcopy and biopsies are normal 3. Cytology and HPV testing at 12 and 24 months if the second colposcopy is normal

    Procedure: Colposcopy

Interventions

  • ProcedureConization

    A cone biopsy to remove abnormal tissue.

    Also known as: Excision

  • ProcedureColposcopy

    1. Colposcopy with biopsy within 3 months,endocervical sample, ultrasound and endometrial biopsy if the woman is ≥40 2. Colposcopy after 12 months if the first colposcopy and biopsies are normal 3. Cytology and HPV testing at 12 and 24 months if the second colposcopy is normal

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. CIN3+

    Proportion of women with histologically verified HSIL+ (CIN3+) including AIS+ after AGC found in screening

    Time frame: 2-3 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. CIN2+

    Proportion of women with histologically verified HSIL+ (CIN2+) including AIS+ after AGC found in screening

    Time frame: 2-3 years

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Karolinska University Hospital
    Stockholm, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Norman I, Hjerpe A, Dillner J. Risk of high-grade lesions after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e017070. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017070. PubMed 29247086 ↗
  • Wang J, Andrae B, Sundstrom K, Strom P, Ploner A, Elfstrom KM, Arnheim-Dahlstrom L, Dillner J, Sparen P. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after atypical glandular cells in cervical screening: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2016 Feb 11;352:i276. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i276. PubMed 26869597 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — To be determined.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05231993
Lead sponsor
Karolinska Institutet
Collaborators
Regional Cancer Centre Stockholm Gotland, Karolinska University Hospital
Responsible party
Joakim Dillner (Professor, Karolinska Institutet) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 9, 2022
Start date
Jan 27, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 19, 2025

Study contacts

Kristina Elfgren, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Karolinska University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion