ClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT05230888Updated Sep 1, 2023

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Elderly Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients

An observational study in Lung Cancer and Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, sponsored by University of Hull. Withdrawn at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 70 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-01.

Sponsored by University of Hull · Observational

Why this study was withdrawn
Research personnel not recruited
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0
Ages
70 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lung cancer is responsible for one of the highest incidences of cancer-related mortality globally, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for the biggest subtype of lung cancer. In recent years, the use of immunotherapy has revolutionised the management of NSCLC, with better response rates and survival outcomes reported in the literature, compared to traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy. Despite this, doubts remain regarding the true efficacy of immunotherapy in patients > 75 years old, given that this age subgroup is mis-represented in prospective phase III trials, in terms of numbers and baseline functional status, compared to real-world experience.

Furthermore, the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is associated with a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), affecting a range of organ systems. Once again, there are doubts about the safety of the use of these agents in patients > 75 years old, and whether baseline performance status and comorbidities are good predictors of efficacy and safety outcomes in this elderly patient subgroup.

Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) and the vulnerable elders survey (VES-13) are assessment tools that provide a good indication of functional status in elderly patients, in a similar capacity to performance status and comorbidities. This study therefore aims to prospectively examine patients > 70 years old with a diagnosis of NSCLC, commencing immunotherapy. It will assess CGA and VES-13 scores at baseline, and correlate this with certain outcomes such as the incidence of severe adverse effects from immunotherapy at 3 and 6 months, any admissions to hospital arising from immunotherapy toxicities (and the subsequent length of inpatient stay), and mortality within 30 days. In doing so, it will help to determine if CGA and VES-13 scores can be used as a reliable indication of possible future efficacy and toxicity outcomes in this elderly patient subgroup.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lung Cancer
  • Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
03

In context

Lung Neoplasms

7,334 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,554 are open to participants now.

Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Hull is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

NSCLC patients ≥70 years old receiving ICI treatment at the Queen's Centre for Oncology and Haematology, Hull.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients ≥70 years old with advanced NSCLC due to start first or second line ICI therapy.
  2. Patients able to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients already on treatment with ICIs.
  2. Patients with CNS or leptomeningeal spread / disease progression.
  3. ECOG performance status III/IV.
  4. Patients with severe autoimmune diseases.
  5. Patients who are recruited and then stop treatment after receiving ≤3 cycles of ICI therapy, secondary to disease progression.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Cohort

    The effect of immunotherapy treatment will be assessed using the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) and vulnerable elders survey (VES-13) in 100 non-small cell lung cancer patients, aged ≥70 years old, receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment.

    Other: Questionnaires about symptoms

Interventions

  • OtherQuestionnaires about symptoms

    The CGA and VES-13 questionnaires will be conducted at baseline. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) will be investigated at 3 and 6 months using a Patient Knows Best symptom tracker form (local Trust created).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of irAEs at 3 months.

    Time frame: At 3 months after entering the study.

  2. Nature of irAEs at 3 months.

    Time frame: At 3 months after entering the study.

  3. Grading of irAEs at 3 months.

    Time frame: At 3 months after entering the study.

  4. Incidence of irAEs at 6 months.

    Time frame: At 6 months after entering the study.

  5. Nature of irAEs at 6 months.

    Time frame: At 6 months after entering the study.

  6. Grading of irAEs at 6 months.

    Time frame: At 6 months after entering the study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of re-admission into hospital at 3 months.

    Time frame: At 3 months after entering the study.

  2. Incidence of re-admission into hospital at 6 months.

    Time frame: At 6 months after entering the study.

  3. Duration of inpatient stay (conditional on re-admission into hospital).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after entering the study.

  4. Death within 30 days (if applicable).

    Time frame: Within 30 days of entering the study.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Castle Hill Hospital
    Cottingham, Hull HU16 5JQ, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2022, 9 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 12, 2022
First posted
Feb 9, 2022
StartActual
Feb 9, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2022
CompletionEst.
Nov 2022
Last update
Sep 1, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 1, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05230888
Lead sponsor
University of Hull
Collaborators
Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2022
Start date
Feb 9, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 1, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Aug 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion