CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05225064Updated Jun 22, 2022

Increasing COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake in Developing Countries (Bihar)

An interventional study of Incentives to be vaccinated and Mask in Vaccination Refusal, sponsored by Yale University. Completed at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 15 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-22.

Sponsored by Yale University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
114,512
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Working with governments in Bihar, India, we will evaluate a number of mechanisms to increase vaccine uptake. These include household vaccination visits instead of community vaccination clinic.monetary and non-monetary incentives, and concurrent mask promotion. This ClinicalTrials entry contains results only for the study in Bihar.

Read the detailed description

The goal of the study is to identify strategies that best promote and support COVID vaccine uptake in developing countries, we propose to test a range of scalable social and behavioural interventions. This could help policy makers design and employ interventions that are effective. This is especially valuable in resource constrained contexts where funds and institutional resources can be diverted towards interventions that have proven to work.

In Bihar the intervention will be village-level social mobilization involving community promotion, including in-person vaccine reinforcement, and household-level social mobilization. Some treatment villages will receive household- level interventions with varying intensity (different proportion of households will be visited). There will also an accompanying mask distribution campaign during household visits where the importance of mask-wearing as a complement to vaccine use will be explained.

This ClinicalTrials entry contains results only for the study in Bihar.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vaccination Refusal

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • vaccination
  • masks
  • incentives
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 114,512 is above the median of 100 across 4,099 interventional studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Yale University is the lead sponsor of 1,724 studies on the registry; 298 are open to participants now.

Of its 210 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 126 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Lives in study village

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Does not live in study village
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
114,512 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    No vaccine or mask promotion, but access to vaccines increased to match access in intervention villages

  • Experimental
    Village-level vaccine clinics with monetary, non-monetary, or no incentive

    Village-level vaccine clinics with monetary, non-monetary, or no incentive. Villages are cross-randomized to grocery coupon, food ration, no incentive, or grocery coupon to both community member and community health worker after the community member has received a vaccination.

    Behavioral: Incentives to be vaccinated · Behavioral: Vaccination made more convenient · Behavioral: Social mobilization campaign to be vaccinated

  • Experimental
    Household-level vaccination with monetary or no incentive

    Household-level vaccination with monetary incentive or no incentive. Villages are cross-randomized to grocery coupon or no incentive upon receiving vaccination

    Behavioral: Incentives to be vaccinated · Behavioral: Vaccination made more convenient · Behavioral: Social mobilization campaign to be vaccinated

  • Experimental
    Village-level vaccination without incentive, plus mask promotion

    Individuals are encourage to attend village-level vaccine clinics but not given any incentive. Mask distribution and reinforcement activities are conducted in villages at a similar time as vaccine promotion.

    Device: Mask · Behavioral: Encouragement to wear a mask · Behavioral: Vaccination made more convenient · Behavioral: Social mobilization campaign to be vaccinated

  • Experimental
    Village-level vaccination without incentive

    Individuals are encourage to attend village-level vaccine clinics but not given any incentive.

    Behavioral: Vaccination made more convenient · Behavioral: Social mobilization campaign to be vaccinated

Interventions

  • BehavioralIncentives to be vaccinated

    Individuals will be provided with a guaranteed cash payment, entry into a cash lottery, or guaranteed gift of food if they are vaccinated

  • DeviceMask

    Individuals are given cloth masks

  • BehavioralEncouragement to wear a mask

    Individuals who are not wearing masks over their mouth and nose are stopped in public places and encouraged to wear a mask

  • BehavioralVaccination made more convenient

    Vaccines are conducted at the household-level rather than the village-level

  • BehavioralSocial mobilization campaign to be vaccinated

    Village-level social mobilization campaign to be vaccinated

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percent of individuals who receive the first, second, or third dose of covid vaccine

    Prevalence of vaccination with difference doses

    Time frame: up to 4 weeks (endline may vary depending on estimated uptake rates)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Project Concern International
    Patna, Bihar 800001, India
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 22, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05225064
Lead sponsor
Yale University
Collaborators
University of Connecticut, Lahore University of Management Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Innovations for Poverty Action
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 4, 2022
Start date
Jan 19, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 27, 2022
Completion
Apr 27, 2022
Last update
Jun 22, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion