Balance in Patients With Ectopic Bone Tissue After Total Hip Replacement

This study was conducted according to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology) and an appropriate checklist was presented to the editors of the Journal. Study protocol was designed as a retrospective matched-cohort observational study. This study was approved by Institutional Bioethics Committee (Number: KB/102/2007) Between January 2020 and December 2020 312 patients undergoing total hip replacement were observed. During the standard 6-weeks, 3-months and 6-months follow-up visit every patient had an AP pelvic weight-bearing x-ray. All patients were qualified and operated by a fellowship-trained single surgeon. For the present analysis, the following demographic patient data were queried: sex, age at surgery (years), and BMI. 49 patients, who developed ectopic bone formation were observed. For these patients, a propensity score based on age, sex and BMI was generated. Patients with HO were matched to patients without HO patients using a 0.1 propensity score threshold with priority given to exact matches.

All patients were operated through an anterolateral approach with the patient lying on the healthy side with one-third medium gluteal muscle dissection. Uncemented Taperloc/Allofit total hip implants (Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA) were used in every single case. Femoral neck dissection was performed after full joint dislocation, between the tip of the greater trochanter to the point 10 mm proximal to the lesser trochanter. Acetabular cup was placed aiming 30-40 degrees of acetabular cup inclination and 10 degrees of anteversion. Femoral stem was aimed to be placed in the anatomical axis of the femur. The postoperative protocol included chemical and mechanical thromboprophylaxis unless specifically contraindicated. All patients received one dose of parenteral antibiotics at the induction of anaesthesia and two further doses post-operatively. No pre- or postoperative ectopic bone formation prophylaxis was performed. Flexion and extension exercises of the hip, knee and ankle and isometric quadriceps contraction exercises were started on the first postoperative day, with full weight-bearing as tolerated. The aim of mobilisation with a physiotherapist was to obtain flexion of the hip of 90° mobilising and safely walking with crutches by the third postoperative day.

At 6-months follow-up visit, radiographs analysis in terms of any ectopic bone formation was performed using Brooker's classification.

All patients fulfilled WOMAC (The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index) and Oxford questionnaires preoperatively and during follow-up visits.

Both cohorts underwent biomechanical assessment, performed by two independent blinded researchers (PC, KŻ) who were not aware whether patients developed ectopic bone following total hip replacement. Every analysis was performed using the Biodex Balance System (Biodex, Inc, Shirley, NY) with participants both feet standing steadily on the platform. Every participant was protected from falling with the use of support. Device screen was installed at the level of the patient's sight to avoid taking an uncomfortable position that might have influenced the results.

Postural stability test was performed, containing the results from three measurements. Every measurement has been performed on the 12th level of the platform stability for 20 seconds with 10 seconds break between every test. Results obtained from the participants were recorded as stability index (SI) values which represent deviations of platform position from the vertical in degrees. The higher SI values are, the more difficult it was for participants to maintain stability during the test.

Risk of fall test - a single test consisted of the results obtained from three measurements. Each measurement was performed at level 6 of the platform stability for 20 seconds with a 10-second rest time between attempts. The person conducting the test informed the patient in advance of how the test would proceed and then gave verbal instructions during each test. The patients were positioned in the centre of the platform, both feet set with their feet shoulder-width apart. The final result of each test was a computerised risk of fall assessment report with patient scores related to normative data.