ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05210647Updated Jan 27, 2022

Robotic Assisted Colon and Rectal Surgery Prognostic and Outcome Analysis

An observational study in Colorectal Disorders, sponsored by Taichung Veterans General Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-27.

Sponsored by Taichung Veterans General Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
291
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To analysis surgical outcome between robotic and laparoscopy colon and rectal surgery. Retrospective case-control study of single institute.

Read the detailed description

Microinvasive surgery bring minor pain, faster recovery and comparable oncological outcome. Robotic surgery seems to be superior in precise dissection then before. This study compare robot assisted to laparoscopy surgery in colon and rectal disease. To analysis the surgical outcome and prognostic factors.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Disorders

Keywords

  • robot, laparopscopy, MIS, surgical outcome, da Vinci Xi,
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Taichung Veterans General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 175 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

From 2019.1.1 to 2022.1.8. Robot surgery team in department of colorectal surgery in TCVGH leaded by Surgeon A and B conducted 142 robot surgery using da Vinci Xi. Meanwhile, they also done 150 conventional laparoscopy surgery. The study compare the surgical outcome and relative prognostic factors between laparoscopy and robotic surgery.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • for colon and rectal disease, using conventional laparoscopy and da Vinci Xi robot system.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • emergent operation, combined other open surgery, for non-colorectal disease, carcinomatosis found to be unsuitable for surgery once peritoneum entered, taTME in laparoscopy group and other robot system in robotic surgery group.
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
291 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • conventional laparoscopy surgery

    Conventional laparoscopy surgery for colon and rectal disease.

  • robot assisted surgery

    robotic assisted surgery for colon and rectal disease.

    Device: robotic surgery

Interventions

  • Devicerobotic surgery

    by da Vinci Xi

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. surgical outcomes

    operation time, blood loss, hospital stay, complication rate.

    Time frame: 2019.1.1-2022.1.8

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
    Taichung, 40703, Taiwan
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05210647
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 27, 2022
Start date
Jan 1, 2019
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2021
Completion
Jan 8, 2022
Last update
Jan 27, 2022

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion