CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05179395BrasthesisUpdated May 23, 2025Results posted

Brasthesis Prosthetic Harness for Women Veterans With Upper Limb Amputations

An interventional study of Brasthesis in Upper Limb Amputation, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-23.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Device feasibility

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This project tests Brasthesis, a new product for women Veterans with upper limb loss. Brasthesis incorporates the harnessing straps that hold the prosthesis to the body into a heavy-duty sports bra. The position of the harnessing straps are individualized for each woman so that the prosthesis can be positioned for optimal contact between the prosthetic sensor and the residual limb. The investigators foresee Brasthesis being available as an adaptable sports bra that comes with a goodie bag of spare parts that can be used to customize Brasthesis. The investigators plan to develop Brasthesis to be machine washable and relatively inexpensive so that Veterans can have more than one in a variety of colors.

Read the detailed description

Current traditional prosthetic chest harnessing worn by women Veterans with limb loss) is less than optimal due to female anatomy. The investigators know from the sports and seat belt/airbag literature that breast tissue injuries can disrupt the blood flow to the breast resulting in swelling, significant blood loss, hematoma, fat necrosis, and oil cyst hematoma. Injury to the mammary ducts can affect the future or current flow of breast milk. More commonly, smaller superficial arteries along with veins become injured, leading to more localized injury and less serious bleeding and bruising. While there is no known research on whether a prosthetic harness can cause injury to breast tissue, the investigators know that frequent wearing of tight clothing can cause bruising, swelling, and thrombophlebitis. The investigators have designed a bra with incorporated prosthetic harness prototype for women Veterans with mid to short transhumeral, shoulder, or interscapulothoracic amputation(s) that the investigators have named Brasthesis (patent pending). The purpose of the proposed project is to use a case series design to prove the concept of Brasthesis prototype. The specific aims of this project are to: (1) Compare the satisfaction and function with and comfort of Brasthesis with the traditional harness and (2) Use pressure mapping to compare the interface pressure of Brasthesis with the traditional prosthesis. Five women with proximal upper limb loss will be fit with Brasthesis using a procedure similar to the one the investigators used for constructing the prototype. The inclusion criteria are: (1) unilateral mid to short trans-humeral, shoulder, or interscapular-thoracic unilateral amputation and (2) have an existing myoelectric or hybrid prosthetic limb that they used or rejected/abandoned. The additional resources required to train a participant with no prosthetic experience is judged beyond SPIRE resources/scope of this study. The exclusion criteria are: (1) open wounds in the upper torso or extremities and (2) body-powered prosthetic users due to the dynamic requirements of the harness. The investigators will pursue Using Brasthesis with body powered prosthetics in a subsequent study. Once the patient has provided written informed consent, two bras will be ordered. One bra the patient will wear. The second bra will be deconstructed and reconstructed for individualized suspensory harness strapping. At the time of Brasthesis fitting, baseline will be collected, demographic and clinical data and satisfaction, function, and comfort outcomes measures. After fitting, the participant will wear Brasthesis for four weeks. Participants will be contacted weekly to track wearing time in days per week and hours per day (Aim 1). The investigators will also employ a Jawbone Up 24 activity tracker as a quantitative proxy of prosthesis wear time. Pre to post ordinal change in wearing time, satisfaction, function, and comfort outcomes will be analyzed using quantitative descriptive analyses. At the end of the wearing period, PI Winkler will conduct semi-structured phone interviews with participants and the prosthetist. Interviews will be transcribed and analyzed using thematic analysis guided by descriptive phenomenology theory. The semi-structured interview will have three overall discussion points: (1) Describe the barriers encountered while fitting Brasthesis , (2) How did you manage strap placement based on the presence and length of the residual limb and the available skin surface area available for contact with the prosthetic sensor, and (3) How does Brasthesis compare with traditional prosthesis? Aim 2 will use pressure mapping technology to compare the residual limb and intact limb under arm pressure distribution data for Brasthesis and participants' traditional prostheses. The investigators will create color-coded 'heat maps' that directly link pressure values to the three-dimensional anatomy of each participant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Upper Limb Amputation

Keywords

  • amputation
  • artificial limb
03

In context

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • mid to short transhumeral, shoulder, or interscapulothoracic unilateral amputation,
  • have an existing myoelectric, hybrid, or cosmetic prosthetic limb that they use or have abandoned. The additional resources to train a participant with no prosthetic experience is beyond the scope of this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • open wounds in the upper torso or extremities,
  • body-powered prosthetic users are excluded due to the dynamic requirements of the harness. The investigators decided including women who did not have an existing prosthesis would exceed the time resources for a SPIRE funding mechanism.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Brasthesis

    All five participants will wear Brasthesis for 4-weeks

    Device: Brasthesis

Interventions

  • DeviceBrasthesis

    Brasthesis is a harness that is integrated with an off the shelf sports bra

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Prosthetic Function and Satisfaction Using the Orthotic and Prosthetic Users Survey (OPUS)

    One of the OPUS self-report survey modules is the Upper Extremity Functional Status Survey which will be used to measure change: The Upper Extremity Functional Status Survey- when wearing a traditional and Brasthesis harness. 1. The Upper Extremity Functional Status Survey has 28 items that are rated on a 5-point Likert type scale with a a possible range from 0 to 112 with a higher score representing a higher level of independent function.

    Time frame: Pre and post 4-week harness wearing time

  2. Change in Comfort Measures With the Socket Comfort Score

    The change in comfort will be measured between the residual limb and socket and axilla of intact arm will be measured with the traditional harness (pre) ad Brasthesis (post). The Socket Comfort Score is a 1-item measure that rates comfort on a 11-point Likert-type scale with a range of 0-10. A higher score indicates more comfort.

    Time frame: Pre and post 4-week harness wearing time

  3. Satisfaction With Devices

    The Satisfaction with Device Survey has 11 items that are rated on a 5-point Likert type scale with a a possible range from 11 to 55 with a higher score representing a better outcome, e.g., more satisfaction.

    Time frame: At post 4 week harness wearing time

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Range of Motion

    Change in range of motion of the residual limb will be measured using a goniometer. Normal values for shoulder flexion range from 0-180 Normal values for shoulder extension range from 0-60 Normal values for shoulder adduction range from 0-50 Normal values for shoulder abduction range from 0-180

    Time frame: Pre and post 4-week harness wearing time

  2. Change in Pressure Using the Tekscan F-Socket Pressure Mapping System

    The change in pressure between the residual limb and socket and axilla of intact arm will be measured with the traditional harness (pre) ad Brasthesis (post). Data reported as mean max pressure mmHg Normal range of pressure readings are 0-250 mmHg

    Time frame: Pre and post 4-week harness wearing time

Other outcomes

  1. Activity Tracker

    The activity tracker measures prosthesis/harness wearing time and reports in 15 minute increments of time. Wearing time was summed to a calculation of hours per week across the 4 weeks of the study period. The range of hours per week is 0-168.

    Time frame: 4 week time frame from baseline to follow up

07

Results

Posted May 23, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBrasthesis
Started5
Participants enrolled5
Completed4
Not completed1
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy1

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Prosthetic Function and Satisfaction Using the Orthotic and Prosthetic Users Survey (OPUS)

One of the OPUS self-report survey modules is the Upper Extremity Functional Status Survey which will be used to measure change: The Upper Extremity Functional Status Survey- when wearing a traditional and Brasthesis harness. 1. The Upper Extremity Functional Status Survey has 28 items that are rated on a 5-point Likert type scale with a a possible range from 0 to 112 with a higher score representing a higher level of independent function.

Time frame:
Pre and post 4-week harness wearing time
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change in Prosthetic Function and Satisfaction Using the Orthotic and Prosthetic Users Survey (OPUS)
Units on a scaleBrasthesis
Change in Prosthetic Function and Satisfaction Using the Orthotic and Prosthetic Users Survey (OPUS)73 ± 2.9
PrimaryChange in Comfort Measures With the Socket Comfort Score

The change in comfort will be measured between the residual limb and socket and axilla of intact arm will be measured with the traditional harness (pre) ad Brasthesis (post). The Socket Comfort Score is a 1-item measure that rates comfort on a 11-point Likert-type scale with a range of 0-10. A higher score indicates more comfort.

Time frame:
Pre and post 4-week harness wearing time
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Comfort Measures With the Socket Comfort Score
score on a scaleBrasthesis
Change in Comfort Measures With the Socket Comfort Score4.75 ± 1.25
PrimarySatisfaction With Devices

The Satisfaction with Device Survey has 11 items that are rated on a 5-point Likert type scale with a a possible range from 11 to 55 with a higher score representing a better outcome, e.g., more satisfaction.

Time frame:
At post 4 week harness wearing time
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Satisfaction With Devices
units on a scaleBrasthesis
Satisfaction With Devices41.25 ± 5.8
SecondaryChange in Range of Motion

Change in range of motion of the residual limb will be measured using a goniometer. Normal values for shoulder flexion range from 0-180 Normal values for shoulder extension range from 0-60 Normal values for shoulder adduction range from 0-50 Normal values for shoulder abduction range from 0-180

Time frame:
Pre and post 4-week harness wearing time
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees
Change in Range of Motion
DegreesBrasthesis
Change in ROM in shoulder flexion103 ± 56
Change in ROM in shoulder extension39 ± 18
Change in ROM in shoulder adduction0 ± 0
Change in ROM in shoulder abduction100 ± 53
SecondaryChange in Pressure Using the Tekscan F-Socket Pressure Mapping System

The change in pressure between the residual limb and socket and axilla of intact arm will be measured with the traditional harness (pre) ad Brasthesis (post). Data reported as mean max pressure mmHg Normal range of pressure readings are 0-250 mmHg

Time frame:
Pre and post 4-week harness wearing time
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Change in Pressure Using the Tekscan F-Socket Pressure Mapping System
mmHgBrasthesis
Change in Pressure Using the Tekscan F-Socket Pressure Mapping System92 ± 10
Other pre-specifiedActivity Tracker

The activity tracker measures prosthesis/harness wearing time and reports in 15 minute increments of time. Wearing time was summed to a calculation of hours per week across the 4 weeks of the study period. The range of hours per week is 0-168.

Time frame:
4 week time frame from baseline to follow up
Reported as:
Mean · Hours per week
Activity Tracker
Hours per weekBrasthesis
Activity Tracker43.75 ± 32.85

Adverse events

Collected over 4 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Brasthesis0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)0/5 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Brasthesis
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years5
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Brasthesis
Mean49.8 ± 10.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Brasthesis
Female5
Male0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Brasthesis
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White5
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Brasthesis
United States5
Socket Comfort Score
Socket Comfort Score(units on a scale)Brasthesis
Mean4.8 ± 1.1
Wear Time
Wear Time(hours per week)Brasthesis
Mean32 ± 24.7
08

Study locations

1 site
  • James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 6, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 10, 2022
  • Informed consent form · Jul 10, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05179395
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 5, 2022
Start date
Jul 18, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 14, 2024
Completion
Mar 14, 2024
Results posted
May 23, 2025
Last update
May 23, 2025

Study contacts

Jeffrey T Heckman, DO
principal investigator · James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, Tampa, FL

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion