CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05168267Updated Apr 8, 2025Results posted

PTSD Treatment for Incarcerated Men and Women: NIMH

An interventional study of Cognitive Processing Therapy in PTSD, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-08.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
69
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study examining the feasibility of and psychological response to group Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) in incarcerated men and women with Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The study will be conducted in male and female incarcerated populations and will include 2 groups of 10 individuals for CPT in both populations (i.e., 40 participants total; 20F/20M). The study will run for up to 2 years. Participants can expect to be participating in study for up to 22 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Overall Study Objectives:

The primary objectives of this project include:

  1. Establish the feasibility of group CPT delivery in male and female incarcerated populations with PTSD;
  2. Establish the acceptability of group CPT delivery in male and female incarcerated populations with PTSD;
  3. Establish feasibility of assessment collection for primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and potential mediators and moderators during a clinical trial examining group CPT delivery in incarcerated settings.

Prior to beginning any study procedures, informed consent will be obtained orally and in writing. During the informed consent process, eligible participants will be provided with detailed information about the study, including their right to refuse or discontinue participation at any time and the fact that their decision to participate or decline will have no bearing on their standing within the criminal justice system.

Potential participants will be contacted by calling them over the phone system within the prison. When they arrive to the private testing room, they are asked if they would like to learn about the study and potentially participate. If so, participants undergo consent.

Eligible participants will first complete the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (PCL-5) to ascertain current PTSD symptomology and diagnosis. Participants will then be assigned to the CPT groups. The CPT groups will engage in 12, 90-minute treatment sessions (18 hours total). CPT group-members are also asked to complete weekly homework (approximately 12 hours total). A maximum of 6 participants will be included in each CPT session. Participants will be notified via institutional mail when they are starting CPT. Participants will be able to continue any ongoing treatment/interventions they are engaged in within the institution. All participants will be asked what treatment groups they are currently enrolled in during the initial screening to examine the possibility of attentional bias within the CPT group (i.e., more frequent interaction leading to treatment outcomes).

In addition to the treatment groups, CPT group members will also complete a pre-treatment testing session two weeks prior to treatment week 1. After treatment session 5, group members will complete mid-testing assessments. Participants will be called down individually to complete these assessments in a private room with a research assistant after completing the 5th therapy session, but before completing the 8th therapy session. CPT group members will then complete post-treatment testing within one week after completing treatment (group session 12). One month after the treatment is completed, group members will complete the first round of follow-up testing. Three months after the treatment is completed, group members will complete the final round of follow-up testing. Post- and one-month follow up- testing will follow the same procedure as pre- and mid-testing. The three month follow-up session will be identical, with the addition of the PCL-5 interview to re-assess PTSD diagnosis. Group members will be asked to complete 18 sessions in total (pre-, mid-, post-, one-month follow-up testing, three month follow-up testing, 12 treatment groups, and 1 post-intervention focus group).

02

Conditions studied

  • PTSD

Keywords

  • Group therapy
  • Incarcerated Individuals
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,161 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 151 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 114 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Intelligence quotient (IQ) greater than or equal to 70
  • 18 years old or older
  • Reading level of 4th grade or higher
  • stable medication use (same medication for at least one month)
  • able and willing to participate in group therapy
  • meet PCL-5 criteria for a current PTSD diagnosis within two months of study enrollment
  • no scheduled release date before the end of the treatment group

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently enrolled in trauma focused treatment that is historical or involves processing of trauma itself
  • no active symptoms of psychosis that would interfere with the individual's ability to participate in the group
  • no active suicidal ideation with intent or plan
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
69 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) group

    Arm = Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) Group = 4 groups of 12 (48 total; 24F/24M) receive CPT to treat PTSD

    Behavioral: Cognitive Processing Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralCognitive Processing Therapy

    CPT: a type of cognitive behavioral therapy recommended for the treatment of PTSD. Delivered over 12 sessions with an emphasis on addressing trauma-related cognitions and challenging trauma-related beliefs. Includes homework assignments. For this study, CPT will be conducted in groups.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number and Percentage of Participants That Attend All Offered Cognitive Processing Therapy Sessions

    Intervention feasibility measured primarily by participant retention

    Time frame: up to 6 weeks (by the end of 12th session)

  2. Change in Self-reported PTSD Symptoms (PCL-5)

    PTSD symptom severity is measured by PCL-5 questionnaire (scores from 0, no symptoms, to 80, high severity); primary measure of intervention efficacy. The negative numbers indicate a decrease in symptom severity of the intervention period.

    Time frame: baseline (one week prior to intervention), post-intervention (up to 13 weeks on study)

  3. Mean Scores on the CSQ-8 (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire)

    Client treatment acceptability and satisfaction is measured by mean scores on the CSQ-8; Scores are summed across items once. Items 2, 4, 5, and 8 are reverse scored. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: Post (1 week post-intervention, up to 13 weeks on study)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Individuals That Meet Study Inclusion Criteria

    Assesses for participant eligibility as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

    Time frame: baseline (one week prior to intervention)

  2. Percentage of Eligible Individuals Enrolled in the Study

    Assesses for participant interest as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

    Time frame: up to start of intervention

  3. Number of Participants Attending Greater Than or Equal to 75% of Sessions (Attendance)

    Assesses for participant compliance: participation during session as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

    Time frame: By the end of final treatment session (up to 12 weeks)

  4. Percentage of Retained Participants That Completed at Least >80% of Assigned Worksheets

    Assesses for participant compliance: extent to which participants complied with treatment skill practice

    Time frame: By the end of final treatment session (up to 12 weeks)

  5. Percentage of Session Elements That Were Rated "Present" (Versus "Absent") by a Clinical Supervisor

    Higher percentage indicates better adherence to session elements. Assesses for therapist adherence to CPT guidelines as secondary measure of intervention feasibility. For each 12-session intervention, 2 sessions were audio recorded and rated.

    Time frame: By the end of final treatment session (up to 12 weeks)

  6. Ratings 1-5 by Clinical Supervisors on Quality of Session Elements Delivered by Therapist

    Higher ratings indicate higher-quality session element (scores 1-5; 1="poor", 5="excellent) by the clinical supervisors. Competence ratings will be collected for two audio recorded group sessions out of each 12-session intervention. Assesses for therapist compliance as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

    Time frame: By the end of final treatment session (up to 12 weeks)

  7. Number of Participants Reporting Increased Suicidality Over the Course of Treatment (Endorsing 2 or Higher on Question #9 of BDI-II)

    Question 9 on the BDI-II assesses for suicidal ideation. A score of 2 (I would like to kill myself) or 3 (I would kill myself if I had the chance; the highest score) indicate heightened levels of suicidal ideation. Participants who endorse current suicidal ideation will be referred to mental health services within the institution. Assesses for participant safety as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

    Time frame: post (one week post-intervention, up to 13 weeks on study)

  8. Reasons for Participant Discontinuation

    We will collect information on participant dropout reasons to understand reasons for discontinuation

    Time frame: Up to 3 month follow up (up to 25 weeks)

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Started3534
Screened5547
Consented to participate4643
Eligible to participate4336
Started intervention3434
Participants providing data at 1-week follow up3132
Completed3132
Not completed42
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject21
Withdrew: Withdrawn by therapist11
Withdrew: Left facility10

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber and Percentage of Participants That Attend All Offered Cognitive Processing Therapy Sessions

Intervention feasibility measured primarily by participant retention

Time frame:
up to 6 weeks (by the end of 12th session)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number and Percentage of Participants That Attend All Offered Cognitive Processing Therapy Sessions
ParticipantsWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Number and Percentage of Participants That Attend All Offered Cognitive Processing Therapy Sessions3132
PrimaryChange in Self-reported PTSD Symptoms (PCL-5)

PTSD symptom severity is measured by PCL-5 questionnaire (scores from 0, no symptoms, to 80, high severity); primary measure of intervention efficacy. The negative numbers indicate a decrease in symptom severity of the intervention period.

Time frame:
baseline (one week prior to intervention), post-intervention (up to 13 weeks on study)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Self-reported PTSD Symptoms (PCL-5)
score on a scaleWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Change in Self-reported PTSD Symptoms (PCL-5)-19.07 (-58 to -13)-12.94 (-43 to -12.94)
PrimaryMean Scores on the CSQ-8 (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire)

Client treatment acceptability and satisfaction is measured by mean scores on the CSQ-8; Scores are summed across items once. Items 2, 4, 5, and 8 are reverse scored. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.

Time frame:
Post (1 week post-intervention, up to 13 weeks on study)
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Scores on the CSQ-8 (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire)
units on a scaleWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Mean Scores on the CSQ-8 (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire)28.48 ± 3.9325.7 ± 4.74
SecondaryPercentage of Individuals That Meet Study Inclusion Criteria

Assesses for participant eligibility as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

Time frame:
baseline (one week prior to intervention)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Individuals That Meet Study Inclusion Criteria
ParticipantsWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Percentage of Individuals That Meet Study Inclusion Criteria4336
SecondaryPercentage of Eligible Individuals Enrolled in the Study

Assesses for participant interest as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

Time frame:
up to start of intervention
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Eligible Individuals Enrolled in the Study
ParticipantsWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Percentage of Eligible Individuals Enrolled in the Study3534
SecondaryNumber of Participants Attending Greater Than or Equal to 75% of Sessions (Attendance)

Assesses for participant compliance: participation during session as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

Time frame:
By the end of final treatment session (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Attending Greater Than or Equal to 75% of Sessions (Attendance)
ParticipantsWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Number of Participants Attending Greater Than or Equal to 75% of Sessions (Attendance)3130
SecondaryPercentage of Retained Participants That Completed at Least >80% of Assigned Worksheets

Assesses for participant compliance: extent to which participants complied with treatment skill practice

Time frame:
By the end of final treatment session (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Retained Participants That Completed at Least >80% of Assigned Worksheets
ParticipantsWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Percentage of Retained Participants That Completed at Least >80% of Assigned Worksheets2122
SecondaryPercentage of Session Elements That Were Rated "Present" (Versus "Absent") by a Clinical Supervisor

Higher percentage indicates better adherence to session elements. Assesses for therapist adherence to CPT guidelines as secondary measure of intervention feasibility. For each 12-session intervention, 2 sessions were audio recorded and rated.

Time frame:
By the end of final treatment session (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of session elements present
Percentage of Session Elements That Were Rated "Present" (Versus "Absent") by a Clinical Supervisor
Percentage of session elements presentWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Percentage of Session Elements That Were Rated "Present" (Versus "Absent") by a Clinical Supervisor87.7285.96
SecondaryRatings 1-5 by Clinical Supervisors on Quality of Session Elements Delivered by Therapist

Higher ratings indicate higher-quality session element (scores 1-5; 1="poor", 5="excellent) by the clinical supervisors. Competence ratings will be collected for two audio recorded group sessions out of each 12-session intervention. Assesses for therapist compliance as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

Time frame:
By the end of final treatment session (up to 12 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · CPT session elements
Ratings 1-5 by Clinical Supervisors on Quality of Session Elements Delivered by Therapist
CPT session elementsWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Unique Items4.67 ± .574.35 ± .5
Essential Items4.77 ± .434.36 ± .53
SecondaryNumber of Participants Reporting Increased Suicidality Over the Course of Treatment (Endorsing 2 or Higher on Question #9 of BDI-II)

Question 9 on the BDI-II assesses for suicidal ideation. A score of 2 (I would like to kill myself) or 3 (I would kill myself if I had the chance; the highest score) indicate heightened levels of suicidal ideation. Participants who endorse current suicidal ideation will be referred to mental health services within the institution. Assesses for participant safety as secondary measure of intervention feasibility.

Time frame:
post (one week post-intervention, up to 13 weeks on study)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting Increased Suicidality Over the Course of Treatment (Endorsing 2 or Higher on Question #9 of BDI-II)
ParticipantsWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Number of Participants Reporting Increased Suicidality Over the Course of Treatment (Endorsing 2 or Higher on Question #9 of BDI-II)02
SecondaryReasons for Participant Discontinuation

We will collect information on participant dropout reasons to understand reasons for discontinuation

Time frame:
Up to 3 month follow up (up to 25 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Reasons for Participant Discontinuation
ParticipantsWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Transferred Facilities10
Scheduling Issues10
Group "Not Helpful"10
Work02
Withdrawn by study clinician02

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from consented (one week prior to intervention) to the three month follow up (12 weeks after intervention, up to 25 weeks total). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Women's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)7/35 (20%)
Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)0/34 (0%)0/34 (0%)14/34 (41.2%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventWomen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Men's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)
Medical EventCardiac disorders1/355/34
Social CircusmtancesSocial circumstances0/354/34
Increased PTSD symptomsPsychiatric disorders1/353/34
Increase in depressive symptomsPsychiatric disorders0/353/34
Segregated Housing Placement / Rule ViolationSocial circumstances3/353/34
Passive Suicidal IdeationPsychiatric disorders0/352/34
Increased emotional distressPsychiatric disorders2/350/34

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Women's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) GroupMen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Total
Mean36.09 ± 10.7839.6 ± 11.338.12 ± 11.23
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Women's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) GroupMen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Total
Female35035
Male03434
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Women's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) GroupMen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Total
Hispanic or Latino022
Not Hispanic or Latino353267
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Women's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) GroupMen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Total
Womens Facility — American Indian or Alaska Native202
Womens Facility — Asian011
Womens Facility — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Womens Facility — Black or African American31417
Womens Facility — White281745
Womens Facility — More than one race123
Womens Facility — Unknown or Not Reported101
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Women's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) GroupMen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Total
United States353469
PCL-5
PCL-5(units on a scale)Women's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) GroupMen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Total
Mean50.49 ± 12.2947.26 ± 10.3148.90 ± 11.39
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)(score on a scale)Women's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) GroupMen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Total
Mean22.57 ± 9.7225.03 ± 9.3223.72 ± 9.54
Beck Depression Inventory 2 (BDI-II)
Beck Depression Inventory 2 (BDI-II)(score on a scale)Women's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) GroupMen's Facility Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)Total
Mean30.14 ± 11.4129.94 ± 9.1730.04 ± 10.29
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Psychiatric Institute and Clinic
    Madison, Wisconsin 53719, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • James, D.J. and L.E. Glaze, Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates, U.S.D.o. Justice, Editor. 2006: Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report.
  • Egeressy A, Butler T, Hunter M. 'Traumatisers or traumatised': Trauma experiences and personality characteristics of Australian prisoners. Int J Prison Health. 2009;5(4):212-22. doi: 10.1080/17449200903343209. PubMed 25757522 ↗
  • Campbell CA, Albert I, Jarrett M, Byrne M, Roberts A, Phillip P, Huddy V, Valmaggia L. Treating Multiple Incident Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) in an Inner City London Prison: The Need for an Evidence Base. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2016 Jan;44(1):112-7. doi: 10.1017/S135246581500003X. Epub 2015 Feb 20. PubMed 25697197 ↗
  • Resick, P.A., C.M. Monson, and K.M. Chard, Cognitive Processing Therapy for PTSD: A Comprehensive Manual. 2016: Guilford Press.
  • Resick PA, Nishith P, Weaver TL, Astin MC, Feuer CA. A comparison of cognitive-processing therapy with prolonged exposure and a waiting condition for the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in female rape victims. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Aug;70(4):867-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.4.867. PubMed 12182270 ↗
  • Morgan RD, Winterowd CL. Interpersonal process-oriented group psychotherapy with offender populations. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2002 Aug;46(4):466-82. doi: 10.1177/0306624X02464008. PubMed 12150085 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Jan 22, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05168267
Lead sponsor
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Collaborators
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 23, 2021
Start date
Jun 6, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2024
Completion
Jul 31, 2024
Results posted
Apr 8, 2025
Last update
Apr 8, 2025

Study contacts

Michael R Koenigs, PhD
principal investigator · University of Wisconsin, Madison

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion