An interventional study of McCoy laryngoscope and C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope in Obesity, sponsored by Eun Young Park. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-06.
Sponsored by Eun Young Park · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Obesity is associated with difficult intubation rate of 30%, and this study was performed to compare the use of McCoy laryngoscope and C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope for intubation in obese patients. A total 104 patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 35kg/m² scheduled for general anesthesia were randomly assigned to be intubated with McCoy laryngoscope or C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope. The primary outcome was intubation time, and secondary outcomes were mask ventilation scale, intubation difficulty scale (IDS), percentage of glottis opening (POGO) score, and hemodynamic variables including mean arterial pressure, heart rate and saturation.
6,296 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 1,692 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 104 is above the median of 78 across 4,878 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.
Browse Obesity studies →This is the only study on the registry with Eun Young Park as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients were intubated with McCoy laryngoscope.
Device: McCoy laryngoscope
Patients were intubated with C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope.
Device: C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope
Patients scheduled for general anesthesia were intubated with McCoy laryngoscope.
Patients scheduled for general anesthesia were intubated with C-MAC D-blade video laryngoscope.
Intubation time
Timing measurement began when the laryngoscope blade was inserted in patients' mouth and ended when end tidal carbon dioxide tracing was detected in the monitor.
Time frame: The patients were excluded in this study if intubation time was over 90 seconds.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.