ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05143476UNIONUpdated Feb 27, 2026

Serum-Protein-Based Indices for the Progression of Fracture Healing and Nonunion

An observational study in Humerus Fractures, sponsored by Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-27.

Sponsored by Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To define a serum protein-based diagnostic for the progression and failure of fracture healing, through the identification of a set of serum proteins that appear at early times of biological healing and show a specific correlation with later radiological and functional signs used to define delayed healing and non-union.

Read the detailed description

Aim 1 Learning Set: At the earliest time in the study when 10 non-unions have been identified, we will select 10 control patients matched for comorbidities (including a body mass index>40, smoking history, and diabetes) from the group that has been enrolled for comparison to the 10 non-union patients. The proteins showing the most substantial changes in response to either their initial or end point measurements in both healer and non-healer sets will be identified. Temporal clustering and biological assessment tools will be used to identify the biological processes and time frames showing altered serum levels for these markers. A selection process will then use a set of pair wise iterative processes to identify both single markers and multiple marker subsets that show the best correlations to both mRUST and union/nonunion diagnosis prior to the current time that the diagnosis for failed healing is made.

Aim2 Validation Set: As soon as the next group 10 non-union patients are identified a new group of 10 healers will be selected and the target group of protein identified in phase one will be tested for robustness in a second study with this new set of non-healers healers. Assessments of the robustness will be based on level of detection (LOD) and reproducibility of LOD and diagnostic performance. A third assessment will be carried out with the total group of 20 non healers identified in both the first and second phases of the project by rescreening this group against profiles of a final and novel set of 40 new healers. This new set of healers will be selected from the total patient sets of profiles that have been collected across the entire study period and again will be randomly selected and matched for comorbidities. During each subsequent screen we will refine the marker set further taking into account both performance features, qualitative factors related to a protein's biological functions and relationships to the processes of healing, and their correlation to the clinical parameters that we are using to assess progression of healing (union). The last stage of assessment provides an independent technical biochemical/immunological validation for the ten best performing proteins. This assessment will be made using a conventional Western blot assay across a randomized set of 20 profiles from both healers and non-healers who had been previously screened using the microarray format. This last assay is a quality control step for protein identification specification.

02

Conditions studied

  • Humerus Fractures

Keywords

  • Limb Fractures
  • Failure to Progress
  • Nonunion
  • Serum Markers
03

In context

Humeral Fractures

105 studies on the registry are indexed under Humeral Fractures; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 45 is below the median of 91 across 36 observational studies indexed under Humeral Fractures.

Browse Humeral Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium is the lead sponsor of 31 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

We will consent and enroll up to 180 patients who meet the enrollment inclusion exclusion criteria for this study. In this group we anticipate based on our prior clinical data that about 20 patients would experience failed healing (nonunion) providing us with the ability to identify those protein in the serum that are diagnostic for failed healing. Patient enrollment will take place continuously over a three year period with the two stages of the project initiated when the enrollment numbers are met to carry out each aim of the project. When a patient presents with a humerus fracture he or she will be evaluated (according to standard of care) for possible enrollment in the study. The inclusion /exclusion criteria will be reviewed by the treating surgeon.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Skeletally mature, ages 18-70 (inclusive)
  2. Diagnosis of isolated closed extra-articular fractures of the humeral shaft deemed appropriate for closed treatment by immobilization and a sling by the treating physician
  3. Approached for consent within two weeks of injury
  4. Available for follow up at this treatment facility for at least six months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Humeral shaft fractures that extend into the articular surface.
  2. Pathologic fractures.
  3. Additional long bone injuries or fractures of upper or lower extremity that would compromise outcome assessments of single fracture protein levels.
  4. Previous retained hardware in humerus from other injuries.
  5. Soft tissue injury compromising selected treatment method.
  6. Any injury that involved a trauma activation with entry of more than two AIS codes.
  7. Fractures with vascular injury.
  8. Pregnant women, potentially pregnant, or lactating women
  9. based on the medical record and patient reported use of pharmacological medications that would lead to immunocompromise. (i.e., Anti-TNF therapies, or associated therapies for treatment of various rheumatological conditions.)
  10. Unable to comply with postoperative rehabilitation protocols or instructions (i.e., head injury or cognitively impaired).
  11. Known metabolic bone disease.
  12. Severe problems with maintaining follow-up (e.g., patients who are prisoners or homeless at the time of injury or who are intellectually challenged without adequate family support).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
45 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Observational group

    Follow-up visits will be conducted at 4-6, 7-9, 12-16 and 26-32 weeks, from time of fracture. A participant's doctor will perform routine examination of fracture healing. The assessment will include evaluation of gross fracture site motion and presence or absence of radiographic healing, including a mRUST score.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fracture Healing Outcomes and Functional Healing Outcomes

    The primary outcome for the assessment of fracture healing will be assessed by gross motion and mRUST (modified radiograph union score) score greater than or equal to 6. mRUST score ranges from 4-16 where score greater than or equal to 6 is considered as the predictors of progression to union.

    Time frame: 7-9 week visit

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Boston Medical Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02118, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2021 to primary completion in May 2024, 34 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 10, 2021
First posted
Dec 3, 2021
StartActual
Jun 26, 2021
Primary completionActual
May 2, 2024
CompletionActual
Oct 28, 2024
Last update
Feb 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05143476
Lead sponsor
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2021
Start date
Jun 26, 2021
Primary completion
May 2, 2024
Completion
Oct 28, 2024
Last update
Feb 27, 2026

Study contacts

Louis Gerstenfeld, PhD
principal investigator · Boston University
Renan C Castillo, PhD
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion