ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05143333Updated Jan 11, 2022

Cognitive Assessment in COVID-19 Positive Patients Using the DANA App

An observational study in COVID-19, sponsored by Johns Hopkins University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-01-11.

Sponsored by Johns Hopkins University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
28
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) is a battery of cognitive tests delivered via an electronic tablet or smartphone. The overarching goal of this study is to evaluate the post-acute trajectory of cognitive functioning in patients hospitalized for COVID-19 using the DANA.

Read the detailed description

The sequelae of COVID-19 are increasingly appreciated to be systemic and persistent among certain populations. Retrospective review of severe COVID-19 cases revealed increased altered mental status, encephalitis, psychosis, and neurocognitive abnormalities in the three weeks following discharge. During severe COVID-19 infection, there is additional evidence of cerebrovascular events, including ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage. The most common long-term neurological sequelae are loss of taste/smell, headache, and vertigo. However, there is additional evidence for cognitive impairment among those with severe COVID-19, with 33% of patients discharged from one intensive care unit (ICU) exhibiting clinically relevant inattention, disorientation, and poorly organized movements. Another study utilizing a three-week telephone cognitive screening four weeks after discharge showed that 42% of those who experienced delirium during ICU stay had lasting lower cognitive scores compared to those who did not experience delirium.

The majority of currently available knowledge about neurocognitive symptoms associated with COVID-19 comes from cross-sectional studies of patients in the acute setting. Existing data suggests that following hospitalization, COVID-19 survivors may most frequently demonstrate deficits in letter-cued verbal fluency and executive function. However, this body of research is in its early stages and further investigation is needed. The model of traditional face-to-face cognitive testing using paper and pencil instruments is poorly suited to a global infectious disease pandemic. The Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) is a battery of cognitive tests delivered via an electronic tablet or smartphone. The platform allows higher temporal precision and frequency of measurement than traditional neuropsychological methods while including previously standardized cognitive tests and allowing individuals to repeatedly self-administer the battery in the individuals' own homes without examiner supervision. Hence, the DANA battery bypasses several of the major limitations associated with in-person cognitive exams.

02

Conditions studied

  • COVID-19

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • COVID-19 cognition
03

In context

COVID-19

7,774 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 482 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 260 across 3,188 observational studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University is the lead sponsor of 1,809 studies on the registry; 314 are open to participants now.

Of its 208 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 144 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants must have a documented pulmonary illness due to COVID and being treated in the PACT clinic. They should have access to an internet-connected electronic device (e.g., Android or iOS phone or tablet) able to use the DANA app.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Have documented pulmonary illness treated in the PACT clinic.
  • Have access to an internet-connected electronic device (e.g., Android or iOS phone or tablet) able to perform DANA.
  • Agree to participate in seven DANA assessments.
  • Be proficient in use of the English language.
  • Willing and able to consent to the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • During the testing phase, plans to undergo treatment with documented lasting neurocognitive effects that will confound DANA assessments, including but not limited to: neurosurgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, electroconvulsive therapy, and cardiac surgery.
  • During the testing phase, sustains injury or disease state unrelated to reason for PACT admission with documented lasting neurocognitive effects that will confound DANA assessments, including but not limited to: traumatic brain injury (as determined by study clinician).
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Post acute COVID-19

    Severity of COVID-19 will be determined based on patient classification within the PACT (Johns Hopkins Post-acute COVID-19 Team) clinic. Specifically, patients followed in the PACT-ICU clinic required ICU stays of ≥48 hours and high-flow nasal cannula/non-invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation. Those followed in the PACT-Base clinic have less severe disease that does not necessitate ≥48 hours in the ICU but does qualify for PACT clinic referral based on either (1) ongoing pulmonary and/or rehabilitation needs at the time of hospital discharge, or (2) persistent pulmonary or functional deficits at 4-6 weeks post infection without hospitalization.

    Other: DANA app

Interventions

  • OtherDANA app

    The Defense Automated Neurobehavioral Assessment (DANA) is a battery of cognitive tests delivered via an electronic tablet or smartphone. The platform allows higher temporal precision and frequency of measurement than traditional neuropsychological methods while including previously standardized cognitive tests and allowing individuals to repeatedly self-administer the battery in their own homes without examiner supervision. Hence, the DANA battery bypasses several of the major limitations associated with in-person cognitive exams.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cognitive dysfunction trajectory

    ● Characterize the nature (i.e., pattern of cognitive deficits) and trajectory of cognitive dysfunction among those treated for COVID-19 with high temporal resolution repeatedly for up to 6 months using the DANA.

    Time frame: upto 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. DANA validation

    ● Validate DANA results against traditional neuropsychological test results collected as part of routine clinical care.

    Time frame: upto 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Johns Hopkins Psychiatry department
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2021, 5 months.

Of 1,625 non-industry observational studies under COVID-19, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 29. This study's 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,750 studies reached it within 13 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 29.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 1, 2021
First posted
Dec 3, 2021
StartActual
Jul 1, 2021
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2021
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2021
Last update
Jan 11, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05143333
Collaborators
AnthroTronix, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 3, 2021
Start date
Jul 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021
Completion
Dec 31, 2021
Last update
Jan 11, 2022

Study contacts

Anupama Kumar, MBBS
principal investigator · Johns Hopkins University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion