An observational study in Injuries and Emergencies, sponsored by Oslo Metropolitan University. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-11-01.
Sponsored by Oslo Metropolitan University · Observational
Video streaming as an additional tool to telephone was introduced in some Norwegian emergency medical call centers during the spring of 2020. This allows the dispatchers to communicate with the caller through video streaming during emergency calls. Some studies are conducted on this use of video streaming, but further research is needed.
In this study, the investigators have chosen to focus on potential effect from video streaming on bystander first aid for injured patients. The investigators have knowledge from preliminary results that dispatchers often find video streaming useful in emergency calls regarding injuries.
This study will investigate whether the use of video streaming might have an effect on the recognition rate by dispatchers on the need for bystander first aid for injured patients. In addition, the investigators will investigate whether video-instructions from dispatcher can improve bystander first aid quality.
The investigators will be using data collected by ambulance personnel including patients with injuries, as well as data from EMCC journals and audio logs.
Background:
Emergency Medical Communication Centres (EMCCs) in Norway receive more than 400 000 emergency calls every year, resulting in more than 250 000 ambulance dispatches. Emergency calls are answered by nurses or paramedics with special training, who by audio assesses the situation and decides on a response. Video streaming as a supplement to telephone in EMCC was introduced during springtime 2020 in Norway, and is independent of this study. The intended effect was to improve shared situational awareness between caller and operator, and thus improve the triage process. The video solution is live-only, and caller must give consent. Limited scientific evidence for such use exists, and even if video calls seems commonplace in society, the effects and acceptance in EMCCs has mainly been studied in simulated settings. Preliminary results from the early launch of video streaming showed that injured patients was one of the conditions where the dispatchers seemed to find video streaming useful. Previous studies by Bakke et.al investigating bystander first aid for injured patients, showed a potential for dispatchers in EMCCs to recognize more injured patients with the need for bystander first aid.
Aim:
This study focuses on the effect of video streaming in EMCCs on bystander first aid. The investigators aim to investigate whether dispatchers identifies the need for relevant first aid measures more frequently when using video streaming. The study will be conducted in several health trusts in Norway. In health trusts where video streaming not yet has been implemented in the EMCC, the investigators will collect data from period before video streaming is implemented, and after video streaming is implemented. From some health trusts in the study, video streaming already been implemented, and data collection will hence only be conducted for an after-period.
Methods and population size:
The number needed to treat is based on the studies by Bakke et al, as well it is based on one of our outcome goals: an aim for improvement of correctly identification of need for first aid by EMCC operator from 35% to 50%. Bakke et al included 355 cases during 18 months, which was done in a study area with approximately 270.500 inhabitants. For achievement of power of 0,80 and p-value \<0,05 we need each study group to be 169, with the aimed improvement of 15%. Adding an estimate of missing cases of 10%, our study sample size for each group for this outcome measure is estimated to approximately 200 cases. For the outcome goal on quality improvement on first aid, which we aim the effect to be a raise in 20%, there is no aggregated outcome from previous studies to base an improvement on. The investigators therefore base our study sample size on number of cases included in Bakke's study. For this study to reach inclusion of 355 cases and with a study area with 1.150.000 inhabitants, the investigators need four months for each period. In Bakke's study, inclusion criteria were based on ICD-10 from hospital admissions. The investigators are therefore confident that the study will reach a minimum of 355 cases including patients not admitted to hospital as well. Based on these calculations on study sample sizes, the investigators estimate each of the before- and after periods to last 4 months, where cases before video implementation will be compared to calls after, separated by a wash-in period of 1-2 months.
Data collection and analyzes:
Patients will be included by ambulance personnel after the study's inclusion criteria. Ambulance personnel on scene will collect data through an internet-based questionnaire on need for first aid measures and quality of bystander first aid. In addition, data will be collected from EMCC journals and audio logs. This data will contain information on dispatchers recognition of first aid measures, as well as information on prehospital resources and time data. The investigators will also apply for data from the National Trauma Registry. Ambulance personnel participating in the data collection will complete an educational course about the questionnaire. The questionnaire used will be validated in a separate study. Analyzes of primary and secondary outcomes will be executed according to the ITT-principle. Uni- and multivariate regression analysis will be conducted.
Ethics:
The study is assessed by the Regional ethics committee in Norway as outside area of jurisdiction. It is approved by the Norwegian Center for Research Data and the Norwegian Health Directorate.
1,692 studies on the registry are indexed under Emergencies; 333 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 174 is below the median of 353 across 714 observational studies indexed under Emergencies.
Browse Emergencies studies →Oslo Metropolitan University is the lead sponsor of 64 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Patients with injuries who meet the inclusion criteria in the health trusts cooperating as study areas.
Exclusion Criteria:
Injured patients included in the study from health trusts where video streaming not yet has been implemented in the EMCC
Injured patients included in the study from health trusts where video streaming has been implemented in the EMCC
Other: Video streaming
Video streaming as a supplement to telephone during emergency calls for dispatchers at EMCCs
Dispatchers' recognition of relevant first aid measures
Number of patients where dispatchers in the EMCCs recognizes relevant first aid measures
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1,5 years
First aid measures performed by bystander
Number of patients with first aid measures performed by bystander before the arrival of the first ambulance unit
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1,5 years
Bystander first aid quality
Number of patients with first aid measures of high quality performed by bystander
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1,5 years
Time delay until activation of first ambulance
No increase in time from the emergency call is received until activation of first ambulance unit
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1,5 years
Time delay until need for first aid is recognized by dispatcher
No increase in time from the emergency call is received until need for first aid is recognized by the dispatcher
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1,5 years
30-days mortality for patients included
No increase in 30-days mortality for patients where video streaming was used
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1,5 years
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Oslo Metropolitan University