CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05113797Updated Aug 23, 2022

Use of the OPTIMAL Theory of Motor Learning With the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test

An interventional study of Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test and OPTIMAL motor learning theory in Balance, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-23.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Assessing and improving movement quality are important components of rehabilitation. The Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ) is a balance test used to assess dynamic balance in healthy adults, athletes, and those who are rehabilitating a lower extremity injury. Performing the YBT-LQ requires utilization of different strategies. It is unknown how different practice conditions will affect dynamic balance learning or performance on YBT-LQ. This study aims to compare the influence of OPTIMAL motor learning practice with standard practice conditions on YBT-LQ measurements.

Read the detailed description

The Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test (YBT-LQ) is used to assess dynamic balance and functional symmetry in healthy adults, athletes, and those who are rehabilitating a lower extremity injury, and has good to excellent interrater reliability. Performing the YBT-LQ requires utilization of different neuromotor and postural control strategies in each direction of the test. The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning is a theoretical framework that has been shown to improve motor performance through three main components: promotion of autonomy support (AS), presence of an external focus (EF) of attention, and implementation of enhanced expectancies (EE) placed upon a task. These components of the OPTIMAL theory of motor learning have been demonstrated to enhance balance learning in several populations. There is also extensive literature on the effects of the individual components of the OPTIMAL theory of motor learning and some evidence that demonstrates the beneficial effects of the combined components on motor learning. However, to the authors knowledge, literature has not been published upon the effect of all three components of the OPTIMAL theory of motor learning on dynamic balance learning. Therefore, the purpose of this study is intended to determine if the OPTIMAL theory of motor learning will influence performance on the YBT-LQ.

Healthy participants aged 18 to 65 will be recruited for participation through word-of-mouth advertising. Inclusion criteria will include a passing score of >35 degrees bilateral ankle dorsiflexion and an ability to balance on one leg. Upon signing the informed consent document from participants, height, weight, BMI, gender, age, and limb length will be recorded for data analysis. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: an OPTIMAL motor learning group or a control group. The intended experimental design will be a multigroup nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group for this study. Participants will attend two study visits separated by 2-14 days. A visit one baseline YBT-LQ pretest will be administered in a standardized fashion the same for both groups. During visit two, the OPTIMAL group will practice the YBT-LQ using OPTIMAL principles, while the control group practices the YBT-LQ using standard principles, then both groups will undergo a posttest YBT-LQ measurement. Primary outcome measures will be normalized composite scores of the YBT-LQ. Secondary outcome measures will be participant self-reported measures of perceived competence, task effort, level of autonomy, and externally focused attention during the task on a 0 to 10 Likert scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Balance
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy participants
  • Having the ability to safely stand on one leg and pass the ankle dorsiflexion clearing test (> 35 degrees ankle dorsiflexion).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of a recent lower extremity injury in the last month that limits their ability to stand on one leg.
  • Failure to achieve 35 degrees of bilateral dorsiflexion on the dorsiflexion clearing test.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group

    Subjects will perform YBT-LQ practice tests using standardized set of verbal instructions provided in the YBT-LQ online manual prior to the testing condition.

    Diagnostic Test: Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test

  • Experimental
    OPTIMAL Motor Learning Group

    Subjects will perform the YBT-LQ with the practice period altered to implement aspects of the three pillars of the OPTIMAL motor learning theory (promotion of autonomy support (AS), presence of an external focus (EF) of attention, and implementation of enhanced expectancies (EE) placed upon a task).

    Diagnostic Test: Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test · Behavioral: OPTIMAL motor learning theory

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testLower Quarter Y-Balance Test

    Dynamic balance assessment performed in a standing position while balanced on one leg, participants are asked to move a plastic box with their other foot in three directions (forward, back to the left, and back to the right) and a distance measurement is recorded. Each leg will be tested three times in each direction for the YBT-LQ assessment.

  • BehavioralOPTIMAL motor learning theory

    OPTIMAL theoretical framework instructions and coaching will be utilized to improve motor performance through three main components: promotion of autonomy support (AS), presence of an external focus (EF) of attention, and implementation of enhanced expectancies (EE) placed upon a task.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in composite YBT-LQ scores

    Measure by 3 reach trials in 3 directions on each leg recorded to the nearest 0.5 cm. Composite score calculated by the sum of three directions for one leg divided by three times limb length, multiplied by 100

    Time frame: Baseline, 14 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perceived competence

    Measured using a self-reported Likert scale that rates their level of agreement to the statement, "I had the ability and understanding to move the box as far as possible in all three directions (anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral)" on a scale of 0=strongly disagree, 5=neutral, and 10=strongly agree

    Time frame: 14 days

  2. Task Effort

    Measured using a self-reported Likert scale that rates their level of agreement to the statement, "I tried very hard on this balance test" on a scale of 0=strongly disagree, 5=neutral, and 10=strongly agree

    Time frame: 14 days

  3. Level of autonomy

    Measured using a self-reported Likert scale that rates their level of agreement to the statement, "I felt in control of my ability to perform well on the Lower Quarter Y-Balance Test" on a scale of 0=strongly disagree, 5=neutral, and 10=strongly agree

    Time frame: 14 days

  4. Externally focused attention during the task

    Measured using a self-reported Likert scale that rates their level of agreement to the statement, "I focused on the target more than myself pushing the box during the test" on a scale of 0=strongly disagree, 5=neutral, and 10=strongly agree

    Time frame: 14 days

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Darren Calley
    Rochester, Minnesota 55904, United States
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 23, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05113797
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
Darren Q. Calley (Principal Investigator, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2021
Start date
Nov 13, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2022
Completion
Mar 1, 2022
Last update
Aug 23, 2022

Study contacts

Darren Calley, PT, DScPT, OCS
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion