CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05103163Updated Nov 2, 2021

The Effect of Foot Reflexology on Patient Satisfaction, Pain, and Vital Signs After Abdominal Surgery

An interventional study of Foot Reflexology in Surgery, sponsored by Gurkan Kapikiran. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-02.

Sponsored by Gurkan Kapikiran · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2020, registered Oct 2021).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Reflexology practice is an effective method in pain control by stimulating the release of endorphins. The study was conducted to determine the effect of foot reflexology applied to patients undergoing abdominal surgery on pain, patient satisfaction and vital signs. The study was conducted in a randomized controlled manner. The population of the study consisted of adult patients who underwent abdominal surgery in a university hospital in Turkey. The sample consisted of 156 patients with the indicated power analysis, including the analysis 78 experimental and 78 controls. Data were collected between October 2020 and May 2021 using Personal Information Form, Numerical Pain Scale, Newcastle Nursing Care Satisfaction Scale and Vital Signs Registration Form.

Read the detailed description

This study was conducted in a randomized controlled experimental setup. This research was conducted in the general surgery clinic of a university hospital in Turkey between October 2020 and May 2021.

The universe of the research; consisted of 261 patients aged 18 years and over who underwent abdominal surgery in the general surgery ward of a university hospital. The G Power 3.1.9.7 computer program was used to calculate the sample size. According to this program, it was determined that a total of 156 patients, 78 patients in each group, should be reached, with an effect size of 0.4, a margin of error of 0.04, a confidence interval of 0.95, and a population representation power of 95%. 57 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria and 48 patients who did not volunteer to participate in the study were not included in the sample.

Which of the patients included in the study would be in the experimental group and which would be in the control group was made according to the randomization table determined by the web-based random assignment software (RAY). There are two columns in the table as group 1 and group 2. Which column would be in the experimental group and which would be in the control group was determined by drawing lots. As a result of the draw, it was determined that group 1 would be in the control group and group 2 would be in the experimental group. Then, group assignments were made in accordance with the randomization order determined by RAY.

In the collection of data; "personal information form", "numerical pain scale", "newcastle nursing care satisfaction scale" and vital signs registration form were used.

Data were collected by the first researcher by face-to-face interview method between October 2020 and May 2021. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were recruited three days a week and on weekends after surgery.

A single post-operative session (30 minutes) of foot reflexology was applied to patients with abdominal surgery in the intervention group by the first investigator who had received reflexology practice training before starting the study. Patient privacy was respected in all procedures. During the application, it was ensured that the ambient sounds were as quiet and calm as possible. The monitor and phones were set to silent mode, and the television was turned off during the application. The bed-ends were removed, the patient was asked to lie in the supine position, and the investigator supported the patient's feet with a pillow, ready for reflexology. After these preparations, the researcher washed and dried his hands, took some olive oil, rubbed his hands and brought it to body temperature. Personal information form was applied before the reflexology application. As a pre-test, pain and nursing satisfaction levels were evaluated with newcastle nursing care satisfaction scale. Then, vital signs (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse, respiration and saturation) were measured. Foot warming movements, which is the first stage of foot reflexology, were applied to the left foot for 5 minutes. As foot warming movements; Achilles tendon stretching, rotation, executing the thumbs of the hand under the foot, bilateral wrist loosening and laundry tightening were performed using several methods. Then, the warm-up movements were terminated by applying deep and painless pressure to the solar plexus area of the left foot for 1 minute. Then in order; Reflexology was applied to the brain (pineal and pituitary region in the thumb, hypothalamus), lymphatic system, tension region (projection of the solar plexus on the foot), lung, adrenal gland, thyroid, diaphragm, stomach and joint regions. Afterwards, relaxation movements were made for the foot, pressure was applied to the solar plexus and the reflexology application was completed within 30 minutes. Immediately after the application, vital signs were re-measured as a post-test, and numerical pain scale and newcastle nursing care satisfaction scale were re-applied.

To the patients in the control group; personal information form, numerical pain scale and newcastle nursing care satisfaction scale were used as pre-tests. After the questions were answered, numerical pain scale and newcastle nursing care satisfaction scale were re-administered 30 minutes later as a post-test without any intervention other than the clinical protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgery

Keywords

  • Abdominal Surgery
  • Foot Reflexology
  • Vital Signs
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Pain
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Gurkan Kapikiran is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years of age and above who are open to communication,
  • Hospitalized for at least two nights
  • Defining the severity of pain as 4 and above,
  • Any lesion, wound, infection, etc. that prevents the practice of standing reflexology. non,
  • Not diagnosed with cancer
  • Deep vein thrombosis, epilepsy, Thrombophlebitis, febrile diseases etc. without diseases,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any lesion, wound, infection etc. on the foot
  • Presence of deep vein thrombosis
  • Presence of epilepsy
  • With thrombophlebitis and febrile diseases
  • Those who do not volunteer to participate in the study,
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
156 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Foot reflexology group

    Before the reflexology application, a personal information form was applied to the patients who had abdominal surgery. As a pre-test, satisfaction levels in terms of pain and nursing were evaluated. Then, vital signs (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, pulse, respiration and saturation) were measured. Foot warming movements were started and then the warming movements were terminated by applying pressure to the solar plexus area of the left foot. Then in order; Reflexology was applied to the brain, lymphatic system, blood pressure area, lung, adrenal gland, thyroid, diaphragm, stomach and joint areas. Afterwards, relaxation movements were made for the foot, pressure was applied to the solar plexus and the reflexology application was completed within 30 minutes. Immediately after the application, vital signs were re-measured as a post-test, and the numerical pain scale and care satisfaction scale were applied again.

    Other: Foot Reflexology

  • No intervention
    No treatment group

    To the patients in the control group; Personal Information Form, Numerical Pain Scale (NPS) and Newcastle Nursing Care Satisfaction Scale (NNCSS) were applied as pre-test. After the questions were answered, NNCSS with NPS was applied again 40 minutes later as a final test, without any intervention other than the clinical protocol.

Interventions

  • OtherFoot Reflexology

    Reflexology application is an energy balancing system with its own pressure technique that provides recovery by rubbing the reflex (nerve endings) points, stroking and applying pressure during squeezing movements. Thanks to the pressure and massage applie

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    It is a Likert-type scale, scored between 1 and 5, consisting of 19 questions containing patients' views of satisfaction with nursing care.

    Time frame: 0-30 minutes

  2. Pain Level

    It is a numeric scale which is based on explaining pain severity with numbers, and where 0 point means no pain and 10 points mean unbearable pain

    Time frame: 0.-30. minutes

  3. Blood pressure measurement

    Systolic blood pressure was measured with a digital sphygmomanometer (mm Hg).

    Time frame: 0.-30. minutes

  4. Blood pressure measurement

    Diastolic blood pressure was measured with a digital sphygmomanometer (mm Hg).

    Time frame: 0.-30. minutes

  5. Pulse measurement

    The patient's heart rate in 1 minute was measured.

    Time frame: 0.-30. minutes

  6. Respiratory rate measurement

    The respiratory rate of the patient in 1 minute was measured.

    Time frame: 0.-30. minutes

  7. oxygen saturation measurement

    Oxygen saturation was measured with a pulse oximeter device.

    Time frame: 0.-30. minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Turgut Ozal Medical Center
    Malatya, 44090, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 2, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05103163
Lead sponsor
Gurkan Kapikiran
Responsible party
Gurkan Kapikiran (Assistant Professor, Inonu University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 2, 2021
Start date
Oct 10, 2020
Primary completion
May 10, 2021
Completion
Sep 25, 2021
Last update
Nov 2, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion