ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05085561SYCAMOREUpdated Oct 22, 2026Results posted

The Symptomatic Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Trial of REC-994

A Phase 2 interventional study of REC-994 and Placebo in Cerebral Cavernous Malformation, sponsored by Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc.. Completed at 15 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.

Sponsored by Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 22, 2026Results postedStudy documents posted+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a two-part, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of REC-994 (200 mg and 400 mg) compared to placebo in participants with symptomatic cerebral cavernous malformation (CCM).

Read the detailed description

Part 1: Participants will receive treatment over a period of 12 months. Part 2: Optional long-term extension (LTE) for participants completing Part 1 and who are eligible for extended treatment with REC-994.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Cavernous Malformation

Keywords

  • Cerebral Cavernous Malformation
  • CCM
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc. is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 years of age or older with anatomic CCM lesions demonstrated by brain MRI
  2. Have symptomatic CCM
  3. Have provided written to participate in the study
  4. Have not participated in a clinical trial utilizing an agent within 28 days or within 5 half-lives of the investigational drug (whichever is longer) prior to Screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Symptoms deemed by the study Investigator to be caused exclusively by irreversible neuronal damage from prior stroke or neurosurgical instrumentation
  2. History of cranial irradiation or surgical/radiosurgical treatment of the primary symptomatic CCM lesion
  3. Pregnant or breast feeding
  4. Be unable or unwilling to participate in MRI assessments (e.g., claustrophobia, metal implant or implanted cardiac pacemaker)
  5. Liver dysfunction or active liver disease as defined by baseline serum transaminases >2x (ULN)
  6. Have moderately or severely impaired renal function (estimated [eGFR] \<60ml/min) or active renal disease or have previously received a kidney transplant
  7. Have had a previous diagnosis of skeletal muscle disorders (myopathy) of any cause or have a baseline creatine kinase level > 5x ULN
  8. History of alcohol or substance abuse within 1 year prior to screening
  9. laboratory abnormality
  10. Have had an intracerebral hemorrhage within 3 months of screening or any brain surgery within 6 months of screening (not including the primary symptomatic CCM lesion)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
62 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    REC-994 200 mg

    Participants received REC-994 200 milligrams (mg) orally once daily (QD) (1 200 mg REC-994 tablet, 1 matching placebo tablet)

    Drug: REC-994 · Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    REC-994 400 mg

    Participants received REC-994 400 mg orally QD (2 200 mg REC-994 tablets)

    Drug: REC-994

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants received matching placebo orally QD (2 matching placebo tablets)

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugREC-994

    REC-994 200 mg tablets

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo Tablets

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    A TEAE was the development of an undesirable medical condition or the deterioration of a pre-existing medical condition following or during exposure to a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered causally related to the product. TEAES which include treatment related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, treatment-related serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and treatment-related TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation are reported. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section

    Time frame: Up to a maximum of 1201 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at Month 12

    The mRS is used for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered an acute stroke. The mRS score was calculated from a 6-point scale runs from 0-5, corresponding to no symptoms at all (0) to severe (5). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in symptoms. Change from baseline at Month 12 was analyzed by mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method. The model included the change from baseline at visit as the dependent variable, with baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

  2. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Total SymptoMScreen (SMSS) Score at Month 12

    The SMSS questionnaire is a self-assessment tool consists of 12 critical neurologic items, each assessed on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all affected) to 6 (total limitation). The total score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in symptoms. Change from baseline at Month 12 was analyzed by MMRM method. The model included the change from baseline at visit as the dependent variable, with baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

  3. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Health Index (CCM-HI) Total Score at Month 12

    The CCM-HI is a novel patient-reported outcome to assess overall symptom burden across 20 domains. The total CCM-HI score was calculated as a weighted sum of subscale scores, with higher scores indicating greater disease burden. Subscale scores were derived by multiplying individual item responses (scored 0-4) by predefined weights and summing within each subscale. Each subscale score is then multiplied by a corresponding scaling factor. The weighted subscale scores were summed to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in symptoms. Change from baseline at Month 12 were analyzed by MMRM method. The model included the change from baseline at visit as the dependent variable, with baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

  4. Part 1: Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12

    The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. The model included the CGI-I score at each visit as the dependent variable, with corresponding baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Time frame: Month 12

  5. Part 1: Patient Global Impressions - Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12

    The PGI is a 7-point scale that requires the participant to assess how much their own illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and was rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. The model included the PGI-I score at each visit as the dependent variable, with corresponding baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

    Time frame: Month 12

  6. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Seizures at Month 12

    Number of monthly seizures was calculated during each analysis window as follows: (number of observed seizures in each interval/number of days with seizure diary entry during each interval) x 30. Change from Baseline over monthly intervals was reported with a negative change indicating a reduction in the number of seizures.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

  7. Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Headaches at Month 12

    Number of monthly headaches was calculated during each analysis window as follows: (number of observed headaches in each interval/number of days with headache diary entry during each interval) x 30. Change from Baseline over monthly intervals was reported with a negative change indicating a reduction in the number of seizures.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 12

  8. Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computerized Tomography (CT) Confirmed Cerebral Haemorrhagic Events

    MRI and/or CT scan were used to confirm evidence of symptomatic cerebral hemorrhagic events.

    Time frame: Up to a maximum 1201 days

07

Results

Posted Oct 22, 2026

Participant flow

Part 1
Participant flow — Part 1
MilestoneREC-994 200 mg (Parts 1 and 2)REC-994 400 mg (Parts 1 and 2)Placebo (Part 1)Placebo Part 1, Then REC-994 200 mg Part 2Placebo Part 1, Then REC-994 400 mg Part 2
Started21212000
Completed19201800
Not completed21200
Withdrew: Adverse event00100
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11000
Withdrew: Protocol violation00100
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject10000
Part 2
Participant flow — Part 2
MilestoneREC-994 200 mg (Parts 1 and 2)REC-994 400 mg (Parts 1 and 2)Placebo (Part 1)Placebo Part 1, Then REC-994 200 mg Part 2Placebo Part 1, Then REC-994 400 mg Part 2
Started1618087
Completed1615086
Not completed03001
Withdrew: Adverse event01000
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01001
Withdrew: Sponsor terminated01000

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE was the development of an undesirable medical condition or the deterioration of a pre-existing medical condition following or during exposure to a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered causally related to the product. TEAES which include treatment related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, treatment-related serious TEAEs, TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and treatment-related TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation are reported. A summary of all Serious Adverse Events and Other Adverse Events (nonserious) regardless of causality is located in the 'Reported Adverse Events' Section

Time frame:
Up to a maximum of 1201 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsREC-994 200 mg (Parts 1 and 2)REC-994 400 mg (Parts 1 and 2)Placebo (Part 1)Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 200mg Part 2Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 400mg Part 2
Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)20161757
Treatment Related TEAE05202
Serious TEAE23412
Treatment Related Serious TEAE00000
TEAEs Leading to Treatment Discontinuation11100
Treatment Related TEAEs leading to treatment discontinuation01000
SecondaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at Month 12

The mRS is used for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities of people who have suffered an acute stroke. The mRS score was calculated from a 6-point scale runs from 0-5, corresponding to no symptoms at all (0) to severe (5). A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in symptoms. Change from baseline at Month 12 was analyzed by mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) method. The model included the change from baseline at visit as the dependent variable, with baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at Month 12
score on a scaleREC-994 200 mg (Part 1)REC-994 400 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at Month 12-0.1 ± 0.15-0.2 ± 0.16-0.1 ± 0.16
SecondaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in Total SymptoMScreen (SMSS) Score at Month 12

The SMSS questionnaire is a self-assessment tool consists of 12 critical neurologic items, each assessed on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all affected) to 6 (total limitation). The total score ranged from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in symptoms. Change from baseline at Month 12 was analyzed by MMRM method. The model included the change from baseline at visit as the dependent variable, with baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Total SymptoMScreen (SMSS) Score at Month 12
score on a scaleREC-994 200 mg (Part 1)REC-994 400 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Total SymptoMScreen (SMSS) Score at Month 12-0.7 ± 1.66-2.4 ± 1.80-0.5 ± 1.81
SecondaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Health Index (CCM-HI) Total Score at Month 12

The CCM-HI is a novel patient-reported outcome to assess overall symptom burden across 20 domains. The total CCM-HI score was calculated as a weighted sum of subscale scores, with higher scores indicating greater disease burden. Subscale scores were derived by multiplying individual item responses (scored 0-4) by predefined weights and summing within each subscale. Each subscale score is then multiplied by a corresponding scaling factor. The weighted subscale scores were summed to generate a total score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting more severe symptoms. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in symptoms. Change from baseline at Month 12 were analyzed by MMRM method. The model included the change from baseline at visit as the dependent variable, with baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Health Index (CCM-HI) Total Score at Month 12
score on a scaleREC-994 200 mg (Part 1)REC-994 400 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Health Index (CCM-HI) Total Score at Month 12-5.8 ± 2.39-1.9 ± 2.53-7.8 ± 2.52
SecondaryPart 1: Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12

The CGI-I is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. The model included the CGI-I score at each visit as the dependent variable, with corresponding baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Part 1: Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12
score on a scaleREC-994 200 mg (Part 1)REC-994 400 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)
Part 1: Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Month 123.1 ± 0.253.7 ± 0.273.1 ± 0.27
SecondaryPart 1: Patient Global Impressions - Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12

The PGI is a 7-point scale that requires the participant to assess how much their own illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention and was rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. The model included the PGI-I score at each visit as the dependent variable, with corresponding baseline score as covariate, treatment, visit, and treatment by visit interaction as fixed effects. Participant was included as a random effect using an unstructured covariance structure.

Time frame:
Month 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Part 1: Patient Global Impressions - Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12
score on a scaleREC-994 200 (Part 1)REC-994 400 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)
Part 1: Patient Global Impressions - Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score at Month 123.1 ± 0.273.6 ± 0.283.1 ± 0.28
SecondaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Seizures at Month 12

Number of monthly seizures was calculated during each analysis window as follows: (number of observed seizures in each interval/number of days with seizure diary entry during each interval) x 30. Change from Baseline over monthly intervals was reported with a negative change indicating a reduction in the number of seizures.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · Seizures per month
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Seizures at Month 12
Seizures per monthREC-994 200 mg (Part 1)REC-994 400 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Seizures at Month 121.1 ± 3.99-0.4 ± 1.41-0.2 ± 1.17
SecondaryPart 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Headaches at Month 12

Number of monthly headaches was calculated during each analysis window as follows: (number of observed headaches in each interval/number of days with headache diary entry during each interval) x 30. Change from Baseline over monthly intervals was reported with a negative change indicating a reduction in the number of seizures.

Time frame:
Baseline, Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · Headaches per month
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Headaches at Month 12
Headaches per monthREC-994 200 mg (Part 1)REC-994 400 mg (Part 1)Placebo (Part 1)
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Headaches at Month 12-3.5 ± 5.87-7.5 ± 11.07-7.1 ± 9.51
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computerized Tomography (CT) Confirmed Cerebral Haemorrhagic Events

MRI and/or CT scan were used to confirm evidence of symptomatic cerebral hemorrhagic events.

Time frame:
Up to a maximum 1201 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computerized Tomography (CT) Confirmed Cerebral Haemorrhagic Events
ParticipantsREC-994 200 mg (Parts 1 and 2)REC-994 400 mg (Parts 1 and 2)Placebo (Part 1)Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 200mg Part 2Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 400mg Part 2
Number of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computerized Tomography (CT) Confirmed Cerebral Haemorrhagic Events22311

Adverse events

Collected over Up to a maximum of 1201 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
REC-994 200 mg (Parts 1 and 2)0/21 (0%)2/21 (9.5%)20/21 (95.2%)
REC-994 400 mg (Parts 1 and 2)0/21 (0%)3/21 (14.3%)16/21 (76.2%)
Placebo (Part 1)0/20 (0%)4/20 (20%)16/20 (80%)
Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 200mg Part 20/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)4/8 (50%)
Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 400mg Part 20/7 (0%)2/7 (28.6%)6/7 (85.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent serious events
EventREC-994 200 mg (Parts 1 and 2)REC-994 400 mg (Parts 1 and 2)Placebo (Part 1)Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 200mg Part 2Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 400mg Part 2
Vasogenic cerebral oedemaNervous system disorders0/210/210/200/81/7
DiplopiaEye disorders0/210/210/200/81/7
Nervous system disorderNervous system disorders0/210/210/201/80/7
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/210/211/200/80/7
Brain oedemaNervous system disorders0/210/211/200/80/7
Brain stem haemorrhageNervous system disorders0/210/211/200/80/7
Cerebral infarctionNervous system disorders0/210/211/200/80/7
Spinal cord haemorrhageNervous system disorders0/210/211/200/80/7
Spinal cord oedemaNervous system disorders0/210/211/200/80/7
BacteraemiaInfections and infestations0/210/211/200/80/7
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 127
Most frequent other events
EventREC-994 200 mg (Parts 1 and 2)REC-994 400 mg (Parts 1 and 2)Placebo (Part 1)Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 200mg Part 2Placebo Part 1 Then REC-994 400mg Part 2
COVID-19Infections and infestations5/216/211/200/80/7
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/211/211/200/82/7
FatigueGeneral disorders1/211/210/202/80/7
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/213/211/200/81/7
DizzinessNervous system disorders2/213/211/200/81/7
HypoaesthesiaNervous system disorders3/211/211/200/80/7
Brain stem microhaemorrhageNervous system disorders0/210/210/200/81/7
HemiparesisNervous system disorders0/210/210/200/81/7
Respiratory tract infection viralInfections and infestations0/210/210/200/81/7
DepressionPsychiatric disorders0/213/211/200/81/7

Baseline characteristics

Full Analysis Set (FAS), included all participants randomly assigned to a treatment group on Day 1 of Part 1 and have at least one efficacy assessment after randomization in Part 1.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)REC-994 200 mgREC-994 400 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean46.6 ± 14.5248.9 ± 10.8247.1 ± 15.7847.5 ± 13.64
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)REC-994 200 mgREC-994 400 mgPlaceboTotal
Female9161439
Male125623
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)REC-994 200 mgREC-994 400 mgPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0101
Asian1113
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0000
Black or African American2013
White18171752
More than one race0213
Unknown or Not Reported0000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)REC-994 200 mgREC-994 400 mgPlaceboTotal
United States21212062
08

Study locations

15 sites
  • Xenoscience Inc
    Phoenix, Arizona 85004, United States
  • UCLA
    Los Angeles, California 90095, United States
  • Stanford University
    Palo Alto, California 94304, United States
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • Lyerly Neurosurgery
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207-8202, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Florida
    Port Saint Lucie, Florida 34987, United States
  • Emory
    Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States
  • Valley Hospital
    Ridgewood, New Jersey 07450, United States
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10027, United States
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
    Dallas, Texas 75390-8855, United States
  • University of Virginia
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2022 to primary completion in Jun 2025, 39 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2026, 1 year 3 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Jun 2026.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 8, 2021
First posted
Oct 20, 2021
StartActual
Mar 17, 2022
Primary completionActual
Jun 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Jun 30, 2025
Results delay requested
Jun 18, 2026
Results first posted
Oct 22, 2026
Last update
Oct 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Results
Results posted
posted Oct 22, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • ChangedBefore Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs)Now Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Time frame: Up to 24 months → Up to a maximum of 1201 days
Oct 22, 2026
Documents
Secondary outcomes
8 added, 6 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
  • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Total SymptoMScreen (SMSS) Score at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
  • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Health Index (CCM-HI) Total Score at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
  • AddedPart 1: Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12Time frame: Month 12
  • AddedPart 1: Patient Global Impressions - Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12Time frame: Month 12
  • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Seizures at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
  • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Headaches at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
  • AddedNumber of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computerized Tomography (CT) Confirmed Cerebral Haemorrhagic EventsTime frame: Up to a maximum 1201 days
  • RemovedChange in patient reported outcomes (Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Health Index)Time frame: Up to 24 months
  • RemovedChange in patient reported outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale)Time frame: Up to 24 months
  • RemovedChange in patient reported outcomes (SymptoMScreen Score)Time frame: Up to 24 months
  • RemovedChange in disease-associated symptoms (number of MRI-confirmed cerebral hemorrhagic events)Time frame: Up to 24 months
  • RemovedPlasma concentrations of REC-994Time frame: Up to 12 months
  • Removedother outcomeChange in disease-associated symptoms (size and number of lesions on MRI)Time frame: Up to 24 months
Oct 22, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 22, 2026
    Results posted
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • ChangedBefore Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs)Now Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Time frame: Up to 24 months → Up to a maximum of 1201 days
    Secondary outcomes 8 added, 6 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Score at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
    • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Total SymptoMScreen (SMSS) Score at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
    • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Health Index (CCM-HI) Total Score at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
    • AddedPart 1: Clinical Global Impressions - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12Time frame: Month 12
    • AddedPart 1: Patient Global Impressions - Improvement (PGI-I) Scale Score at Month 12Time frame: Month 12
    • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Seizures at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
    • AddedPart 1: Change From Baseline in Number of Monthly Headaches at Month 12Time frame: Baseline, Month 12
    • AddedNumber of Participants With Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) or Computerized Tomography (CT) Confirmed Cerebral Haemorrhagic EventsTime frame: Up to a maximum 1201 days
    • RemovedChange in patient reported outcomes (Cerebral Cavernous Malformation Health Index)Time frame: Up to 24 months
    • RemovedChange in patient reported outcomes (Modified Rankin Scale)Time frame: Up to 24 months
    • RemovedChange in patient reported outcomes (SymptoMScreen Score)Time frame: Up to 24 months
    • RemovedChange in disease-associated symptoms (number of MRI-confirmed cerebral hemorrhagic events)Time frame: Up to 24 months
    • RemovedPlasma concentrations of REC-994Time frame: Up to 12 months
    • Removedother outcomeChange in disease-associated symptoms (size and number of lesions on MRI)Time frame: Up to 24 months
    + 4 other changes: index terms, verification date, registry dates and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05085561
Lead sponsor
Recursion Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2021
Start date
Mar 17, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 30, 2025
Results posted
Oct 22, 2026
Last update
Oct 22, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion