CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05072730ISAR-CALC2Updated Jul 13, 2026

ComparIson of Strategies to PrepAre SeveRely CALCified Coronary Lesions 2

An interventional study of Super High Pressure Balloon (OPN NC) and Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) in Calcified Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen. Completed at 6 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-13.

Sponsored by Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The ISAR-CALC 2 trial is an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomized, multicenter, assessors-blind, open-label other clinical investigation. The objective of this trial is to investigate final angiographic minimal lumen diameter (MLD) following a strategy of super high-pressure balloon (OPN NC) versus intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) for drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in severely calcified coronary lesions.

Read the detailed description

Detailed information is provided elsewhere.

02

Conditions studied

  • Calcified Coronary Artery Disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen is the lead sponsor of 112 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age above 18 years and able to give consent
  • Persistent angina despite medical therapy and/or evidence of inducible ischemia
  • De-novo lesion in a native coronary artery
  • Target reference vessel diameter or intended stent diameter ≥2.50 or ≤4.00 mm by visual estimation
  • Severe calcification of the target lesion as determined by visual estimation at coronary angiography
  • Unsuccessful lesion preparation with standard non-compliant balloon (\< 30% reduction of baseline diameter stenosis at maximal pressure)
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Target lesion is located in a coronary artery bypass graft
  • Target lesion is an in-stent restenosis
  • Target lesion is a chronic total occlusion
  • Target vessel thrombus
  • Limited long-term prognosis due to other comorbid conditions with life expectancy \<12 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Super high-pressure balloon (OPN NC)

    Patients will be treated with a Super High Pressure percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) Balloon (OPN NC).

    Device: Super High Pressure Balloon (OPN NC)

  • Experimental
    Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)

    Patients will be treated with intravascular lithotripsy (IVL).

    Device: Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)

Interventions

  • DeviceSuper High Pressure Balloon (OPN NC)

    Strategy of super high-pressure balloon angioplasty after unsuccessful lesion preparation with conventional NC balloon angioplasty. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging will be performed after lesion preparation with OPN balloon. Optional additional pre-dilatation with OPN/standard NC balloon is permitted at the operator´s discretion. Following lesion preparation, stenting will be performed in the same setting using a latest-generation everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE; Abbott Vascular, Chicago, IL, USA). Optional post-dilatation with OPN balloon or standard NC balloon is permitted at the operator´s discretion.

  • DeviceIntravascular lithotripsy (IVL)

    Strategy of IVL after unsuccessful lesion preparation with conventional NC balloon angioplasty. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging will be performed after lesion preparation with IVL balloon. Optional additional pre-dilatation with standard NC balloon is permitted at the operator´s discretion. Following lesion preparation, stenting will be performed in the same setting using a latest-generation everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE; Abbott Vascular, Chicago, IL, USA). Optional post-dilatation with standard NC balloon is permitted at the operator´s discretion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Final angiographic minimal lumen diameter

    The primary outcome measure of the trial is the final angiographic minimal lumen diameter as assessed by angiographic core laboratory.

    Time frame: Intraprocedural.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Angiographic Success

    Defined as target lesion residual angiographic stenosis \< 30% in the presence of Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 3 flow.

    Time frame: Intraprocedural.

  2. Procedural Success

    Defined as angiographic success without the occurrence of major adverse cardiac event (MACE), a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel related MI and repeat target-vessel revascularization, during index hospitalization.

    Time frame: During index hospitalization, assessed up to 30 days.

  3. Strategy Success

    Defined as procedural success using the assigned study device and DES, without requirement for additional devices for lesion preparation; i.e. rotational atherectomy

    Time frame: Intraprocedural.

  4. Acute lumen gain

    Defined as minimal lumen diameter (MLD) after balloon angioplasty with the assigned study devices minus baseline MLD.

    Time frame: Intraprocedural.

  5. Complementary lesion preparation

    Need for complementary lesion preparation with rotational atherectomy

    Time frame: Intraprocedural.

  6. MACE rates

    Occurrence of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) up to 30 days.

    Time frame: 30 days.

  7. Stent expansion as assessed by OCT imaging.

    Stent expansion index, defined as minimum stent area divided by mean reference lumen area assessed with OCT imaging.

    Time frame: Intraprocedural.

  8. Cost-effectiveness analysis

    Cost-effectiveness analysis of OPN versus IVL in severely calcified coronary lesions treated with DES implantation.

    Time frame: Intraprocedural.

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
    Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
  • Helios Klinikum Erfurt
    Erfurt, 99089, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
    Frankfurt am Main, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Jena
    Jena, 07747, Germany
  • MEDICLIN Herzzentrum Lahr
    Lahr, 77933, Germany
  • Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
    München, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Scalamogna M, Abdel-Wahab M, Mashayekhi K, Fusaro M, Leistner DM, Ayoub M, Xhepa E, Joner M, Kastrati A, Cassese S, Rheude T. Randomized ComparIson of Strategies to PrepAre SeveRely CALCified Coronary Lesions 2: Design and Rationale of the ISAR-CALC 2 Trial. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Apr;49:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.12.008. Epub 2022 Dec 30. PubMed 36609101 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05072730
Lead sponsor
Deutsches Herzzentrum Muenchen
Collaborators
Abbott Medical Devices, SIS Medical AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 11, 2021
Start date
Dec 1, 2022
Primary completion
May 21, 2026
Completion
May 21, 2026
Last update
Jul 13, 2026

Study contacts

Salvatore Cassese, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich
Tobias Rheude, MD
principal investigator · Deutsches Herzzentrum Munich

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion