CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05062343Updated Oct 27, 2023Results posted

Cook Balloon vs Dilapan-S for Outpatient Cervical Ripening

An interventional study of Dilapan-S and Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon in Induced; Birth, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-27.

Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to compare Cook balloon and Dilapan-S for outpatient cervical ripening to see if Dilapan-S is non-inferior in increasing Bishop score compared to the Cook balloon.

Read the detailed description

Upon presentation for cervical ripening appointment, a sterile vaginal exam will be completed to assign Bishop score, as per standard routine. Once the patient has been consented and randomized, the participant will have a Cook catheter or Dilapan-S inserted. For the Cook catheter, the uterine component of the balloon will be inflated to maximum 60mL, the vaginal balloon will not be inflated per standard practice and per the literature that shows slightly increased pain and negligible improvement in cervical ripening. The catheter will be taped to the inner thigh with gentle traction. For Dilapan-S, 3-5 dilators will be placed.

After placement, the patient will be discharged home with strict return precautions per the outpatient cervical ripening protocol. Patients must return to labor and delivery within 24 hours of cervical ripening agent placement at their scheduled inpatient induction time.

Upon return to labor and delivery, if not already expelled, the mechanical ripening device will be removed, and an examiner blinded to the cervical ripening method will complete a sterile vaginal exam to assign a Bishop score.

At that point health care providers will manage active labor per usual practice. Labor interventions are at the discretion of the healthcare provider. The need for operative delivery or cesarean section will be at the discretion of the healthcare provider.

02

Conditions studied

  • Induced; Birth

Keywords

  • Induction of labor
  • Cervical ripening
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,236 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.

Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (55%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-50 years of age
  • Term (37-41 6/7 weeks gestational age)
  • Low risk (i.e. without any maternal or fetal co-morbidity) and who are candidates for outpatient cervical ripening per the Brigham and Women's outpatient cervical ripening protocol
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Cephalic presentation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior cesarean section
  • Any contraindication to outpatient cervical ripening per Brigham and Women's outpatient cervical ripening protocol
  • Non-English-speaking
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Care provider)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Dilapan-S

    After randomization, the patient will have Dilapan-S placed via sterile speculum exam with placement of 3-5 rods. The rods will remain in place until expelled or up to 24 hours or until the scheduled return to labor and delivery. At presentation to labor and delivery, the rods will be confirmed expelled or will be removed and a blinded examiner will complete a sterile cervical exam. At that point the primary health care providers will manage further labor per their standard practice.

    Device: Dilapan-S

  • Active comparator
    Cook Catheter

    After randomization, the patient will have the Cook catheter placed via sterile vaginal or speculum exam with the uterine component of the balloon inflated to maximum 60mL. The balloon will remain in place until expelled or up to 24 hours or until the scheduled return to labor and delivery. At presentation to labor and delivery, the Cook catheter will be confirmed expelled or will be removed and a blinded examiner will complete a sterile cervical exam. At that point the primary health care providers will manage further labor per their standard practice.

    Device: Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon

Interventions

  • DeviceDilapan-S

    Osmotic dilator

  • DeviceCook Cervical Ripening Balloon

    Double balloon catheter for cervical ripening

    Also known as: Cook catheter

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Bishop Score

    Difference in Bishop score calculated from exam at time of device removal minus Bishop score calculated from exam at time of device placement. Bishop score, or cervical score, ranges from a minimum of 0 to maximum of 13. Higher scores indicate that the cervix is more favorable, or ready for labor. Thus, change in Bishop score could range from -13 to +13 with a higher number showing more change in the score, or more cervical ripening.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient Satisfaction score based on patient survey. Range from 0 (unsatisfied) to 10 (highly satisfied).

    Time frame: Assessed upon device removal, within 24 hours

  2. Mode of Delivery: Vaginal Delivery, Cesarean Delivery

    Mode of delivery, vaginal (including spontaneous vaginal, forceps and vacuum) and cesarean delivery

    Time frame: Assessed at the time of delivery, within 1 week

  3. Time on Labor and Delivery

    Time from admission on labor and delivery until delivery. Measured in hours.

    Time frame: Assessed at the time of delivery, within 1 week

  4. Maternal Length of Stay

    Admission Date/Time to Discharge Date/Time

    Time frame: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)

  5. Cervical Ripening Success Score: No Failure, Failure

    Failure defined by: inability to place intervention agent or need for further cervical ripening after removal

    Time frame: Assessed at the time of device removal, within 24 hours

  6. Composite Maternal Morbidity: Morbidity, no Morbidity

    Morbidity defined as any one of the following: higher-order laceration, blood transfusion, endometritis, wound infection, venous thromboembolism, hysterectomy, ICU admission or death

    Time frame: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)

  7. Composite Neonatal Morbidity: Morbidity, no Morbidity

    Morbidity defined as any one of the following: culture-proven neonatal sepsis, neonatal blood transfusion, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, or therapeutic hypothermia

    Time frame: Assessed at end of study period (week 4)

07

Results

Posted Oct 27, 2023

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneDilapan-SCook Catheter
Started4040
Completed4040
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Bishop Score

Difference in Bishop score calculated from exam at time of device removal minus Bishop score calculated from exam at time of device placement. Bishop score, or cervical score, ranges from a minimum of 0 to maximum of 13. Higher scores indicate that the cervix is more favorable, or ready for labor. Thus, change in Bishop score could range from -13 to +13 with a higher number showing more change in the score, or more cervical ripening.

Time frame:
Up to 24 hours
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change in Bishop Score
score on a scaleDilapan-SCook Catheter
Change in Bishop Score3.0 (2.0 to 5.0)3.0 (2.0 to 4.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Dilapan-S vs Cook Catheter · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.91
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction

Patient Satisfaction score based on patient survey. Range from 0 (unsatisfied) to 10 (highly satisfied).

Time frame:
Assessed upon device removal, within 24 hours
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Patient Satisfaction
score on a scaleDilapan-SCook Catheter
Patient Satisfaction9 (8 to 10)8 (5 to 9)
Statistical analysis
  • Dilapan-S vs Cook Catheter · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.01
SecondaryMode of Delivery: Vaginal Delivery, Cesarean Delivery

Mode of delivery, vaginal (including spontaneous vaginal, forceps and vacuum) and cesarean delivery

Time frame:
Assessed at the time of delivery, within 1 week
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Mode of Delivery: Vaginal Delivery, Cesarean Delivery
ParticipantsDilapan-SCook Catheter
Vaginal delivery3030
Cesarean delivery1010
Statistical analysis
  • Dilapan-S vs Cook Catheter · Chi-squared · p = 1.0
SecondaryTime on Labor and Delivery

Time from admission on labor and delivery until delivery. Measured in hours.

Time frame:
Assessed at the time of delivery, within 1 week
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Time on Labor and Delivery
HoursDilapan-SCook Catheter
Time on Labor and Delivery20.1 (13.9 to 26.2)17.0 (11.7 to 28.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Dilapan-S vs Cook Catheter · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.89
SecondaryMaternal Length of Stay

Admission Date/Time to Discharge Date/Time

Time frame:
Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Reported as:
Median · Days
Maternal Length of Stay
DaysDilapan-SCook Catheter
Maternal Length of Stay3.2 (2.7 to 4.7)2.9 (2.7 to 3.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Dilapan-S vs Cook Catheter · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.98
SecondaryCervical Ripening Success Score: No Failure, Failure

Failure defined by: inability to place intervention agent or need for further cervical ripening after removal

Time frame:
Assessed at the time of device removal, within 24 hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Cervical Ripening Success Score: No Failure, Failure
ParticipantsDilapan-SCook Catheter
No failure3325
Failure715
Statistical analysis
  • Dilapan-S vs Cook Catheter · Chi-squared · p = 0.045
SecondaryComposite Maternal Morbidity: Morbidity, no Morbidity

Morbidity defined as any one of the following: higher-order laceration, blood transfusion, endometritis, wound infection, venous thromboembolism, hysterectomy, ICU admission or death

Time frame:
Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Composite Maternal Morbidity: Morbidity, no Morbidity
ParticipantsDilapan-SCook Catheter
Morbidity88
No Morbidity3232
Statistical analysis
  • Dilapan-S vs Cook Catheter · Chi-squared · p = 1
SecondaryComposite Neonatal Morbidity: Morbidity, no Morbidity

Morbidity defined as any one of the following: culture-proven neonatal sepsis, neonatal blood transfusion, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 or 4, or therapeutic hypothermia

Time frame:
Assessed at end of study period (week 4)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Composite Neonatal Morbidity: Morbidity, no Morbidity
ParticipantsDilapan-SCook Catheter
Morbidity10
No morbidity3940
Statistical analysis
  • Dilapan-S vs Cook Catheter · Fisher Exact · p = 1

Adverse events

Collected over Events collected up until 6 weeks after delivery. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Dilapan-S0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)
Cook Catheter0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)0/40 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Dilapan-SCook CatheterTotal
Mean31.8 ± 4.833.3 ± 4.132.5 ± 4.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Dilapan-SCook CatheterTotal
Female404080
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Dilapan-SCook CatheterTotal
Hispanic or Latino5611
Not Hispanic or Latino343468
Unknown or Not Reported101
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Dilapan-SCook CatheterTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian325
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American628
White273360
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported437
Gestational age
Gestational age(Weeks)Dilapan-SCook CatheterTotal
Mean39.4 ± 1.039.3 ± 0.739.4 ± 0.9
Parity: Nulliparity, Multiparity
Parity: Nulliparity, Multiparity(Participants)Dilapan-SCook CatheterTotal
Nulliparity282856
Multiparity121224
Insurance type: public, private
Insurance type: public, private(Participants)Dilapan-SCook CatheterTotal
Public insurance9413
Private insurance313667
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Brigham and Women's HospitaL
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G, Hill K, Thom EA, El-Sayed YY, Perez-Delboy A, Rouse DJ, Saade GR, Boggess KA, Chauhan SP, Iams JD, Chien EK, Casey BM, Gibbs RS, Srinivas SK, Swamy GK, Simhan HN, Macones GA; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566. PubMed 30089070 ↗
  • Saad AF, Villarreal J, Eid J, Spencer N, Ellis V, Hankins GD, Saade GR. A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):275.e1-275.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.008. Epub 2019 Feb 18. PubMed 30790569 ↗
  • Ausbeck EB, Jauk VC, Xue Y, Files P, Kuper SG, Subramaniam A, Casey BM, Szychowski JM, Harper LM, Tita AT. Outpatient Foley Catheter for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):597-606. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004041. PubMed 32769658 ↗
  • Saunders SJ, Saunders R, Wong T, Saad AF. Out-of-Hospital Cervical Ripening With a Synthetic Hygroscopic Cervical Dilator May Reduce Hospital Costs and Cesarean Sections in the United States-A Cost-Consequence Analysis. Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 18;9:689115. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.689115. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34222185 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 24, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05062343
Lead sponsor
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Responsible party
Sarah E Little (Clinical Instructor, Brigham and Women's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 30, 2021
Start date
May 1, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 19, 2023
Completion
Jul 19, 2023
Results posted
Oct 27, 2023
Last update
Oct 27, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion