ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05048472EAPoC-VLUpdated Jul 1, 2025

East Africa Point of Care Viral Load Study

An interventional study of Abbott HIV-1/2 VL Point of care Device in HIV, Viral Load and Point of Care Monitoring, sponsored by MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit. Completed at 7 sites in 4 countries. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 24 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-01.

Sponsored by MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Apr 2025, 1 year 6 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
956
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Months to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of EAPoC-VL project is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness of using point of care viral load (PoC VL) monitoring to improve viral load suppression among children, adolescents and young people (age ≤24 years) living with HIV in Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda.

Read the detailed description

Main Study Aims:

i) To determine the effectiveness of PoC VL monitoring in improving viral suppression among children, adolescents and young people living with HIV in East Africa.

ii) To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of using PoC VL monitoring among children, adolescents and young people living with HIV in East Africa.

iii) To understand the psychosocial life of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV in East Africa and how they predict adherence and viral load suppression

Objectives of Aim 1:

Primary objective i. To estimate the effect of PoC VL monitoring on viral load suppression among children, adolescents and young people living with HIV in East Africa at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.

Secondary objectives i. To describe the effect of PoC VL monitoring on the proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that experiences virological rebound after initial suppression within 6 and 12 months of follow-up.

ii. To describe the effect of PoC VL monitoring on time to initiation of intensive adherence counselling following virological failure among children, adolescents and young people living with HIV.

iii. To estimate the effect of PoC VL monitoring on the proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that experiences change of ART regimen within 6 and 12 months of follow-up.

iv. To determine the effect of PoC VL monitoring on the proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that is retained in care at 6 and 12 months.

Objectives of Aim 2 i. To assess the acceptability of the implementation and scale-up of PoC VL testing and monitoring from the perspective of children, adolescents, young people and their caregivers.

ii. To assess the critical determinants that may affect the implementation of PoC VL testing and monitoring from the perspective of healthcare workers and policy makers.

iii. To assess potential barriers and facilitators to implementation and scale-up of PoC VL testing and monitoring among children, adolescents and young people living with HIV.

iv. To assess the incremental cost-effectiveness of PoC VL from a modified societal perspective using established models, with data collected alongside the implementation of the intervention combined with data estimated based on existing studies.

Objectives of Aim 3 i. To psychometrically validate 'psychosocial life' questionnaires. ii. To iteratively develop and psychometrically validate a novel user-friendly tablet-based 'Psychosocial Life' game that predicts adherence and viral load.

iii. To develop and test a set of clinical micro-interventions for psychosocial support based on existing best practice.

iv. To measure how 'psychosocial life' mediates the PoC effect on adherence and viral load.

v. To test proof-of-concept of the use of the novel 'psychosocial life' game and associated micro-interventions in a clinical setting.

Design: A cluster randomized controlled trial with 14 intervention clusters and 14 control clusters.

Study Sites: Twenty (28) health facilities spread across 4 countries as follows: Uganda (8), Kenya (4), Tanzania (12), and Rwanda (4).

Population: The study will be conducted among three population sub-groups

  1. Study population 1: children, adolescents and young people (≤24 years) living with HIV in participating countries in East Africa.
  2. Study population 2: Care givers/ guardians and treatment supporters of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV in participating countries in East Africa
  3. Study population 3: Health care workers attending to children, adolescents and young people living with HIV, and policy makers.

Study Intervention: PoC VL monitoring using Cepheid Gene Xpert machine Control: Standard-of-care / centralized HIV VL monitoring

Duration: The whole project will take 48 months including 24 months of data collection. Each participant will be followed up for approximately 12 months.

Sample size The study will enroll 956 children, adolescents and young people (6months - 24years); with 476 in 14 intervention clusters and 476 in 14 control clusters (34 participants per cluster). The effect of the intervention and 95% CIs will be estimated using cluster-level summary methods and a power of 80%.

Study outcomes of Aim 1 Primary outcomes i. The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that achieves viral suppression at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.

ii. The time between enrolment into the study and viral suppression.

Secondary outcomes i. The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that experiences virological rebound after initial suppression within 6 and 12 months of follow-up ii. The time between enrolment into the study and initiation of intensive adherence counselling following virological failure.

iii. The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that experiences change of ART regimen within 6 and 12 months of follow-up iv. The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that is retained in care at 6 and 12 months.

Study outcomes of Aim 2 i. Assessed acceptability of the implementation and scale-up of PoC VL testing and monitoring from the perspective of children, adolescents and young people, and their caregivers.

ii. Identified critical determinants that may affect the implementation of PoC VL testing and monitoring from the perspective of healthcare workers and policy makers.

iii. Identified potential barriers and facilitators to implementation and scale-up of PoC VL testing and monitoring among children, adolescents and young people living with HIV.

iv. An assessment of the incremental cost-effectiveness of PoC VL from a modified societal perspective

Study outcomes of Aim 3 i. Quantified and psychometrically validated measurement of the psychosocial life of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV in East Africa ii. A novel psychometrically validated user-friendly tablet-based 'Psychosocial Life' game that predicts viral load based on psychosocial life.

iii. A list of proposed clinical micro-interventions for psychosocial support based on existing best practice.

iv. A model explaining how psychosocial life indicators mediate the PoC effect on adherence and viral load suppression.

v. A proof-of-concept of the use of the novel 'psychosocial life' game and associated micro-interventions in clinical settings.

Statistical Analysis Aim 1

To investigate the effect of the intervention on viral suppression our analysis will be carried out at the cluster level as follows:

  • Reduce clusters to independent observations and provide summary statistics by comparing those in the intervention arm to those in the non-intervention arm.
  • Use fixed effects regression to take into account unobserved time-invariant heterogeneity and the treatment effects across the clusters
  • Analyse the main outcome (viral suppression) using time to event comparison of the two arms from enrolment to failure or completion of the follow-up time (2 years).

Mixed method Analysis Aim 2 Acceptability and feasibility will be investigated using a combined qualitative and quantitative approach, consisting of thematic content analyses of observations, in-depth interviews and focus group discussions, triangulated and generalized with descriptive statistics of survey data. As part of the feasibility study, the impact of a range of values in sensitivity analyses using each of the respective sites' 2020 per capita GDP as a benchmark cost-effectiveness threshold will be evaluated to be able to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of the PoC HIV VL compared to the standard of care. Quality adjusted life years (QALYS) will be calculated based on weights derived from the Global Burden of Disease.

Analysis for Aims 3 Step 1: Determining which psychosocial indicators will be used in the structure equation model on baseline data Pearson correlation analyses will be conducted to examine the strength of associations between all psychosocial life indicator variables and medication adherence. For that, a correlation table will be obtained for looking for multicollinearity. If any two explanatory variables have a Pearson's coefficient of 0.80 or greater one of the variables will be excluded from further analysis as they may measure the same underlying factor.

To determine statistically which psychosocial life indicators have the most predictive power and ascertain the extent to which selected indicators can predict adherence or viral load, a stepwise hierarchical multiple regression will be carried out. Potential predictors will be automatically added into the regression model in steps based on statistical algorithms. Only indicators that significantly improve the overall model fit (R square change) will be retained for the final model of children's psychosocial life.

Step 2: Building a structural equation model and testing how psychosocial life mediates the effect of PoC on adherence and viral load.

Following the RCT design, the goal of this analysis is to measure how psychosocial life indicators mediate the PoC effect on adherence and viral load. An initial hypothetical psychosocial life model will be developed based on variables proved to have the most predictive power obtained from phase one and a synthesis of the empirical literature. The outcome variable will be the change in adherence and viral load separately (difference between baseline and endline data). From the main study (WP1) we assume that PoC improves the medical adherence of children with HIV. We also hypothesize that PoC will improve psychosocial life indicators and that better psychosocial life improves medical adherence and viral load.

Three different types of mediational model will be verified to test the potential mediating role of psychosocial life on the relationship between PoC and medication adherence: (a) a single mediator model, (b) multiple parallel mediator model, and (c) SEM model considering psychosocial life as a latent variable indicated by selected indicators.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV
  • Viral Load
  • Point of Care Monitoring

Keywords

  • Children
  • East Africa
  • Adolescents and young people
03

In context

Lead sponsor

MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 6 months - 24 years
  • Documented evidence of infection
  • Receiving ART for treatment of HIV infection for at least 6 months.
  • Has had a detectable VL of >1000 copies/ml in the last 6 months.
  • Guardian, parent or legal representative able and willing to give voluntary consent and sign/mark an document.
  • Willing and able to comply with protocol requirements/study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any medical conditions that require pausing of ART for more than three months.
  • Potential participant already enrolled in another study which may interfere with the study outcome or participation as per investigator's judgement.
  • Child, adolescent or young person already enrolled and completed follow up in the current study.
  • Any medical or other condition in the potential participant or their parent/ guardian that precludes provision of / assent or that may hinder achieving study objectives as per investigator's judgement.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
956 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    Use of point of care viral load monitoring (initially Abbott PoC devices, then changed to Cepheid Gene Xpert)

    Diagnostic Test: Abbott HIV-1/2 VL Point of care Device

  • No intervention
    Control

    Use of the standard of care viral load monitoring (centralized viral load monitoring)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testAbbott HIV-1/2 VL Point of care Device

    Point of care viral load monitoring

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that achieves viral suppression at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.

    The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that achieves viral suppression at 6 and 12 months of follow-up

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. The time between enrolment into the study and viral suppression.

    The time between enrolment into the study and viral suppression.

    Time frame: 36 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that experiences virological rebound after initial suppression within 6 and 12 months of follow-up

    The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that experiences virological rebound after initial suppression within 6 and 12 months of follow-up

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. The time between enrolment into the study and initiation of intensive adherence counselling following virological failure.

    The time between enrolment into the study and initiation of intensive adherence counselling following virological failure.

    Time frame: 36 months

  3. The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that experiences change of ART regimen within 6 and 12 months of follow-up

    The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that experiences change of ART regimen within 6 and 12 months of follow-up

    Time frame: 36 months

  4. The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that is retained in care at 6 and 12 months.

    The proportion of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV that is retained in care at 6 and 12 months.

    Time frame: 36 months

Other outcomes

  1. The proportion of children, adolescents and young people and their care givers who accept implementation of PoC VL testing and monitoring

    The proportion of children, adolescents and young people and their care givers who accept implementation of PoC VL testing and monitoring.

    Time frame: 36 months

  2. The number of factors which may affect the implementation of PoC VL testing and monitoring from the perspective of healthcare workers and policy makers.

    The number of factors which may affect the implementation of PoC VL testing and monitoring from the perspective of healthcare workers and policy makers.

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. The number of potential barriers and facilitators to implementation and scale-up of PoC VL testing and monitoring identified by children, adolescents and young people living with HIV.

    The number of potential barriers and facilitators to implementation and scale-up of PoC VL testing and monitoring identified by children, adolescents and young people living with HIV.

    Time frame: 36 months

  4. The incremental cost-effectiveness of PoC VL from a modified societal perspective

    The incremental cost-effectiveness of PoC VL from a modified societal perspective

    Time frame: 36 months

  5. A psychometrically validated measurement of the psychosocial life of children, adolescents and young people living with HIV in East Africa

    Validated psychosocial life questionnaire The psychosocial life questionnaire consists of eight scales measuring different psychosocial indicators (1.motivational readiness scale, 2.Social support scale, 3.Self-efficacy scale, 4.Stigma scale, 5.Patient health questionnaire-9, 6.General anxiety disorder-7, 7. Alcohol use and 8.Quality of life) and only individual scales will be validated. Validation of three scales will be prioritized (1. Stigma scale, 2. Patient health questionnaire-9 and 3. General anxiety disorder-7) measuring three psychosocial indicators (stigma, depression and anxiety) which are the most important predictors of poor medication adherence in East Africa). Each scale, it will be possible to compute the minimum and maximum scores and the higher the score the worse the psychosocial issue. The minimum - maximum score 18-54 , 9-36 and 7-28 for the Stigma scale, Patient health questionnaire-9 and General anxiety disorder-7, respectively.

    Time frame: From 12-36 months

  6. A novel psychometrically validated user-friendly tablet-based 'Psychosocial Life' game that predicts viral load based on psychosocial life.

    The psychosocial life game will be developed from eight scales of psychosocial life questionnaire; meaning that the psychosocial life game will consist of eight components / sessions, each measuring a specific psychosocial indicator (motivational readiness, social support, self-efficacy, stigma, depression, anxiety, alcohol use or quality of life) predictive of poor medication adherence and viral load suppression. The psychosocial life game will be deployed to HIV clinics and will serve to diagnose a need for psychosocial support among users (adolescents and young people). The game will also be validated against the observed psychosocial needs of the users (i.e. adolescents and youth).

    Time frame: From 36-48 months

  7. A list of proposed clinical micro-interventions for psychosocial support based on existing best practice.

    The List of micro-interventions for psychosocial support services will be identified from analysis results of qualitative data collected from the four countries on 'best practices on psychosocial support services provided to children, adolescents and young people living with HIV in East Africa.' The analysis report of qualitative data collected on feasibility and acceptability will be reviewed to identify micro-interventions.

    Time frame: From 36-48 months

  8. A model explaining how psychosocial life indicators mediate the PoC effect on adherence and viral load suppression.

    Explanatory model of the effect of psychosocial life indicators on the PoC effect on adherence and viral load suppression. In this study, psychosocial life indicators (motivational readiness, social support, stigma, depression, anxiety, alcohol use, self-efficacy, quality of life) are mediating indicators between PoC (dependent / explanatory variable) and medication adherence and viral load suppression (outcome variables). Before conducting analysis to construct the model, there will be a need to first assess if there is PoC effect. Due to small sample size, there will be a need to first check if there is an effect of PoC on viral load suppression.

    Time frame: From 36-48 months

  9. A proof-of-concept of the use of the novel 'psychosocial life' game and associated micro-interventions in clinical settings.

    Proof-of-concept of the use of the novel 'psychosocial life' game. The proof-of-concept will be produced in form of report a mixed methods study that will be conducted to assess feasibility and acceptability of the use of psychosocial life game considering the perspective of end users

    Time frame: From 36-48 months

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Kenya Medical Research Institute
    Kisumu, Kenya
  • University of Rwanda
    Kigali, Rwanda
  • Management and Development for Health
    Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  • National Institute of Medical Research
    Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
  • Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute
    Moshi, Tanzania
  • MRC/UVRI and LSHTM
    Entebbe, Uganda
  • Unhro/ Uvri
    Entebbe, Uganda
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Joint United Nations Programme on, H.A. and H.I.V.A. Joint United Nations Programme on, 90-90-90: an ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic. Geneva: UNAIDS
  • UNAIDS UNAIDS data 2020. Annual Report, 2020.
  • Joint United Nations Programme on, H.A., Fast-track: ending the AIDS epidemic by 2030. Geneva: UNAIDS.
  • Humphrey JM, Genberg BL, Keter A, Musick B, Apondi E, Gardner A, Hogan JW, Wools-Kaloustian K. Viral suppression among children and their caregivers living with HIV in western Kenya. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Apr;22(4):e25272. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25272. PubMed 30983148 ↗
  • Agolory S, de Klerk M, Baughman AL, Sawadogo S, Mutenda N, Pentikainen N, Shoopala N, Wolkon A, Taffa N, Mutandi G, Jonas A, Mengistu AT, Dzinotyiweyi E, Prybylski D, Hamunime N, Medley A. Low Case Finding Among Men and Poor Viral Load Suppression Among Adolescents Are Impeding Namibia's Ability to Achieve UNAIDS 90-90-90 Targets. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 11;5(9):ofy200. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy200. eCollection 2018 Sep. PubMed 30211248 ↗
  • Gill MM, Hoffman HJ, Bobrow EA, Mugwaneza P, Ndatimana D, Ndayisaba GF, Baribwira C, Guay L, Asiimwe A. Detectable Viral Load in Late Pregnancy among Women in the Rwanda Option B+ PMTCT Program: Enrollment Results from the Kabeho Study. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0168671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168671. eCollection 2016. PubMed 28006001 ↗
  • Ntlantsana V, Hift RJ, Mphatswe WP. HIV viraemia during pregnancy in women receiving preconception antiretroviral therapy in KwaDukuza, KwaZulu-Natal. South Afr J HIV Med. 2019 Apr 10;20(1):847. doi: 10.4102/sajhivmed.v20i1.847. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31061722 ↗
  • Bulage L, Ssewanyana I, Nankabirwa V, Nsubuga F, Kihembo C, Pande G, Ario AR, Matovu JK, Wanyenze RK, Kiyaga C. Factors Associated with Virological Non-suppression among HIV-Positive Patients on Antiretroviral Therapy in Uganda, August 2014-July 2015. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 May 3;17(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2428-3. PubMed 28468608 ↗
  • Nabukeera S, Kagaayi J, Makumbi FE, Mugerwa H, Matovu JKB. Factors associated with virological non-suppression among HIV-positive children receiving antiretroviral therapy at the Joint Clinical Research Centre in Lubowa, Kampala Uganda. PLoS One. 2021 Jan 27;16(1):e0246140. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246140. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33503074 ↗
  • RBC, Rwanda Population-based HIV Impact Assessment, R.B. Centre, Editor. 2020, RPHIA 2018-2019.
  • UNAIDS, Understanding fast†track: Accelerating action to end the AIDS epidemic by 2030. 2015, UNAIDS Geneva.
  • Mwau M, Syeunda CA, Adhiambo M, Bwana P, Kithinji L, Mwende J, Oyiengo L, Sirengo M, Boeke CE. Scale-up of Kenya's national HIV viral load program: Findings and lessons learned. PLoS One. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190659. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29324811 ↗
  • El-Sadr WM, Rabkin M, Nkengasong J, Birx DL. Realizing the potential of routine viral load testing in sub-Saharan Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Nov;20 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):e25010. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25010. No abstract available. PubMed 29130621 ↗
  • Mangone E, C.C., Johns B, Mudhune V, & Avila C, Economic Evaluation of Nationally Scaled Point-of-Care Diagnostic Platforms for Viral Load Monitoring in Kenya, U. Report, Editor. 2018.
  • Zhang J, Lan T, Lu Y. Translating in vitro diagnostics from centralized laboratories to point-of-care locations using commercially-available handheld meters. Trends Analyt Chem. 2020 Mar;124:115782. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115782. Epub 2019 Dec 23. PubMed 32194293 ↗
  • Boeke CE, Joseph J, Atem C, Banda C, Coulibaly KD, Doi N, Gunda A, Kandulu J, Kiernan B, Kingwara L, Maokola W, Maparo T, Mbaye RN, Mtumbuka E, Mziray J, Ngugi C, Nkakulu J, Nzuobontane D, Okomo Assoumo MC, Peter T, Rioja MR, Sacks JA, Simbi R, Vojnov L, Khan SA. Evaluation of near point-of-care viral load implementation in public health facilities across seven countries in sub-Saharan Africa. J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Jan;24(1):e25663. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25663. PubMed 33455081 ↗
  • Moyo S, Mohammed T, Wirth KE, Prague M, Bennett K, Holme MP, Mupfumi L, Sebogodi P, Moraka NO, Boleo C, Maphorisa CN, Seraise B, Gaseitsiwe S, Musonda RM, van Widenfelt E, Powis KM, Gaolathe T, Tchetgen Tchetgen EJ, Makhema JM, Essex M, Lockman S, Novitsky V. Point-of-Care Cepheid Xpert HIV-1 Viral Load Test in Rural African Communities Is Feasible and Reliable. J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Dec;54(12):3050-3055. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01594-16. Epub 2016 Oct 12. PubMed 27733636 ↗
  • Bwana P, Ageng'o J, Danda J, Mbugua J, Handa A, Mwau M. Performance and usability of mPIMA HIV 1/2 viral load test in point of care settings in Kenya. J Clin Virol. 2019 Dec;121:104202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.104202. Epub 2019 Oct 23. PubMed 31715524 ↗
  • Drain PK, Dorward J, Violette LR, Quame-Amaglo J, Thomas KK, Samsunder N, Ngobese H, Mlisana K, Moodley P, Donnell D, Barnabas RV, Naidoo K, Abdool Karim SS, Celum C, Garrett N. Point-of-care HIV viral load testing combined with task shifting to improve treatment outcomes (STREAM): findings from an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet HIV. 2020 Apr;7(4):e229-e237. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(19)30402-3. Epub 2020 Feb 24. PubMed 32105625 ↗
  • Nicholas S, Poulet E, Wolters L, Wapling J, Rakesh A, Amoros I, Szumilin E, Gueguen M, Schramm B. Point-of-care viral load monitoring: outcomes from a decentralized HIV programme in Malawi. J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Aug;22(8):e25387. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25387. PubMed 31441242 ↗
  • Villa G, Abdullahi A, Owusu D, Smith C, Azumah M, Sayeed L, Austin H, Awuah D, Beloukas A, Chadwick D, Phillips R, Geretti AM. Determining virological suppression and resuppression by point-of-care viral load testing in a HIV care setting in sub-Saharan Africa. EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Jan 5;18:100231. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.12.001. eCollection 2020 Jan. PubMed 31922120 ↗
  • Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, Bakken S, Kaplan CP, Squiers L, Fabrizio C, Fernandez M. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009 May;36(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002. PubMed 19362699 ↗
  • Fleuren MA, Paulussen TG, Van Dommelen P, Van Buuren S. Towards a measurement instrument for determinants of innovations. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014 Oct;26(5):501-10. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu060. Epub 2014 Jun 20. PubMed 24951511 ↗
  • Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of health care interventions: A theoretical framework and proposed research agenda. Br J Health Psychol. 2018 Sep;23(3):519-531. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12295. Epub 2018 Feb 16. No abstract available. PubMed 29453791 ↗
  • Baral S, Logie CH, Grosso A, Wirtz AL, Beyrer C. Modified social ecological model: a tool to guide the assessment of the risks and risk contexts of HIV epidemics. BMC Public Health. 2013 May 17;13:482. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-482. PubMed 23679953 ↗
  • Fazeli PL, Turan JM, Budhwani H, Smith W, Raper JL, Mugavero MJ, Turan B. Moment-to-moment within-person associations between acts of discrimination and internalized stigma in people living with HIV: An experience sampling study. Stigma Health. 2017 Aug;2(3):216-228. doi: 10.1037/sah0000051. Epub 2016 Aug 8. PubMed 28966982 ↗
  • WHO, Child and Adolescent Health and Development, in Progress Report, W.H. Organization, Editor. 2006.
  • Decety J. Empathy in Medicine: What It Is, and How Much We Really Need It. Am J Med. 2020 May;133(5):561-566. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.012. Epub 2020 Jan 15. PubMed 31954114 ↗
  • Mariani D, de Azevedo MCVM, Vasconcellos I, Ribeiro L, Alves C, Ferreira OC Jr, Tanuri A. The performance of a new point-of-care HIV virus load technology to identify patients failing antiretroviral treatment. J Clin Virol. 2020 Jan;122:104212. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.104212. Epub 2019 Nov 9. PubMed 31765957 ↗
  • Meggi B, Bollinger T, Zitha A, Mudenyanga C, Vubil A, Mutsaka D, Nhachigule C, Mabunda N, Loquiha O, Kroidl A, Jani IV. Performance of a True Point-of-Care Assay for HIV-1/2 Viral Load Measurement at Antenatal and Postpartum Services. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2021 May 1;87(1):693-699. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002621. PubMed 33399310 ↗
  • Vasconcellos I, Mariani D, Azevedo MCVM, Ferreira OC Jr, Tanuri A. Development and validation of a simple and rapid way to generate low volume of plasma to be used in point-of-care HIV virus load technologies. Braz J Infect Dis. 2020 Jan-Feb;24(1):30-33. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2019.10.010. Epub 2019 Nov 21. PubMed 31760036 ↗
  • Gavina K, Franco LC, Khan H, Lavik JP, Relich RF. Molecular point-of-care devices for the diagnosis of infectious diseases in resource-limited settings - A review of the current landscape, technical challenges, and clinical impact. J Clin Virol. 2023 Dec;169:105613. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105613. Epub 2023 Oct 18. PubMed 37866094 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual Participant Data will be de-identified so as to make it anonymous. This will then be reported either for individuals (e.g. quotations from qualitative interviews) or for study participants as a group.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2022 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 32 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 1, 2021
First posted
Sep 17, 2021
StartActual
Aug 19, 2022
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 1, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05048472
Lead sponsor
MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit
Collaborators
Karolinska Institutet, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre, Tanzania, Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania, Kenya Medical Research Institute, University of Rwanda
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 17, 2021
Start date
Aug 19, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2025
Completion
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Jul 1, 2025

Study contacts

Pontiano Kaleebu
principal investigator · London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion