CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT05046639Updated Mar 3, 2025Results posted

Sciatic Block in Contralateral Limb Phantom and Residual Limb Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of 10 mL 2% lidocaine and 10 mL preservative free saline in Pain and Amputation, sponsored by Northwestern University. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-03.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Principal investigator is leaving the university.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Participants with chronic, refractory phantom limb pain (PLP) or residual limb pain (RLP) for more than 6 months will be enrolled in this clinical trial. Aim: Define the attributable pain relief and functional improvement in participants with PLP/RLP after contralateral limb sciatic nerve block. Also, contribute to the basic science understanding of the crossed-withdraw reflex by demonstrating a known animal model phenomenon in human participants. Hypothesis: Contralateral limb sciatic nerve anesthetic block with 2% lidocaine provides immediate clinically meaningful pain reduction, defined as the proportion of patients with at least 50% improvement in numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score in PLP/RLP when compared to sham.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain
  • Amputation

Keywords

  • Pain
  • Amputation
  • Phantom Pain
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

    1. Age greater than 18 years of age at day of enrollment
    1. Lower extremity amputation performed more than 12 months before study enrollment
    1. PLP/RLP in affected amputated limb > 4 on numeric rating scale 26 (NRS26)
    1. Pain duration of more than 6 months despite a trial of conservative therapies for at least 2 months, including oral medications, topical medicines, physical therapy, and physical modalities (i.e., heat, cold, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, phonophoresis)
    1. Willingness to undergo image guided diagnostic nerve block

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Refusal / inability to participate or provide consent
    1. Contraindications to diagnostic nerve block
    1. Non-neurogenic source of PLP/RLP
    1. Current opioid use > 50 morphine milligram equivalents per day
    1. Any interventional pain treatment in the residual limb within the last 30 days
    1. Severe uncontrolled medical condition (i.e., hypertensive crisis, decompensated hypothyroidism)
    1. Use of investigational pain drug within past 30 days or other concurrent clinical trial enrollment
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1 participant (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Group 2% Lidocaine first, then Sham Preservative Free Saline

    Image guided sciatic nerve anesthetic block of the contralateral limb with an injection of 10 mL 2% lidocaine. Crossover: Image guided sciatic nerve anesthetic block of the contralateral limb with 10 mL preservative-free saline. Crossover treatment will occur 5 days after the first block.

    Drug: 10 mL 2% lidocaine

  • Placebo comparator
    Sham Preservative Free Saline first, then Treatment Group 2% Lidocaine

    Image guided sciatic nerve anesthetic block of the contralateral limb with an injection of 10 mL preservative free saline. Crossover: Image guided sciatic nerve anesthetic block of the contralateral limb with an injection of 10 mL 2% lidocaine. Crossover treatment will occur 5 days after the first block.

    Drug: 10 mL preservative free saline

Interventions

  • Drug10 mL 2% lidocaine

    Image guided sciatic nerve anesthetic block of the contralateral limb with an injection of 10 mL 2% lidocaine. Crossover treatment 5 days later using image guided sciatic nerve anesthetic block of the contralateral limb with 10 mL preservative-free saline.

  • Drug10 mL preservative free saline

    Image guided sciatic nerve anesthetic block of the contralateral limb with an injection of 10 mL preservative free saline. Crossover treatment 5 days later using Image guided sciatic nerve anesthetic block of the contralateral limb with an injection of 10 mL 2% lidocaine.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Reporting ≥ 50% Improvement in NRS Pain Score

    Proportions of Participants Reporting ≥ 50% Improvement in NRS pain score on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) from baseline at 15 minutes in treatment and sham groups.

    Time frame: 15 minutes after treatment

07

Results

Posted Mar 3, 2025
Limitations and caveats
Study closed early due to PI leaving institution.

Participant flow

One subject was screened and enrolled in this project at a dedicated Pain Center.

First Intervention
Participant flow — First Intervention
MilestoneTreatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free Saline
Started01
Completed01
Not completed00
Washout Period 5 Days
Participant flow — Washout Period 5 Days
MilestoneTreatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free Saline
Started01
Completed01
Not completed00
Second Intervention (Crossover)
Participant flow — Second Intervention (Crossover)
MilestoneTreatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free Saline
Started01
Completed01
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Reporting ≥ 50% Improvement in NRS Pain Score

Proportions of Participants Reporting ≥ 50% Improvement in NRS pain score on a scale of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable) from baseline at 15 minutes in treatment and sham groups.

Time frame:
15 minutes after treatment
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Reporting ≥ 50% Improvement in NRS Pain Score
ParticipantsTreatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free Saline
Number of Participants Reporting ≥ 50% Improvement in NRS Pain Score11

Adverse events

Collected over 24 hours after procedure.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Group 2% Lidocaine0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)
Sham Preservative Free Saline0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)0/1 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Project terminated early. PI leaving institution.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Treatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free SalineTotal
Mean—55 (55 to 55)55 (55 to 55)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free SalineTotal
Female011
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Treatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free SalineTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American011
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Treatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free SalineTotal
United States—11
Height (Inches)
Height (Inches)(Inches)Treatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free SalineTotal
Mean—66 (66 to 66)66 (66 to 66)
Weight Kilograms
Weight Kilograms(Kilograms)Treatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free SalineTotal
Mean—97 (97 to 97)97 (97 to 97)
Level of Amputation
Level of Amputation(Participants)Treatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free SalineTotal
Above Knee Amputation011
Below Knee Amputation000
Current Pain Level
Current Pain Level(Score on a scale)Treatment Group 2% LidocaineSham Preservative Free SalineTotal
Mean—6 (6 to 6)6 (6 to 6)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Richardson C, Glenn S, Horgan M, Nurmikko T. A prospective study of factors associated with the presence of phantom limb pain six months after major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. J Pain. 2007 Oct;8(10):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.05.007. Epub 2007 Jul 12. Erratum In: J Pain. 2007 Dec;8(12):998. PubMed 17631056 ↗
  • Cohen SP, Gilmore CA, Rauck RL, Lester DD, Trainer RJ, Phan T, Kapural L, North JM, Crosby ND, Boggs JW. Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Following Amputation. Mil Med. 2019 Jul 1;184(7-8):e267-e274. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz114. PubMed 31111898 ↗
  • Ephraim PL, Wegener ST, MacKenzie EJ, Dillingham TR, Pezzin LE. Phantom pain, residual limb pain, and back pain in amputees: results of a national survey. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Oct;86(10):1910-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.031. PubMed 16213230 ↗
  • Hanley MA, Ehde DM, Jensen M, Czerniecki J, Smith DG, Robinson LR. Chronic pain associated with upper-limb loss. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;88(9):742-51; quiz 752, 779. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181b306ec. PubMed 19692791 ↗
  • Kooijman CM, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, Elzinga A, van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and phantom sensations in upper limb amputees: an epidemiological study. Pain. 2000 Jul;87(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00264-5. PubMed 10863043 ↗
  • Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, Stewart R, van der Schans CP. Phantom pain and risk factors: a multivariate analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002 Dec;24(6):578-85. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(02)00538-9. PubMed 12551807 ↗
  • Yin Y, Zhang L, Xiao H, Wen CB, Dai YE, Yang G, Zuo YX, Liu J. The pre-amputation pain and the postoperative deafferentation are the risk factors of phantom limb pain: a clinical survey in a sample of Chinese population. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017 May 26;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0359-6. PubMed 28549447 ↗
  • Desmond DM, Maclachlan M. Prevalence and characteristics of phantom limb pain and residual limb pain in the long term after upper limb amputation. Int J Rehabil Res. 2010 Sep;33(3):279-82. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e328336388d. PubMed 20101187 ↗
  • Schley MT, Wilms P, Toepfner S, Schaller HP, Schmelz M, Konrad CJ, Birbaumer N. Painful and nonpainful phantom and stump sensations in acute traumatic amputees. J Trauma. 2008 Oct;65(4):858-64. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31812eed9e. PubMed 18849803 ↗
  • Richardson C, Glenn S, Nurmikko T, Horgan M. Incidence of phantom phenomena including phantom limb pain 6 months after major lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Clin J Pain. 2006 May;22(4):353-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ajp.0000177793.01415.bd. PubMed 16691088 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 14, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 3, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05046639
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 26, 2023
Completion
Jul 26, 2023
Results posted
Mar 3, 2025
Last update
Mar 3, 2025

Study contacts

Charles Hogue, MD
study director · Northwestern University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion