ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05035342FECESUpdated May 25, 2025

Fecal Transplantation to Eradicate Colonizing Emergent Superbugs

A Phase 3 interventional study of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) capsules and Placebo capsules in Enterobacteriaceae Infections and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 11 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 105 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-25.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Phase 3, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 10 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
214
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 105 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 12 studies in Enterobacteriaceae Infections with a site in France — 3 open to participants now, 3 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Enterobacteriaceae Infections · France.

Started
2024
the only one that year
Phase 3
Only one
of the 12
Registered
8th of 12
by date
Lead sponsor
1 of 12
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Among the 12 studies in Enterobacteriaceae Infections with a site in France, this one is the only one that started in 2024, is the only one in phase 3, and was the 8th registered.

Enterobacteriaceae Infections

59 studies on the registry are indexed under Enterobacteriaceae Infections; 14 are open to participants now.

Browse Enterobacteriaceae Infections studies →

Open to participants now

3 of the 12 studies in Enterobacteriaceae Infections with a site in France are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 3 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in France have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in France →

Who these studies take

Of the 9 Enterobacteriaceae Infections studies recruiting now, 4 set no upper age limit and 2 stop at 75 or younger; 2 take children under 18; 2 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 105 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 12 studies in Enterobacteriaceae Infections with a site in France, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Carriage of multi-drug and extensive-drug resistant Gram negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) is associated with an increased risk of infections by these bacteria for the carriers and a high risk of dissemination both in the healthcare setting and the community; the main MDR-GNB reservoir is the fecal microbiota. To prevent both infections and dissemination, effective measures to decolonize subjects carrying MDR-GNB are urgently needed. Animal models, case reports and cohort studies suggest fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) may be efficient for MDR-GNB decolonization.

Read the detailed description

The issue of antibiotic resistance is considered as one of the major Public Health threats of the 21th century by the World Health Organisation (WHO). Given the rapid increase in the dissemination of multi-drug resistant organisms globally, the real implications of spreading drug resistance will be felt the world over, with developing countries and large emerging nations bearing the brunt of this problem. Routine surgeries and minor infections will become life-threatening once again and the hard won victories against infectious diseases of the last fifty years will be jeopardised. Hospital stays and expenses will increase significantly. Drug resistant infections are already on the rise with numbers suggesting that up to 50,000 lives are lost each year to antibiotic-resistant infections in Europe and the US alone. Globally, at least 700,000 die each year of drug resistance in bacterial infections. Estimates have found that antibiotic resistance may kill more than cancer in 2050, with figures reaching 10 million deaths a year globally, if nothing is done.

In this context, one of the most worrying problems is the dramatic increase in infections caused by multi-drug resistant Gram Negative bacteria (MDR-GNB), including extended spectrum β-lactamase and/or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E and CRE) with few effective therapeutic options remaining in the armamentarium of clinicians. There is a striking lack of new antimicrobial agents especially against MDR-GNB while dissemination of these MDR-GNB is accelerating. The rising epidemic of CRE is especially worrying. Southern European countries such as Italy and Greece are already at epidemic levels of CRE infections, which are associated with much higher death rates and are more expensive to treat because of the lack of effective non-toxic antibiotics.

Even if new agents were discovered, the lead in time is considerable as there are no truly new agents expected on the market in the short or medium term. Alternative effective measures to contain resistance and limit the spread of MDR-GNB are therefore urgently needed. The gut microbiota is the main reservoir of MDR-GNB. Patients carrying MDR-GNB are at higher risk of clinical infections with their own bacteria and of dissemination in the community and in the hospital settings. In the last 10 years, the number of MDR-GNB carriers has increased strikingly (for instance, one report found a 10-fold increase in France from 2006-2011 from 0.6% to 6% of subjects in the community; another found a 12% ESBL-E colonization rate in Parisian hospitals upon admission in 2015) and continues to rise. Finding efficient decolonization strategies is urgent to attempt to limit the risk of infection at the individual level and the spread of MDR-GNB at the population level.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), which has been shown to be highly effective for the treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections (CDI), has also been suggested as a decolonization strategy for patients carrying MDR-GNB: animal models and several clinical case reports suggest that this strategy may be interesting to decolonize MDR-GNB carriers. To date, the question of whether FMT may be efficient to decolonize MDR-GNB carriers in human is not resolved. Because decolonization may also be spontaneous, performing a randomized controlled trial is essential to answer this question.

The hypothesis for this study is that FMT may be efficient to decolonize patients carrying MDR-GNB in their gut microbiota. To determine whether this hypothesis is true, we shall conduct a phase III randomized controlled trial comparing capsule-delivered FMT with a placebo to decolonize subjects carrying either CRE or ESBL-E.

Elimination of carriage should benefit directly the individual patient by preventing infections with these resistant organisms and limiting isolation precautions, which impacts their quality of care, the possibilities of transfer to other healthcare settings (such as rehabilitation centres) and their psychological health. Additionally, the elimination of MDR-GNB carriage should benefit the community by decreasing the risk of inter-individual transmission in particular in the healthcare setting. For this intervention, we will use frozen capsules rather than nasogastric infusion or colonoscopy, as they limit adverse events, facilitate donor screening, allow for outpatient treatment, and are adapted to treat large populations. Thanks to the above-mentioned reasons, capsules are becoming the standard-of-care for FMT. In the context of the major threat that antibiotic resistance in Gram negatives carries, both on an individual and a collective point-of-view; this is a highly important question.

03

Conditions studied

  • Enterobacteriaceae Infections
  • Fecal Microbiota Transplantation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 105 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria for patients:

  • ≥ 18 years and \< 105 years
  • Patient with at least one positive rectal swab for enterobacteria:

extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), or who have had an ESBL-E or CRE infection within the year For ESBL-E carriers: an ESBL-E infection within the year is mandatory

  • Patient able to take 50 capsules orally in a day and without swallowing disorders

Inclusion Criteria for healthy volunteers donors:

  • Healthy subjects ≥ 18 years and \< 50 years
  • \< 30 kg/m\^2
  • Regular bowel movement defined as at least 1 stool every 2 daysand maximum than 3 stools per day

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria for patients:

  • Current antibiotic treatment with te exception of long term antibiotic prophylaxis (duration of at least 3 months/year)
  • Patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding during the study
  • Women of who are unwilling or unable to use an acceptable method of [such as oral contraceptives, other hormonal contraceptives (vaginal products, skin patches, or implanted or injectable products), or mechanical products such as an intrauterine device or barrier methods (condoms)] to avoid pregnancy for the entire study
  • Patient under legal protection
  • Participation in another interventional study
  • Non-affiliation to a social security scheme
  • Patient under AME
  • Refusal to participate to the study

Exclusion Criteria for healthy volunteers donors:

  • Any history of or current proctologic disease or any acute condition, which in the investigator's judgment could harm the volunteer and/or compromise or limit the evaluation of the protocol or data analysis (for details, please see protocol)
  • Subject under legal protection
  • Participation in any other interventional study
  • No-affiliation to a social security scheme
  • Subject under AME
  • Refusal to participate to the study

Randomization criteria:

  • Patient colonized with a carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and/or colonized with an extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) at inclusion on stool culture
  • Patient with an ESBL-E infection in the previous 12 months (only for participants no colonized with CRE).
  • Compatible transplant (FMT) based on patient's serological profile (CMV/EBV) available
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
214 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Fecal microbiota Transplant (FMT)

    Fecal microbiota Transplant (FMT) prepared from the stools of healthy donors diluted in 80% glycerol used as bacterial cryoprotectant, blenderized, sieved and centrifuged (4°C, 4000 tr/min, 20 min) and manufactured in capsules (n=50 capsules corresponding to approximately 50 grams of stool; 50 in one day).

    Biological: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) capsules

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo of FMT

    FMT vehicle (solution of saline (NaCl 0.9%)) with 80% glycerol (storage in the same conditions as preparation for FMT experimental group) administered at the same volume and same time point as the experimental group.

    Biological: Placebo capsules

Interventions

  • BiologicalFecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) capsules

    Donated fecal matter will be sequentially diluted in 80% glycerol used as bacterial cryoprotectant, blenderized, sieved and centrifuged (4°C, 4000 tr/min, 20 min). The pellet is resuspended and manually pipetted into size 0 capsules (650 μL), which are closed and then secondarily sealed in size 00 capsules (hypromellose capsules, DR caps from Capsugel®, MA). Each capsule contains 1g ± 0,1g of fecal suspension corresponding to 0.5 to 0.8g of native stool. Capsules will be stored frozen at -80°C for up to 24 months pending use. The stability of biodiversity and viability of the frozen microbiota was regularly verified to ensure the efficacy of the transplantation (personal data).

  • BiologicalPlacebo capsules

    The "placebo" FMT capsules will be performed with the final dilution solution, ie the 80% glycerol solution used as a cryoprotectant. This solution will be double encapsulated like the FMT capsules.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine whether FMT with frozen capsules is effective for decolonization of MDR-GNB.

    Proportion of subjects not carrying MDR-GNB (neither ESBL-E nor CRE) at day 30 (±10 days) after randomization as determined by culture methods

    Time frame: 30 days post-randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prevention of infections

    Occurrence of a clinical infection with ESBL-E or CRE, between randomization and day 90

    Time frame: 90 days post-randomization

  2. Prevention of infections

    Number of days of use of systemic antibiotics between randomization and day 90

    Time frame: 90 days post-randomization

  3. Prevention of infections

    Number of days of isolation precautions during the hospital stay

    Time frame: up to 2 years post-randomization

  4. Prevention of infections

    Length of stay in hospital

    Time frame: up to 2 years post-randomization

  5. Safety and tolerability of FMT

    Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Time frame: 2 years post-randomization

  6. Microbiology

    Proportion of subjects not carrying MDR-GNB (neither ESBL-E nor CRE) at day 90 after randomization

    Time frame: 90 days post-randomization

  7. Microbiology

    Relative abundance of resistant strains over the total Enterobacteriaceae (expressed as a ratio)

    Time frame: Baseline (inclusion), 30 and 90 days post-randomization

  8. Microbiology

    Concentration (expressed in colony-forming units per gram of feces) of resistant strains

    Time frame: Baseline (inclusion), 30 and 90 days post-randomization

  9. Microbiology

    Characteristics of ESBL-E/CPE strains (species identification, resistance mechanisms)

    Time frame: Baseline (inclusion), 30 and 90 days post-randomization

  10. Microbiology

    16S microbiome analysis, analysis in terms of diversity and operational taxonomic unit (OTU) presence (relative to baseline)

    Time frame: Baseline (inclusion), 30 and 90 days post-randomization

07

Study locations

1 of 11 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2026, 28 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 31, 2021
First posted
Sep 5, 2021
StartActual
Jan 11, 2024
Primary completionEst.
May 2026
CompletionEst.
Apr 2028
Last update
May 25, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 25, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05035342
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 5, 2021
Start date
Jan 11, 2024
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 25, 2025

Study contacts

Victoire De Lastours, MD, PhD
Contact
victoire.de-lastours@aphp.fr
+33 1 40 87 52 27
Harry Sokol, MD, PhD
Contact
harry.sokol@aphp.fr
+33 1 49 28 24 73
Victoire De Lastours, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion