ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05034328Updated Jan 20, 2025Results posted

Symbiofilm Trial in Allergic Kids (SYMBIOFILM-TAK)

An observational study in Common Cold and Allergy, sponsored by Lallemand Pharma AG. Completed at 15 sites in Poland. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 10 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-20.

Sponsored by Lallemand Pharma AG · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
186
Ages
6 Years to 10 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Healsea® Children is a seawater-based nasal spray supplemented with a natural Symbiofilm® extract (0.02%) isolated from marine bacteria. Symbiofilm has antibiofilm activity against various bacterial pathogens involved in respiratory tract infections.Healsea® Children is indicated in the cleaning and moistening of nasal mucosa during common cold and rhinitis for children above 6 years.

This non interventional post-market clinical investigation aimed to confirm the benefit of Healsea® Children in real life setting in children with perennial allergy who are more prone to common cold.

Read the detailed description

Healsea® Children is a seawater-based nasal spray supplemented with a natural Symbiofilm® extract (0.02%) isolated from marine bacteria. Symbiofilm® is an exopolymeric composition with emulsifying properties, in vitro antibiofilm activity and detachment properties against various bacterial pathogens involved in respiratory tract infections. Symbiofilm® has no bacteriostatic nor bactericidal activities. Healsea® Children is indicated in the cleaning and moistening of nasal mucosa during common cold and rhinitis.

The common cold is an acute viral infection of the upper respiratory tract, involving, to variable degrees, sneezing, nasal congestion and discharge (rhinorrhea), sore throat, cough, low-grade fever, headache, and malaise (1). It can be caused by members of several families of viruses; the most common are rhinoviruses. Acute viral rhinitis is generally self-limiting. In children where the illness is not self-limiting and extends beyond 7-10 days, many agree that a bacterial infection is likely (1). Bacterial over infections and progression to a chronic state are favoured by the formation of biofilms, which facilitate bacterial growth and persistence as well as reducing antibiotic efficacy (2-3).

Allergic diseases may play a particular role in promoting the respiratory infection recurrences (4). The physiological immune response is impaired in allergic subjects and allergic inflammation favours predisposition to respiratory infections. Subjects with allergic disorders may have functional defect of type 1 immune response that is relevant in fighting infections (5-6).

Allergic rhinitis (AR) may affect up to 40% of the paediatric population. Nasal symptoms are caused by exposure to an allergen to which a patient is sensitized.

AR is characterized by typical nasal symptoms and immunoglobulin E (IgE) -mediated inflammation. The allergic inflammatory process releases many cytokines and other proinflammatory proteins. Inflammation caused by nasal allergy leads to obstruction, fluid accumulation and acute disease. If these diseases are unsuccessfully treated, a chronic state of inflammation, obstruction, and infection develops that can cause mucosal damage and, ultimately, chronic disease (7).

For these reasons, the paediatric IgE-dependent allergic population that is more prone to common cold represents a suitable target for Healsea® Children (8-9).

During this prospective post-market clinical investigation, IgE-dependent allergic children with early symptoms of infectious rhinitis will be followed, children being treated with Healsea® Children on top of common cold conventional therapies or with conventional therapies only (excluded nasal irrigation).

Conventional therapies for non-complicated infectious rhinitis are symptomatic but are not without side effects. For example, decongestant use can increase blood pressure, antihistamine intake is associated with drowsiness.

Healsea® Children represents an interesting alternative that can not only improve acute infectious rhinitis symptomatology but could also limit the complication and progression to chronic state.

This non interventional post-market clinical investigation aimed to confirm the benefit of Healsea® Children in a real life setting in children with perennial allergy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Common Cold
  • Allergy

Keywords

  • Infectious rhinitis, nasal irrigation, perennial allergy
03

In context

Common Cold

219 studies on the registry are indexed under Common Cold; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 186 is above the median of 114 across 25 observational studies indexed under Common Cold.

Browse Common Cold studies →

Lead sponsor

Lallemand Pharma AG is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 10 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population comprises children 6 to10 years old with perennial allergy and early symptoms of common cold.

The recruitment will be competitive in both group, exposed to Healsea® Children or not exposed to Healsea® Children. However, when 100 patients will be recruited in one group, the recruitment will be stopped in this group but will continue in the other group until 100 patients to be enrolled.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male/Female subjects ≥6 and ≤10-year-old
  2. AsIgE (Allergy specific IgE) ≥ class 2 (RAST) or positive prick test for at least one perennial allergen
  3. Acute infectious rhinitis/rhinosinusitis for ≤48h before trial entry
  4. Patient presenting with fever ≥ 37.5 °C at screening
  5. Symptoms of headache, muscle ache, chilliness, sore throat, blocked nose, runny nose, cough, sneezing with a total score ≤9 (according to a physician-rated symptom score; scale: 0 to 3 [0: no symptom to 3: severe intensity])
  6. At least one of these symptoms: sore throat, runny nose or blocked nose (i.e., with a score ≥1)
  7. Written consent obtained from parent/legal guardians
  8. Written assent obtained from patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Known /allergy to any component of the test device
  2. Medical history that is considered by the investigator as a reason for non-inclusion,
  3. Severe nasal septum deviation or other condition that could cause nasal obstruction such as the presence of nasal polyps
  4. History of nasal or sinus surgery that in the opinion of the investigator may influence symptom scores
  5. Antibiotic intake within 2 weeks before screening
  6. Systemic within 4 weeks before screening
  7. Antihistamines intake for allergy when treatment was started from less than 4 weeks
  8. Bacterial lysate intake within 6 months before screening
  9. Chronic decongestant use
  10. Recent (within the previous 2 days) intake of a common cold medicine that in the opinion of the investigator may influence symptom score at screening (NSAID, nasal decongestants, cough medicines)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
186 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Healsea® Children: isotonic seawater based nasal spray supplemented with natural Symbiofilm® extract

    Children will receive Healsea® Children nasal spray on top of conventional therapies for common cold, as needed.

    Device: Healsea® Children · Other: Conventional therapies for common cold

  • Conventional therapies

    Children will receive conventional therapies for common cold as needed, nasal irrigation excluded

    Other: Conventional therapies for common cold

Interventions

  • DeviceHealsea® Children

    Children will be administered Healsea Children , one puff (1-2 sec) in each nostril twice a day for 10 days on top of conventional therapies, as needed

    Also known as: Conventional therapies for common cold

  • OtherConventional therapies for common cold

    Children will receive conventional therapies for common cold, nasal irrigation excluded (antipyretics, mucolytics, decongestants, antitussives, systemic and topical corticosteroids, antibiotics)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. AUC (Area Under Curve) of the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptoms Survey for Kids (WURSS-K) During the 10-day Treatment Period

    The WURSS-K will be assessed once daily, from Day1 to Day10 (treatment period) WURSS-K is a 3-dimensional structure questionnaire specifically designed for children 4 to 10 years of age. It includes 6 items assessing symptoms (symptoms score: runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, cough, feeling tired), 7 items assessing functional impairments (quality of life score: think, sleep, breathe, talk, walk/climb stairs/exercise, go to school, play with friends), 1 item assessing global severity. All these items are scored from 0 (absent or no impairment) through 1 (a little bad), 2 (bad) and 3 (very bad). The AUC value of the WURSS-K during the 10 day- treatment period is comprised between 0 WURSS-K score\*day (no impairement) and 420 WURSS-K score \*day (maximal impairement)

    Time frame: Cumulative AUC of the WURSS score assessed from Day 1 to Day 10

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Days With Runny Nose

    During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Runny nose is the item 2

    Time frame: Number of days with runny nose during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days

  2. Number of Days With Stuffy Nose

    During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Stuffy nose is the item 3.

    Time frame: Number of days with stuffy nose during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up period of 20 days, up to 30 days

  3. Number of Days With Sneezing

    During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of common cold symptoms in both groups. Sneezing is the item 4.

    Time frame: Number of days with sneezing during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days

  4. Number of Days With Sore Throat

    During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Sore throat is the item 5.

    Time frame: Number of days with sore throat during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days

  5. Number of Days With Cough

    During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Cough is the item 6.

    Time frame: Number of days with cough during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days

  6. Number of Days With "Feeling Tired"

    During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Feeling tired is the item 7.

    Time frame: Number of days with "feeling tired" during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days

  7. Respiratory Complication Requiring Antibiotic Prescription After the10-day Treatment Period

    The number of subjects who develop respiratory complication requiring antibiotic prescription during a 20-day follow-up period after the treatment period will be assessed in both groups and compared

    Time frame: Number of subjects with respiratory complications during the 20-day follow-up period

  8. Number of Participants With Use of Concomitant Treatments

    Number of subjects who took at least one concomitant treatment (antibiotics, antipyretics, systemic or local mucolytics, decongestants, antitussives, systemic and topical corticosteroids) that may impact symptoms of common cold and comparaison between groups

    Time frame: During 10-day treatment period and a follow-up period of 20 days, up to 30 days

07

Results

Posted Jan 20, 2025
Limitations and caveats
This is a not blinded, nor placebo-controlled investigation

Participant flow

Participants were outpatients visiting a physician in Polish hospitals or private practices at the onset of a common cold. The first patient was screened and enrolled on 14th of February 2022 and the last patient on 20th October 2022.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
Started10185
Full analysis set (fas)10185
Per protocol set (pp)9176
Completed10075
Not completed110
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up010

Outcome measures

PrimaryAUC (Area Under Curve) of the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptoms Survey for Kids (WURSS-K) During the 10-day Treatment Period

The WURSS-K will be assessed once daily, from Day1 to Day10 (treatment period) WURSS-K is a 3-dimensional structure questionnaire specifically designed for children 4 to 10 years of age. It includes 6 items assessing symptoms (symptoms score: runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, cough, feeling tired), 7 items assessing functional impairments (quality of life score: think, sleep, breathe, talk, walk/climb stairs/exercise, go to school, play with friends), 1 item assessing global severity. All these items are scored from 0 (absent or no impairment) through 1 (a little bad), 2 (bad) and 3 (very bad). The AUC value of the WURSS-K during the 10 day- treatment period is comprised between 0 WURSS-K score\*day (no impairement) and 420 WURSS-K score \*day (maximal impairement)

Time frame:
Cumulative AUC of the WURSS score assessed from Day 1 to Day 10
Reported as:
Mean · scores on WURSS-K scale* days
AUC (Area Under Curve) of the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptoms Survey for Kids (WURSS-K) During the 10-day Treatment Period
scores on WURSS-K scale* daysHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
AUC (Area Under Curve) of the Wisconsin Upper Respiratory Symptoms Survey for Kids (WURSS-K) During the 10-day Treatment Period36.56 ± 21.1455.54 ± 27.86
Statistical analysis
  • Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract vs Conventional Therapies · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = <0.05
SecondaryNumber of Days With Runny Nose

During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Runny nose is the item 2

Time frame:
Number of days with runny nose during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Day
Number of Days With Runny Nose
DayHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
Number of Days With Runny Nose7.4 ± 6.99.4 ± 7.9
Statistical analysis
  • Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract vs Conventional Therapies · Regression, Cox · p = 0.7026 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.063 · 95% CI 0.778 to 1.451
SecondaryNumber of Days With Stuffy Nose

During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Stuffy nose is the item 3.

Time frame:
Number of days with stuffy nose during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up period of 20 days, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Day
Number of Days With Stuffy Nose
DayHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
Number of Days With Stuffy Nose6.8 ± 6.38.6 ± 7.5
Statistical analysis
  • Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract vs Conventional Therapies · Regression, Cox · p = 0.6322 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.078 · 95% CI 0.792 to 1.469
SecondaryNumber of Days With Sneezing

During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of common cold symptoms in both groups. Sneezing is the item 4.

Time frame:
Number of days with sneezing during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Day
Number of Days With Sneezing
DayHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
Number of Days With Sneezing6.1 ± 6.55.9 ± 6.0
Statistical analysis
  • Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract vs Conventional Therapies · Regression, Cox · p = 0.9598 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.992 · 95% CI 0.726 to 1.356
SecondaryNumber of Days With Sore Throat

During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Sore throat is the item 5.

Time frame:
Number of days with sore throat during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Day
Number of Days With Sore Throat
DayHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
Number of Days With Sore Throat3.9 ± 5.65.2 ± 6.9
Statistical analysis
  • Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract vs Conventional Therapies · Regression, Cox · p = 0.1016 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.333 · 95% CI 0.945 to 1.880
SecondaryNumber of Days With Cough

During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Cough is the item 6.

Time frame:
Number of days with cough during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Day
Number of Days With Cough
DayHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
Number of Days With Cough6.1 ± 6.27.1 ± 7.2
Statistical analysis
  • Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract vs Conventional Therapies · Regression, Cox · p = 0.3954 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.153 · 95% CI 0.830 to 1.601
SecondaryNumber of Days With "Feeling Tired"

During the treatment period, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily. After D10, the WURSS-K will be assessed once daily until the subject feels not sick for two consecutive days. Items 2 to 7 will be used to assess the duration of each common cold symptoms in both groups. Feeling tired is the item 7.

Time frame:
Number of days with "feeling tired" during the 10-day treatment period and a follow-up of 20 days, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Mean · Day
Number of Days With "Feeling Tired"
DayHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
Number of Days With "Feeling Tired"4.8 ± 6.26.4 ± 7.3
Statistical analysis
  • Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract vs Conventional Therapies · Regression, Cox · p = 1.218 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.218 · 95% CI 0.871 to 1.703
SecondaryRespiratory Complication Requiring Antibiotic Prescription After the10-day Treatment Period

The number of subjects who develop respiratory complication requiring antibiotic prescription during a 20-day follow-up period after the treatment period will be assessed in both groups and compared

Time frame:
Number of subjects with respiratory complications during the 20-day follow-up period
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Respiratory Complication Requiring Antibiotic Prescription After the10-day Treatment Period
ParticipantsConventional TherapiesHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract
Respiratory Complication Requiring Antibiotic Prescription After the10-day Treatment Period12
Statistical analysis
  • Conventional Therapies vs Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract · Regression, Logistic · p = >0.05
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Use of Concomitant Treatments

Number of subjects who took at least one concomitant treatment (antibiotics, antipyretics, systemic or local mucolytics, decongestants, antitussives, systemic and topical corticosteroids) that may impact symptoms of common cold and comparaison between groups

Time frame:
During 10-day treatment period and a follow-up period of 20 days, up to 30 days
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Participants With Use of Concomitant Treatments
participantsHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
Number of Participants With Use of Concomitant Treatments5366
Statistical analysis
  • Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract vs Conventional Therapies · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0010 · Odds ratio (or): 0.335 · 95% CI 0.174 to 0.644

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected during a 10-day treatment period and a follow-up period of 20 days, up to 30 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® Extract0/101 (0%)0/101 (0%)17/101 (16.8%)
Conventional Therapies0/85 (0%)0/85 (0%)23/85 (27.1%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 17
Most frequent other events
EventHealsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional Therapies
coughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders5/10111/85
PyrexiaGeneral disorders5/1013/85
PharyngitisInfections and infestations2/1014/85
Nasal obstructionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/1013/85
Ear painEar and labyrinth disorders0/1013/85
RhinorrheaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/1012/85
Rhinitis allergicRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1012/85
BronchitisInfections and infestations1/1012/85
RhinitisInfections and infestations1/1012/85
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/1012/85

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional TherapiesTotal
Mean7.86 ± 1.428.02 ± 1.407.93 ± 1.41
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional TherapiesTotal
Female453681
Male5649105
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional TherapiesTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported10185186
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional TherapiesTotal
Poland10185186
Symptoms of acute rhinitis at baseline: temperature
Symptoms of acute rhinitis at baseline: temperature(Degrees Celcius)Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional TherapiesTotal
Mean37.75 ± 0.2337.81 ± 0.3937.78 ± 0.31
Symptoms of acute rhinitis at baseline
Symptoms of acute rhinitis at baseline(units on a scale)Healsea® Children: Isotonic Seawater Based Nasal Spray Supplemented With Natural Symbiofilm® ExtractConventional TherapiesTotal
Headache0.6 ± 0.60.5 ± 0.60.6 ± 0.6
Muscle ache0.1 ± 0.40.2 ± 0.50.2 ± 0.4
Chiliness0.2 ± 0.40.3 ± 0.50.2 ± 0.5
Sore throat0.8 ± 0.70.8 ± 0.70.8 ± 0.7
Blocked nose1.7 ± 0.71.6 ± 0.81.7 ± 0.7
Runny nose1.5 ± 0.71.5 ± 0.71.5 ± 0.7
Cough0.9 ± 0.81.1 ± 1.01.0 ± 0.9
Sneezing1.0 ± 0.70.9 ± 0.71.0 ± 0.7
08

Study locations

15 sites
  • Research Site
    Białystok, 15-010, Poland
  • Research Site
    Białystok, 15-430, Poland
  • Research Site
    Bydgoszcz, 85-048, Poland
  • Research Site
    Dys, 21-003, Poland
  • Research Site
    Głowno, 95-015, Poland
  • Research Site
    Kraków, 30-644, Poland
  • Research Site
    Lublin, 20-093, Poland
  • Research Site
    Lublin, 20-141, Poland
  • Research Site
    Lublin, 20-552, Poland
  • Research Site
    Lublin, 20-803, Poland
  • Research Site
    Lublin, 20-865, Poland
  • Research Site
    Rzeszów, 35-061, Poland
  • Research Site
    Tarnów, 33-100, Poland
  • Research Site
    Warszawa, 04-314, Poland
  • Research Site
    Łomża, 18-402, Poland
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Hopkins C, Hellings PW, Kern R, Reitsma S, Toppila-Salmi S, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Mullol J, Alobid I, Terezinha Anselmo-Lima W, Bachert C, Baroody F, von Buchwald C, Cervin A, Cohen N, Constantinidis J, De Gabory L, Desrosiers M, Diamant Z, Douglas RG, Gevaert PH, Hafner A, Harvey RJ, Joos GF, Kalogjera L, Knill A, Kocks JH, Landis BN, Limpens J, Lebeer S, Lourenco O, Meco C, Matricardi PM, O'Mahony L, Philpott CM, Ryan D, Schlosser R, Senior B, Smith TL, Teeling T, Tomazic PV, Wang DY, Wang D, Zhang L, Agius AM, Ahlstrom-Emanuelsson C, Alabri R, Albu S, Alhabash S, Aleksic A, Aloulah M, Al-Qudah M, Alsaleh S, Baban MA, Baudoin T, Balvers T, Battaglia P, Bedoya JD, Beule A, Bofares KM, Braverman I, Brozek-Madry E, Richard B, Callejas C, Carrie S, Caulley L, Chussi D, de Corso E, Coste A, El Hadi U, Elfarouk A, Eloy PH, Farrokhi S, Felisati G, Ferrari MD, Fishchuk R, Grayson W, Goncalves PM, Grdinic B, Grgic V, Hamizan AW, Heinichen JV, Husain S, Ping TI, Ivaska J, Jakimovska F, Jovancevic L, Kakande E, Kamel R, Karpischenko S, Kariyawasam HH, Kawauchi H, Kjeldsen A, Klimek L, Krzeski A, Kopacheva Barsova G, Kim SW, Lal D, Letort JJ, Lopatin A, Mahdjoubi A, Mesbahi A, Netkovski J, Nyenbue Tshipukane D, Obando-Valverde A, Okano M, Onerci M, Ong YK, Orlandi R, Otori N, Ouennoughy K, Ozkan M, Peric A, Plzak J, Prokopakis E, Prepageran N, Psaltis A, Pugin B, Raftopulos M, Rombaux P, Riechelmann H, Sahtout S, Sarafoleanu CC, Searyoh K, Rhee CS, Shi J, Shkoukani M, Shukuryan AK, Sicak M, Smyth D, Sindvongs K, Soklic Kosak T, Stjarne P, Sutikno B, Steinsvag S, Tantilipikorn P, Thanaviratananich S, Tran T, Urbancic J, Valiulius A, Vasquez de Aparicio C, Vicheva D, Virkkula PM, Vicente G, Voegels R, Wagenmann MM, Wardani RS, Welge-Lussen A, Witterick I, Wright E, Zabolotniy D, Zsolt B, Zwetsloot CP. European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps 2020. Rhinology. 2020 Feb 20;58(Suppl S29):1-464. doi: 10.4193/Rhin20.600. PubMed 32077450 ↗
  • Yan J, Bassler BL. Surviving as a Community: Antibiotic Tolerance and Persistence in Bacterial Biofilms. Cell Host Microbe. 2019 Jul 10;26(1):15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.06.002. PubMed 31295420 ↗
  • Rabin N, Zheng Y, Opoku-Temeng C, Du Y, Bonsu E, Sintim HO. Biofilm formation mechanisms and targets for developing antibiofilm agents. Future Med Chem. 2015;7(4):493-512. doi: 10.4155/fmc.15.6. Erratum In: Future Med Chem. 2015;7(10):1362. doi: 10.4155/fmc.15.77. PubMed 25875875 ↗
  • Varricchio A, La Mantia I, Brunese FP, Ciprandi G. Inflammation, infection, and allergy of upper airways: new insights from national and real-world studies. Ital J Pediatr. 2020 Feb 10;46(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-0782-z. PubMed 32039733 ↗
  • Ciprandi G, Tosca MA, Fasce L. Allergic children have more numerous and severe respiratory infections than non-allergic children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2006 Aug;17(5):389-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2006.00413.x. PubMed 16846459 ↗
  • Cirillo I, Marseglia G, Klersy C, Ciprandi G. Allergic patients have more numerous and prolonged respiratory infections than nonallergic subjects. Allergy. 2007 Sep;62(9):1087-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01401.x. Epub 2007 Jun 18. PubMed 17578494 ↗
  • Eifan AO, Durham SR. Pathogenesis of rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2016 Sep;46(9):1139-51. doi: 10.1111/cea.12780. PubMed 27434218 ↗
  • De Corso E, Lucidi D, Cantone E, Ottaviano G, Di Cesare T, Seccia V, Paludetti G, Galli J. Clinical Evidence and Biomarkers Linking Allergy and Acute or Chronic Rhinosinusitis in Children: a Systematic Review. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020 Sep 5;20(11):68. doi: 10.1007/s11882-020-00967-9. PubMed 32889648 ↗
  • Lin SW, Wang SK, Lu MC, Wang CL, Koo M. Acute rhinosinusitis among pediatric patients with allergic rhinitis: A nationwide, population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2019 Feb 12;14(2):e0211547. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211547. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30753196 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05034328
Lead sponsor
Lallemand Pharma AG
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 5, 2021
Start date
Feb 14, 2022
Primary completion
Nov 3, 2022
Completion
Nov 3, 2022
Results posted
Jan 20, 2025
Last update
Jan 20, 2025

Study contacts

Andrzej EMERYK, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University Children Hospital, Lublin, Poland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion