An interventional study of OraQuick® HIV Self-Test in HIV Testing and HIV Infections, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Completed at 7 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-11.
Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Oral fluid based HIV Self-testing (HIVST) provides another innovative and simple option to increase opportunities for HIV testing. At-home testing for HIV using oral fluid has been FDA approved and in use in the USA since 2012, and studies have also shown that interest and acceptability of HIVST with oral fluid is high in other global settings. However data for oral fluid based HIVST within key populations and those at high risk for HIV infection in Canada is limited.
This study involves around 900 persons who are non-healthcare professionals and inexperienced in HIV self-testing (intended users) and are presenting at clinic sites across Canada for HIV testing. It will evaluate the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity), usability (persons performs test correctly) and readability (persons successfully interpret test results) of the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test when performed by persons representing intended users living in Canada.
A final report of study results will be provided to the Test manufacturer for inclusion in the Health Canada license application process.
Background and Rationale:
Self-testing for HIV is an approach with the potential to increase the access, uptake and frequency of HIV testing for those who may not otherwise test and remain undiagnosed. There is increasing evidence showing the acceptability and usability of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in various key populations. In 2016 the World Health Organization recommended HIVST as an alternative option to complement existing HIV testing opportunities. Since then, HIVST use has been scaling up rapidly; for example, Canada's first blood-based (fingerstick) HIV self-test was licensed for use in November 2020.
Oral fluid based HIVST provides another innovative and simple option to increase opportunities for HIV testing. At-home testing for HIV using oral fluid has been FDA approved and in use in the USA since 2012, and studies have also shown that interest and acceptability of HIVST with oral fluid is high in other global settings. However data for oral fluid based HIVST within key populations and those at high risk for HIV infection in Canada is limited.
Having a licensed oral fluid HIV self-test in addition to the licensed blood-based HIV self-test will allow individuals to choose what is best for them and increase the potential to reach the undiagnosed living with HIV.
Objective:
This study will evaluate the accuracy, usability (persons performs test correctly) and readability (persons successfully interpret test results) of the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test when performed by persons representing intended users living in Canada.
Hypothesis:
The OraQuick Self-test as performed by intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) will meet or exceed the accuracy, usability and label comprehension requirements from Health Canada for license as a Class IV in vitro diagnostic device for Canadian market entry.
Study Design:
This study was designed around the requirements set out in the Health Canada Guidance Document: "Guidance for Manufacturers of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT's) for Use at Point of Care or Self Testing, 2017". It is an investigational device trial designed as a cross-sectional study which employs observational and interview-based methods.
Sample population:
The study population requirements published by Health Canada stipulates that the prospective study include: 900 lay persons with unknown HIV status including 400 persons at risk for HIV infection (e.g. intravenous drug users, men who have sex with men, etc.). Self-reported practices or behaviour will be used to define those at high risk.
A minimum of 900 participants (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) will read the instructions for use and conduct the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test. They will not be provided any training prior to use of the test. A trained healthcare provider or researcher (trained Observer) will watch, and document use of the test and independently read the participants self-test result. The participants will then complete a questionnaire to share their opinion on usability and label comprehension of this test.
A minimum of 400 (of the 900) participants will also be provided five mock devices with different results and asked to interpret those results i.e. strong positive; weak positive, negative, invalid with no control and no test line, and invalid with no control and a positive test line. This will evaluate readability of this test.
All participants will also have a venous blood sample collected for testing of plasma at a central laboratory with a 4th generation (Ag/Ab combo) HIV enzyme immunoassay that will serve as the comparator method (laboratory reference testing). All self-tests will be confirmed using a Canadian standard HIV testing algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of the self-test result will be calculated relative to the "clinical truth" of the participants' HIV status determined by the confirmatory test process, where applicable. Participants will be instructed to return to the clinic for a follow-up visit, two (2) weeks after self-testing to obtain their laboratory test results which will be their official result.
Study Intervention Details:
Participants will be recruited to the study when they come in for voluntary HIV testing (e.g. POC testing) at a minimum of 3 study sites (different geographic locations). If persons consent to participating, all those enrolled will voluntarily complete a questionnaire (collecting demographics and HIV medical history information) and then provide their venous whole blood sample (for standard of care, laboratory confirmatory testing and comparator method), complete the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test (read test instructions, sample collection, sample testing, result interpretation), complete mock result interpretation, and complete questionnaires - Visit 1 (day 1; about 60 minutes). All patients will be instructed to return to the clinic for a follow-up visit two (2) weeks later to obtain their laboratory test results (Visit 2; about 15 - 60 minutes), post -test counselling, and to be linked to appropriate care depending on the test results..
Patients may also have a point-of-care (POC) test conducted on site as part of the clinic's standard of care testing, outside of the protocol and after all study procedures for Visit 1 are completed.
4,258 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 240 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 951 is above the median of 83 across 3,251 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.
Browse HIV Infections studies →Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 434 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.
Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Observed self-test of oral fluid with the OraQuick HIV Self-Test
Device: OraQuick® HIV Self-Test
OraQuick® HIV Self-Test in oral fluid conducted by observed intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) compared to laboratory 4th generation Ag/Ab enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results performed on venous blood.
Device Performance: Positive and Negative Percent Agreement
Sensitivity and specificity of study participants' self-interpreted self-test results with the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test versus the HIV status as determined by the 4th generation EIA and confirmatory testing for HIV as necessary.
Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
Observer Usability Assessment
Observation to determine if participants perform all critical steps correctly
Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
Participant and Observer Interpretations
Confirmation by Observer to determine if participant interprets test results correctly and successful interpretation of various contrived (mock) test device results.
Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
Label Comprehension
To determine that the participant is aware of key messages in labelling including test limitations and what to do following the test result.
Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
Readability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)
The percentage of correct interpretations of contrived devices compared to the expected results.
Time frame: Outcome measured following mock device interpretation on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
| Milestone | Investigational Device |
|---|---|
| Started | 951 |
| Completed | 911 |
| Not completed | 40 |
| Withdrew: Protocol violation | 7 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 33 |
Sensitivity and specificity of study participants' self-interpreted self-test results with the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test versus the HIV status as determined by the 4th generation EIA and confirmatory testing for HIV as necessary.
| Participants | Self-testing Participants |
|---|---|
| True Positive | 1 |
| False Negative | 0 |
| True Negative | 880 |
| False Positive | 0 |
| Inconclusive | 1 |
| Positive % Agreement | 1 |
| Negative % Agreement | 880 |
| Invalid | 20 |
| Not sure/Do not know | 9 |
Observation to determine if participants perform all critical steps correctly
| Expected Responses | Self-testing Participants |
|---|---|
| Did the study participant read the instructions for use (IFU)? — Expected response | 859 |
| Did the study participant read the instructions for use (IFU)? — Unexpected response | 47 |
| Were the instructions for use (IFU) read before the test? — Expected response | 701 |
| Were the instructions for use (IFU) read before the test? — Unexpected response | 205 |
| Was the IFU referred to during the test process? — Expected response | 864 |
| Was the IFU referred to during the test process? — Unexpected response | 42 |
| Did the study participant remove the contents of the test pack? — Expected response | 901 |
| Did the study participant remove the contents of the test pack? — Unexpected response | 5 |
| Was the study participant able to find the test tube packet? — Expected response | 905 |
| Was the study participant able to find the test tube packet? — Unexpected response | 1 |
| Did the study participant remove the test tube from the packet? — Expected response | 905 |
| Did the study participant remove the test tube from the packet? — Unexpected response | 1 |
| Did the study participant remove the cap from the test tube? — Expected response | 896 |
| Did the study participant remove the cap from the test tube? — Unexpected response | 10 |
| Did the study participant place the test tube in the holder? — Expected response | 848 |
| Did the study participant place the test tube in the holder? — Unexpected response | 58 |
| Did the study participant have any difficulty with the test tube? — Expected response | 731 |
| Did the study participant have any difficulty with the test tube? — Unexpected response | 175 |
| Was the study participant able to find the test stick packet? — Expected response | 903 |
| Was the study participant able to find the test stick packet? — Unexpected response | 3 |
| Did the study participant remove the test stick from the packet? — Expected response | 902 |
| Did the study participant remove the test stick from the packet? — Unexpected response | 4 |
| Did the study participant touch the flat pad? — Expected response | 859 |
| Did the study participant touch the flat pad? — Unexpected response | 47 |
| Did the study participant collect the sample correctly (1x upper and lower swab)? — Expected response | 754 |
| Did the study participant collect the sample correctly (1x upper and lower swab)? — Unexpected response | 152 |
| Did the study participant place the test stick in the test tube correctly? — Expected response | 889 |
| Did the study participant place the test stick in the test tube correctly? — Unexpected response | 17 |
| Did the participant perform any steps out of the order? — Expected response | 800 |
| Did the participant perform any steps out of the order? — Unexpected response | 106 |
| Did the participant miss any step and continue the process despite a missed or incorrect step? — Expected response | 860 |
| Did the participant miss any step and continue the process despite a missed or incorrect step? — Unexpected response | 46 |
| Did the participant quit the process at any point? — Expected response | 905 |
| Did the participant quit the process at any point? — Unexpected response | 1 |
| Did the study participant wait 20 minutes before reading the results of the test? — Expected response | 820 |
| Did the study participant wait 20 minutes before reading the results of the test? — Unexpected response | 86 |
Confirmation by Observer to determine if participant interprets test results correctly and successful interpretation of various contrived (mock) test device results.
| Participants | Self-testing Participants |
|---|---|
| Participant & Observer Agreement | 884 |
| Participant & Observer Disagreement | 22 |
To determine that the participant is aware of key messages in labelling including test limitations and what to do following the test result.
| Participants | Self-testing Participants |
|---|---|
| Did you use the Instructions for Use (IFU) sheet to help you complete the test? — Yes | 881 |
| Did you use the Instructions for Use (IFU) sheet to help you complete the test? — No | 22 |
| Were the Instructions for Use (IFU) easy to follow? — Yes | 878 |
| Were the Instructions for Use (IFU) easy to follow? — No | 24 |
| Were the pictures and illustrations in the Instruction for Use (IFU) helpful? — Yes | 878 |
| Were the pictures and illustrations in the Instruction for Use (IFU) helpful? — No | 24 |
| Was the Self-Test easy to use? — Yes | 895 |
| Was the Self-Test easy to use? — No | 7 |
| Are you confident you could perform this test on your own? — Yes | 899 |
| Are you confident you could perform this test on your own? — No | 3 |
| Would you use this test again if it were available to you? — Yes | 882 |
| Would you use this test again if it were available to you? — No | 20 |
| Would you prefer to use this test at home (yes) or get tested at a clinic (no)? — Yes | 697 |
| Would you prefer to use this test at home (yes) or get tested at a clinic (no)? — No | 205 |
| Would you recommend this test to others? (e.g. a sexual partner, friend) — Yes | 890 |
| Would you recommend this test to others? (e.g. a sexual partner, friend) — No | 12 |
The percentage of correct interpretations of contrived devices compared to the expected results.
| In Concordance | Self-testing Participants |
|---|---|
| Strong positive | 418 |
| Weak positive | 329 |
| Negative | 453 |
| Invalid, test line present | 273 |
| Invalid, no control line or test line | 448 |
Collected over Adverse event data were collected over the two week time frame in which the participant completed visit 1 and visit 2.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Self-testing Participants | 0/951 (0%) | 0/951 (0%) | 3/951 (0.3%) |
| Event | Self-testing Participants |
|---|---|
| Buffer solution-soaked swab placed in mouthProduct Issues | 3/951 |
Self-testing participants with unknown HIV status
| Age, Customized(Participants) | Investigational Device |
|---|---|
| 18-25 years | 307 |
| 26-35 years | 302 |
| 36-45 years | 158 |
| 46-55 years | 73 |
| >55 years | 70 |
| Prefer not to answer | 1 |
| Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants) | Investigational Device |
|---|---|
| Cis-male | 434 |
| Cis-female | 450 |
| Other | 26 |
| Prefer not to anwer | 1 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Investigational Device |
|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 0 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 911 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Investigational Device |
|---|---|
| White | 235 |
| African/Caribbean/Black | 211 |
| Indigenous | 46 |
| Middle Eastern/North African | 25 |
| East Asian | 85 |
| South Asian | 222 |
| LatinX | 54 |
| Other | 33 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | Investigational Device |
|---|---|
| Canada — British Columbia | 102 |
| Canada — Manitoba | 56 |
| Canada — Ontario | 662 |
| Canada — Quebec | 91 |
| Education(Participants) | Investigational Device |
|---|---|
| No formal education | 0 |
| Primary school | 20 |
| Secondary school | 226 |
| College | 242 |
| University or higher | 420 |
| Prefer not to answer | 3 |
| Employment(Participants) | Investigational Device |
|---|---|
| Employed | 405 |
| Student | 261 |
| Retired | 23 |
| Unemployed | 215 |
| Prefer not to answer | 7 |
| HIV Status(Participants) | Investigational Device |
|---|---|
| Negative status | 485 |
| Unknown status/never tested | 426 |
6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Unity Health Toronto