CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05020353OQHIVSTUpdated May 11, 2025Results posted

OraQuick® HIV Self-Test Study in Canada

An interventional study of OraQuick® HIV Self-Test in HIV Testing and HIV Infections, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Completed at 7 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-11.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
951
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Oral fluid based HIV Self-testing (HIVST) provides another innovative and simple option to increase opportunities for HIV testing. At-home testing for HIV using oral fluid has been FDA approved and in use in the USA since 2012, and studies have also shown that interest and acceptability of HIVST with oral fluid is high in other global settings. However data for oral fluid based HIVST within key populations and those at high risk for HIV infection in Canada is limited.

This study involves around 900 persons who are non-healthcare professionals and inexperienced in HIV self-testing (intended users) and are presenting at clinic sites across Canada for HIV testing. It will evaluate the accuracy (sensitivity and specificity), usability (persons performs test correctly) and readability (persons successfully interpret test results) of the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test when performed by persons representing intended users living in Canada.

A final report of study results will be provided to the Test manufacturer for inclusion in the Health Canada license application process.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale:

Self-testing for HIV is an approach with the potential to increase the access, uptake and frequency of HIV testing for those who may not otherwise test and remain undiagnosed. There is increasing evidence showing the acceptability and usability of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in various key populations. In 2016 the World Health Organization recommended HIVST as an alternative option to complement existing HIV testing opportunities. Since then, HIVST use has been scaling up rapidly; for example, Canada's first blood-based (fingerstick) HIV self-test was licensed for use in November 2020.

Oral fluid based HIVST provides another innovative and simple option to increase opportunities for HIV testing. At-home testing for HIV using oral fluid has been FDA approved and in use in the USA since 2012, and studies have also shown that interest and acceptability of HIVST with oral fluid is high in other global settings. However data for oral fluid based HIVST within key populations and those at high risk for HIV infection in Canada is limited.

Having a licensed oral fluid HIV self-test in addition to the licensed blood-based HIV self-test will allow individuals to choose what is best for them and increase the potential to reach the undiagnosed living with HIV.

Objective:

This study will evaluate the accuracy, usability (persons performs test correctly) and readability (persons successfully interpret test results) of the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test when performed by persons representing intended users living in Canada.

Hypothesis:

The OraQuick Self-test as performed by intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) will meet or exceed the accuracy, usability and label comprehension requirements from Health Canada for license as a Class IV in vitro diagnostic device for Canadian market entry.

Study Design:

This study was designed around the requirements set out in the Health Canada Guidance Document: "Guidance for Manufacturers of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDT's) for Use at Point of Care or Self Testing, 2017". It is an investigational device trial designed as a cross-sectional study which employs observational and interview-based methods.

Sample population:

The study population requirements published by Health Canada stipulates that the prospective study include: 900 lay persons with unknown HIV status including 400 persons at risk for HIV infection (e.g. intravenous drug users, men who have sex with men, etc.). Self-reported practices or behaviour will be used to define those at high risk.

A minimum of 900 participants (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) will read the instructions for use and conduct the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test. They will not be provided any training prior to use of the test. A trained healthcare provider or researcher (trained Observer) will watch, and document use of the test and independently read the participants self-test result. The participants will then complete a questionnaire to share their opinion on usability and label comprehension of this test.

A minimum of 400 (of the 900) participants will also be provided five mock devices with different results and asked to interpret those results i.e. strong positive; weak positive, negative, invalid with no control and no test line, and invalid with no control and a positive test line. This will evaluate readability of this test.

All participants will also have a venous blood sample collected for testing of plasma at a central laboratory with a 4th generation (Ag/Ab combo) HIV enzyme immunoassay that will serve as the comparator method (laboratory reference testing). All self-tests will be confirmed using a Canadian standard HIV testing algorithm. The sensitivity and specificity of the self-test result will be calculated relative to the "clinical truth" of the participants' HIV status determined by the confirmatory test process, where applicable. Participants will be instructed to return to the clinic for a follow-up visit, two (2) weeks after self-testing to obtain their laboratory test results which will be their official result.

Study Intervention Details:

Participants will be recruited to the study when they come in for voluntary HIV testing (e.g. POC testing) at a minimum of 3 study sites (different geographic locations). If persons consent to participating, all those enrolled will voluntarily complete a questionnaire (collecting demographics and HIV medical history information) and then provide their venous whole blood sample (for standard of care, laboratory confirmatory testing and comparator method), complete the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test (read test instructions, sample collection, sample testing, result interpretation), complete mock result interpretation, and complete questionnaires - Visit 1 (day 1; about 60 minutes). All patients will be instructed to return to the clinic for a follow-up visit two (2) weeks later to obtain their laboratory test results (Visit 2; about 15 - 60 minutes), post -test counselling, and to be linked to appropriate care depending on the test results..

Patients may also have a point-of-care (POC) test conducted on site as part of the clinic's standard of care testing, outside of the protocol and after all study procedures for Visit 1 are completed.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV Testing
  • HIV Infections

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • HIV
  • Self-testing
  • HIVST
03

In context

HIV Infections

4,258 studies on the registry are indexed under HIV Infections; 240 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 951 is above the median of 83 across 3,251 interventional studies indexed under HIV Infections.

Browse HIV Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 434 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Are 18 years of age and older
  • Are able to speak / read / write English or French
  • Have presented for voluntary testing for HIV infection in the clinic or community based setting
  • Are willing to participate in the study site's standard of care HIV counselling and testing program and receive the study site's standard of care test results
  • Are willing to be a participant in the study
  • Are able to provide informed consent i.e. understands and signs the informed consent form
  • Are able to complete the required testing on the allocated testing day
  • Are willing to provide the necessary oral fluid and venipuncture blood for use in the study protocol testing methods.
  • Are of unknown HIV status (last HIV negative test must be a minimum of 3 months prior)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not meet all the inclusion criteria
  • Are known HIV positive
  • Are on antiretroviral therapy (ART) or anti-HIV medications for the treatment of HIV, either as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) or experimental vaccine
  • Have any experience or have ever conducted a rapid diagnostic self-test for HIV or any other sexually transmitted and blood borne illnesses disease
  • Are currently participating in a concurrent trial of HIV self-tests
  • Are investigator site employees or immediate family members of sponsor or investigator site employee
  • Are a practicing medical healthcare professional (doctor, nurse or HIV counsellor that performs HIV testing with Rapid Tests)
  • Any condition which, in the opinion of the Observer, would make the participant unsuitable or unsafe for enrolment or could interfere with the completion of the assessment and questionnaire etc. or bias the outcome, e.g. being unable to see / read by forgetting to bring reading glasses, being intoxicated, acute sickness, visibly distressed.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
951 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Investigational Device

    Observed self-test of oral fluid with the OraQuick HIV Self-Test

    Device: OraQuick® HIV Self-Test

Interventions

  • DeviceOraQuick® HIV Self-Test

    OraQuick® HIV Self-Test in oral fluid conducted by observed intended users (non-healthcare professional and inexperienced in HIV self-testing) compared to laboratory 4th generation Ag/Ab enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results performed on venous blood.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Device Performance: Positive and Negative Percent Agreement

    Sensitivity and specificity of study participants' self-interpreted self-test results with the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test versus the HIV status as determined by the 4th generation EIA and confirmatory testing for HIV as necessary.

    Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

  2. Observer Usability Assessment

    Observation to determine if participants perform all critical steps correctly

    Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

  3. Participant and Observer Interpretations

    Confirmation by Observer to determine if participant interprets test results correctly and successful interpretation of various contrived (mock) test device results.

    Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

  4. Label Comprehension

    To determine that the participant is aware of key messages in labelling including test limitations and what to do following the test result.

    Time frame: Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Readability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)

    The percentage of correct interpretations of contrived devices compared to the expected results.

    Time frame: Outcome measured following mock device interpretation on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.

07

Results

Posted May 11, 2025
Limitations and caveats
This is a prospective study for which the prevalence of infection is low.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneInvestigational Device
Started951
Completed911
Not completed40
Withdrew: Protocol violation7
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject33

Outcome measures

PrimaryDevice Performance: Positive and Negative Percent Agreement

Sensitivity and specificity of study participants' self-interpreted self-test results with the OraQuick® HIV Self-Test versus the HIV status as determined by the 4th generation EIA and confirmatory testing for HIV as necessary.

Time frame:
Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Device Performance: Positive and Negative Percent Agreement
ParticipantsSelf-testing Participants
True Positive1
False Negative0
True Negative880
False Positive0
Inconclusive1
Positive % Agreement1
Negative % Agreement880
Invalid20
Not sure/Do not know9
PrimaryObserver Usability Assessment

Observation to determine if participants perform all critical steps correctly

Time frame:
Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of units · Expected Responses
Observer Usability Assessment
Expected ResponsesSelf-testing Participants
Did the study participant read the instructions for use (IFU)? — Expected response859
Did the study participant read the instructions for use (IFU)? — Unexpected response47
Were the instructions for use (IFU) read before the test? — Expected response701
Were the instructions for use (IFU) read before the test? — Unexpected response205
Was the IFU referred to during the test process? — Expected response864
Was the IFU referred to during the test process? — Unexpected response42
Did the study participant remove the contents of the test pack? — Expected response901
Did the study participant remove the contents of the test pack? — Unexpected response5
Was the study participant able to find the test tube packet? — Expected response905
Was the study participant able to find the test tube packet? — Unexpected response1
Did the study participant remove the test tube from the packet? — Expected response905
Did the study participant remove the test tube from the packet? — Unexpected response1
Did the study participant remove the cap from the test tube? — Expected response896
Did the study participant remove the cap from the test tube? — Unexpected response10
Did the study participant place the test tube in the holder? — Expected response848
Did the study participant place the test tube in the holder? — Unexpected response58
Did the study participant have any difficulty with the test tube? — Expected response731
Did the study participant have any difficulty with the test tube? — Unexpected response175
Was the study participant able to find the test stick packet? — Expected response903
Was the study participant able to find the test stick packet? — Unexpected response3
Did the study participant remove the test stick from the packet? — Expected response902
Did the study participant remove the test stick from the packet? — Unexpected response4
Did the study participant touch the flat pad? — Expected response859
Did the study participant touch the flat pad? — Unexpected response47
Did the study participant collect the sample correctly (1x upper and lower swab)? — Expected response754
Did the study participant collect the sample correctly (1x upper and lower swab)? — Unexpected response152
Did the study participant place the test stick in the test tube correctly? — Expected response889
Did the study participant place the test stick in the test tube correctly? — Unexpected response17
Did the participant perform any steps out of the order? — Expected response800
Did the participant perform any steps out of the order? — Unexpected response106
Did the participant miss any step and continue the process despite a missed or incorrect step? — Expected response860
Did the participant miss any step and continue the process despite a missed or incorrect step? — Unexpected response46
Did the participant quit the process at any point? — Expected response905
Did the participant quit the process at any point? — Unexpected response1
Did the study participant wait 20 minutes before reading the results of the test? — Expected response820
Did the study participant wait 20 minutes before reading the results of the test? — Unexpected response86
PrimaryParticipant and Observer Interpretations

Confirmation by Observer to determine if participant interprets test results correctly and successful interpretation of various contrived (mock) test device results.

Time frame:
Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participant and Observer Interpretations
ParticipantsSelf-testing Participants
Participant & Observer Agreement884
Participant & Observer Disagreement22
PrimaryLabel Comprehension

To determine that the participant is aware of key messages in labelling including test limitations and what to do following the test result.

Time frame:
Outcome measured following POC tests on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Label Comprehension
ParticipantsSelf-testing Participants
Did you use the Instructions for Use (IFU) sheet to help you complete the test? — Yes881
Did you use the Instructions for Use (IFU) sheet to help you complete the test? — No22
Were the Instructions for Use (IFU) easy to follow? — Yes878
Were the Instructions for Use (IFU) easy to follow? — No24
Were the pictures and illustrations in the Instruction for Use (IFU) helpful? — Yes878
Were the pictures and illustrations in the Instruction for Use (IFU) helpful? — No24
Was the Self-Test easy to use? — Yes895
Was the Self-Test easy to use? — No7
Are you confident you could perform this test on your own? — Yes899
Are you confident you could perform this test on your own? — No3
Would you use this test again if it were available to you? — Yes882
Would you use this test again if it were available to you? — No20
Would you prefer to use this test at home (yes) or get tested at a clinic (no)? — Yes697
Would you prefer to use this test at home (yes) or get tested at a clinic (no)? — No205
Would you recommend this test to others? (e.g. a sexual partner, friend) — Yes890
Would you recommend this test to others? (e.g. a sexual partner, friend) — No12
SecondaryReadability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)

The percentage of correct interpretations of contrived devices compared to the expected results.

Time frame:
Outcome measured following mock device interpretation on Visit 1, Day 1 for each participant.
Reported as:
Count of units · In Concordance
Readability or Interpretation (Mock Devices)
In ConcordanceSelf-testing Participants
Strong positive418
Weak positive329
Negative453
Invalid, test line present273
Invalid, no control line or test line448

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected over the two week time frame in which the participant completed visit 1 and visit 2.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Self-testing Participants0/951 (0%)0/951 (0%)3/951 (0.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSelf-testing Participants
Buffer solution-soaked swab placed in mouthProduct Issues3/951

Baseline characteristics

Self-testing participants with unknown HIV status

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Investigational Device
18-25 years307
26-35 years302
36-45 years158
46-55 years73
>55 years70
Prefer not to answer1
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Investigational Device
Cis-male434
Cis-female450
Other26
Prefer not to anwer1
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Investigational Device
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino0
Unknown or Not Reported911
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Investigational Device
White235
African/Caribbean/Black211
Indigenous46
Middle Eastern/North African25
East Asian85
South Asian222
LatinX54
Other33
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Investigational Device
Canada — British Columbia102
Canada — Manitoba56
Canada — Ontario662
Canada — Quebec91
Education
Education(Participants)Investigational Device
No formal education0
Primary school20
Secondary school226
College242
University or higher420
Prefer not to answer3
Employment
Employment(Participants)Investigational Device
Employed405
Student261
Retired23
Unemployed215
Prefer not to answer7
HIV Status
HIV Status(Participants)Investigational Device
Negative status485
Unknown status/never tested426

6 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Cool Aid Community Health Centre
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Nine Circles Community Health Centre
    Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
  • ByWard Family Health Team
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
  • Hassle Free Clinic
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Maple Leaf Research
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Women's Health in Women's Hands Community Health Centre
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Clinique médicale l'Actuel
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 13, 2021

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05020353
Lead sponsor
Unity Health Toronto
Collaborators
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 25, 2021
Start date
Jun 21, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 4, 2023
Completion
May 15, 2024
Results posted
May 11, 2025
Last update
May 11, 2025

Study contacts

Sean B Rourke, PhD
principal investigator · MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Micheal's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion