ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05016856Updated Feb 24, 2025

Smart Reminders to Promote Home-based Cognitive Training

An interventional study of Adherence Promotion With Person-centered Technology (APPT) System and Standard Reminder System (Active Control) in Adherence, Treatment, sponsored by Florida State University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 65 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-24.

Sponsored by Florida State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
190
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will examine whether among older adults an adaptive and personalized reminder system can better support adherence to home-based cognitive training over typical reminder systems.

Read the detailed description

Many cognitive training interventions are associated with poor adherence, and poor adherence is associated with fewer benefits. Further, poor adherence in cognitive intervention studies can interfere with answering fundamental questions regarding intervention efficacy. This study will compare the effects of non-adaptive and smart adherence support systems. Participants will be asked to engage in frequent home-based cognitive training on a computer tablet. In the smart adherence support condition, participants will receive adaptive and tailored reminders based on dynamic algorithms that deploy reminders in a way that considers participant preferences, days and times of previous successful engagement, the success of previous reminder attempts, and answers to brief questions contained within reminder prompts. Parameter weights for these variables will be adjusted dynamically over a 6-month assessment period to ensure that reminders are deployed when they are most likely to be acted upon. This study will investigate adherence to training sessions, multiple times each week for 6 months, representing a large challenge to adherence. Participants will be randomly assigned to one condition or another, and adherence at home will be monitored. This will be an Individually Randomized Group-Treatment Trial (IRGT).

02

Conditions studied

  • Adherence, Treatment

Keywords

  • adherence
  • cognitive intervention
  • memory support
  • artificial intelligence
  • aging
  • technology
03

In context

Treatment Adherence and Compliance

128 studies on the registry are indexed under Treatment Adherence and Compliance; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 190 is above the median of 86 across 107 interventional studies indexed under Treatment Adherence and Compliance.

Browse Treatment Adherence and Compliance studies →

Lead sponsor

Florida State University is the lead sponsor of 245 studies on the registry; 46 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 9 (56%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 65 years of age or older
  • normal or corrected to normal visual acuity
  • must pass a dementia screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parkinson's, Alzheimer's disease, or any other neurodegenerative disease
  • terminal illness
  • blindness or deafness
  • severe motor impairment
  • not living in the Tallahassee area for the entire 6 month study period
  • unable to read at or above 6th grade level
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
190 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Reminder Only Condition

    To promote adherence, participants will receive generic reminders when home-based cognitive training has not been completed. This will be in the form of a text message to participants' smart phone.

    Behavioral: Standard Reminder System (Active Control)

  • Experimental
    Smart Adherence Support Condition

    To promote adherence, participants will receive reminders when home-based cognitive training has not been completed. This will be in the form of a text message to participants' smart phone. In this condition, participants will receive adaptive and tailored reminders based on dynamic algorithms that deploy reminders in a way that considers participant preferences, days and times of previous successful assessments, the success of previous reminder attempts, and answers to brief questions contained within reminder prompts. Parameter weights for these variables will be adjusted dynamically over a 6-month assessment period to ensure that reminders are deployed when they are most likely to be acted upon.

    Behavioral: Adherence Promotion With Person-centered Technology (APPT) System

Interventions

  • BehavioralAdherence Promotion With Person-centered Technology (APPT) System

    A personalized and adaptive text message reminder system.

  • BehavioralStandard Reminder System (Active Control)

    A typical text message reminder system.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence (session number)

    Number of sessions over 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Adherence (session length)

    Number of sessions reaching at least 80% of the assigned session duration over 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Adherence (holidays)

    Number of extended gaps in between sessions over 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Objective Cognition (predictor of adherence)

    A composite measure of objective cognitive ability

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, predicting adherence variables over 6 months

  2. Subjective Cognition (predictor of adherence)

    A composite measure of subjective cognitive deficit

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, predicting adherence variables over 6 months

  3. Self-Efficacy (predictor of adherence)

    A composite measure of self-efficacy (beliefs held about ability to complete tasks)

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, predicting adherence variables over 6 months

  4. Technology Proficiency (predictor of adherence)

    A composite measure of proficiency with technology

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, predicting adherence variables over 6 months

  5. Perceived Training Efficacy (predictor of adherence)

    A composite measure of belief in the the efficacy of cognitive training

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, predicting adherence variables over 6 months

  6. Personality (predictor of adherence)

    Measure of stable traits

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, predicting adherence variables over 6 months

  7. Dementia Worry (predictor of adherence)

    A composite measure of anxiety over cognitive decline

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, predicting adherence variables over 6 months

  8. Busyness Scale (predictor of adherence)

    Self-reported environmental demands of day-to-day life

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, predicting adherence variables over 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Interview

    Interview assessing experience in study

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Psychology, Florida State University
    Tallahassee, Florida 32306-4301, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified adherence data (time and date of intervention engagement) and scored individual difference measures (at the level of the individual) will be shared online.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: Data will be made available one year after the publication of the first primary outcome paper or two years after the collection of the final participants' data, whichever come first.

Access criteria: Data will be freely available online.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05016856
Responsible party
Walter Boot (Principal Investigator, Florida State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 23, 2021
Start date
Nov 7, 2022
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2024
Completion
Jan 1, 2025
Last update
Feb 24, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion