ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05015088GastrocUpdated Oct 10, 2023

Effectiveness of Gastrocnemius Stretching

An observational study in Gastrocnemius Tightness, sponsored by Regis University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-10.

Sponsored by Regis University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aims of this study are to: (1) determine muscle activation of the tibialis posterior muscle during different common gastrocnemius stretches and (2) radiographically quantify the tibial-calcaneal angle during the common stretching positions. We hypothesize that stretching over the edge of a step with the arch supported will minimize the activation of the tibialis posterior muscle in addition to increasing the tibial-calcaneal angle.

Read the detailed description

Many studies have assessed the effect of dynamic and passive support of the medial longitudinal arch. The posterior tibial tendon is the main dynamic stabilizer of the medial longitudinal arch, although peroneus/fibularis longus, flexor digitorum longus, and flexor hallucis longus also contribute to a lesser degree. Passive structures also a play role in supporting the arch and include the plantar fascia, plantar ligaments and spring ligament. These plantar structures aid in preventing collapse of the arch during weight bearing.

Several studies have demonstrated that increased tension from the triceps surae can lead to flattening of the arch. Gastrocnemius muscle tightness in particular is thought to be partially responsible for many forefoot and midfoot conditions in non-neurologically impaired patients. Therefore, identifying effective ways to stretch the gastrocnemius muscle without creating increased stress through dynamic structures that support the longitudinal arch may be important for the management of individuals with limited gastrocnemius flexibility.

Common ways to stretch the gastrocnemius include a runner's stretch, stretching with the foot fully supported on a ramp, stretching with the arch of the foot supported on the edge of step and the heel dropping down toward the ground and lastly, stretching with the ball of the foot supported on the edge of a step and the heel dropping down toward the ground. To our knowledge no other studies have assessed the muscle activation of the tibialis posterior muscle via indwelling EMG activation in addition to radiographic measurements to determine the effectiveness of common gastrocnemius stretches. Therefore, the aims of this study are to determine muscle activation of the tibialis posterior muscle during different common gastrocnemius stretches and to radiographically quantify the tibial-calcaneal angle. We hypothesize that stretching over the edge of a step with the arch supported will minimize the activation of the tibialis posterior muscle in addition to increasing the tibial-calcaneal angle more than the other stretching positions.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastrocnemius Tightness
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Regis University is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy individuals

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 20 healthy subjects between the ages of 18 to 65 years old.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any boney or tendinous foot/ankle operative procedure
  • diagnosis of neuromuscular disorder
  • any previous ankle fracture or degenerative changes that would limit dorsiflexion range of motion
  • no obvious gait asymmetries demonstrated through observation
  • participants who are pregnant will be excluded from participation in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Gastrocnemius Stretching Group

    The study will enroll 20 healthy subjects between the ages of 18 to 65 years old. Individuals will be recruited from multiple locations. Exclusion criteria include: any boney or tendinous foot/ankle operative procedure, diagnosis of neuromuscular disorder, any previous ankle fracture or degenerative changes that would limit dorsiflexion range of motion. Participants must have no obvious gait asymmetries demonstrated through observation. In addition, participants who are pregnant will be excluded from participation in the study.

    Other: No interventions will be performed in this study

Interventions

  • OtherNo interventions will be performed in this study

    This study will not include any intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. EMG activation

    EMG activation of tibialis posterior muscle during 4 common gastrocnemius stretching positions

    Time frame: up to 6 months

  2. Radiographic evaluation

    radiographically the angle of the tibia-calcaneus axis and calcaneal pitch between four different common gastrocnemius stretches

    Time frame: up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Relationship between foot posture and radiographic evaluation of tibia-calcaneal angle

    Assess if there is a relationship between radiographic stretching position and foot posture

    Time frame: up to 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Regis University
    Denver, Colorado 80221, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mueller TJ. Acquired flatfoot secondary to tibialis posterior dysfunction: biomechanical aspects. J Foot Surg. 1991 Jan-Feb;30(1):2-11. PubMed 2002182 ↗
  • Thordarson DB, Schmotzer H, Chon J, Peters J. Dynamic support of the human longitudinal arch. A biomechanical evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Jul;(316):165-72. PubMed 7634700 ↗
  • Huang CK, Kitaoka HB, An KN, Chao EY. Biomechanical evaluation of longitudinal arch stability. Foot Ankle. 1993 Jul-Aug;14(6):353-7. doi: 10.1177/107110079301400609. PubMed 8406252 ↗
  • DiGiovanni CW, Kuo R, Tejwani N, Price R, Hansen ST Jr, Cziernecki J, Sangeorzan BJ. Isolated gastrocnemius tightness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Jun;84(6):962-70. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200206000-00010. PubMed 12063330 ↗
  • Maeda N, Komiya M, Nishikawa Y, Morikawa M, Tsutsumi S, Tashiro T, Fukui K, Kimura H, Urabe Y. Effect of Acute Static Stretching on the Activation Patterns Using High-Density Surface Electromyography of the Gastrocnemius Muscle during Ramp-Up Task. Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jul 15;21(14):4841. doi: 10.3390/s21144841. PubMed 34300581 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05015088
Lead sponsor
Regis University
Responsible party
Stephanie Albin (Principal Investigator, Regis University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 20, 2021
Start date
May 1, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2023
Completion
Apr 15, 2023
Last update
Oct 10, 2023

Study contacts

Stephanie Albin, PhD
principal investigator · Regis University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion