CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05014191Updated Sep 12, 2025

Treatment Positioning in Vulvar Cancer Radiation Therapy

An observational study in Radiation Toxicity, sponsored by King Hussein Cancer Center. Completed at 1 site in Jordan. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-12.

Sponsored by King Hussein Cancer Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The study investigators will conduct a prospective study on patients with non-metastatic vulvar cancer who will receive radiation treatment using Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) modality with curative intent. Our aim is to compare straight-leg versus frog-leg position in terms of RTOG acute skin toxicity. Also, the study investigators will evaluate if positioning has an impact on the total treatment time and deviation on Cone Beam CT (CBCT) that might warrant re-simulation and consequently re-planning.

Read the detailed description

Vulvar cancer is a rare tumor with a prevalence of about 3-5% of gynecological malignancies with squamous cell carcinoma being the most common histopathologic subtype. It is more common among elderly and postmenopausal women.

Surgery is the cornerstone for the management of patients with early stage vulvar cancer. Radiotherapy is an integral part of the management of vulvar cancer both in the definitive and adjuvant settings.

Several studies have shown that intensity modulated radiotherapy IMRT is associated with better locoregional control compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy 3DCRT. In addition, it is associated with dosimetric advantage and better sparing of the organs at risk.

Historically, frog-leg position was the standard to provide better access for electron boost in conventional era. After evolution of inverse planning, electron boost is not further needed. Some centers have adopted straight-leg position.

There is paucity of literature regarding vulvar cancer in general and there is lack of data addressing radiation therapy treatment position specifically.

The study investigators will conduct a prospective study on patients with non-metastatic vulvar cancer who will receive radiation treatment using Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) modality with curative intent. Our aim is to compare straight-leg versus frog-leg position in terms of RTOG acute skin toxicity. Also, the investigators will evaluate if positioning has an impact on the total treatment time and deviation on Cone Beam CT (CBCT) that might warrant re-simulation and consequently re-planning.

If both positions proved to be similar in terms of skin toxicity, then the investigators will adopt supine position in the treatment of all patients with vulvar cancer. It will be more comfortable position, and so more reproducible and this reproducibility will be reflected on better treatment outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Radiation Toxicity

Browse trials for

03

In context

Radiation Injuries

108 studies on the registry are indexed under Radiation Injuries; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 105 across 41 observational studies indexed under Radiation Injuries.

Browse Radiation Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

King Hussein Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 23 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women who were diagnosed with vulvar carcinoma, receiving adjuvant or definitive chemoradiation to primary disease and inguinal lymph nodes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >= 18 years
  • ECOG PS = 0-1
  • Women with Bx confirmed vulvar cancer FIGO stage I-IVA (treated with curative intent)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whom radiotherapy plans do not cover inguinal lymph nodes will be excluded.

Vulnerable patients will be excluded (pregnant)

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Radiation therapy in frog leg position
  • Radiation therapy in straight leg position
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. RTOG acute Skin toxicity (<3 months of starting RT)

    Time frame: 3 months after completion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total treatment time and the need for re-planning

    Time frame: 3 months for each patient

07

Study locations

1 site
  • King Hussein Cancer Center
    Amman, Amman Governorate 11941, Jordan
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05014191
Lead sponsor
King Hussein Cancer Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 20, 2021
Start date
Jul 1, 2020
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2025
Completion
Jan 1, 2025
Last update
Sep 12, 2025

Study contacts

Fawzi J Abuhijla
principal investigator · King Hussein Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion