ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05011942Updated Sep 19, 2024

Irrisept Spinal Fusion Pilot Study Protocol

An interventional study of Irrisept Irrigation solution in Lumbar Spine Disease, sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study objectives include assessing the use of Irrisept irrigation solution in lumbar spinal fusion procedures and effect on clinical and patient reported outcome measures. This includes assessing postoperative SSI as well as fusion rates in addition to patient reported outcome measures.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized controlled pilot study with a study size of 50 patients. Results will be utilized to plan a larger scale study. Background literature supports the use of chlorhexidine gluconate as an irrigation solution to decrease SSI although this has not been conducted in this population of patients (lumbar spine fusion) to date. A decrease in SSI with Irrisept, could support the possible use of this as an irrigation solution to decrease infections postoperatively. It will be important to know the effect if any of Irrisept on fusion rates. This study will provide valuable information that may assist in future treatment and prevention of SSI in lumbar spinal fusion patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Spine Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Spinal Diseases

174 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Diseases; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 60 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Diseases.

Browse Spinal Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Kansas Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 492 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-85, undergoing primary lumbar spinal fusion (less than or equal to 3 levels)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior lumbar fusion (decompression only okay), spinal infection, spinal neoplasm
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    normal saline control arm

    ii. normal saline used after initial skin incision prior to coming through fascia, after placement of instrumentation (screws, hooks), prior to placement of bone graft, and after fascial closure iii. Irrigation exposure/soak time to be 1 min for each irrigation time point.

    Device: Irrisept Irrigation solution

  • Active comparator
    Irrisept irrigation solution

    ii. Irrigation (Irrisept vs control of normal saline) used after initial skin inicision prior to coming through fascia, after placement of instrumentation (screws, hooks), prior to placement of bone graft, and after fascial closure iii. Irrigation exposure/soak time to be 1 min for each irrigation time point. iv. 1 bottle (450 mL) Irrisept irrigation to be used during case with normal saline rinse to follow at each irrigation time point in study subjects

    Device: Irrisept Irrigation solution

Interventions

  • DeviceIrrisept Irrigation solution

    ii. Irrigation (Irrisept vs control of normal saline) used after initial skin inicision prior to coming through fascia, after placement of instrumentation (screws, hooks), prior to placement of bone graft, and after fascial closure iii. Irrigation exposure/soak time to be 1 min for each irrigation time point. iv. 1 bottle (450 mL) Irrisept irrigation to be used during case with normal saline rinse to follow at each irrigation time point in study subjects v. Normal saline irrigation will be used alone in control subjects at the same time points.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative surgical site infections

    Postop SSI

    Time frame: assessed for change at 1 month

  2. Postoperative surgical site infections

    postop SSI

    Time frame: assessed for change at 3 months

  3. Postoperative surgical site infections

    postop SSI

    Time frame: assessed for change at 6 months

  4. Postoperative surgical site infections

    postop SSI

    Time frame: assessed for change at 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fusion rates after surgery

    fusion rates after surgery with irrisept vs saline irrigation

    Time frame: assessed at 1 month

  2. Fusion rates after surgery

    fusion rates after surgery with irrisept vs saline irrigation

    Time frame: assessed for change at 3 months

  3. Fusion rates after surgery

    fusion rates after surgery with irrisept vs saline irrigation

    Time frame: assessed for change at 6 months

  4. Fusion rates after surgery

    fusion rates after surgery with irrisept vs saline irrigation

    Time frame: assessed for change at 12 months

  5. Patient outcome measures

    Visual Analog Score for pain measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 1 month

  6. Patient outcome measures

    Visual Analog Score for pain measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 3 months

  7. Patient outcome measures

    Visual Analog Score for pain measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 6 months

  8. Patient outcome measures

    Visual Analog Score for pain measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 12 months

  9. Patient outcome measures

    Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 1 month

  10. Patient outcome measures

    Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 3 months

  11. Patient outcome measures

    Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 6 months

  12. Patient outcome measures

    Oswestry Disability Index Questionnaire measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 12 months

  13. Patient outcome measures

    Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 Questionnaire measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 1 month

  14. Patient outcome measures

    Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 Questionnaire measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 3 months

  15. Patient outcome measures

    Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 Questionnaire measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 6 months

  16. Patient outcome measures

    Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 22 Questionnaire measuring patient outcomes in both study arms

    Time frame: assessed at 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2024, 30 months after the start.

Of 40 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spinal Diseases, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 30 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 43 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 30, 2021
First posted
Aug 18, 2021
StartActual
Jun 6, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2024
CompletionEst.
Dec 2024
Last update
Sep 19, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05011942
Collaborators
Irrimax Corporation
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2021
Start date
Jun 6, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion