An interventional study of Online Interactive Courses in Older Adults, sponsored by Yang Shang-Yu. Completed at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 65 Years to 88 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-08-16.
Sponsored by Yang Shang-Yu · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
Background:
The early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic can be marked as a critical period in human history as it increased loneliness in people's lives. This is particularly true for the older adults who are single, living alone, and suffering from chronic diseases. However, there is insufficient existing research on associated interventions and their effectiveness.
Objectives:
To investigate the effectiveness of an 8-week online interactive course on the loneliness, depression, social support, and quality of life (QOL) of older adults in the community during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods:
This pilot study, also a single-blind randomized controlled trial, collected data from a community in central Taiwan. Participants were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. Subsequently, participants in the experimental group received an 8-week intensive (Monday to Friday) online interactive course, whereas those in the control group consumed 8 weeks of unidirectional online video and audio programs (such as from YouTube). Assessments were conducted both before and after the intervention, with the primary outcome being the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA), and secondary outcomes being the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form, the Inventory of Socially Supportive Behavior (ISSB) Scale, and the WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Scale.
Yang Shang-Yu is the lead sponsor of 4 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants in the experimental group received an 8-week intensive (Monday to Friday) online interactive course.
Other: Online Interactive Courses
Participants in the control group consumed 8 weeks of unidirectional online video and audio programs (such as from YouTube).
In the experimental group, after consensus was reached in the expert meeting (consisting of a doctor specializing in occupational therapy, a doctor specializing in nursing, and a doctor specializing in public health), a 5-days-per-week (Monday to Friday) 8-week intensive online interactive course was designed. The course was made accessible to the participants through a social network app (Line) from 12:00 to 20:30.
UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA)
The third version of UCLA compiled by Russel (1996) was used to measure "loneliness." It was translated into Chinese by Chang and Yang (1999) and included 20 questions. Each question was scored on the 4-point Likert Scale, with 1: "I never feel this way," 2: "I rarely feel this way," 3: "I sometimes feel this way," and 4: "I often feel this way." The total score ranged between 20 and 80, and the higher the score, the higher the participant's degree of loneliness. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the pre- and post-intervention UCLA was 0.76 and 0.78, respectively.
Time frame: 10-20 minutes
Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS-SF)
Developed by Sheikh and Yesavage (1986), GDS-SF comprises 15 Yes or No questions, with participants scoring 1 if answering "Yes" or 0 if answering "No." The 2-point scale (Yes/No) made the questionnaire easy to complete for the participants. The threshold of the scale was 7 points, with scores larger than 7 indicating a depression status. The total score ranged between 0 and 15, and the higher the score, the higher the degree of depression. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the pre- and post-intervention GDS-SF was 0.81 and 0.82, respectively.
Time frame: 10-20 minutes
Inventory of Socially Supportive Behavior (ISSB) Scale
Initially developed by Barrera Jr et al. (1981), ISSB was subsequently translated into Chinese and compiled into 8 questions by Ou (2013). The scale consisted of two categories, namely Emotional Support and Tangible Support. The total score of both categories represented the participant's satisfaction with social support. The scale was scored on a 5-point Likert Scale, with 1 representing "Strongly disagree," 2: "Disagree," 3: "Neutral," 4: "Agree," and 5: "Strongly agree." The total score ranged between 8 and 40, and the higher the score, the higher the participant's satisfaction with social support. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the pre- and post-intervention ISSB was 0.83 and 0.77, respectively.
Time frame: 10-20 minutes
WHO Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) Scale
The questionnaire was composed of questions on QOL formulated by the World Health Organization (WHO) based on the commonality of various cultures. The Taiwanese version of WHOQOL-BREF included 28 questions, each scored on a 5-point Likert Scale. It was composed of four domains, namely, Physical health (7 questions), Psychological health (6 questions), Social relationships (4 questions), and Environment (9 questions). The score of an individual question ranged between 1 and 5, and after conversion, the total score of each domain ranged between 4 and 20. The higher the score, the higher the individual's QOL. In this study, the Cronbach's alpha of the domains Physical health, Psychological health, Social relationships, and Environment before and after the intervention was 0.82 (0.80), 0.77 (0.79), 0.76 (0.81), and 0.82 (0.84), respectively.
Time frame: 10-20 minutes
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.