An interventional study of Otago Exercise Program in Older Adults, sponsored by University of Jordan. Completed at 1 site in Jordan. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-07.
Sponsored by University of Jordan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Falls are common in older adults and may lead to disability or even death. Therefore, exercise programs that focus on preventing falls by improving strength and balance are important to investigate in older adults. One of the home-based exercise programs that was found effective in reducing the risk of falling and the rate of subsequent falls in older adults is the Otago exercise program (OEP). The OEP is an individualized home based retraining program that works mainly on balance and lower extremity strength through several progressive resistive exercises.
The OEP is available in English language since late 1990. However, its use in the Arabic-speaking countries is limited due to the language barrier. Therefore, translating such a program to the Arabic language would facilitate its use among Arabic-speaking older adults.
Therefore, this study aims:
Design:
Phase 1: Translation and cultural adaptation of the Otago Exercise Program (OEP) into the Arabic language.
Phase 2: Assessing feasibility of the OEP on a pilot sample of Arabic-speaking older adults using a focus group and a pilot Trial.
University of Jordan is the lead sponsor of 130 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Older adults will receive the Arabic Otago Exercise Program for 8 weeks plus health awareness videos.
Other: Otago Exercise Program
Older adults will receive only health awareness videos every 2 weeks.
A Home-based Exercise Program to improve strength and balance and prevent falls.
Incidence of Falls in the previous 12 months
Incidence of Falls and Falls Circumstances in the previous 12 months
Time frame: Previous 12 months
Incidence of falls during the treatment period (8 weeks)
Incidence of falls during the treatment period (previous 2 months) to assess the effect of the intervention on the incidence of falls.
Time frame: Immediately post intervention.
Fear of Falling (using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International)
The effect of the intervention on fear of falling. The total score ranges between 16 and 64 with a higher score indicates greater fear of falling (worse).
Time frame: Immediately post intervention.
Balance (using Chair balance test and Four test balance scale)
The effect of the intervention on balance. The time taken to conduct these balance tasks are timed using a stopwatch. The longer the time taken by the participant to perform the tasks, the worse the balance. There is no minimum or maximum scores for these tests.
Time frame: Immediately post intervention.
Mobility (using Timed-Up and go)
The effect of the intervention on mobility. This assessments of mobility is timed out using a stopwatch.
Time frame: Immediately post intervention.
Grip strength (using a hand held dynamometer)
The effect of the intervention on grip strength. The strength of Hand grip muscle will be assessed using a dynamometer in kilograms.
Time frame: Immediately post intervention.
The Quality of Life (using Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 12)
The effect of the intervention on Quality of Life. The total score ranges between 0% to 100% with higher score indicates a better quality of life (better).
Time frame: Immediately post intervention.
The severity of Anxiety and Depression (using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
The effect of the intervention on the severity of Anxiety and Depression. The total score for each subscale of the HADS ranges from 0 to 21 with higher score indicates more severe anxiety or depression (worse).
Time frame: Immediately post intervention.
Pain (using pain rating scale)
The effect of the intervention on pain. The total score of PRS ranges between 0 to 10 with higher score indicates more pain and interference with discomfort (worse).
Time frame: Immediately post intervention.
The severity of fatigue (using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale)
The effect of the intervention on fatigue. The total score of MFIS ranges between 0 to 84 with higher score indicates higher impact of fatigue on on daily functioning (worse).
Time frame: Immediately post intervention.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Aug 2021 to primary completion in Dec 2022, 16 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.