ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04995562Updated Jan 7, 2026

Use of Hyperpolarized 129Xe MR Lung Imaging in Infants

A Phase 4 interventional study of 129Xe in Lungs; Developmental Disorder, sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 6 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-07.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati · Phase 4, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2020, registered Apr 2021).
  • Started May 2020; still recruiting 6 years 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 6 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Abnormalities of the lungs are common in newborns and can include aspiration or infectious pneumonia, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), pulmonary hypertension (PH), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), and other abnormalities of lung development. Diagnostic radiography is commonly used in this population to differentiate diagnosis and to assess changes after treatment. While X-ray and CT provide quality imaging, they also expose infants to ionizing radiation. MR imaging offers a safe, non-ionizing alternative. However, imaging lungs via 1H MR is intrinsically difficult due to multiple air-tissue interfaces within the lungs causing local gradients and severe magnetic field susceptibility, which leads to an exceedingly short effective transverse relaxation time (T2*). Additionally, the lungs have low proton density, which along with the short T2* results in low signal to noise ratio, and the physiological motion caused by respiration and cardiac pulsation further reduces lung signal. The development of more powerful hardware, along with faster MRI techniques, has enabled detailed noninvasive 1H MR imaging of pulmonary tissues. Additionally, the development of inhaled hyperpolarized gas MRI has led to breakthroughs in the ability to visualize and quantify regional ventilation and alveolar size.

Read the detailed description

MRI with hyperpolarized xenon-129 and helium-3 noble gases has been tested and utilized at CCHMC in adults and children over 4 years with a very strong safety record. The safety of both helium-3 and xenon-129 is well known, with 3He being used safely and effectively to image infants, and 129Xe being used extensively in school-age children at CCHMC and elsewhere. Upon inhalation of an anoxic gas mixture, this mixture mixes with the residual volume of standard oxygenated breathing air that remains in the lung even after a normal exhalation, yielding a hypoxic breath. This is performed in the MRI room with pulse oximetry.

The investigators believe, based upon over 2 decades of experience with these noble gases, that the risk of the procedure is very low and primarily relates to the tidal hypoxic inhalation. (The reason for the hypoxic inhalation is because of the depolarizing effects of O2 on the hyperpolarized gas MRI signal.) Thus, an unpublished pilot feasibility study at Cincinnati Children's Hospital was conducted with infants age 0 - 5 months to provide safety data to expand MRI with gases to the neonatal population by pilot testing a brief hypoxic challenge in a controlled setting. The study was conducted in the NICU and included an induced 3-second apnea breath-hold with inhaled nitrogen (N2) while the infant was closely monitored. The study progressed stepwise beginning with 3 infants on room air, 3 infants on oxygen with nasal cannula, then 3 infants currently requiring respiratory support with CPAP or RAM cannula. After each cohort of 3, there was a safety review by the PI and at least one Sub-I who is also a faculty member in the NICU to determine safety before progressing to the next cohort. Results indicate that the procedure was feasible in these populations and was safe. There were no reportable adverse events. Approximately 20 seconds after the breath-hold, there was an expected small transient decline in SpO2 of approximately 5% which quickly (within 5 seconds) returned to baseline, and there were no significant changes in heartrate during the procedure; importantly, no procedure required stopping due to unexpected values. While this pilot study used ultrapure \~100% N2 to induce an apneic period, the degree of apnea will be similar or significantly less with this protocol's xenon apneic periods (Xe concentrations of \~10-100%, and thus will introduce no apneic differences in the proposed study. Safety for this previous pilot study was based upon the much more rigorous clinically accepted hypoxic challenge used to test "fitness-to-fly" done on older infants and children as well as adults. In one research study, the hypoxia challenge test (HCT) was performed on neonates as young as \<1 week old with diagnoses of prematurity and BPD. The prospective observational study was carried out on 3 groups of infants: healthy term infants at ≤7 days-old, preterm infants (≥34 weeks CGA) without BPD 2 to 3 days before discharge, and preterm infants with BPD. The infants were placed in a body plethysmograph and inhaled 15% O2 while continuously observed for 20 minutes. If the SpO2 dropped to 85%, the test was stopped and was recorded as a test failure. In Group 1 (full term infants), there was 1 failure out of n=24 (4.2% failure rate). In Group 2 (preterm without BPD), there were 12 failures out of n=62 (19.4% failure rate). In Group 3 (preterm with BPD), there were 16 failures out of n=23 (69.6% failure rate). The BPD infants reached the minimum SpO2 earlier (average 8 minutes) than preterm infants without BPD (average 15 min). While the "fitness-to-fly" test is not routinely performed at Cincinnati Children's, and is typically only utilized at altitude, this previous study with lengthy exposure of the hypoxia challenge is significant in the context of this protocol in that the protocol has significantly less risk (3-second apnea period, as opposed to lengthy hypoxia). Even the BPD cohort had exhibited resilience with an average 8 minute window before desaturation to 85% SpO2.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lungs; Developmental Disorder

Keywords

  • 129 Xe MRI
  • hyperpolarized xenon
  • neonates
  • nasal cannula
  • HFNC
  • CPAP
  • RAM cannula
03

In context

Developmental Disabilities

230 studies on the registry are indexed under Developmental Disabilities; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 60 across 150 interventional studies indexed under Developmental Disabilities.

Browse Developmental Disabilities studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati is the lead sponsor of 673 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Of its 57 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 31 (54%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 6 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

All Cohorts

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female
  • Any age NICU inpatient who is clinically stable and with adequate temperature control to tolerate MRI as determined by the primary clinical team

Cohort 1

  • Age 0 - 6 months
  • NICU patient on oxygen with a nasal cannula (≤ 2L per minute) (unchanged - supplemental O2 for minimum 24 hours)
  • Maintaining SpO2 > 88% on nasal O2

Cohort 2

  • Age 0 - 6 months
  • NICU patient who requires a slightly higher level of respiratory support (with High Flow Nasal Cannula > 2L per minute, CPAP, or RAM cannula and O2 unchanged for minimum 24 hours), with FiO2 \< 50%.
  • Maintaining SpO2 > 88% on nasal O2

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • General anesthesia within 24 hours prior to MRI or other sedation (e.g. morphine, Versed, fentanyl) within the last 4 hours.
  • Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support
  • Evidence of any respiratory infection within 1 week of testing (imaging may be rescheduled for a common viral infection such as a cold).
  • Suspected muscular dystrophy or neurologic disorder that may affect lung development.
  • Significant genetic or chromosomal abnormalities that may affect lung development
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Uncontrolled atrial or ventricular arrhythmia
  • Open surgical wounds
  • Need for inotropic support
  • Need for vasodilator agents
  • Need for high level of respiratory support (i.e. FiO2 >50%, and/or higher respiratory support than listed in Cohort 2 Inclusion Criteria, such as invasive ventilation).
  • Standard MRI exclusion criteria as set forth by the CCHMC Department of Radiology (e.g., support/implant equipment that is not MR compatible).
  • Infant size not compatible with NICU MRI scanner (\~>4.5kg).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Oxygen with nasal cannula

    6 infants on oxygen with nasal cannula

    Drug: 129Xe

  • Experimental
    HFNC, CPAP, or RAM cannula

    6 infants currently requiring respiratory support with high flow nasal cannula (HFNC), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or RAM cannula

    Drug: 129Xe

Interventions

  • Drug129Xe

    Inhaled contrast for MRI

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ventilation defect percentage (VDP)

    To calculate the percentage of the lung that is ventilated with 129Xe gas. This is an indicator of lung ventilation. The lung function outcome will be measured using hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI, wherein hyperpolarized 129Xe is inhaled and its distribution is imaged within the lungs. Different MRI pulse sequences are used to obtain different functional information about the lungs. VDP will be assessed using a 2D spoiled gradient echo sequence.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)

    To calculate the diffusivity coefficient (cm2/s) of the 129Xe gas within the lungs. This is an indicator of regional alveolar microstructure regional distribution in neonatal participants on respiratory support. The lung function outcome will be measured using hyperpolarized 129Xe MRI, wherein hyperpolarized 129Xe is inhaled and its distribution is imaged within the lungs. Different MRI pulse sequences are used to obtain different functional information about the lungs. ADC will be assessed using a 2D diffusion-weighted spoiled gradient echo sequence.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2020 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 83 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 12, 2021
First posted
Aug 9, 2021
StartActual
May 6, 2020
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2028
Last update
Jan 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04995562
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 9, 2021
Start date
May 6, 2020
Primary completion
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 7, 2026

Study contacts

Megan Schmitt, RN
Contact
Megan.Schmitt@cchmc.org
(513) 636-9348
Carrie Stevens
Contact
carrie.stevens@cchmc.org
(513) 636-9973
Jason Woods, PhD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Hyperpolarized Xe-129

Start the discussion