CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04994535Updated Aug 20, 2024Results posted

A Study To Assess the Safety and Effects of OnabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) Intramuscular Injection in Adult Participants With Platysma Prominence

A Phase 3 interventional study of OnabotulinumtoxinA and Placebo in Platysma Prominence, sponsored by AbbVie. Completed at 34 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-20.

Sponsored by AbbVie · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
426
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and effects of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) for the temporary improvement in the appearance of platysma prominence.

Study doctors will randomize participants into 1 of the 2 groups, called treatment arms. There is a 1 in 2 chance that a participant will be assigned to placebo. Around 400 participants will be enrolled in the study across approximately 35 sites in USA, Belgium, Canada, Germany and the UK.

Participants will receive a single treatment of intramuscular injection of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX) or placebo on Day 1 during this 4 month long study.

Participants will attend regular monthly visits during the study at the study site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Platysma Prominence

Keywords

  • Platysma Prominence
  • OnabotulinumtoxinA
  • BOTOX
03

In context

Lead sponsor

AbbVie is the lead sponsor of 953 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 350 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 210 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must voluntarily sign and date an informed consent, approved by an independent ethics committee (IEC)/institutional review board (IRB), prior to the initiation of any screening or study specific procedures
  • Are willing and able to comply with procedures required in the protocol
  • Adult male or female, at least 18 years old at the time of signing the informed consent
  • Good health as determined by medical history, physical examination, vital signs, and investigator's judgment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any medical condition that may put the participant at increased medical risk with exposure to BOTOX, including diagnosed myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other condition that might interfere with neuromuscular function
  • Participant has an anticipated need for treatment with botulinum toxin of any serotype for any indication during the study (other than study intervention)
  • Anticipated need for surgery or overnight hospitalization during the study
  • Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding and are considering becoming pregnant or donating eggs during the study
  • Known immunization or hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin serotype
  • History of clinically significant (per investigator's judgment) drug or alcohol abuse within the last 6 months
  • Lower facial and neck hair, scarring (e.g., acne), or other abnormal variations that may interfere with photography (such that photograph is not acceptable)
  • Tattoos, jewelry, or clothing that cannot be removed, and that obscure the target area of interest
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
426 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BOTOX

    BOTOX (OnabotulinumtoxinA) will be injected into the platysma muscle on Day 1

    Drug: OnabotulinumtoxinA

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo will be injected into the platysma muscle on Day 1

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugOnabotulinumtoxinA

    Injection

    Also known as: BOTOX

  • DrugPlacebo

    Saline injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

    Time frame: Enrollment to Day 120

  2. Composite Achievement of Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS and Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS, at Maximum Contraction at Day 14

    The Clinician Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (C-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme. The Participant Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (P-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

    Time frame: Day 14

  3. Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14

    The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

    Time frame: Day 14

  4. Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14

    The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

    Time frame: Day 14

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

    The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

    Time frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

  2. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

    The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

    Time frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

  3. Percentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14

    The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).

    Time frame: Day 14

  4. Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the Bother Assessment Scale - Platysma Prominence (BAS-PP) Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14

    The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

    Time frame: Day 14

  5. Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 14

    The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

    Time frame: Day 14

  6. Change From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14

    The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact due to the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher summary scores (range: 7-35) indicating greater negative psychosocial impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face. For change from baseline in the ANLFQ: Impacts summary score, positive values indicate worsening and negative values indicate improvement in the psychosocial impact.

    Time frame: Day 14

  7. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

    The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

    Time frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

  8. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

    The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

    Time frame: Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

  9. Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rating of Minimal or Mild According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14

    The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

    Time frame: Day 14

  10. Percentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the ANLFQ: Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14

    The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).

    Time frame: Day 14

  11. Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14

    The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

    Time frame: Day 14

  12. Change From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90

    The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact of the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher scores indicating greater negative impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face.

    Time frame: Days 30, 60, and 90

07

Results

Posted Aug 20, 2024

Participant flow

A total of 426 participants were enrolled and randomized into the study (ITT Population); 209 to BOTOX and 217 to placebo. A total of 208 participants were treated with BOTOX and 216 participants were treated with placebo (Safety Analysis Set). A total of 381 participants were included in the modified ITT (mITT) Population; 186 to BOTOX and 195 to placebo. A participant was considered to have completed the study if he/she had at least completed the treatment visit and the end of study visit.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboBOTOX
Started217209
Completed199194
Not completed1815
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up77
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject107
Withdrew: Other11

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Events

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.

Time frame:
Enrollment to Day 120
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
ParticipantsPlaceboBOTOX
Number of Participants With Adverse Events4334
PrimaryComposite Achievement of Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS and Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS, at Maximum Contraction at Day 14

The Clinician Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (C-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme. The Participant Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (P-APPS) evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Composite Achievement of Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS and Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS, at Maximum Contraction at Day 14
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Composite Achievement of Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) and at Least a 2-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Both Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS and Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS, at Maximum Contraction at Day 140.5 (NA to NA)31.4 (25.0 to 37.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 30.9 · 95% CI 24.5 to 37.4
PrimaryAchievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14

The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 142.2 (0 to 4.3)41.0 (33.8 to 48.3)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 38.9 · 95% CI 31.3 to 46.4
PrimaryAchievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14

The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 14
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Achievement of at Least a 2-grade Improvement From Baseline Based on the Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Day 143.9 (1.1 to 6.7)40.8 (33.5 to 48.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 36.9 · 95% CI 29.1 to 44.7
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

Time frame:
Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Day 143.0 (0.6 to 5.3)48.3 (41.3 to 55.3)
Day 303.3 (0.9 to 5.8)43.8 (36.9 to 50.7)
Day 604.5 (1.6 to 7.3)24.8 (18.8 to 30.8)
Day 902.0 (0.1 to 3.9)15.2 (10.2 to 20.1)
Day 1202.5 (0.4 to 4.7)14.0 (9.2 to 18.8)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame:
Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Grade 1 or 2 (Minimal or Mild) According to Participant's Self-Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Day 145.1 (2.1 to 8.2)47.1 (40.2 to 54.1)
Day 305.6 (2.4 to 8.8)41.0 (34.2 to 47.8)
Day 607.1 (3.5 to 10.6)28.8 (22.4 to 35.2)
Day 903.6 (1.0 to 6.2)20.6 (14.9 to 26.3)
Day 1203.8 (1.2 to 6.3)16.7 (11.5 to 21.9)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14

The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percent of participants
Percentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14
percent of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Percentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 1412.0 (7.4 to 16.5)62.1 (55.4 to 68.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 50.2 · 95% CI 42.0 to 58.3
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the Bother Assessment Scale - Platysma Prominence (BAS-PP) Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14

The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the Bother Assessment Scale - Platysma Prominence (BAS-PP) Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the Bother Assessment Scale - Platysma Prominence (BAS-PP) Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 1423.1 (17.3 to 28.9)50.2 (43.3 to 57.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 27.1 · 95% CI 18.1 to 36.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 14

The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 14
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 1414.4 (9.5 to 19.2)50.2 (43.3 to 57.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 35.8 · 95% CI 27.4 to 44.2
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14

The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact due to the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher summary scores (range: 7-35) indicating greater negative psychosocial impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face. For change from baseline in the ANLFQ: Impacts summary score, positive values indicate worsening and negative values indicate improvement in the psychosocial impact.

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14
score on a scalePlaceboBOTOX
Change From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14-2.7 ± 0.45-7.1 ± 0.46
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · ANCOVA · p = <.0001 (P-value derived from ANCOVA model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS with baseline value as a factor.) · Difference (se): -4.4 · 95% CI -5.4 to -3.4
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

The C-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a static measurement encompassing the investigator's visual examination of the platysma muscle at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5- Extreme.

Time frame:
Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Investigator's Assessment Using C-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Day 1420.1 (14.5 to 25.7)76.9 (71.0 to 82.7)
Day 3018.7 (13.2 to 24.3)72.6 (66.4 to 78.8)
Day 6019.5 (13.9 to 25.1)54.9 (47.7 to 62.0)
Day 9017.3 (12.0 to 22.7)44.0 (37.0 to 50.9)
Day 12014.9 (10.0 to 19.9)33.9 (27.4 to 40.5)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120

The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame:
Day 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved at Least 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline Based on Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14, 30, 60, 90, and 120
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Day 1421.0 (15.3 to 26.6)79.3 (73.6 to 84.9)
Day 3022.8 (17.0 to 28.6)73.9 (67.8 to 80.0)
Day 6020.9 (15.3 to 26.5)65.2 (58.6 to 71.9)
Day 9018.6 (12.9 to 24.2)53.7 (46.6 to 60.7)
Day 12018.8 (13.2 to 24.3)42.9 (36.0 to 49.7)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rating of Minimal or Mild According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14

The P-APPS evaluates platysma prominence severity and is a single-item measure that is accompanied by a 5-grade photonumeric scale for participants to self-assess the severity of their platysma prominence at maximum contraction, ranging from 1 - Minimal to 5 - Extreme.

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rating of Minimal or Mild According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 14
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rating of Minimal or Mild According to Participant's Assessment Using P-APPS at Maximum Contraction at Days 145.2 (1.9 to 8.4)48.1 (40.7 to 55.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 42.9 · 95% CI 34.8 to 51.0
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the ANLFQ: Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14

The ANLFQ: Satisfaction scale assesses how satisfied the participants are with the treatment they received for the appearance of their neck and lower face. Item 5 is a verbal descriptor scale ranging from 1 (Very satisfied) to 5 (Very dissatisfied).

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the ANLFQ: Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 14
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Percentage of Participants With Responses of "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" on the ANLFQ: Satisfaction (Follow-up) Item 5 (Effect of Treatment) at Day 1411.8 (7.0 to 16.6)61.2 (54.0 to 68.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 49.4 · 95% CI 40.8 to 58.1
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14

The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 14
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 2 (Jawline) at Day 1420.6 (14.7 to 26.4)49.4 (42.1 to 56.7)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 28.8 · 95% CI 19.4 to 38.2
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 14

The BAS-PP Scale is a 2-item measure that asks participants to rate how bothered they are by the appearance of their vertical neck bands (Item 1) and jawline (Item 2) where items are rated from 1 (Not at all bothered) to 5 (Extremely bothered).

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 14
percentage of participantsPlaceboBOTOX
Percentage of Participants With Responses of 'Not at All Bothered' or 'A Little Bothered' on the BAS-PP Scale Item 1 (Vertical Neck Bands) at Day 1411.9 (7.2 to 16.6)47.8 (40.5 to 55.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS.) · Difference (%): 35.9 · 95% CI 27.2 to 44.6
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14

The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact due to the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher summary scores (range: 7-35) indicating greater negative psychosocial impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face. For change from baseline in the ANLFQ: Impacts summary score, positive values indicate worsening and negative values indicate improvement in the psychosocial impact.

Time frame:
Day 14
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14
score on a scalePlaceboBOTOX
Change From Baseline on the Appearance of Neck and Lower Face Questionnaire (ANLFQ): Impacts Summary Score at Day 14-3.0 ± 0.50-7.7 ± 0.51
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from ANCOVA model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS with baseline value as a factor.) · Difference (se): -4.7 · 95% CI -5.8 to -3.7
SecondaryChange From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90

The ANLFQ: Impacts scale assesses the psychosocial impact of the appearance of the neck and lower face. All items are rated on a 5-point Verbal Descriptor Scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (All of the time), with higher scores indicating greater negative impact from the appearance of the neck and lower face.

Time frame:
Days 30, 60, and 90
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline on the ANLFQ: Impacts Summary Score at Days 30, 60, and 90
score on a scalePlaceboBOTOX
Day 30-3.9 ± 0.54-8.8 ± 0.55
Day 60-3.5 ± 0.56-8.2 ± 0.56
Day 90-3.5 ± 0.50-7.4 ± 0.50
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from ANCOVA model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS with baseline value as a factor.) · Difference (se): -4.9 · 95% CI -6.0 to -3.7
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from ANCOVA model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS with baseline value as a factor.) · Difference (se): -4.7 · 95% CI -5.9 to -3.6
  • Placebo vs BOTOX · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 (P-value derived from ANCOVA model stratified by investigator site and baseline C-APPS with baseline value as a factor.) · Difference (se): -3.9 · 95% CI -4.9 to -2.8

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality and adverse event tables include events reported from enrollment to end of study. The median time participants were followed was 120 days for both the BOTOX and Placebo treatment groups.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo0/216 (0%)1/216 (0.5%)6/216 (2.8%)
BOTOX0/208 (0%)0/208 (0%)7/208 (3.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboBOTOX
ADNEXA UTERI CYSTReproductive system and breast disorders1/2160/208
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboBOTOX
COVID-19Infections and infestations6/2167/208

Baseline characteristics

Baseline analyses were performed on the ITT population, consisting of all randomized participants.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboBOTOX (onabotulinumtoxinA)Total
Mean46.9 ± 10.1848.0 ± 9.5747.5 ± 9.89
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboBOTOX (onabotulinumtoxinA)Total
Female206198404
Male111122
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboBOTOX (onabotulinumtoxinA)Total
Hispanic or Latino353065
Not Hispanic or Latino182179361
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboBOTOX (onabotulinumtoxinA)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native011
Asian81119
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American527
White202191393
More than one race246
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

34 sites
  • Total Skin and Beauty Derm Ctr /ID# 249905
    Birmingham, Alabama 35205, United States
  • Westside Aesthetics /ID# 231196
    Los Angeles, California 90025-1708, United States
  • Skin Care and Laser Physicians of Beverly Hills /ID# 231194
    Los Angeles, California 90069, United States
  • Moradi MD /ID# 244719
    Vista, California 92083-6030, United States
  • Skin Research Institute LLC /ID# 231195
    Coral Gables, Florida 33146-1837, United States
  • Skin and Cancer Associates, LLP /ID# 231189
    Miami, Florida 33137-3254, United States
  • DeNova Research /ID# 231191
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Oak Dermatology in Naperville /ID# 231193
    Naperville, Illinois 60563-3018, United States
  • Etre Cosmetic Dermatology and Laser Center /ID# 231192
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70130-4353, United States
  • BOYD Beauty Birmingham /ID# 231190
    Birmingham, Michigan 48009-6301, United States
  • Michigan Center for Research Corporation /ID# 249911
    Clinton Township, Michigan 48038, United States
  • Skin Specialists, PC /ID# 249903
    Omaha, Nebraska 68144, United States
  • The Center for Dermatology Cosmetics & Laser Surgery /ID# 231187
    Mount Kisco, New York 10549-3028, United States
  • Luxurgery /ID# 244924
    New York, New York 10021-4951, United States
  • Coastal Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas /ID# 231197
    Charleston, South Carolina 29414, United States
  • Tennessee Clinical Research Center /ID# 244720
    Nashville, Tennessee 37215-2885, United States
  • DermResearch, Inc. Austin, TX /ID# 249904
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
  • Bellaire Dermatology Associates /ID# 249902
    Bellaire, Texas 77401, United States
  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research at SBA Dermatology /ID# 232104
    Houston, Texas 77056-4129, United States
  • Austin Institute for Clinical Research /ID# 244936
    Pflugerville, Texas 78660, United States
  • UZ Brussel /ID# 229125
    Jette, Bruxelles-Capitale 1090, Belgium
  • Medical Skincare /ID# 229129
    Sint-Truiden, Limburg 3800, Belgium
  • Duinbergen Clinic /ID# 231282
    Knokke-Heist, West-Vlaanderen 8301, Belgium
  • Beacon Dermatology Inc /ID# 231675
    Calgary, Alberta T3E 0B2, Canada
  • Pacific Derm /ID# 231019
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 4E1, Canada
  • Sweat Clinics of Canada /ID# 231021
    Toronto, Ontario M5R 3N8, Canada
  • Bertucci MedSpa Inc. /ID# 231020
    Woodbridge, Ontario L4L 8E2, Canada
  • Studienzentrum Theatiner46 /ID# 229570
    Muenchen, Bayern 80333, Germany
  • Rosenpark Research /ID# 229568
    Darmstadt, Hessen 64283, Germany
  • Noahklinik GmbH /ID# 232311
    Kassel, 34117, Germany
  • Hautok and Hautok-cosmetics /ID# 229573
    Muenchen, 80333, Germany
  • Privatpraxis fuer Dermatologie und Aesthetik /ID# 230901
    Muenchen, 80539, Germany
  • Waverley Medical Practice /ID# 229590
    Coatbridge, ML5 3AP, United Kingdom
  • MediZen Premier Aesthetic Clinic /ID# 229588
    Sutton Coldfield, B74 2UG, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Related links

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Nov 22, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jun 20, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols, analyses plans, clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04994535
Lead sponsor
AbbVie
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 6, 2021
Start date
Aug 10, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 14, 2023
Completion
Jun 14, 2023
Results posted
Aug 20, 2024
Last update
Aug 20, 2024

Study contacts

ABBVIE INC.
study director · AbbVie

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Other studies from this sponsor

AbbVie

Start the discussion