ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04990089Updated Jan 31, 2025

VIVO European Observational Registry

An observational study in Ventricular Arrythmia, Ventricular Tachycardia and Premature Ventricular Contraction, sponsored by Catheter Precision. Inc.. Completed at 8 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-31.

Sponsored by Catheter Precision. Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
125
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A multi-center, observational registry conducted in Europe and the UK to prospectively review VIVO in a clinical setting in 125 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventricular Arrythmia
  • Ventricular Tachycardia
  • Premature Ventricular Contraction
03

In context

Tachycardia, Ventricular

451 studies on the registry are indexed under Tachycardia, Ventricular; 120 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is below the median of 167 across 147 observational studies indexed under Tachycardia, Ventricular.

Browse Tachycardia, Ventricular studies →

Lead sponsor

Catheter Precision. Inc. is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients experiencing ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and being considered for or have a scheduled a ventricular ablation procedure.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must at least 18 years of age Patients who have signed an IRB/EC approved patient and applicable patient privacy protection authorization per local law
  • Patients who have previously had contrast cardiac imaging or will have cardiac imaging ordered per standard of care
  • Patients will be selected without regard to gender.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that are unable to receive contrast cardiac imaging (MR or CT)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • DeviceVIVO

    VIVO is a per-procedural planning tool designed to non-invasively identify the origin of a ventricular arrhythmia.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measure the effectiveness of VIVO within different types of VA procedures

    The primary effectiveness objective is to assess the types of procedures where VIVO is used to plan and/or guide the ablation procedure or to determine a diagnosis of arrhythmia. Primary Effectiveness endpoint: Summarize the types of procedures where VIVO was utilized in the procedure to include the number of VT vs PVC, whether VIVO improved procedural planning and acute procedural success measured as termination or reduction in arrhythmia.

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Measure the safety by observing adverse events related to the device and procedure

    Primary safety objective is to assess any adverse events related to the device and procedure. Primary Safety endpoint: Summarize the number of adverse events related to VIVO or procedure.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness

    Secondary effectiveness objective is to evaluate the success of the ablation procedure (if performed) at follow- up visits (3, 6 and 12 months). Secondary effectiveness endpoint: Summarize the success of the ablation procedure at each follow up visit.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

8 sites
  • Mater Private Hospital
    Dublin, Ireland
  • Mazzoni Hospital
    Ascoli Piceno, Italy
  • University Medical Center Groningen
    Groningen, Netherlands
  • Erasmus Medical Center
    Rotterdam, Netherlands
  • La Luz Hospital
    Lisbon, Portugal
  • Glenfield University Hospital
    Leicester, United Kingdom
  • Royal Brompton Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • John Radcliffe University Hospital
    Oxford, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — NO IPD is to be shared with other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 31, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04990089
Lead sponsor
Catheter Precision. Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 4, 2021
Start date
Oct 21, 2021
Primary completion
Jun 28, 2024
Completion
Sep 28, 2024
Last update
Jan 31, 2025

Study contacts

Andre Ng, MD
principal investigator · Glenfield University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion