CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT04983498Updated Dec 15, 2021

Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Endoscopy

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ondansetron 4 MG and Lactated Ringers, Intravenous in Enhanced Recovery Pathway and Endoscopy, sponsored by Northwestern University. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-12-15.

Sponsored by Northwestern University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was withdrawn
Investigator left organization before study initiated.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare an Enhanced Recovery Pathway to the current pre-operative/recovery practices of the endoscopy department on patient post-procedure outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Every 4th to 5th patient that checks in to the endoscopy department for their procedure will be screened for eligibility requirements. If eligible for the study, the patient will be informed about the study and potential risks. All patients giving written informed consent will be enrolled into the enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) [nursing managed ERP: goal-directed fluid management (Lactated Ringer's Solution at 5mL/kg/hr), PONV prophylaxis for an apfel score of 2 or greater (ondansetron 4 mg IV), early mobilization up to chair (within 5-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room), and early PO intake within 15-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room post-procedure] for their procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Enhanced Recovery Pathway
  • Endoscopy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University is the lead sponsor of 1,396 studies on the registry; 199 are open to participants now.

Of its 102 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Outpatient colonoscopy under moderate sedation
  • Colonoscopy Indications: Screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than one sedation procedure scheduled same day
  • Allergy to ondansetron
  • Past PONV requiring scopolamine patches
  • Diagnoses: ESRD, heart failure, cirrhosis, long QT syndrome
  • Patients requiring fluid restrictions, such as dialysis patients
  • Post-procedure NPO requirements, such as procedure-related NPO status (stent placement, pneumatic dilation, etc.) or second procedure in another location
  • High Fall Risk Patients
  • Adults unable to consent
  • Pregnant patients
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Prospective Experimental Group

    For the experimental group, we will recruit 200 participants who will receive the Enhanced Recovery Pathway, which will be ordered as a standing order set by the attending provider and managed by their peri-procedural nurses. The modified ERP for this study includes the following interventions: nursing managed order sets with ERP instructions to receive goal-directed fluid management within anesthesia approved parameters utilizing the NMH Colorectal ERAS protocol for IV fluid administration, PONV prophylaxis for participants with an apfel score of 2 or greater (ondansetron 4 mg IV), an additional dose of ondansetron 4mg IV will be available in recovery if the patient has nausea/vomiting despite prophylaxis, early mobilization up to chair (within 5-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room) based on nursing parameters, and early PO intake within 15-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room post-procedure based on nursing parameters.

    Drug: Ondansetron 4 MG · Drug: Lactated Ringers, Intravenous · Other: Early Mobilization · Other: Early PO Intake

  • No intervention
    Retrospective Control Group

    The retrospective group will consist of 200 randomly selected medical records of patients who had colonoscopy procedures for a 6 month period prior to study implementation (between 10/1/2019 to 4/1/2020). The retrospective control group will have received the current standard of care including: IV fluids for management of intra-procedural hypotension as indicated/ordered by the physician, PO intake at 30-45 minutes, up to a chair at 60 minutes, and all procedure related complications will have been treated (e.g. PONV) per physician order as is the current standard of practice in the GI Lab recovery area.

Interventions

  • DrugOndansetron 4 MG

    PONV prophylaxis for participants with an apfel score of 2 or greater (ondansetron 4 mg IV), an additional dose of ondansetron 4mg IV will be available in recovery if the patient has nausea/vomiting despite prophylaxis.

    Also known as: Post-operative Nausea & Vomiting Prophylaxis

  • DrugLactated Ringers, Intravenous

    Goal directed IV fluids to be administered starting preop per the NMH Colorectal ERAS protocol (LR @ 5mL/kg/hr).

    Also known as: Intravenous Hydration

  • OtherEarly Mobilization

    Patient transferred up to the chair (within 5-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room) based on nursing parameters and patient safety.

  • OtherEarly PO Intake

    Patient will be offered PO intake within 15-30 minutes of admission to the recovery room post-procedure based on nursing parameters and patient safety.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To compare recovery time stamps before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period.

    We will compare mean recovery times between control and intervention groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA).

    Time frame: 1-2 hours

  2. To compare the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period.

    We will perform a Chi-square analysis for presence or absence of nausea and/or vomiting in the recovery period (measured by: administration of anti-emetic, documentation on N/V flowchart, and/or documentation in nursing narrative note) between control and intervention groups.

    Time frame: 1-2 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare patient satisfaction scores before and after implementing a modified ERAs for endoscopy patients in the recovery period.

    We will perform a t-test of patient satisfaction scores (Press Ganey scores) between control and intervention groups.

    Time frame: 15 minutes

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Alghanem SM, Massad IM, Rashed EM, Abu-Ali HM, Daradkeh SS. Optimization of anesthesia antiemetic measures versus combination therapy using dexamethasone or ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Surg Endosc. 2010 Feb;24(2):353-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0567-3. Epub 2009 Jun 11. PubMed 19517165 ↗
  • Amornyotin S. Sedation-related complications in gastrointestinal endoscopy. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Nov 16;5(11):527-33. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v5.i11.527. PubMed 24255744 ↗
  • Brown JK, Singh K, Dumitru R, Chan E, Kim MP. The Benefits of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs and Their Application in Cardiothoracic Surgery. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2018 Apr-Jun;14(2):77-88. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-14-2-77. PubMed 29977464 ↗
  • Apfel CC, Korttila K, Abdalla M, Kerger H, Turan A, Vedder I, Zernak C, Danner K, Jokela R, Pocock SJ, Trenkler S, Kredel M, Biedler A, Sessler DI, Roewer N; IMPACT Investigators. A factorial trial of six interventions for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 10;350(24):2441-51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032196. PubMed 15190136 ↗
  • Ellett ML. Review of propofol and auxiliary medications used for sedation. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;33(4):284-95; quiz 296-7. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e3181eac371. PubMed 20679780 ↗
  • Crenshaw JT, Winslow EH. Preoperative fasting: old habits die hard. Am J Nurs. 2002 May;102(5):36-44; quiz 45. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200205000-00033. PubMed 12006853 ↗
  • Gan TJ. Postoperative nausea and vomiting--can it be eliminated? JAMA. 2002 Mar 13;287(10):1233-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.10.1233. No abstract available. PubMed 11886298 ↗
  • Joliat GR, Ljungqvist O, Wasylak T, Peters O, Demartines N. Beyond surgery: clinical and economic impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1008. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3824-0. PubMed 30594252 ↗
  • Lichtenstein GR, Cohen LB, Uribarri J. Review article: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy--the importance of adequate hydration. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Sep 1;26(5):633-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03406.x. PubMed 17697197 ↗
  • Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):292-298. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4952. PubMed 28097305 ↗
  • Saraghi M. Intraoperative Fluids and Fluid Management for Ambulatory Dental Sedation and General Anesthesia. Anesth Prog. 2015 Winter;62(4):168-76; quiz 177. doi: 10.2344/0003-3006-62.4.168. PubMed 26650497 ↗
  • Shaikh SI, Nagarekha D, Hegade G, Marutheesh M. Postoperative nausea and vomiting: A simple yet complex problem. Anesth Essays Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;10(3):388-396. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.179310. PubMed 27746521 ↗
  • Som A, Bhattacharjee S, Maitra S, Arora MK, Baidya DK. Combination of 5-HT3 Antagonist and Dexamethasone Is Superior to 5-HT3 Antagonist Alone for PONV Prophylaxis After Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2016 Dec;123(6):1418-1426. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001617. PubMed 27870735 ↗
  • Weinberg L, Faulkner M, Tan CO, Liu DH, Tay S, Nikfarjam M, Peyton P, Story D. Fluid prescription practices of anesthesiologists managing patients undergoing elective colonoscopy: an observational study. BMC Res Notes. 2014 Jun 10;7:356. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-356. PubMed 24916073 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 15, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04983498
Lead sponsor
Northwestern University
Responsible party
Angela Maeder (PhD, RNC-OB, Clinical Nurse, Labor and Delivery Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 30, 2021
Start date
Sep 1, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 1, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 15, 2021

Study contacts

Angela Maeder, PhD
principal investigator · Northwestern Medicine

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion