An interventional study of lab session in Educational Problems, sponsored by Beni-Suef University. Completed at 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 22 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-27.
Sponsored by Beni-Suef University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of utilizing an Elsevier clinical skill platform in clinical nursing education.
1.2. Research hypotheses
A quasi-experimental, two groups, pre-posttest study was carried out in Nursing college, King Khalid University, Kingdome of Saudi Arabia.
2.2 Instruments
2.3 Participants: A convenience sample of all students enrolled in the critical care nursing course (n=52) were divided into two groups and random selection was implemented by the registration office following the inclusion criteria for all students who were enrolled first time receive critical care nursing course. Therefore, two students were withdrawn at the beginning of the course. The first group represented the control group the Clinical Lab session (25 students), whilst the second group represented the intervention group the Elsevier clinical skill (25 students).
Beni-Suef University is the lead sponsor of 333 studies on the registry; 116 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: lab session
assign students to clinical modules for study the clinical lab scope of practice
Improve student's performance per clinical lab session
1. Pre-posttest per skill was conducted for both group the Elsevier clinical skill group (ECS Group) and traditional Clinical Lab Session group (CLS Group), to assess the students' knowledge level before and after receiving each scheduled Lab Module.
Time frame: 13 lab session-13 weeks
evaluate effectiveness of teaching pedagogy
2. Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE): The summative OSCE included practical stations with an associated written paper for each skill examined. For the practical station, Students must pass the practical station (100%), as well as the relevant written station (70%) to achieve a pass in that scope of practice skill according to Exam policy \& Procedure.
Time frame: Week 14
assess students' perception of Usability and Learning of Elsevier Clinical Skill:
Included 8 questions 1st theme is relevant to the Usability of the platform (4 items) and 2nd theme reflected the Learning enhancement while using the platform (4 items). Each item was scored on a three-point Likert scale as follows: Strongly agree or agree (3), Neither agree nor disagree (2) and strongly disagree or disagree (1). The overall perceptions of students with both online and traditional lab experiences included and score ranged between (1-3) as 1= Much better than or better than, 2= About the same as 2, Much worse than or not as good as 3
Time frame: up to 15 weeks
Plan to share: Undecided — data analysis completed July writing paper on August publish paper on September
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Beni-Suef University