CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04973241Updated Jul 22, 2021

Mandibular Dimensions as a Predictor of Age and Sex in a Sample of Upper Egypt Population by Using Panoramic Images and Cone Beam Computed Tomography

An observational study in Mandibular Dimensions, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-22.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
100
Ages
15 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Growth changes occur from the intrauterine life to senility, hard tissues like bones and teeth undergo changes with growth, a change in shape and/or fusion of ossification centers, the stability of these changes facilitate ease in estimation of age from hard tissue samples ( Bhalaji ,2006;Reddy,2006; Mohite et al.,2011).

Mandibles were used for the study for two simple causes: First, there appears to be a lack of standards utilizing this element and second, this bone is often recovered mostly intact (Franklin et al.,2008) The mandible is considered the most durable facial bone ;is due to the presence of a dense layer of compact bone and therefore remains well conserved than many other bones and the only movable bone of the skull available for gender identification; is due to the morphological characteristics of mandible, and radiology plays an important role in it. It is composed of two hemi mandibles united at the midline by a vertical symphysis. Each one of them is composed of a horizontal body with a posterior vertical extension termed the ramus(ndira et al.,2012 ).

Mandibular canines are found to exhibit the highest sexual dimorphism.The mean age of eruption of mandibular canines is 10.87 years, and they are the last teeth to be extracted with respect to age; so, they can be considered as the key teeth for personal identification (Khangura et al.,2011; Padmavati et al.,2011; Yuwanati et al.,2012).

Measurements of the mandibular ramus tend to show higher sexual dimorphism, and variations between the sexes are mostly more marked in the mandibular ramus than in the mandibular body (Humphrey et al.,1999).

Gonial angle is commonly used to determine the rotation of the mandible and to identify growth pattern, it is a common parameter used to describe orthodontic extractions or surgical treatments(Kitai et al.,2013).

Several studies focused on the comparison between CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) and OPG (Orthopantomograph) for visualization of bone and teeth (Dalessandri et al.,2012 ;Savoldi et al.,2015).

OPG is a very popular technique ,the most available and commonly used extra-oral radiography, its lower cost ,wide area coverage ,ease of preparation have made it an excellent choice for routine examination of many structures thus useful for research purpose does not involve the patient any additional exposure or cost(Ghosh et al.,2009 ;Sairam et al.,2016).

The CBCT imaging device can obtain undistorted three-dimensional (3D) images of good quality with a low radiation dose (Yamamoto et al.,2003).

02

Conditions studied

  • Mandibular Dimensions
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

persons aged between 15 and 40 years.

Inclusion criteria

    1. Panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography of patients aged15-40 years.
  1. Only patients with a documented date of birth.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Asymmetry in OPG and CBCT images, unreadable ,unclear ,poor quality, gross pathology and magnification.

      1. Panoramic radiographs with positioning errors which could cause distortions in the dimensions.
      1. Hereditary facial asymmetries. 4. Images of completely edentulous patients. 5. Surgical intervention, patients with orthognathic surgeries. 6. Presence of pathologies such as fractures, impacted teeth, missing teeth, cleft lip or palate, cysts, tumors, osteomyelitis,severe osteoporosis in the mandible, periodontal lesion, and congenital craniofacial abnormalities, in the lower jaw, resorption in the mandibular arch that could affect the interpretation of radiographic image, 7. History of head trauma
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • OPG

    Radiation: OPG & CBCT

  • CBCT

    Radiation: OPG & CBCT

Interventions

  • RadiationOPG & CBCT

    panoramic images , cone beam computed tomography

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. comparison of OPG & CBCT

    2. Comparison of the accuracy in identification of age and sex between using digital orthopantomographs and cone beam computed tomography

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 22, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04973241
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
EMM Kotb (Eman Mahmoud Metwally, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2021
Start date
Oct 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2021

Study contacts

Eman Mahmoud Metwally, Demonstrator
Contact
emanmetwally53@yahoo.com
01033343919 ext. 01017812151

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion