CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04973228Updated Mar 12, 2024Results posted

Trial of PDE4 Inhibition With Roflumilast (ARQ-154) Foam 0.3% for the Management of Seborrheic Dermatitis (STRATUM)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Roflumilast Foam and Vehicle Foam in Seborrheic Dermatitis, sponsored by Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 53 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 9 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-12.

Sponsored by Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
457
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
9 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase 3, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study assessed the safety and efficacy of roflumilast (ARQ-154) foam 0.3% applied once daily (qd) for 8 weeks by participants with seborrheic dermatitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Seborrheic Dermatitis
03

In context

Dermatitis

1,435 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatitis; 131 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 457 is above the median of 64 across 1,131 interventional studies indexed under Dermatitis.

Browse Dermatitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 23 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
9 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants legally competent to sign and give informed consent and, if appropriate, assent as required by local laws.
  • Males and females ages 9 years and older at the time of consent.
  • Clinical diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis of at least 3 months duration at Screening as determined by the Investigator. Stable disease for the past 4 weeks.
  • Seborrheic dermatitis up to 20% BSA involvement. Involvement may be of the scalp and/or face and/or trunk and/or intertriginous areas.
  • An Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) disease severity of at least Moderate ('3') at Baseline.
  • Overall Assessment of Erythema and Overall Assessment of Scaling scores of at least Moderate ('2') at Baseline.
  • Females of childbearing potential (FOCBP) must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening (Visit 1) and a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline (Visit 2).
  • Females of non-childbearing potential must either be post-menopausal with spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 12 months or have undergone surgical sterilization.
  • Subjects in good health as judged by the Investigator.
  • Subjects are considered reliable and capable of adhering to the Protocol and visit schedule according to the Investigator judgment.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who cannot discontinue treatment with therapies for the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis prior to the Baseline visit and during the study.
  • Planned excessive exposure of treated area(s) to either natural or artificial sunlight, tanning bed or other LED.
  • Previous treatment with ARQ-154 or ARQ-151.
  • Subjects with any serious medical condition or clinically significant abnormality that would prevent study participation or place the subject at significant risk, as judged by the Investigator.
  • Females who are pregnant, wishing to become pregnant during the study, or are breast-feeding.
  • Subjects with a history of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening.
  • Subjects, parent(s)/legal guardian(s) who are unable to communicate, read, or understand the local language(s).
  • Subjects who are family members of the clinical study site, clinical study staff, or sponsor, or family members living in the same house of enrolled subjects.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
457 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Roflumilast Foam 0.3%

    Participants with seborrheic dermatitis apply roflumilast foam 0.3% once daily (QD) for 8 weeks.

    Drug: Roflumilast Foam

  • Placebo comparator
    Vehicle Foam

    Participants with seborrheic dermatitis apply vehicle foam QD for 8 weeks.

    Drug: Vehicle Foam

Interventions

  • DrugRoflumilast Foam

    Roflumilast 0.3% foam for topical application

    Also known as: ARQ-154

  • DrugVehicle Foam

    Vehicle foam for topical application

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Achievement of Success on the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 8

    The percentage of participants achieving IGA "success" is presented. Success is defined as a score of 0 ('clear') or 1 ('almost clear') plus a 2-point improvement at Week 8. The IGA is 5-point scale assessing the severity of seborrheic dermatitis with total scores ranging from 0 ('clear') to 4 ('severe') \[higher scores indicating greater severity\].

    Time frame: Week 8

Secondary outcomes

  1. Achievement of Success in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) at Week 8

    The percentage of participants achieving WI-NRS "success" is presented. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the participant-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participants experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity). The endpoint is the average of daily assessments reported during each study week, and requires at least 4 daily assessments reported during the week. In participants with a weekly average baseline pruritus score of ≥4, "success" is defined as achievement of a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average WI-NRS pruritus score at Week 8.

    Time frame: Week 8

  2. Achievement of Success in the WI-NRS at Week 4

    The percentage of participants achieving WI-NRS "success" is presented. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the participant-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participants experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity). The endpoint is the average of daily assessments reported during each study week, and requires at least 4 daily assessments reported during the week. In participants with a weekly average baseline pruritus score of ≥4, "success" is defined as achievement of a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average WI-NRS pruritus score at Week 4.

    Time frame: Week 4

  3. Achievement of Success in the WI-NRS at Week 2

    The percentage of participants achieving WI-NRS "success" is presented. In participants with a weekly average baseline pruritus score of ≥4, "success" is defined as achievement of a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average WI-NRS pruritus score at Week 2. The endpoint is the average of daily assessments reported during each study week, and requires at least 4 daily assessments reported during the week. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the participant-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participants experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity).

    Time frame: Week 2

  4. Achievement of Success on the IGA at Week 2

    The percentage of participants achieving WI-NRS "success" is presented. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the participant-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participants experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity). The endpoint is the average of daily assessments reported during each study week, and requires at least 4 daily assessments reported during the week. In participants with a weekly average baseline pruritus score of ≥4, "success" is defined as achievement of a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average WI-NRS pruritus score at Week 2.

    Time frame: Week 2

  5. Achievement of Success on the IGA at Week 4

    The percentage of participants achieving IGA "success" is presented. Success is defined as a score of 0 ('clear') or 1 ('almost clear') plus a 2-point improvement at Week 8. The IGA is 5-point scale assessing the severity of seborrheic dermatitis with total scores ranging from 0 ('clear') to 4 ('severe') \[higher scores indicating greater severity\].

    Time frame: Week 4

  6. Achievement of Overall Assessment of Scaling Score of 0 at Week 8

    The percentage of participants achieving Overall Assessment of Scaling score of 0 at Week 8 is presented. The Overall Assessment of Scaling is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("No scaling: No scaling evident on lesions.") to 3 ("Severe: Coarse, thick scales, with flaking into clothes or skin."). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: Week 8

  7. Achievement of Overall Assessment of Erythema Score of 0 at Week 8

    The percentage of participants achieving Overall Assessment of Erythema score of 0 at Week 8 is presented. The Erythema Assessment is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("None: no evidence of erythema.") to 3 ("Severe: Intense \[fiery red\] erythema."). Higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Week 8

07

Results

Posted Mar 12, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
Started304153
Completed276138
Not completed2815
Withdrew: Adverse event23
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy13
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up124
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject114
Withdrew: Did not tolerate application10
Withdrew: Wanted to early terminate and use own product01
Withdrew: Missed visits due to new work schedule10

Outcome measures

PrimaryAchievement of Success on the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 8

The percentage of participants achieving IGA "success" is presented. Success is defined as a score of 0 ('clear') or 1 ('almost clear') plus a 2-point improvement at Week 8. The IGA is 5-point scale assessing the severity of seborrheic dermatitis with total scores ranging from 0 ('clear') to 4 ('severe') \[higher scores indicating greater severity\].

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of Success on the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 8
percentage of participantsRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
Achievement of Success on the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) at Week 880 (74 to 84)58 (50 to 66)
Statistical analysis
  • Roflumilast Foam 0.3% vs Vehicle Foam · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 2.79 · 95% CI 1.75 to 4.45Stratified by pooled site and IGA strata with multiple imputation to handle missing data
SecondaryAchievement of Success in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) at Week 8

The percentage of participants achieving WI-NRS "success" is presented. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the participant-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participants experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity). The endpoint is the average of daily assessments reported during each study week, and requires at least 4 daily assessments reported during the week. In participants with a weekly average baseline pruritus score of ≥4, "success" is defined as achievement of a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average WI-NRS pruritus score at Week 8.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of Success in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) at Week 8
percentage of participantsRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
Achievement of Success in the Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) at Week 863 (56 to 70)41 (31 to 51)
Statistical analysis
  • Roflumilast Foam 0.3% vs Vehicle Foam · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 2.95 · 95% CI 1.68 to 5.19Stratified by pooled site and IGA strata with multiple imputation to handle missing data
SecondaryAchievement of Success in the WI-NRS at Week 4

The percentage of participants achieving WI-NRS "success" is presented. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the participant-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participants experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity). The endpoint is the average of daily assessments reported during each study week, and requires at least 4 daily assessments reported during the week. In participants with a weekly average baseline pruritus score of ≥4, "success" is defined as achievement of a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average WI-NRS pruritus score at Week 4.

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of Success in the WI-NRS at Week 4
percentage of participantsRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
Achievement of Success in the WI-NRS at Week 448 (41 to 54)29 (21 to 39)
Statistical analysis
  • Roflumilast Foam 0.3% vs Vehicle Foam · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0007 · Odds ratio (or): 2.62 · 95% CI 1.47 to 4.67Stratified by pooled site and IGA strata with multiple imputation to handle missing data
SecondaryAchievement of Success in the WI-NRS at Week 2

The percentage of participants achieving WI-NRS "success" is presented. In participants with a weekly average baseline pruritus score of ≥4, "success" is defined as achievement of a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average WI-NRS pruritus score at Week 2. The endpoint is the average of daily assessments reported during each study week, and requires at least 4 daily assessments reported during the week. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the participant-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participants experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity).

Time frame:
Week 2
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of Success in the WI-NRS at Week 2
percentage of participantsRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
Achievement of Success in the WI-NRS at Week 233 (27 to 40)16 (10 to 24)
Statistical analysis
  • Roflumilast Foam 0.3% vs Vehicle Foam · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0016 · Odds ratio (or): 2.74 · 95% CI 1.41 to 5.34Stratified by pooled site and IGA strata with multiple imputation to handle missing data
SecondaryAchievement of Success on the IGA at Week 2

The percentage of participants achieving WI-NRS "success" is presented. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the participant-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the participants experienced in the previous 24 hours (higher scores indicate higher itch severity). The endpoint is the average of daily assessments reported during each study week, and requires at least 4 daily assessments reported during the week. In participants with a weekly average baseline pruritus score of ≥4, "success" is defined as achievement of a ≥4-point improvement from baseline in weekly average WI-NRS pruritus score at Week 2.

Time frame:
Week 2
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of Success on the IGA at Week 2
percentage of participantsRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
Achievement of Success on the IGA at Week 243 (37 to 49)26 (19 to 33)
Statistical analysis
  • Roflumilast Foam 0.3% vs Vehicle Foam · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.0002 · Odds ratio (or): 2.43 · 95% CI 1.54 to 3.84Pooled by site and IGA strata with multiple imputation to handle missing data
SecondaryAchievement of Success on the IGA at Week 4

The percentage of participants achieving IGA "success" is presented. Success is defined as a score of 0 ('clear') or 1 ('almost clear') plus a 2-point improvement at Week 8. The IGA is 5-point scale assessing the severity of seborrheic dermatitis with total scores ranging from 0 ('clear') to 4 ('severe') \[higher scores indicating greater severity\].

Time frame:
Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of Success on the IGA at Week 4
percentage of participantsRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
Achievement of Success on the IGA at Week 473.1 (67.67 to 77.83)47.1 (39.19 to 55.10)
Statistical analysis
  • Roflumilast Foam 0.3% vs Vehicle Foam · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 3.22 · 95% CI 2.06 to 5.03Pooled by site and IGA strata with multiple imputation to handle missing data
SecondaryAchievement of Overall Assessment of Scaling Score of 0 at Week 8

The percentage of participants achieving Overall Assessment of Scaling score of 0 at Week 8 is presented. The Overall Assessment of Scaling is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("No scaling: No scaling evident on lesions.") to 3 ("Severe: Coarse, thick scales, with flaking into clothes or skin."). Higher scores indicate greater symptom severity.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of Overall Assessment of Scaling Score of 0 at Week 8
percentage of participantsRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
Achievement of Overall Assessment of Scaling Score of 0 at Week 858 (52 to 63)37 (29 to 45)
Statistical analysis
  • Roflumilast Foam 0.3% vs Vehicle Foam · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 2.41 · 95% CI 1.56 to 3.73Stratified by pooled site and IGA strata with multiple imputation to handle missing data
SecondaryAchievement of Overall Assessment of Erythema Score of 0 at Week 8

The percentage of participants achieving Overall Assessment of Erythema score of 0 at Week 8 is presented. The Erythema Assessment is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("None: no evidence of erythema.") to 3 ("Severe: Intense \[fiery red\] erythema."). Higher scores indicate greater severity.

Time frame:
Week 8
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Achievement of Overall Assessment of Erythema Score of 0 at Week 8
percentage of participantsRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
Achievement of Overall Assessment of Erythema Score of 0 at Week 858 (52 to 63)32 (25 to 40)
Statistical analysis
  • Roflumilast Foam 0.3% vs Vehicle Foam · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = <0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 3.22 · 95% CI 2.05 to 5.06Stratified by pooled site and IGA strata with multiple imputation to handle missing data

Adverse events

Collected over Up to ~8 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Roflumilast Foam 0.3%0/304 (0%)1/304 (0.3%)0/304 (0%)
Vehicle Foam0/153 (0%)0/153 (0%)0/153 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventRoflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle Foam
KeratoacanthomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/3040/153

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Roflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle FoamTotal
Mean43.2 ± 16.8141.8 ± 17.4742.7 ± 17.03
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Roflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle FoamTotal
Female15178229
Male15375228
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Roflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle FoamTotal
Hispanic or Latino692897
Not Hispanic or Latino235125360
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Roflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle FoamTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native404
Asian181028
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American361551
White234122356
More than one race112
Other11415
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Baseline Score
Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Baseline Score(Participants)Roflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle FoamTotal
2 - Mild000
3 - Moderate287141428
4 - Severe171229
Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) Baseline Score
Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) Baseline Score(Participants)Roflumilast Foam 0.3%Vehicle FoamTotal
020929
1131427
2221032
3351651
4261541
5432063
6402262
7391756
8331649
914721
1012618
08

Study locations

53 sites
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 01
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85255, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 45
    Encinitas, California 92024, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 46
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 64
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 21
    Santa Monica, California 90404, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 42
    Coral Gables, Florida 33134, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 57
    Delray Beach, Florida 33484, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 33
    Largo, Florida 33770, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 31
    North Miami Beach, Florida 33162, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 65
    Sanford, Florida 32771, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 12
    Tampa, Florida 33613, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 10
    Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 03
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46250, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 22
    Plainfield, Indiana 46168, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 15
    Louisville, Kentucky 40217, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 04
    Lake Charles, Louisiana 70605, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 02
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 28
    Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 40
    Clinton Township, Michigan 48038, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 20
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 14
    Fridley, Minnesota 55432, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 44
    Saint Joseph, Missouri 64506, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 19
    Reno, Nevada 89509, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 34
    East Windsor, New Jersey 08520, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 63
    Bronx, New York 10462, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 66
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 23
    High Point, North Carolina 27262, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 70
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 18
    Bexley, Ohio 43209, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 71
    Portland, Oregon 97223, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 08
    Broomall, Pennsylvania 19008, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 27
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 06
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37922, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 13
    Arlington, Texas 76011, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 11
    Austin, Texas 78759, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 41
    College Station, Texas 77845, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 60
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 26
    Pflugerville, Texas 78660, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 72
    Plano, Texas 75024, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 54
    San Antonio, Texas 78213, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 24
    San Antonio, Texas 78218, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 07
    West Jordan, Utah 84088, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 17
    Norfolk, Virginia 23502, United States
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 35
    Calgary, Alberta T2J 7E1, Canada
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 37
    Surrey, British Columbia V3V 0C6, Canada
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 47
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3M 3Z4, Canada
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 43
    Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 1G9, Canada
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 16
    London, Ontario N6H 5L5, Canada
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 29
    Mississauga, Ontario L5H 1G9, Canada
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 30
    North Bay, Ontario P1B 3Z7, Canada
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 32
    Peterborough, Ontario K9J 5K2, Canada
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 36
    Waterloo, Ontario N2J 1C4, Canada
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 09
    Westmount, Quebec H3Z 2S6, Canada
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · May 5, 2022
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 22, 2022

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04973228
Lead sponsor
Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 22, 2021
Start date
Jul 8, 2021
Primary completion
Apr 6, 2022
Completion
Apr 6, 2022
Results posted
Mar 12, 2024
Last update
Mar 12, 2024

Study contacts

David Berk, MD
study director · Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion