CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04964869Updated Oct 24, 2024

Efficacy of Prophylactic Epinephrine Solution Injection in Prevention of Delayed Post-sphincterotomy

An interventional study of epinephrine solution injection in Bleeding Hemorrhage, sponsored by Wen-Hsin Huang. Recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-10-24.

Sponsored by Wen-Hsin Huang · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2021; still recruiting 5 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Bleeding is the most frequently reported serious complication of endoscopic sphincterotomy, and severe bleeding has occurred in about 1% to 2% of patients. Endoscopic injection of epinephrine is the most commonly used, effective, and least expensive method for the management of post- sphincterotomy bleeding. However, the efficacy of prophylactic saline-epinephrine solution injection to prevent delayed EST bleeding when transient bleeding During ERCP has not been established.

Read the detailed description

Backgroud:

Bleeding is the most frequently reported serious complication of endoscopic sphincterotomy, and severe bleeding has occurred in about 1% to 2% of patients. Endoscopic injection of epinephrine is the most commonly used, effective, and least expensive method for the management of post- sphincterotomy bleeding. However, the efficacy of prophylactic saline-epinephrine solution injection to prevent delayed EST bleeding when transient bleeding During ERCP has not been established.

Study Rationale:

The hypotheses of the study is the prophylactic saline-epinephrine solution injection affects incidence of delayed post-EST bleeding.

Study Design:

A single blinded parallel group, multiple center, randomized controlled trial. The sample size is estimated 400 (200 in injection group and 200 in non-injection group), The primary outcome is the rate of delayed EST bleeding within 30 days of ERCP.

Study Objectives:

Primary objective: the rate of post-EST bleeding within 30 days of ERCP Secondary objectives: the rate of post-ERCP advese effect, the increasing procedure time because of hemostasis, the need for angiographic/endoscopic hemostasis times.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bleeding Hemorrhage

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • sphincterotomy
  • epinephrine solution
03

In context

Hemorrhage

3,000 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemorrhage; 474 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 100 across 1,985 interventional studies indexed under Hemorrhage.

Browse Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Wen-Hsin Huang is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 20 years or older.
  • Ability to give informed consent.
  • An naive major papilla.
  • Transient bleeding after endoscopic sphincterotomy
  • Bleeding less than 30 secs when end of procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior endoscopic sphincterotomy.
  • Thrombocytopenia (platelets \<50,000/mm3).
  • Liver cirrhosis (Child A-C)
  • CKD stage 4-5 and dialysis.
  • Allergy to epinephrine
  • Prolonged PT/APTT (INR>1.5)
  • Had exposure any antithrombotic or antiplatelet agent in recent 7 days and/or will take those agents in one month after EST
  • Ampulla Vater tumor
  • Active GI bleeding
  • Pregnancy
  • Limited visibility when immediate bleeding after sphincterotomy
  • Still bleeding after 30 secs when end of procedure
  • Recurrent bleeding during ERCP
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Epinephrine solution injection group

    In injected group, The saline epinephrine solution (1mg in 10ml N/S) is injected to 2 sites of cutted papilla (1 o'clock and 11 o'clock) by injected needle, at least 0.5ml per injected site, and must be protruded from submucosal layer.

    Procedure: epinephrine solution injection

  • No intervention
    non-injection group

    In non injection group, the saline epinephrine solution is not given

Interventions

  • Procedureepinephrine solution injection

    epinephrine solution injection at least 1 ml to the post- sphincterotomy wound

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. post EST bleeding rate

    delay post-sphincterotomy bleeding rate

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • China Medical University Hospital
    Taichung, North Dist. 404332, Taiwan
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04964869
Lead sponsor
Wen-Hsin Huang
Responsible party
Wen-Hsin Huang (Gastroenterology and Hepatology Deputy Director, China Medical University Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2021
Start date
Jul 15, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 24, 2024

Study contacts

Shih-Chieh Chuang, MD
Contact
D18114@mail.cmuh.org.tw
+886-975680839
Wen-Hsin Huang, MD
Contact
u97766.huang@msa.hinet.net
+886-4-2205-2121 ext. 2233
Wen-Hsin Huang, MD
principal investigator · China Medical University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion