ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04956120Updated May 5, 2026Results posted

Effect of Citrate Dialysate on Vascular Calcification

An interventional study of Citrate Dialysate and Standard Dialysate in Vascular Calcification, sponsored by Emory University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Sponsored by Emory University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
54
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to determine whether hemodialysis with citrate slows the progression of vascular calcification. Participants will be dialyzed with one of two standard dialysis solutions, one with and one without citrate, for 12 months and then switched to the other solution for 12 months. Vascular calcification will be measured on mammograms that will be performed at 6-month intervals and additional blood samples will be obtained at 6-month intervals.

Read the detailed description

Vascular calcification is a significant problem in dialysis patients that leads to poor outcomes. Currently there is no therapy that directly addresses this problem. Some of the dialysis solutions (dialysates) currently in use contain citrate, a potent inhibitor of calcium precipitation. In particular, citrate can bind to nascent hydroxyapatite crystals and prevent their propagation. Blood citrate levels are greater after dialysis with citrate dialysates than with non-citrate dialysates, which could slow vascular calcification. However, this has never been investigated. Prior research has shown that arterial calcification can be easily detected and reliably measured on routine digital mammograms, with sufficient sensitivity to follow progression. Mammography is more sensitive in detecting arterial calcification than other imaging and associated with far less radiation and cost. This will allow the researchers to detect differences between citrate and non-citrate dialysates in a safe and convenient way. Participants will be dialyzed with one of two standard dialysis solutions, one with and one without citrate, for 12 months and then switched to the other solution for 12 months. Vascular calcification will be measured by mammography every 6 months. The endpoint will be the difference in the rate of progression of breast arterial calcification (BAC) between dialysis with citrate and non-citrate dialysates.

02

Conditions studied

  • Vascular Calcification

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hemodialysis
  • Breast arterial calcification
03

In context

Vascular Calcification

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Vascular Calcification; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 54 is below the median of 64 across 56 interventional studies indexed under Vascular Calcification.

Browse Vascular Calcification studies →

Lead sponsor

Emory University is the lead sponsor of 1,405 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 237 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 178 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • hemodialysis patients with BAC on mammograms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current warfarin use
  • severe hyperparathyroidism (likely to undergo parathyroidectomy in the next 2 years)
  • difficulty controlling serum calcium (likely to require changes in dialysate calcium concentration in the next 2 years)
  • \< 2 years
  • prisoners
  • inability to give consent
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
54 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Citrate Dialysate then Standard Dialysate

    Participants receiving hemodialysis using a citrate acid concentrate dialysate for the first year of the study, then receiving hemodialysis using a non-citrate acid concentrate dialysate (standard dialysate) for the second year of the study.

    Device: Citrate Dialysate · Device: Standard Dialysate

  • Active comparator
    Standard Dialysate then Citrate Dialysate

    Participants receiving hemodialysis using a non-citrate acid concentrate dialysate for the first year of the study, then receiving hemodialysis using a citrate acid concentrate dialysate for the second year of the study.

    Device: Citrate Dialysate · Device: Standard Dialysate

Interventions

  • DeviceCitrate Dialysate

    Dialysate is generated during dialysate from two concentrates (acid concentrate and bicarbonate concentrate) mixed with treated water. When used, citrate is provided in the acid concentrate. The acid concentrate with citrate is approved for this use by the FDA and will be used according to standard procedures without altered dialysis machine settings.

    Also known as: Citrasate

  • DeviceStandard Dialysate

    Dialysate is generated during dialysate from two concentrates (acid concentrate and bicarbonate concentrate) mixed with treated water. The acid concentrate without citrate is approved for this use by the FDA and will be used according to standard procedures without altered dialysis machine settings.

    Also known as: Naturalyte

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Length of Calcified Artery Segments

    Rate of progression of breast arterial calcification (BAC) is calculated by linear regression of 3 mammograms over one year in each treatment arm (Months 0, 6 and 12 versus Months 12, 18 and 24). Progression of calcification is quantified as the length of calcified artery segments per year, measured in millimeters. Slower progression of vascular calcification, indicated by lower values, is a desirable outcome.

    Time frame: 3 measurements during 12 months of treatment for each study period (up to 24 months for both years of the study)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Serum Ionized Calcium (iCa)

    Blood samples were drawn to assess mineral metabolism prior to hemodialysis (HD) and after HD. The values are the mean milligrams (mg) of ionized calcium per deciliter (dL) of blood from two measurements during each study period.

    Time frame: Pre-HD and Post-HD during each study period (up to 24 months for both years of the study)

  2. Serum Magnesium (Mg)

    Blood samples were drawn to assess mineral metabolism prior to and after hemodialysis (HD). The values are mean milligrams (mg) of magnesium per deciliter (dL) of blood from two measurements during each study period.

    Time frame: Pre-HD and Post-HD during each study period (up to 24 months for both years of the study)

  3. Plasma Citrate

    Blood samples were drawn to assess mineral metabolism prior to hemodialysis (HD) and after HD. The values are the mean from two measurements during each study period.

    Time frame: Pre-HD and Post-HD during each study period (up to 24 months for both years of the study)

07

Results

Posted May 5, 2026

Participant flow

The first individual gave informed consent to participate on May 27, 2021 and all study follow up was complete by March 18, 2025. Participants were enrolled from Emory Dialysis centers in Atlanta and Decatur, Georgia, USA.

First year of study
Participant flow — First year of study
MilestoneCitrate Dialysate Then Standard DialysateStandard Dialysate Then Citrate Dialysate
Started2925
Completed1717
Not completed128
Withdrew: Death24
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up52
Withdrew: Physician decision31
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11
Second year of study
Participant flow — Second year of study
MilestoneCitrate Dialysate Then Standard DialysateStandard Dialysate Then Citrate Dialysate
Started1717
Completed1613
Not completed14
Withdrew: Death11
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up02
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryLength of Calcified Artery Segments

Rate of progression of breast arterial calcification (BAC) is calculated by linear regression of 3 mammograms over one year in each treatment arm (Months 0, 6 and 12 versus Months 12, 18 and 24). Progression of calcification is quantified as the length of calcified artery segments per year, measured in millimeters. Slower progression of vascular calcification, indicated by lower values, is a desirable outcome.

Time frame:
3 measurements during 12 months of treatment for each study period (up to 24 months for both years of the study)
Reported as:
Median · millimeters (mm) per year
Length of Calcified Artery Segments
millimeters (mm) per yearCitrate DialysateStandard Dialysate
Length of Calcified Artery Segments47 (10 to 124)9 (-4 to 34)
SecondarySerum Ionized Calcium (iCa)

Blood samples were drawn to assess mineral metabolism prior to hemodialysis (HD) and after HD. The values are the mean milligrams (mg) of ionized calcium per deciliter (dL) of blood from two measurements during each study period.

Time frame:
Pre-HD and Post-HD during each study period (up to 24 months for both years of the study)
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Serum Ionized Calcium (iCa)
mg/dLCitrate DialysateStandard Dialysate
Pre-HD4.8 ± 0.074.8 ± 0.10
Post-HD4.6 ± 0.044.9 ± 0.08
SecondarySerum Magnesium (Mg)

Blood samples were drawn to assess mineral metabolism prior to and after hemodialysis (HD). The values are mean milligrams (mg) of magnesium per deciliter (dL) of blood from two measurements during each study period.

Time frame:
Pre-HD and Post-HD during each study period (up to 24 months for both years of the study)
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Serum Magnesium (Mg)
mg/dLCitrate DialysateStandard Dialysate
Pre-HD2.3 ± 0.042.4 ± 0.07
Post-HD2.0 ± 0.022.1 ± 0.03
SecondaryPlasma Citrate

Blood samples were drawn to assess mineral metabolism prior to hemodialysis (HD) and after HD. The values are the mean from two measurements during each study period.

Time frame:
Pre-HD and Post-HD during each study period (up to 24 months for both years of the study)
Reported as:
Mean · micrometer (uM)
Plasma Citrate
micrometer (uM)Citrate DialysateStandard Dialysate
Pre-HD134 ± 9130 ± 7
Post-HD383 ± 16187 ± 20

Adverse events

Collected over Information on adverse events was collected beginning at the start of the study intervention and continued through the final assessment at Month 24 (up to 24 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Citrate Dialysate3/54 (5.6%)0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)
Standard Dialysate5/54 (9.3%)0/54 (0%)0/54 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Citrate Dialysate Then Standard DialysateStandard Dialysate Then Citrate DialysateTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years221840
>=65 years7714
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Citrate Dialysate Then Standard DialysateStandard Dialysate Then Citrate DialysateTotal
Mean56.4 ± 9.559.8 ± 11.358.0 ± 10.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Citrate Dialysate Then Standard DialysateStandard Dialysate Then Citrate DialysateTotal
Female292554
Male000
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Citrate Dialysate Then Standard DialysateStandard Dialysate Then Citrate DialysateTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino292554
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Citrate Dialysate Then Standard DialysateStandard Dialysate Then Citrate DialysateTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American292554
White000
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Citrate Dialysate Then Standard DialysateStandard Dialysate Then Citrate DialysateTotal
United States292554
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Emory Dialysis at Northside
    Atlanta, Georgia 30318, United States
  • Emory Dialysis at Greenbriar
    Atlanta, Georgia 30331, United States
  • Emory Dialysis at North Decatur
    Decatur, Georgia 30033, United States
  • Emory Dialysis at Candler
    Decatur, Georgia 30034, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data collected during this trial may be made available for sharing with other researchers.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Sharing will begin after publication of results from this study.

Access criteria: Individual participant data will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal in order to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be directed to Dr. O'Neill at woneill@emory.edu.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04956120
Lead sponsor
Emory University
Collaborators
Fresenius Medical Care Renal Therapies Group (FMCRTG)
Responsible party
Charles O'Neill (Professor, Emory University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 9, 2021
Start date
May 27, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 18, 2025
Completion
Mar 18, 2025
Results posted
May 5, 2026
Last update
May 5, 2026

Study contacts

W. Charles O'Neill, MD
principal investigator · Emory University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion