CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04942704Updated Apr 5, 2022

Development of Protocols and Methods for Image Processing and Enhancement of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Data.

An observational study in MRI Image Enhancement, sponsored by Medic Vision Imaging Solutions Ltd. Status unknown at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-05.

Sponsored by Medic Vision Imaging Solutions Ltd · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to develop new methods for image processing and enhancement of MRI data. Different setting of acquisition parameters used in conventional clinical MRI protocols will be defined, to create "New Protocols".

The specific aim of this study is to assess and to improve the performance of our image processing methods, by comparing diagnostic qualities of images obtained by conventional MRI protocols with those obtained by corresponding New Protocols' and processed by our image enhancement method.

02

Conditions studied

  • MRI Image Enhancement
03

In context

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Medic Vision Imaging Solutions Ltd as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Total number of subjects expected to participate in this study is up to 100. The study population consists of patients who will go through their standard care MRI exam. Children, pregnant women and prisoners that are considered vulnerable population by federal regulation will not be included in this study. In addition, decisional incapacity subject will be excluded.

Inclusion criteria

  • Volunteers for clinical MRI examination
  • Patients undergoing clinical MRI examination
  • Capable to provide an informed written consent form

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any contraindication to MRI scanning, such as pacemakers or heart rhythm disturbances, permanent cosmetics or certain metallic implants in the body (excluding dental implants).
  • Age \<18 years old
  • Pregnancy
  • Claustrophobia
  • Decisional incapacity, mentally disabled,
  • MRI exam under sedation or monitoring equipment.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • OtherNon interventional Imaging - MRI

    MRI Scanning using short protocols

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Image Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR)

    Comparing the SNR of images obtained by conventional protocols with the corresponding New Protocols' processed images. The comparison will be performed by neuroradiologists, using a 7-point Likert-scale. Where higher the score, better the outcome (1 means unacceptable and 7 means excellent).

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 months.

  2. Image Resolution

    Comparing the resolution of images obtained by conventional protocols with the corresponding New Protocols' processed images. The comparison will be performed by neuroradiologists, using a 7-point Likert-scale. Where higher the score, better the outcome (1 means unacceptable and 7 means excellent).

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 months.

  3. MRI contrast

    Comparing MR contrast of images obtained by conventional protocols with the corresponding New Protocols' processed images. The comparison will be performed by neuroradiologists, using a 7-point Likert-scale. Where higher the score, better the outcome (1 means unacceptable and 7 means excellent).

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 months.

  4. Artifacts

    Comparing artifacts of images obtained by conventional protocols with the corresponding New Protocols' processed images. The comparison will be performed by neuroradiologists, using a 7-point Likert-scale. Where higher the score, better the outcome (1 means unacceptable and 7 means excellent).

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 months.

  5. Diagnostic quality

    Comparing diagnostic quality of images obtained by conventional protocols with the corresponding New Protocols' processed images. The comparison will be performed by neuroradiologists, using a 7-point Likert-scale. Where higher the score, better the outcome (1 means unacceptable and 7 means excellent).

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 months.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Houston Medical Imaging
    Houston, Texas 77098, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04942704
Lead sponsor
Medic Vision Imaging Solutions Ltd
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 28, 2021
Start date
Jun 15, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 5, 2022

Study contacts

Libi Mori
Contact
libi@medicvision.com
+972522260167

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion