An interventional study of Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy and Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer, sponsored by Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 21 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-01.
Sponsored by Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to confirm whether there is a difference between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in patient survival for Cervical Cancer (Stage IB1, IB2, IIA1).
The purpose of this study is to compare LRH (or robotic-assisted) and ARH in patients with cervical cancer (Stage IB1, IB2, IIA1), by a multicenter stratified randomized controlled study, mainly including the following aspects:
1,881 studies on the registry are indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; 567 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 780 is above the median of 100 across 1,377 interventional studies indexed under Uterine Cervical Neoplasms.
Browse Uterine Cervical Neoplasms studies →Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
the group of LRH
Other: Total Laparoscopic or Robotic Radical Hysterectomy
the group of ARH
Other: Total Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy
Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.
Radical hysterectomy with bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection is performed as standard type C RH by Q-M classification, including cardinal ligaments divided at pelvic sidewall and uterosacral ligaments divided at near the sacral origin and the upper 1/4 to 1/3 of the vagina.
the rate of PFS at 5 years
The curves of PFS at 5 years will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The logrank test will be used to test the above hypothesis, the 5-year PFS rate difference and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for the comparison between the two groups will be estimated.
Time frame: 5 years from surgery
the rate of OS at 5 years
Cox proportional hazards model will be used to estimate the hazard ratio and 95% CI for the effect of treatment on the 5-year OS rate.
Time frame: 5 years from surgery
Analysis of continuous outcomes
Compare these between groups(The continuous outcomes include operative duration, anesthesia time, blood loss during operation, postoperative pain score and postoperative hospital stay.)
Time frame: 1 years from surgery
Analysis of binary outcomes
Compare these between groups(The intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, one-month and one-year postoperative quality of life and sexual life will be treated as binary outcomes and will be summarised by number (%) of participants with the event.)
Time frame: 5 years from surgery
Safety analysis
Adverse events (AEs) will be summarised using the number of AEs, the number (%) of participants with AEs by groups.
Time frame: 5 years from surgery
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University