An interventional study of Virtual educational intervention and Written educational intervention in Asthma and Allergy, sponsored by Universidad de Granada. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-16.
Sponsored by Universidad de Granada · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Despite its importance, there are few studies that implement the use of new technologies in the approach to patients with asthma and allergy. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a telematic educational intervention in patients with allergies and / or asthma
3,921 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 506 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 83 across 2,752 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.
Browse Asthma studies →Universidad de Granada is the lead sponsor of 241 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Educational intervention about the disease, the use of medication and the context of pandemic
Behavioral: Virtual educational intervention
Educacional intervention about the disease, the use of medication and the context of pandemic
Behavioral: Written educational intervention
Control intervention
Educational intervention about the disease, the use of medication and the context of pandemic
Educational intervention about the disease, the use of medication and the context of pandemic
Asthma knowledge questionnaire
Questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge about asthma. The questionnaire consists of 23 questions, some of them with several items. In total, there are 54 possible true / false / don't know answers. Each correct answer is given the value of one point and each incorrect or unknown answer a score of 0. Thus, the score that can be obtained in total is 0-54.
Time frame: Baseline
Asthma knowledge questionnaire
Questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge about asthma. The questionnaire consists of 23 questions, some of them with several items. In total, there are 54 possible true / false / don't know answers. Each correct answer is given the value of one point and each incorrect or unknown answer a score of 0. Thus, the score that can be obtained in total is 0-54.
Time frame: 1month
Allergic rhinitis knowledge questionnaire
Questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge about Allergic rhinitis. It includes 7 items. Patients have to answer true/false. Higher puntuation indicates better knowledge results.
Time frame: Baseline
Allergic rhinitis knowledge questionnaire
Questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge about Allergic rhinitis. It includes 7 items. Patients have to answer true/false. Higher puntuation indicates better knowledge results.
Time frame: 1month
Inhaler technique checklist
Checklist to evaluate the technique of inhaler. It contains several items that need to be checked. If the patient has a puntuation of 0-3 it is considered poor technique; If the patien has a puntuation of 4-5 it is considered the patient has a Moderate technique and if the patient has 6-7 points the technique is Good
Time frame: Baseline
Inhaler technique checklist
Checklist to evaluate the technique of inhaler. It contains several items that need to be checked. If the patient has a puntuation of 0-3 it is considered poor technique; If the patien has a puntuation of 4-5 it is considered the patient has a Moderate technique and if the patient has 6-7 points the technique is Good
Time frame: 1month
Knowledge of COVID
Questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge about COVID-19. It includes 12 items. Patients have to answer true/false. Higher puntuation indicates better knowledge results.
Time frame: Baseline
Knowledge of COVID
Questionnaire to evaluate the knowledge about COVID-19. It includes 12 items. Patients have to answer true/false. Higher puntuation indicates better knowledge results.
Time frame: 1month
Asthma control questionnaire
A simple questionnaire to measure the adequacy of asthma control and change in asthma control which occurs either spontaneously or as a result of treatment. 7 items; 1 week recall (for items on symptoms and rescue inhaler use). 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6= maximum impairment for symptoms and rescue use; and 7 categories for FEV1%). Minimally important difference: Change in score of 0.5
Time frame: Baseline
Asthma control questionnaire
A simple questionnaire to measure the adequacy of asthma control and change in asthma control which occurs either spontaneously or as a result of treatment. 7 items; 1 week recall (for items on symptoms and rescue inhaler use). 7-point scale (0=no impairment, 6= maximum impairment for symptoms and rescue use; and 7 categories for FEV1%). Minimally important difference: Change in score of 0.5
Time frame: 1month
Allergic rhinitis control test
It is 5-item questionnaire about the control of allergic rhinitis. Questions are scored from 1 to 5 and evaluated for rhinitis during the last 2 weeks. Total score between 5 and 25. ≥ 20: Good control of rhinitis; \<20: Poor control of rhinitis
Time frame: Baseline
Allergic rhinitis control test
It is 5-item questionnaire about the control of allergic rhinitis. Questions are scored from 1 to 5 and evaluated for rhinitis during the last 2 weeks. Total score between 5 and 25. ≥ 20: Good control of rhinitis; \<20: Poor control of rhinitis
Time frame: 1month
Fear of COVID-19 Scale
Bangla fear of COVID (FCV19-S): It is a questionnaire that assesses the fear of COVID-19. It consists of 7 items scored on a 5-item Likert scale. The higher the score, the more fear.
Time frame: Baseline
Fear of COVID-19 Scale
Bangla fear of COVID (FCV19-S): It is a questionnaire that assesses the fear of COVID-19. It consists of 7 items scored on a 5-item Likert scale. The higher the score, the more fear.
Time frame: 1month
COVID-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS)
Coronavirus anxiety scale (CAS): It is a scale that measures the anxiety generated by COVID-19 in the last two weeks. It presents 5 items and a score\> 9 indicates dysfunctional anxiety associated with the pandemic.
Time frame: Baseline
COVID-19 Anxiety Scale (CAS)
Coronavirus anxiety scale (CAS): It is a scale that measures the anxiety generated by COVID-19 in the last two weeks. It presents 5 items and a score\> 9 indicates dysfunctional anxiety associated with the pandemic.
Time frame: 1month
COVID Stress Scales
COVID stress scale (CSS): is a 36-item COVID Stress Scale (CSS) to measure these features, as they pertain to COVID-19. The CSS were developed to better understand and assess COVID-19-related distress. The scales were intentionally designed so they could be readily adapted for future pandemics.
Time frame: Baseline
COVID Stress Scales
COVID stress scale (CSS): is a 36-item COVID Stress Scale (CSS) to measure these features, as they pertain to COVID-19. The CSS were developed to better understand and assess COVID-19-related distress. The scales were intentionally designed so they could be readily adapted for future pandemics.
Time frame: 1month
Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler
This is a 10 items self-completed questionnaire to assess patient opinions regarding ease or difficulty of use, portability, and usability of devices for delivery of inhaled corticosteroids. The score ranges from 10-50 points. ≥ 43 points indicates high satisfaction; \<43 points indicates low satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline
Feeling of Satisfaction with Inhaler
This is a 10 items self-completed questionnaire to assess patient opinions regarding ease or difficulty of use, portability, and usability of devices for delivery of inhaled corticosteroids. The score ranges from 10-50 points. ≥ 43 points indicates high satisfaction; \<43 points indicates low satisfaction
Time frame: 1month
Test of Adherence to Inhalers
12-item questionnaire designed to assess the adherence to inhalers. The final version of the questionnaire included 12 items with two main domains, the patient (items #1 to #10) and the health professional (items #11 and #12) domain. In fact, the TAI consists of two complementary questionnaires: the 10-items TAI was designed to identify non-adherent patients and to establish the non-adherence level, whereas the 12-items TAI was designed to guide clinically the non-adherence patterns.An erratic and deliberate non-adherent behavioral pattern was defined in the presence of scores ≤24 for items #1 to #5 and items #6 to #10, respectively. The unwitting pattern was defined in the presence of a score 1 in at least one of the #11 or #12 items of the questionnaire.
Time frame: Baseline
Test of Adherence to Inhalers
12-item questionnaire designed to assess the adherence to inhalers. The final version of the questionnaire included 12 items with two main domains, the patient (items #1 to #10) and the health professional (items #11 and #12) domain. In fact, the TAI consists of two complementary questionnaires: the 10-items TAI was designed to identify non-adherent patients and to establish the non-adherence level, whereas the 12-items TAI was designed to guide clinically the non-adherence patterns.An erratic and deliberate non-adherent behavioral pattern was defined in the presence of scores ≤24 for items #1 to #5 and items #6 to #10, respectively. The unwitting pattern was defined in the presence of a score 1 in at least one of the #11 or #12 items of the questionnaire.
Time frame: 1month
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universidad de Granada