An interventional study of tourniquet and No tourniquet in Arthritis Knee, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-15.
Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is determine the effect on novel pressure-regulating tourniquet use on pain, functional recovery, sleep and total blood loss following total knee arthroplasty.
Functional recovery after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen dramatic improvement over the past 20 years through advances in surgical technique, implant design, perioperative pain management strategies, and physical therapy protocols. Tourniquet use during TKA, however, remains controversial due to conflicting reports in the literature on these benefits and risks of its use. Reported advantages of tourniquet use include improved visualization of the surgical field and decreased intraoperative blood loss. Reported disadvantages of tourniquet use include increased postoperative pain and slower functional recovery as a direct result of the pressure of the tourniquet on the thigh during the procedure.
Traditionally with tourniquet use during TKA, the limb is exsanguinated and the tourniquet is raised to a fixed, pressure at the beginning of the case, typically 250mmHg to 350mmHg, and let down after closure. A novel tourniquet design that adjusts the tourniquet pressure in real-time based on intraoperative patient blood pressure measurements. This design may allow for the tourniquet to be inflated at a lower mean pressure while still maintaining efficacy.
A prospective study comparing total blood loss, pain and functional recovery after TKA using this novel tourniquet design, design (Zimmer A.T.S.® 4000TS Automatic Tourniquet System, with disposable contour cuffs) and TKA without tourniquet would further the current literature. Total blood loss will be calculated by previously validated methods. Pain and functional recovery will be closely monitored throughout the postoperative period using a patient wearable activity tracker (FitBit Inspire HR) and a smartphone-based patient engagement platform with integrated digital surveys paired with smart-brace based home PT assessments (FocusMotion).Pain and functional recovery will be closely monitored throughout the postoperative period using a patient wearable activity tracker (FitBit Inspire HR) and a smartphone-based patient engagement platform with integrated digital surveys paired with smart-brace based home PT assessments (FocusMotion). Applying this technology to the proposed study can help identify problematic pain that is not appreciable during admission; given the fact that markers of inflammation and myocyte damage increase over time until at least post-operative day 3, it is possible that TKAs performed under tourniquet may have pain and narcotic requirements not appreciated with short-stay admissions . The proposed study will further the literature on pain and narcotic use in the early time period after TKA, and will help identify if tourniquet has an effect on these variables.
Furthermore, sleep quality is a component of functional recovery and is correlated with pain. Knee osteoarthritis affects general quality of life by increasing sleep disturbance and nighttime wakening, and this is correlated with the pre-operative radiographic severity of disease. Sleep quality is affected in the immediate post-operative period after TKA as well, but improves by 3-6 months post-operatively . The proposed study would be the largest prospective study investigating the effect of TKA on pain and sleep quality, as well as being the first to investigate tourniquet use as a factor affecting sleep quality and pain. The proposed study would be the first to collect both subjective and objective data on the subject, using validated survey measurements as well as the data collected by the Fitbit Inspire HR device.
3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 317 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 165 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.
Browse Arthritis studies →Washington University School of Medicine is the lead sponsor of 1,764 studies on the registry; 270 are open to participants now.
Of its 325 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 212 (65%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients in this group get a tourniquet during surgery.
Device: tourniquet
Patients in this group do not get a tourniquet during surgery.
Device: No tourniquet
tourniquet is a device used during total knee surgery.
tourniquet is a device used during total knee surgery, this group does not get one
Pain After TKA Measured by VAS Pain Survey on Focusmotion App
Effect of tourniquet use on pain after TKA, 0-10 scale with 10 being higher pain, VAS pain survey
Time frame: 1 year
Functional Recovery Measured by Oxford Knee Score Scale
Effect of tourniquet use on functional recovery after TKA. Score each question (item) from 0 to 4 with 0 being the worst outcome and 4 being the best outcome. The scores are then summed to produce an overall score running from 0 (worst possible) to 48 (best outcome).
Time frame: 1 year
Functional Recovery Measured by Forgotten Joint Score
Effect of tourniquet use on functional recovery after TKA. Scale measures how much patient is aware of their joint after surgery. a total of 12 questions are answered asking about awareness of the knee joint. Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories. Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score. Final score = 100 - ((sum(item01 to item12) - 12)/48\*100) 0:Represents the worst possible score, indicating the highest level of joint awareness and the least ability to forget. 100:Represents the best possible score, indicating the lowest level of joint awareness and the greatest ability to forget
Time frame: 1 year
Functional Recovery Measured by Normal Knee Survey
Effect of tourniquet use on functional recovery after TKA measured by a score of 0-100, 100 being knee feels normal, 0 means knee does not feel normal
Time frame: 1 year
Hours of Sleep Per Night Postoperatively
Investigate sleep quality in post-operative period after TKA using fitbit tracker average hours of sleep at night
Time frame: 3 months
Total Blood Loss
effect of tourniquet use on total calculated blood loss after TKA. this is calculated by change in hemoglobin in g/dL from preop to periop.
Time frame: 1 day
| Milestone | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 82 | 83 |
| Completed | 57 | 58 |
| Not completed | 25 | 25 |
Effect of tourniquet use on pain after TKA, 0-10 scale with 10 being higher pain, VAS pain survey
| score on a scale | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery |
|---|---|---|
| Pain After TKA Measured by VAS Pain Survey on Focusmotion App | 2.8 ± 1.5 | 2.6 ± 1.8 |
Effect of tourniquet use on functional recovery after TKA. Score each question (item) from 0 to 4 with 0 being the worst outcome and 4 being the best outcome. The scores are then summed to produce an overall score running from 0 (worst possible) to 48 (best outcome).
| score on a scale | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Recovery Measured by Oxford Knee Score Scale | 43.0 ± 6.28 | 41.37 ± 8.84 |
Effect of tourniquet use on functional recovery after TKA. Scale measures how much patient is aware of their joint after surgery. a total of 12 questions are answered asking about awareness of the knee joint. Every question is scored 1 (never) to 5 (mostly) according to the selected response categories. Thus, the raw score ranges from 12 to 60. The raw score is linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale and then reversed to obtain the final score. Final score = 100 - ((sum(item01 to item12) - 12)/48\*100) 0:Represents the worst possible score, indicating the highest level of joint awareness and the least ability to forget. 100:Represents the best possible score, indicating the lowest level of joint awareness and the greatest ability to forget
| score on a scale | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Recovery Measured by Forgotten Joint Score | 68.4 ± 28.2 | 70.9 ± 77.4 |
Effect of tourniquet use on functional recovery after TKA measured by a score of 0-100, 100 being knee feels normal, 0 means knee does not feel normal
| score on a scale | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery |
|---|---|---|
| Functional Recovery Measured by Normal Knee Survey | 79.3 ± 90 | 81.5 ± 20.1 |
Investigate sleep quality in post-operative period after TKA using fitbit tracker average hours of sleep at night
| hours of sleep | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery |
|---|---|---|
| Hours of Sleep Per Night Postoperatively | 5.41 ± 2.23 | 6.47 ± 1.63 |
effect of tourniquet use on total calculated blood loss after TKA. this is calculated by change in hemoglobin in g/dL from preop to periop.
| g/dL hemoglobin | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery |
|---|---|---|
| Total Blood Loss | 13.9 ± 1.4 | 11.5 ± 1.3 |
Collected over Ae's collected up to 1 year.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tourniquet During Surgery | 1/57 (1.8%) | 1/57 (1.8%) | 0/57 (0%) |
| No Tourniquet During Surgery | 0/58 (0%) | 0/58 (0%) | 0/58 (0%) |
| Event | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery |
|---|---|---|
| urinary retention lower abdominal and back painHepatobiliary disorders | 1/57 | 0/58 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 43 | 39 | 82 |
| >=65 years | 14 | 19 | 33 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 63.4 (18 to 80) | 64.6 (18 to 80) | 64 (18 to 80) |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 22 | 34 | 56 |
| Male | 35 | 24 | 59 |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants) | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Count of participants | — | — | 0 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Tourniquet During Surgery | No Tourniquet During Surgery | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 57 | 58 | 115 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Washington University School of Medicine