An interventional study of in Situ Simulation in in Situ Simulation, sponsored by Jean François Brichant. Status unknown at 1 site in Belgium. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-10.
Sponsored by Jean François Brichant · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Since 1988, simulation has been proposed as a teaching tool in Anesthesia. The simulation environment allows to teach learners non-technical skills which are a combination of cognitive, social, and personal resources complementary to procedural skills that contribute to an efficient and safe performance.
Non-technical skills traditionally used in Anesthesia are task management, situational awareness, teamwork and decision making. They can be indirectly measured with validated scales (e.g. Anesthesia Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) system). In addition to these basic skills, specific skills such as Anesthesia Crisis Resource Management (ACRM) are required when the patient presents a critical clinical situation.
Simulation, as proposed by Gaba, was initially practiced in centers specifically designed for this purpose. More recently, we have proposed the model of in situ simulation, i.e. in the usual workplace with the usual work team, as another option for the practice of simulation.
There are many theories about the transfer of learning. Transfer can be defined as what remains of the completed training that the learner actually uses, i.e. the final real effect.
Nevertheless, almost 30 years after the introduction of simulation in the training of anesthesiologists, data demonstrating the interest of this teaching in terms of transfer of learning of non-technical skills to clinical practice or benefits for patients are rare.
The main objective of this study is to evaluate the transfer of non-technical skills taught in a training program including in situ simulation to clinical practice by anesthesiology residents.
This is the only study on the registry with Jean François Brichant as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Anesthesiology residents do not receive any in situ simulation sessions during the observation period
Anesthesiology residents receive in situ simulations sessions during the observation period
Other: in Situ Simulation
2 sessions of in situ simulation with 4 crisis scenarios and debriefing focused on non technical skills
ANTS (Anesthesia non technical skills) score
15 items - From 1(poor) to 4 (good) for each item - Minimum 15 - Maximum 60
Time frame: Once a day for 5 consecutive days between the first and the 15th day after enrollment in the study
ANTS (Anesthesia non technical skills) score
15 items - From 1(poor) to 4 (good) for each item - Minimum 15 - Maximum 60
Time frame: Once a day for 5 consecutive days between the 30th and 45th day after enrollment
ANTS (Anesthesia non technical skills) score
15 items - From 1(poor) to 4 (good) for each item - Minimum 15 - Maximum 60
Time frame: Once a day for 5 consecutive days between the 3rd and the 4th month after enrollment
DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) scale
Time frame: Once within the first 15 days of enrollment
DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) scale
Time frame: Once between the 30th and the 45th day after enrollment
DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) scale
Time frame: Once between the 3rd and the 4th month after enrollment
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.