CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04911192Updated Jun 18, 2021

Catheter-Directed Pulmonary Reperfusion in Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism Patients

An interventional study of mechanical fragmentation and In Situ thrombolysis in Pulmonary Embolism, sponsored by Assiut University. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-18.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jun 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  • Primary objective: to evaluate the success and mortality rates of catheter-directed reperfusion therapy in comparison to traditional use of systemic intravenous fibrinolytic therapy, will focus at safety of such management measured by in-hospital mortality and prevalence of severe adverse events.
  • Secondary objective: to assess the feasibility of catheter-directed reperfusion in management of intermediate and high risk pulmonary embolism in Assiut University hospital and its reflection on pulmonary artery pressure
Read the detailed description

Venous thromboembolic disease represents one of the most important causes of cardiovascular death in the world. Symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) occurs in about 500,000 patients annually, with an estimated mortality as high as 30% in high-risk patients .

High-risk pulmonary embolism clinically manifests with hemodynamic instability and systemic hypotension (systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg, pressure drop of more than 40 mm Hg or requiring administration of inotropic agents. In this form of PE (pulmonary embolism) imaging studies usually reveal a "saddle embolus" at the bifurcation of the pulmonary trunk, embolism of the main pulmonary artery, or embolic occlusion of at least two lobar arteries.

Mortality in high-risk pulmonary embolism is at the level of 60%, and in 66% of these patients fatal outcomes take place during the first hours from the onset of clinical symptoms. The remaining patients with severe pulmonary embolism , those with intermediate risk of mortality, do not reveal hypotension, but present with clinical symptoms comprising dyspnea and/or tachycardia. Estimated 30-day mortality in patients with intermediate risk PE (pulmonary embolism) is at the level of 15-20%, and these patients are at a risk of developing pulmonary hypertension and right ventricle heart failure. Given the fact that 40% of patients with class 4 or 5 of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index present with contraindications for systemic fibrinolytic therapy, Catheter-directed reperfusion therapy seems to be a promising alternative treatment modality.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Embolism

Keywords

  • pulmonary embolism
03

In context

Pulmonary Embolism

739 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Embolism; 159 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 150 across 381 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Embolism.

Browse Pulmonary Embolism studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 4,901 studies on the registry; 2,098 are open to participants now.

Of its 13 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age >18 years old.
  • Both gender males and females.
  • Patients with angiographically confirmed acute high risk pulmonary embolism with shock index >1.
  • pulmonary arterial occlusion with >50% involvement of the central (main and/or lobar) pulmonary, and dysfunction of the right ventricle and elevated troponin.
  • patients with high risk pulmonary embolism who remain unstable after receiving fibrinolysis
  • patients with high risk PE pulmonary embolism who cannot receive fibrinolysis
  • patients with intermediate high risk PE pulmonary embolism with adverse prognosis (new hemodynamic instability, worsening respiratory failure, severe RV (right ventricle) dysfunction, or major myocardial necrosis)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with echocardiographically confirmed right sided thrombi.
  • patients with low-risk PE pulmonary embolism or submassive acute PE pulmonary embolism with minor RV (right ventricle) dysfunction, minor myocardial necrosis, and no clinical worsening
  • Anaphylactic reaction to contrast media.
  • Acute renal failure or severe chronic non-dialysis dependent kidney disease.
  • Uncooperative patient
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    systemic thrombolysis group

    patients without any contraindications for systemic fibrinolytic therapy will be treated with traditional systemic thrombolysis (intravenous administration of streptokinase).

  • Active comparator
    mechanical fragmentation group

    patients will be treated with catheter-directed mechanical fragmentation under fluoroscopy guidance. This group will include patients with absolute contraindication for fibrinolytic therapy.

    Procedure: mechanical fragmentation

  • Active comparator
    In Situ thrombolysis group

    patients will be treated with bed side administration of low dose of local thrombolytic therapy (In Situ) via a trans-Jugular Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter. with guidance of the pressure waveforms obtained from SGC(Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter) and echocardiography guidance for ideal Catheter placement. This group will include the patients with relative contraindications for systemic thrombolysis, contraindications for contrasted administration (patients with renal impairment) and also patients with contraindications for radiation exposure (pregnant women).

    Procedure: In Situ thrombolysis

Interventions

  • Proceduremechanical fragmentation

    patients who will be treated with catheter-directed mechanical fragmentation under fluoroscopy guidance. This group will include patients with absolute contraindication for fibrinolytic therapy

  • ProcedureIn Situ thrombolysis

    Group (C) will include the patients who will be treated with bed side administration of low dose of local thrombolytic therapy (In Situ) via a trans-Jugular Swan-Ganz pulmonary artery catheter. with guidance of the pressure waveforms obtained from SGC (Swan-Ganz catheter) and echocardiography guidance for ideal Catheter placement. This group will include the patients with relative contraindications for systemic thrombolysis, contraindications for contrasted administration (patients with renal impairment) and also patients with contraindications for radiation exposure (pregnant women).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of mortality (mortality rate)

    number of deaths from total number of patients in each arm

    Time frame: 30-day

  2. Rate of complications

    as major and minor bleedings

    Time frame: 7 days

  3. Rate of Success

    number of cases with clinical success which defined as stabilization of hemodynamic parameters, resolution of hypoxia, survival from PE(pulmonary embolism) and restoring of right ventricular function (improvement of ghit ventricle and pulmonary artery pressure and decrease troponin level)

    Time frame: 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent of Changes in mean blood pressure

    the percent of change in mean arterial blood pressure

    Time frame: Baseline (measured at first admission) and compared with measurements the following second, eighth, and 24th hours of the intervention.

  2. Mean pulmonary artery pressure

    Mean pulmonary artery pressure will be estimated by transthoracic echocardiography

    Time frame: Baseline (at addmission) and 24 hours after catheter-directed intervention

  3. Duration of ICU(intensive care unit) stay

    the duration of ICU (intensive care unit) stay by days

    Time frame: "through study completion, an average of 1 year".

  4. Duration of hospital stay

    the duration of hospital stay by days

    Time frame: "through study completion, an average of 1 year".

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA, Arcelus JI, Bergqvist D, Brecht JG, Greer IA, Heit JA, Hutchinson JL, Kakkar AK, Mottier D, Oger E, Samama MM, Spannagl M; VTE Impact Assessment Group in Europe (VITAE). Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Oct;98(4):756-64. doi: 10.1160/TH07-03-0212. PubMed 17938798 ↗
  • Goldhaber SZ, Visani L, De Rosa M. Acute pulmonary embolism: clinical outcomes in the International Cooperative Pulmonary Embolism Registry (ICOPER). Lancet. 1999 Apr 24;353(9162):1386-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)07534-5. PubMed 10227218 ↗
  • Nassiri N, Jain A, McPhee D, Mina B, Rosen RJ, Giangola G, Carroccio A, Green RM. Massive and submassive pulmonary embolism: experience with an algorithm for catheter-directed mechanical thrombectomy. Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 Jan;26(1):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.05.026. Epub 2011 Aug 31. PubMed 21885244 ↗
  • Anderson FA Jr, Zayaruzny M, Heit JA, Fidan D, Cohen AT. Estimated annual numbers of US acute-care hospital patients at risk for venous thromboembolism. Am J Hematol. 2007 Sep;82(9):777-82. doi: 10.1002/ajh.20983. PubMed 17626254 ↗
  • Konstantinides SV, Torbicki A, Agnelli G, Danchin N, Fitzmaurice D, Galie N, Gibbs JS, Huisman MV, Humbert M, Kucher N, Lang I, Lankeit M, Lekakis J, Maack C, Mayer E, Meneveau N, Perrier A, Pruszczyk P, Rasmussen LH, Schindler TH, Svitil P, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Zamorano JL, Zompatori M; Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). 2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 14;35(43):3033-69, 3069a-3069k. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu283. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available. Erratum In: Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 14;36(39):2666. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv131. Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 14;36(39):2642. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu479. PubMed 25173341 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04911192
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Aliaa Salama Ahmed Omar (Assistant Lecturer, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 2, 2021
Start date
Jun 30, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2023 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 18, 2021

Study contacts

Aliaa Ahmed, MD
Contact
aliaasalama49@gmail.com
201009087704
Arafa abo el Hassan, lecturer
Contact
arafaelkady@aun.edu.eg
201017445151
mohamed M abd el hadi, prof
principal investigator · professor of chest diseases and tuberculosis
Ayman k hassan, lecturer
study director · Assiut University
olfat M El shinnawy, prof
study chair · Assiut University
Aliaa S Ahmed, MD
principal investigator · Assiut University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion