An observational study in Asthma, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 120 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-07-27.
Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Observational
Investigators are building an empirical evidence base for real world data through large-scale replication of randomized controlled trials. The investigators' goal is to understand for what types of clinical questions real world data analyses can be conducted with confidence and how to implement such studies.
This is a non-randomized, non-interventional study that is part of the RCT DUPLICATE initiative (www.rctduplicate.org) of the Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School. It is intended to replicate, as closely as is possible in healthcare insurance claims data, the trial listed below/above. Although many features of the trial cannot be directly replicated in healthcare claims, key design features, including outcomes, exposures, and inclusion/exclusion criteria, were selected to proxy those features from the trial. Randomization is also not replicable in healthcare claims data but was proxied through a statistical balancing of measured covariates according to standard practice. Investigators assume that the RCT provides the reference standard treatment effect estimate and that failure to replicate RCT findings is indicative of the inadequacy of the healthcare claims data for replication for a range of possible reasons and does not provide information on the validity of the original RCT finding.
3,921 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 507 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 66,581 is above the median of 150 across 970 observational studies indexed under Asthma.
Browse Asthma studies →Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,236 studies on the registry; 224 are open to participants now.
Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (55%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
This study will involve a new user, parallel group, propensity score-matched, retrospective cohort design comparing budesonide-formoterol versus budesonide alone. The patients will be required to have continuous enrollment during a baseline period of 180 days before initiation of budesonide-formoterol or budesonide.
Criteria:
Please see https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1WD618wrywYjEaXzfLTcuK-VCcnb6b-gV for full code and algorithm definitions.
Eligible cohort entry dates:
Budesonide-formoterol was approved by FDA on July 21, 2006 for management of asthma. The initial eligible cohort entry date was the first date after July 21, 2006 for both the databases investigated (IBM MarketScan, Optum CDM). The last date eligible as cohort entry date was the end of available data for IBM MarketScan and Optum CDM. The following eligible cohort entry dates were included:
Inclusion Criteria:
Receiving either:
Exclusion Criteria:
One of the following:
Reference Group
Drug: Budesonide
Exposure Group
Drug: Budesonide-Formoterol
Budesonide dispensing claim is used as the reference group.
Budesonide-Formoterol dispensing claim is used as the exposure group.
First serious asthma-related event
A composite of adjudicated death, intubation, and hospitalization
Time frame: Through study completion (a median of 88-116 days)
Asthma-related hospitalization
Time frame: Through study completion (a median of 88-116 days)
Asthma-related intubation
Time frame: Through study completion (a median of 88-116 days)
Asthma-related death
Time frame: Through study completion (a median of 88-116 days)
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Brigham and Women's Hospital