ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04878354TreeTopUpdated Jan 22, 2025Results posted

A Study in Children and Adolescents With Birch Pollen-induced Rhinoconjunctivitis

A Phase 3 interventional study of Tree SLIT-tablet and Placebo SLIT-tablet in Allergy, sponsored by ALK-Abelló A/S. Completed at 80 sites in 11 countries. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-22.

Sponsored by ALK-Abelló A/S · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
952
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a clinical study in children and adolescents (5-17 years) with allergy to pollen from birch (or related trees). It compares the tree SLIT-tablet with placebo in relieving rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms during the birch/tree pollen season based on the average allergic rhinoconjunctivitis daily total combined score.

The study will also collect health-related quality of life information in the groups treated with the tree SLIT-tablet or with placebo during the pollen season.

The trial medication used is already approved to treat allergic rhinitis caused by birch/tree pollen in adults in several countries?.

Read the detailed description

This is a phase III, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate efficacy and safety of the tree SLIT-tablet in children and adolescents (5-17 years) who have rhinoconjunctivitis (with or without asthma) induced by pollen from birch trees or by trees belonging to the birch homologous group. Approximately 1000 children and adolescents will be enrolled in the trial and will receive either the tree SLIT-tablet or placebo.

The trial consists of 3 periods: a screening period, a treatment period, which includes pre-seasonal and co seasonal treatment, and a follow-up period. The duration is up to 13 months for each participant.

The trial is conducted in several European countries and in Canada.

02

Conditions studied

  • Allergy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis
  • Children
  • Adolescents
  • Birch
03

In context

Hypersensitivity

1,055 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypersensitivity; 149 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 952 is above the median of 73 across 691 interventional studies indexed under Hypersensitivity.

Browse Hypersensitivity studies →

Lead sponsor

ALK-Abelló A/S is the lead sponsor of 67 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female of any race/ethnicity aged ≥4 to \<18 years on the day is obtained from the parent/caregiver; the subject must be ≥5 to \<18 years old at the randomisation visit
  • A documented , physician diagnosed, history of moderate to severe AR/C induced by birch pollen (with or without asthma) despite having received treatment with symptom-relieving medication during at least 1 previous tree pollen season for ages 4 through 6 years at screening or at least 2 previous tree pollen seasons for ages 7 through 17 years at screening
  • Positive skin prick test (SPT) to Betula verrucosa at screening
  • Positive specific IgE to Bet v at screening
  • Presence of 1 or more of the following Allergic Rhinitis Impact on Asthma (ARIA) quality of life items due to AR/C during the previous BPS:

    1. Sleep disturbance
    2. Impairment of daily activities, leisure and/or sport
    3. Impairment of school or work
    4. Troublesome symptoms

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A history of symptomatic seasonal AR/C caused by an allergen source, other than tree pollen from the birch homologous group, with a season overlapping the TPS
  • A clinically relevant history of symptomatic perennial AR/C caused by an allergen source such as animal hair and dander to which the subject is exposed during the TPS
  • Any clinical deterioration of asthma (i.e. asthma exacerbation) that resulted in emergency treatment, hospitalisation or treatment with systemic within 3 months prior to randomisation
  • Reduced lung function at randomisation defined as (FEV1) \<70% of predicted value. For subjects with asthma, this is assessed on subject's usual asthma medication following at least a 6-hour wash-out of SABA. This criterion does not need to be fulfilled if the subject is \<7 years old, cannot perform reproducible FEV1 manoeuvres despite coaching and is not considered as having a diagnosis of asthma
  • Ongoing treatment with any allergy immunotherapy product
  • Severe chronic oral inflammation
  • A diagnosis of eosinophilic oesophagitis
  • A relevant history of systemic allergic reaction e.g. anaphylaxis with cardiorespiratory symptoms, generalised urticaria or severe facial angioedema that in the opinion of the investigator may constitute an increased safety concern
  • treatment (ATC code L04 or L01) within 3 months prior to the screening visit
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
952 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Gelatine (fish source), mannitol and sodium hydroxide

    Drug: Placebo SLIT-tablet

  • Experimental
    Intervention/treatment

    Sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet, for daily administration SQ tree SLIT-tablet

    Drug: Tree SLIT-tablet

Interventions

  • DrugTree SLIT-tablet

    Sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablets

  • DrugPlacebo SLIT-tablet

    Placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    The primary endpoint of the trial was the average allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis TCS during the BPS. The average TCS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the BPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    Average TCS measured in the TPS. TPS includes hazel, alder, birch and oak pollen seasons. The average TCS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the TPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  2. Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the BPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the BPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  3. Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the TPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). TPS includes hazel, alder, birch and oak pollen seasons. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the TPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks).

  4. Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the BPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the BPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  5. Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the TPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). TPS includes hazel, alder, birch and oak pollen seasons. Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the TPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  6. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)

    Average TCS during the AHPS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the AHPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the AHPS (mean duration of approximately 6-7 weeks)

  7. Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the AHPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the AHPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the AHPS (mean duration of approximately 6-7 weeks)

  8. Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the AHPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the AHPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the AHPS (mean duration of approximately 6-7 weeks)

  9. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)

    Average TCS measured in the OPS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the OPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the OPS (mean duration of approximately 3 weeks)

  10. Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the OPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the OPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the OPS (mean duration of approximately 3 weeks)

  11. Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)

    Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the OPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the OPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the OPS (mean duration of approximately 3 weeks)

  12. Number of Severe Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    The disease burden for participants was analyzed in terms of proportion of severe days. A severe day was a day with a daily symptom score (DSS) ≥6 and ≥2 moderate symptoms or 1 severe symptom. The DSS ranged from 0 to 18 and was the sum of the 6 allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scores, each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1= mild symptoms, 2= moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms). The proportion of severe days was the number of severe days divided by the number of days in the season.

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  13. Number of Severe Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    The disease burden for participants was analyzed in terms of proportion of severe days. A severe day was a day with a daily symptom score (DSS) ≥6 and ≥2 moderate symptoms or 1 severe symptom. The DSS ranged from 0 to 18 and was the sum of the 6 allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scores, each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1= mild symptoms, 2= moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms). The proportion of severe days was the number of severe days divided by the number of days in the season.

    Time frame: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  14. Number of Well Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    A well day was defined as a day with no use of allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis (AR/C) rescue medication (daily medication score =0) and daily symptom score ≤2. The proportion of well days was the number of well days divided by the number of days in the season.

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  15. Number of Well Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    A well day was defined as a day with no use of allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis (AR/C) rescue medication (daily medication score =0) and daily symptom score ≤2. The proportion of well days was the number of well days divided by the number of days in the season.

    Time frame: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  16. Number of Symptom-free Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    A a symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication (Total Combined Score = 0). The proportion of symptom-free days was the number of symptom-free divided by the number of days in the season.

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  17. Number of Symptom-free Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    A a symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication (Total Combined Score = 0). The proportion of symptom-free days was the number of symptom-free divided by the number of days in the season.

    Time frame: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  18. Percentage of Patients Free of Symptoms and With no Use of Rescue Medication During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    A symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication, i.e. total combined score (TCS) =0. Thus, the endpoint was categorized as a binary variable with a subject being a responder if he/she had no symptoms and had not used rescue medication during the season

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  19. Percentage of Patients Free of Symptoms and With no Use of Rescue Medication During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    A symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication, i.e. total combined score (TCS) = 0. Thus, the endpoint was categorized as a binary variable with a subject being a responder if he/she had no symptoms and had not used rescue medication during the tree pollen season.

    Time frame: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  20. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

    The TCS European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) scoring was calculated using the medication score proposed by EAACI and was the sum of the DSS/6 and the daily EAACI medication score (DMSEAACI) (values 0,1,2), and thus ranged 0-5 with higher scores indicating more combined allergy symptoms and medication use. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  21. Average Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

    The TCS European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) scoring was calculated using the medication score proposed by EAACI and was the sum of the DSS/6 and the daily EAACI medication score (DMSEAACI) (values 0,1,2), and thus ranged 0-5 with higher scores indicating more combined allergy symptoms and medication use. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks).

  22. Average Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (12-17 Years Only)

    The RQLQ measured the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. The RQLQ (for participants 12-17 years only) comprised 28 items, each scored on a 7-point scale ranging 0-6, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The overall RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 item scores. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  23. Average Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS) (12-17 Years Only)

    The RQLQ measured the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. The RQLQ (for participants 12-17 years only) comprised 28 items, each scored on a 7-point scale ranging 0-6, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The overall RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 item scores. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)

  24. Overall Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (5-11 Years Only)

    The PRQLQ measured the paediatric rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. The PRQLQ consisted of 23 items, each scored on a 7-point scale ranging 0-6, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The overall PRQLQ score was the mean of the 23 item scores. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)

  25. Treatment Satisfaction (TSQM-9)

    Treatment satisfaction was measured using the 9-item treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM-9 questionnaire). After ending treatment, participants completed the TSQM-9 questionnaire which consisted of 9 items covering 3 domains. Each item was scored on a 5 point (ranging 1-5) or 7 point (ranging 1-7) scale. For each domain, item scores were summed and normalised to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better satisfaction.

    Time frame: After ending treatment (after approximately 52 weeks of treatment)

  26. Patient-rated Global Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy

    The global evaluation measured patient treatment satisfaction. After ending treatment, participants were asked: 'Compared to your rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis symptoms in the previous birch/tree pollen season, how have you felt overall in this birch/tree pollen season?'. The endpoint was evaluated as a binary endpoint; answer options 'much better' and 'better' were categorised as improved (taking value 1), while answer options 'the same', 'worse', and 'much worse' were categorised as not improved (taking value 0). The primary estimand for the endpoint was he trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

    Time frame: End of treatment (after approximately 52 weeks of treatment)

  27. Change From Baseline in Birch Specific IgE

    Birch specific IgE reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation

    Time frame: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  28. Change From Baseline in Birch Specific IgG4

    Birch specific IgG4 reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation.

    Time frame: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  29. Change From Baseline in Birch Specific IgE-Blocking Factor (IgE-BF)

    The IgE-blocking factor assesses the effect of serum components (including IgE-blocking antibodies known to be induced by allergy immunotherapy) competing with IgE for binding to allergen. IgE-blocking factor is calculated as 1-(S/T), where S is the amount of allergen-specific IgE bound to allergen in the (possible) presence of competing components, and where T is the total amount of allergen-specific IgE capable of binding to allergen when all competing antibodies/components have been washed off. IgE-blocking factor values closer to 0 indicate the presence of fewer IgE-blocking components and values closer to 1 indicate that more IgE is blocked from binding to the allergen.

    Time frame: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  30. Change From Baseline in Alder, Hazel and Oak Specific IgE

    Change in alder, hazel and oak specific IgE reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation.

    Time frame: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  31. Change From Baseline in Alder, Hazel and Oak Specific IgG4

    Change in alder, hazel and oak specific IgG4 reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation.

    Time frame: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)

  32. Change From Baseline in Alder and Hazel Specific IgE- Blocking Factor (IgE-BF)

    The IgE-blocking factor assesses the effect of serum components (including IgE-blocking antibodies known to be induced by allergy immunotherapy) competing with IgE for binding to allergen. IgE-blocking factor is calculated as 1-(S/T), where S is the amount of allergen-specific IgE bound to allergen in the (possible) presence of competing components, and where T is the total amount of allergen-specific IgE capable of binding to allergen when all competing antibodies/components have been washed off. IgE-blocking factor values closer to 0 indicate the presence of fewer IgE-blocking components and values closer to 1 indicate that more IgE is blocked from binding to the allergen.

    Time frame: From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks treatment, on average)

07

Results

Posted Jan 22, 2025

Participant flow

952 participants were randomized and treated. Participants were recruited from 80 sites in 11 countries (Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Germany, Hungary, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Russia and Slovakia). First participant first visit: 08-Apr-2021. Last participant last visit/contact: 31-Jul-2023.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Started479473
Completed trial458456
Full analysis set479473
Safety analysis set479473
Subgroup analysis set132119
Completed454443
Not completed2530
Withdrew: Adverse event413
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1412
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up41
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy10
Withdrew: Protocol violation01
Withdrew: Reason stated as "other" in crf23

Outcome measures

PrimaryAverage Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

The primary endpoint of the trial was the average allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis TCS during the BPS. The average TCS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the BPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)5.88 ± 0.334.60 ± 0.29
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0004 · Mean difference (final values): 1.29 · 95% CI 0.58 to 2.00Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

Average TCS measured in the TPS. TPS includes hazel, alder, birch and oak pollen seasons. The average TCS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the TPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)4.51 ± 0.253.66 ± 0.22
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0010 · Mean difference (final values): 0.85 · 95% CI 0.34 to 1.35Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the BPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the BPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)2.75 ± 0.162.39 ± 0.15
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0354 · Mean difference (final values): 0.37 · 95% CI 0.03 to 0.71Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the TPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). TPS includes hazel, alder, birch and oak pollen seasons. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the TPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)2.28 ± 0.142.04 ± 0.13
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0734 · Mean difference (final values): 0.24 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.50Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the BPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the BPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)2.42 ± 0.231.55 ± 0.18
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.86 · 95% CI 0.45 to 1.28Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the TPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). TPS includes hazel, alder, birch and oak pollen seasons. Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the TPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)1.72 ± 0.161.18 ± 0.13
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0002 · Mean difference (final values): 0.54 · 95% CI 0.26 to 0.82Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)

Average TCS during the AHPS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the AHPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the AHPS (mean duration of approximately 6-7 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)2.83 ± 0.222.51 ± 0.21
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1516 · Mean difference (final values): 0.32 · 95% CI -0.11 to 0.76Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)

Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the AHPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the AHPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the AHPS (mean duration of approximately 6-7 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)1.57 ± 0.121.56 ± 0.13
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9709 · Mean difference (final values): 0.00 · 95% CI -0.24 to 0.25Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)

Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the AHPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the AHPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the AHPS (mean duration of approximately 6-7 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Alder Hazel Pollen Season (AHPS)0.80 ± 0.110.59 ± 0.09
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0499 · Mean difference (final values): 0.21 · 95% CI 0.00 to 0.41Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)

Average TCS measured in the OPS evaluates the treatment effect based on reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and medication use (on a scale of 0-38). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms and/or more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the OPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the OPS (mean duration of approximately 3 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)5.67 ± 0.364.22 ± 0.31
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Median difference (final values): 1.45 · 95% CI 0.73 to 2.18Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)

Average rhinoconjunctivitis DSS during the OPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms (on a scale of 0 to 18). Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the OPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the OPS (mean duration of approximately 3 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Daily Symptoms Score (DSS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)2.68 ± 0.162.20 ± 0.15
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0075 · Median difference (final values): 0.48 · 95% CI 0.13 to 0.83Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)

Average rhinoconjunctivitis DMS during the OPS evaluates the treatment effect based on the reduction in daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication use (on a scale of 0 to 20). Higher scores indicate more medication use. The endpoint is calculated as the average score of all reported daily values during the OPS. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the OPS (mean duration of approximately 3 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Daily Medication Score (DMS) During the Oak Pollen Season (OPS)2.18 ± 0.231.31 ± 0.18
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Median difference (final values): 0.87 · 95% CI 0.44 to 1.29Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryNumber of Severe Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

The disease burden for participants was analyzed in terms of proportion of severe days. A severe day was a day with a daily symptom score (DSS) ≥6 and ≥2 moderate symptoms or 1 severe symptom. The DSS ranged from 0 to 18 and was the sum of the 6 allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scores, each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1= mild symptoms, 2= moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms). The proportion of severe days was the number of severe days divided by the number of days in the season.

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of severe days
Number of Severe Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)
Proportion of severe daysPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Number of Severe Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)0.230.20
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) · p = <0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 1.20 · 95% CI 1.10 to 1.32Odds ratio is (odds placebo SLIT-tablet / odds tree SLIT-tablet)
SecondaryNumber of Severe Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

The disease burden for participants was analyzed in terms of proportion of severe days. A severe day was a day with a daily symptom score (DSS) ≥6 and ≥2 moderate symptoms or 1 severe symptom. The DSS ranged from 0 to 18 and was the sum of the 6 allergic rhinoconjunctivitis symptom scores, each scored on a scale from 0 to 3 (0 = no symptoms, 1= mild symptoms, 2= moderate symptoms and 3 = severe symptoms). The proportion of severe days was the number of severe days divided by the number of days in the season.

Time frame:
During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of severe days
Number of Severe Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)
Proportion of severe daysPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Number of Severe Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)0.110.11
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) · p = 0.9124 · Odds ratio (or): 1.00 · 95% CI 0.93 to 1.08Odds ration is (odds placebo SLIT-tablet / odds tree SLIT-tablet)
SecondaryNumber of Well Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

A well day was defined as a day with no use of allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis (AR/C) rescue medication (daily medication score =0) and daily symptom score ≤2. The proportion of well days was the number of well days divided by the number of days in the season.

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of well days
Number of Well Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)
Proportion of well daysPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Number of Well Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)0.360.43
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Generalised linear fixed model (GLMM) · p = <0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 0.76 · 95% CI 0.71 to 0.81Odds ratio is (odds placebo SLIT-tablet / odds tree SLIT-tablet)
SecondaryNumber of Well Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

A well day was defined as a day with no use of allergic rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis (AR/C) rescue medication (daily medication score =0) and daily symptom score ≤2. The proportion of well days was the number of well days divided by the number of days in the season.

Time frame:
During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of well days
Number of Well Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)
Proportion of well daysPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Number of Well Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)0.500.53
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) · p = <0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 0.89 · 95% CI 0.85 to 0.93Odds ratio is (odds placebo SLIT-tablet / odds tree SLIT-tablet)
SecondaryNumber of Symptom-free Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

A a symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication (Total Combined Score = 0). The proportion of symptom-free days was the number of symptom-free divided by the number of days in the season.

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of symptom-free days
Number of Symptom-free Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)
Proportion of symptom-free daysPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Number of Symptom-free Days During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)0.240.29
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) · p = <0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 0.78 · 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84Odds ratio is (odds placebo SLIT-tablet / odds tree SLIT-tablet)
SecondaryNumber of Symptom-free Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

A a symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication (Total Combined Score = 0). The proportion of symptom-free days was the number of symptom-free divided by the number of days in the season.

Time frame:
During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion of symptom-free days
Number of Symptom-free Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)
Proportion of symptom-free daysPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Number of Symptom-free Days During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)0.280.30
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) · p = 0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 0.90 · 95% CI 0.86 to 0.95Odds ratio is (odds placebo SLIT-tablet / odds tree SLIT-tablet)
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Free of Symptoms and With no Use of Rescue Medication During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

A symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication, i.e. total combined score (TCS) =0. Thus, the endpoint was categorized as a binary variable with a subject being a responder if he/she had no symptoms and had not used rescue medication during the season

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients Free of Symptoms and With no Use of Rescue Medication During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS)
ParticipantsPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
No season data1918
TCS=0 all days2120
TCS> 0 any day439435
SecondaryPercentage of Patients Free of Symptoms and With no Use of Rescue Medication During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

A symptom-free day was defined as a day with no symptoms and with no use of rescue medication, i.e. total combined score (TCS) = 0. Thus, the endpoint was categorized as a binary variable with a subject being a responder if he/she had no symptoms and had not used rescue medication during the tree pollen season.

Time frame:
During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Percentage of Patients Free of Symptoms and With no Use of Rescue Medication During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS)
ParticipantsPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
No season data1516
TCS = 0 all days104
TCS > 0 any day454453
SecondaryAverage Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Birch Pollen Season (BPS)

The TCS European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) scoring was calculated using the medication score proposed by EAACI and was the sum of the DSS/6 and the daily EAACI medication score (DMSEAACI) (values 0,1,2), and thus ranged 0-5 with higher scores indicating more combined allergy symptoms and medication use. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Birch Pollen Season (BPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Birch Pollen Season (BPS)0.95 ± 0.050.77 ± 0.05
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0015 · Mean difference (final values): 0.18 · 95% CI 0.07 to 0.29Placebo SLIT-tablet vs tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Tree Pollen Season (TPS)

The TCS European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) scoring was calculated using the medication score proposed by EAACI and was the sum of the DSS/6 and the daily EAACI medication score (DMSEAACI) (values 0,1,2), and thus ranged 0-5 with higher scores indicating more combined allergy symptoms and medication use. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks).
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Tree Pollen Season (TPS)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Total Combined Score (TCS) (EAACI Scoring) During Tree Pollen Season (TPS)0.74 ± 0.040.62 ± 0.04
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0032 · Mean difference (final values): 0.12 · 95% CI 0.04 to 0.20Placebo SLIT-tablet vs tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (12-17 Years Only)

The RQLQ measured the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. The RQLQ (for participants 12-17 years only) comprised 28 items, each scored on a 7-point scale ranging 0-6, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The overall RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 item scores. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (12-17 Years Only)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (12-17 Years Only)0.98 ± 0.090.97 ± 0.09
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9277 · Mean difference (final values): 0.01 · 95% CI -0.21 to 0.23Placebo SLIT-tablet vs tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryAverage Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS) (12-17 Years Only)

The RQLQ measured the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. The RQLQ (for participants 12-17 years only) comprised 28 items, each scored on a 7-point scale ranging 0-6, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The overall RQLQ score was the mean of the 28 item scores. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the TPS (mean duration of approximately 11 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Average Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS) (12-17 Years Only)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Average Weekly Overall Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) Score During the Tree Pollen Season (TPS) (12-17 Years Only)0.85 ± 0.070.86 ± 0.08
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9643 · Mean difference (final values): -0.00 · 95% CI -0.19 to 0.18Placebo SLIT-tablet vs tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryOverall Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (5-11 Years Only)

The PRQLQ measured the paediatric rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. The PRQLQ consisted of 23 items, each scored on a 7-point scale ranging 0-6, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life. The overall PRQLQ score was the mean of the 23 item scores. The primary estimand for the endpoint was the trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
During the BPS (mean duration of approximately 3-4 weeks)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Overall Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (5-11 Years Only)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Overall Paediatric Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (PRQLQ) Score During the Birch Pollen Season (BPS) (5-11 Years Only)1.30 ± 0.071.12 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0287 · Mean difference (final values): 0.18 · 95% CI 0.02 to 0.34Placebo SLIT-tablet vs. tree SLIT-tablet
SecondaryTreatment Satisfaction (TSQM-9)

Treatment satisfaction was measured using the 9-item treatment satisfaction questionnaire for medication (TSQM-9 questionnaire). After ending treatment, participants completed the TSQM-9 questionnaire which consisted of 9 items covering 3 domains. Each item was scored on a 5 point (ranging 1-5) or 7 point (ranging 1-7) scale. For each domain, item scores were summed and normalised to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better satisfaction.

Time frame:
After ending treatment (after approximately 52 weeks of treatment)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Treatment Satisfaction (TSQM-9)
score on a scalePlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Convenience79.6 ± 14.778.2 ± 15.3
Effectiveness59.8 ± 21.167.6 ± 18.4
Global satisfaction62.1 ± 23.569.9 ± 20.0
SecondaryPatient-rated Global Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy

The global evaluation measured patient treatment satisfaction. After ending treatment, participants were asked: 'Compared to your rhinitis and/or conjunctivitis symptoms in the previous birch/tree pollen season, how have you felt overall in this birch/tree pollen season?'. The endpoint was evaluated as a binary endpoint; answer options 'much better' and 'better' were categorised as improved (taking value 1), while answer options 'the same', 'worse', and 'much worse' were categorised as not improved (taking value 0). The primary estimand for the endpoint was he trial product estimand. The trial product estimand assesses the anticipated effect of the tree SLIT-tablet if it is taken as instructed.

Time frame:
End of treatment (after approximately 52 weeks of treatment)
Reported as:
Number · Proportion
Patient-rated Global Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy
ProportionPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Patient-rated Global Evaluation of Treatment Efficacy0.70 (0.65 to 0.74)0.85 (0.81 to 0.88)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Generalized linear mixed model (GLMM) · p = <0.0001 · Odds ratio (or): 0.42 · 95% CI 0.30 to 0.58Odds ratio is (odds placebo SLIT-tablet/ odds tree SLIT-tablet)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Birch Specific IgE

Birch specific IgE reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation

Time frame:
From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)
Reported as:
Mean · Log10 transformed kU/L
Change From Baseline in Birch Specific IgE
Log10 transformed kU/LPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Birch specific IgE, visit 4-0.21 (-0.24 to -0.18)0.22 (0.18 to 0.26)
Birch specific IgE, visit 60.10 (0.07 to 0.13)0.06 (0.02 to 0.10)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.43 · 95% CI 0.38 to 0.48Tree SLIT-tablet vs placebo SLIT-tablet, visit 4
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1038 · Mean difference (final values): -0.04 · 95% CI -0.09 to 0.01Tree SLIT-tablet vs. placebo SLIT-tablet, visit 6
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Birch Specific IgG4

Birch specific IgG4 reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation.

Time frame:
From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)
Reported as:
Mean · Log10 transformed mg/L
Change From Baseline in Birch Specific IgG4
Log10 transformed mg/LPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Birch specific IgG4, visit 4-0.09 (-0.11 to -0.07)0.43 (0.39 to 0.47)
Birch specific IgG4, visit 60.05 (0.03 to 0.07)0.54 (0.51 to 0.58)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.53 · 95% CI 0.48 to 0.57Tree SLIT-tablet vs. placebo SLIT-tablet, visit 4
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.49 · 95% CI 0.45 to 0.53Tree SLIT-tablet vs placebo SLIT-tablet, visit 6
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Birch Specific IgE-Blocking Factor (IgE-BF)

The IgE-blocking factor assesses the effect of serum components (including IgE-blocking antibodies known to be induced by allergy immunotherapy) competing with IgE for binding to allergen. IgE-blocking factor is calculated as 1-(S/T), where S is the amount of allergen-specific IgE bound to allergen in the (possible) presence of competing components, and where T is the total amount of allergen-specific IgE capable of binding to allergen when all competing antibodies/components have been washed off. IgE-blocking factor values closer to 0 indicate the presence of fewer IgE-blocking components and values closer to 1 indicate that more IgE is blocked from binding to the allergen.

Time frame:
From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)
Reported as:
Mean · Unitless
Change From Baseline in Birch Specific IgE-Blocking Factor (IgE-BF)
UnitlessPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Birch specific IgE-BF, visit 4-0.01 (-0.03 to 0.01)0.28 (0.23 to 0.32)
Birch specific IgE-BF, visit 60.04 (0.02 to 0.05)0.35 (0.30 to 0.40)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.29 · 95% CI 0.24 to 0.33Tree SLIT-tablet vs. placebo SLIT-tablet, visit 4
  • Placebo SLIT-tablet vs Tree SLIT-tablet · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.31 · 95% CI 0.26 to 0.36Tree SLIT-tablet vs. placebo SLIT-tablet, visit 6
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Alder, Hazel and Oak Specific IgE

Change in alder, hazel and oak specific IgE reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation.

Time frame:
From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)
Reported as:
Mean · log10 transformed kU/L
Change From Baseline in Alder, Hazel and Oak Specific IgE
log10 transformed kU/LPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Alder specific IgE, visit 4-0.22 ± 0.200.17 ± 0.41
Alder specific IgE, visit 60.18 ± 0.340.10 ± 0.31
Hazel specific IgE, visit 4-0.22 ± 0.210.15 ± 0.38
Hazel specific IgE, visit 60.20 ± 0.360.11 ± 0.30
Oak specific IgE, visit 4-0.21 ± 0.170.14 ± 0.37
Oak specific IgE, visit 60.20 ± 0.340.11 ± 0.29
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Alder, Hazel and Oak Specific IgG4

Change in alder, hazel and oak specific IgG4 reflects the allergen-specific allergy immunotherapy-induced immune modulation.

Time frame:
From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks of treatment, on average)
Reported as:
Mean · log10 transformed mg/L
Change From Baseline in Alder, Hazel and Oak Specific IgG4
log10 transformed mg/LPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Alder specific IgG4, visit 4-0.08 ± 0.180.38 ± 0.39
Alder specific IgG4, visit 60.13 ± 0.260.51 ± 0.41
Hazel specific IgG4, visit 4-0.08 ± 0.190.35 ± 0.39
Hazel specific IgG4, visit 60.11 ± 0.240.46 ± 0.42
Oak specific IgG4, visit 4-0.07 ± 0.140.28 ± 0.39
Oak specific IgG4, visit 60.08 ± 0.210.32 ± 0.35
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Alder and Hazel Specific IgE- Blocking Factor (IgE-BF)

The IgE-blocking factor assesses the effect of serum components (including IgE-blocking antibodies known to be induced by allergy immunotherapy) competing with IgE for binding to allergen. IgE-blocking factor is calculated as 1-(S/T), where S is the amount of allergen-specific IgE bound to allergen in the (possible) presence of competing components, and where T is the total amount of allergen-specific IgE capable of binding to allergen when all competing antibodies/components have been washed off. IgE-blocking factor values closer to 0 indicate the presence of fewer IgE-blocking components and values closer to 1 indicate that more IgE is blocked from binding to the allergen.

Time frame:
From baseline (screening) to visit 4 (pre-TPS) (after approximately 19 weeks of treatment, on average) and from baseline (screening) to visit 6 (end of treatment) (after approximately 44 weeks treatment, on average)
Reported as:
Mean · Unitless
Change From Baseline in Alder and Hazel Specific IgE- Blocking Factor (IgE-BF)
UnitlessPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Alder specific IgE-BF, visit 4-0.03 ± 0.080.20 ± 0.18
Alder specific IgE-BF, visit 60.04 ± 0.130.21 ± 0.19
Hazel specific IgE-BF, visit 4-0.03 ± 0.080.15 ± 0.18
Hazel specific IgE-BF, visit 60.02 ± 0.100.14 ± 0.17

Adverse events

Collected over All AEs with start date/time on or after the time of first IMP administration and no later than 7 days after last IMP administration (up to approximately 12 months).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo SLIT-tablet0/479 (0%)6/479 (1.3%)194/479 (40.5%)
Tree SLIT-tablet0/473 (0%)5/473 (1.1%)315/473 (66.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations0/4791/473
ImpetigoInfections and infestations0/4791/473
Infectious mononucleosisInfections and infestations0/4791/473
Anaphylactic reactionImmune system disorders0/4791/473
Foot operationSurgical and medical procedures0/4791/473
AppendicitisInfections and infestations1/4790/473
Lymph node abscessInfections and infestations1/4790/473
Peritonsillar abscessInfections and infestations1/4790/473
TonsillitisInfections and infestations1/4790/473
LymphadenitisBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/4790/473
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlacebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tablet
Oral pruritusGastrointestinal disorders17/479114/473
Throat irritationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders18/479112/473
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations82/47981/473
Tongue pruritusGastrointestinal disorders6/47960/473
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations43/47942/473
COVID-19Infections and infestations43/47927/473
PharyngitisInfections and infestations21/47932/473
Paraesthesia oralGastrointestinal disorders8/47928/473
InfluenzaInfections and infestations25/47917/473

Baseline characteristics

All randomized and treated participants

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Placebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tabletTotal
<=18 years479473952
Between 18 and 65 years000
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Placebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tabletTotal
Mean10.2 ± 3.510.4 ± 3.510.3 ± 3.5
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Placebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tabletTotal
Age by group — 5-11 years300297597
Age by group — 12-17 years179176355
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Placebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tabletTotal
Female194185379
Male285288573
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Placebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tabletTotal
Hispanic or Latino538
Not Hispanic or Latino471463934
Unknown or Not Reported3710
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Placebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tabletTotal
Asian415
White473468941
Black or African American011
Multiple224
Other011
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Placebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tabletTotal
Canada424587
Austria4610
Netherlands202
Belgium347
Hungary242145
Denmark10818
Poland225221446
Slovakia403979
Lithuania464692
Germany444589
Russia393877
Allergic condition caused by birch
Allergic condition caused by birch(participants)Placebo SLIT-tabletTree SLIT-tabletTotal
Allergic conjunctivitis426
Allergic rhinitis122125247
Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis353346699
Asthma125126251
08

Study locations

80 sites
  • Allergy Center Vienna West
    Vienna, 1150, Austria
  • Medical University of Vienna
    Vienna, A-1090, Austria
  • Practice Dr Jean-Benoit Martinot
    Erpent, Namur 5101, Belgium
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
    Gent, Oost-Vlandeeren 9000, Belgium
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, Vlaams Brabant 3000, Belgium
  • CHU Sainte-Justine
    Montréal, Quebec H3T 1C5, Canada
  • Clinique specialisee en allergie de la capitale
    Québec, G1V 4W2, Canada
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital, Astma, Allergi- og Lungeklinikken for Born
    Aarhus, 8200, Denmark
  • Astma, Allergi- og Lungeklinik
    Copenhagen, 1364, Denmark
  • Gentofte Hospital Allergy Clinic
    Hellerup, 2900, Denmark
  • Kinder- u. Jugendmedizin
    Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg 69126, Germany
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis für Kinder und Jugendmedizin
    Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg 68161, Germany
  • Klinikum rechts der Isar der TUM
    Munich, Bayern 80802, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH - Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde Sektion Rhinologie und Allergologie
    Marburg, Hessen 35043, Germany
  • KliFOs - Klinische Forschung Osnabrück
    Osnabrück, Niedersachsen 49074, Germany
  • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf - Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin
    Düsseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen 40217, Germany
  • ENT Research GmbH
    Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen 15355, Germany
  • Kinder- und Jugendärzte
    Hürth, Nordrhein-Westfalen 50354, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Münster
    Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen 48149, Germany
  • Praxis Dr.J. Funck
    Neuss, Nordrhein-Westfalen 41469, Germany
  • Praxis Dr. med. Karsten Jünger
    Herxheim, Rheinland-Pfalz 76863, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin der JGU
    Mainz, Rheinland-Pfalz 55131, Germany
  • Kinderarztpraxis Dr. med. Siegfried Simmet und Simon Traub
    Schweigen-Rechtenbach, Rheinland-Pfalz 76889, Germany
  • Praxis Dr. Yury Yarin
    Dresden, Sachsen 01139, Germany
  • HNO Praxis Dr. Uta Thieme
    Duisburg, 40225, Germany
  • Hautarztpraxis Dr. med. Daniela Kasche
    Hamburg, 22549, Germany
  • HNO-Praxis am Neckar
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
  • Aranyklinika Kft
    Szeged, Csongrád 6720, Hungary
  • Svábhegy Plusz Kft
    Budapest, 1037, Hungary
  • Semmelweis Egyetem
    Budapest, 1083, Hungary
  • Heim Pál Gyermekkórház
    Budapest, 1089, Hungary
  • Kispesti Egeszsegugyi Intezet
    Budapest, 1195, Hungary
  • JSC Ausros Medicinos Centras
    Kaunas, Kauno Apskritis 49387, Lithuania
  • "CD8 Klinika" JSC
    Kaunas, Kauno Apskritis LT-44269, Lithuania
  • "Medicum centrum" JSC
    Taurage, Tauragės Apskritis LT-72250, Lithuania
  • "Seimos gydytojas" JSC
    Vilnius, Vilniaus Apskritis LT-01118, Lithuania
  • "Inlita" JSC Santara CTC
    Vilnius, Vilniaus Apskritis LT-08406, Lithuania
  • Allergy clinic "Perspektyvos" JSC
    Vilnius, Vilniaus Apskritis LT-08465, Lithuania
  • Hospital of University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos
    Kaunas, LT-50161, Lithuania
  • Alerginiu susirgimu diagnostikos ir gydymo centras
    Vilnius, 8109, Lithuania
  • "Center of Innovative Allergology" JSC
    Vilnius, LT-06256, Lithuania
  • Medisch Spectrum Twente
    Enschede, Overijssel 7500KA, Netherlands
  • Erasmus MC - Sophia Childrens Hospital
    Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3015 CN, Netherlands
  • Centrum Medyczne PRATIA Bydgoszcz
    Bydgoszcz, Kujawsko-pomorskie 85-796, Poland
  • Centrum Alergologii Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Alergologiczna
    Lublin, Lubelskie 20-552, Poland
  • ALERGO-MED Spolka z o.o.
    Tarnów, Malopolskie 33-100, Poland
  • Malopolskie Centrum Alergologii
    Krakow, Małopolskie 31-411, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne ALL-MED
    Kraków, Małopolskie 30-033, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne PROMED
    Kraków, Małopolskie 31-411, Poland
  • NZOZ E-Vita
    Bialystok, Podlaskie 15-879, Poland
  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej "ALERGOLOGIA", Poradnia Alergologiczna
    Szczecin, Zachodniopomorskie 70-382, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Pratia Czestochowa
    Czestochowa, 42-200, Poland
  • Indywidualna Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska lek. med. Elzbieta Matusz
    Gryfice, 72-300, Poland
  • ETG Kielce
    Kielce, 25-355, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Plejady
    Kraków, 30-363, Poland
  • Alergotest s.c. Specjalistyczne Centrum Medyczne
    Lublin, 20-095, Poland
  • Gabinet Lekarski Pediatryczno-Alergologiczny Zenon Bukowczan
    Sucha Beskidzka, 34-200, Poland
  • "All-Med" Specjalistyczna Opieka Medyczna
    Wroclaw, 53-201, Poland
  • Michal Bogacki DOBROSTAN
    Wroclaw, 53-201, Poland
  • Michal Bogacki DOBROSTAN
    Wroclaw, 53-301, Poland
  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Centrum Uslug Medycznych "PROXIMUM" Sp. z o.o.
    Wroclaw, 53-428, Poland
  • SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 im. N.Barlickiego
    Łódź, 90-141, Poland
  • WWCOiT im. M. Kopernika w Lodzi, Osrodek Pediatryczny im. dr J.Korczaka
    Łódź, 90-329, Poland
  • Centrum Alergologii Prof. K. Buczyłko Spółka z o.o.
    Łódź, 90-553, Poland
  • ETG Skierniewice
    Skierniewice, Łódzkie 96-100, Poland
  • Specjalist. Praktyka Lek. dr n.med. Joanna Orlicz-Widawska
    Katowice, Śląskie 40-338, Poland
  • NSZOZ Puls - Med Anna Bogusz, Agnieszka Musielak Sp.J.
    Skarżysko-Kamienna, Świętokrzyskie 26-110, Poland
  • NRPC Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, Immunology n.a. Dmitriya Rogacheva - Multispecialty
    Moskva, Moscow 117198, Russian Federation
  • LLC "Olla-Med"
    Moscow, Moskva 105554, Russian Federation
  • FGBU "Scientific center of children health" of RAMS
    Moscow, Moskva 119333, Russian Federation
  • Public Enterprise State Scient
    Moscow, 115478, Russian Federation
  • FGBUN" Federal Research Center for Nutrition and Biotechnology "
    Moskva, 115446, Russian Federation
  • ALERGO H2B s.r.o.
    Komárno, Nitriansky Kraj 945 01, Slovakia
  • DANIMED, spol. s.r.o.
    Levice, 935-31, Slovakia
  • Univerzitna Nemocnica Martin
    Martin, 03601, Slovakia
  • MedKol, s.r.o.
    Nové Zámky, 940 01, Slovakia
  • EMED s.r.o.
    Prešov, 080 01, Slovakia
  • Zoll-Med s.r.o., Ambulancia klinickej imunologie a alergologie
    Rimavska Sobota, 979 01, Slovakia
  • SIMIDA s.r.o.
    Vráble, 952 01, Slovakia
  • Ambulancia klinickej imunologie a alergologie
    Šurany, 942 01, Slovakia
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 22, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04878354
Lead sponsor
ALK-Abelló A/S
Collaborators
Parexel
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 7, 2021
Start date
Apr 7, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2023
Completion
Jul 31, 2023
Results posted
Jan 22, 2025
Last update
Jan 22, 2025

Study contacts

Monika Gappa, Prof. MD
principal investigator · Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion