CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT04878068Updated May 7, 2021

Study to Evaluate the Performance of the Therma COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test for Detection of SARS-CoV-2

An observational study in Covid19, sponsored by Cannabis Research Associates. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-05-07.

Sponsored by Cannabis Research Associates · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2021), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Therma COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test is an in vitro rapid, lateral flow immunoassay intended for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein antigens in human saliva specimens. This test is intended for near-patient use at the point-of-care or lay person, self-use in a non-laboratory or home setting using saliva samples from individuals with or without symptoms of COVID-19.

The Therma COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test will be compared to a Health Canada approved RT-PCR COVID-19 test. Nasopharyngeal (for RT-PCR) samples will be collected at a COVID-19 Testing centre and saliva (for the rapid antigen test) samples will be collected and compared.

The prospective, observational, feasibility study will test 300 participants to establish the performance characteristics of the test on saliva specimens.

02

Conditions studied

  • Covid19

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Saliva Antigen
  • Rapid Saliva Test
03

In context

COVID-19

7,640 studies on the registry are indexed under COVID-19; 488 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 261 across 3,136 observational studies indexed under COVID-19.

Browse COVID-19 studies →

Lead sponsor

Cannabis Research Associates is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Potential participants attending a COVID-19 testing centre for a PCR test will be approached to determine eligibility and obtain consent after they have had their PCR test completed. Three hundred participants will be recruited into the study.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Participant is willing to sign verbal informed consent form
  2. Age 12 or older and parents or legal guardians must consent for children as required by law.
  3. Participant is attending COVID-19 testing centre for a nasopharyngeal swab sample
  4. Participant is willing to provide a self-collected saliva sample

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant has previously tested positive for COVID-19 within the past 90 days
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Rapid Antigen Saliva Test

    Participants who have had a COVID-19 PCR test will self-administer the saliva test. The research team will conduct the processing of the test for the results of positive, negative or inconclusive

    Device: Theram COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test

Interventions

  • DeviceTheram COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test

    The Therma COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test is an in vitro rapid, lateral flow immunoassay intended for the qualitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein antigens in human saliva specimens. This test is intended for near-patient use at the point-of-care or lay person, self-use in a non-laboratory or home setting using saliva samples from individuals with or without symptoms of COVID-19.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Establish Performance of Therma COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test

    To establish the performance characteristics of the Therma COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in a near-patient, point-of-care (POC) setting with lay users (no laboratory experience) testing a participant that has self-collected the saliva specimen. Clinical accuracy of the rapid antigen test compared to RT-PCR test results. Accuracy refers to the (PPA, positive percent agreement (sensitivity) and (NPA, negative percent agreement (specificity) between the results of the tests. The expected performance of the test for symptomatic participants shall be \>90% PPA and \>98% NPA.

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Participant Feedback

    Evaluate participant feedback on the usability of the Therma COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test and saliva collection device using the Participant Study Questionnaire Form (Ease of use 5-point scale from 5=Easy to 1=Hard)

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. User Feedback

    Evaluate user feedback on the usability of the Therma COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test and saliva collection device using the Therma Feasibility Study User Feedback Questionnaire (ease of use 5-point scale from Not at all to Very easy)

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 7, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04878068
Lead sponsor
Cannabis Research Associates
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 7, 2021
Start date
May 15, 2021 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2021 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2021 (estimated)
Last update
May 7, 2021

Study contacts

Lisa Patterson, BA
Contact
lisap1636@gmail.com
289-230-3605
Ira Price, MD
Contact
ira.pmpc@gmail.com
Ira Price, MD
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion