CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT04868682Updated Nov 18, 2025Results posted

Addressing Insufficient PAP Use in Older Veterans

An interventional study of PAP Adherence Program and Active Control in Sleep Apnea, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-18.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
106
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common problem among middle-aged and older Veterans that is associated with poor nighttime sleep, more daytime sleepiness, poor functioning and worse quality of life. The recommended therapy for most patients with OSA is positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy; however, over time many patients prescribed PAP therapy no longer use it regularly. This study will test the effects of an behavioral treatment specifically designed for middle-aged and older Veterans who have stopped using their PAP device, or are not using it regularly.

Eligible Veterans who are enrolled into the study will receive a baseline assessment that includes questionnaires about sleep, health, and quality of life. After completing the baseline assessment, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will meet individually with a "sleep coach" for 5 session over 8 weeks, then they will be contacted by the sleep coach monthly by telephone for up to 6 months. Participants will complete follow-up assessments immediately after the fifth education session and again at 6-months and 12-months.

If successful, this approach has the potential to improve sleep, function and quality of life in middle-aged and older Veterans with OSA.

Read the detailed description

Background: The most frequently diagnosed sleep disorder among middle-aged and older Veterans is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which is associated with serious adverse effects on health, quality of life and survival. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is recommended as first-line treatment (particularly for moderate to severe OSA), but sustained use is difficult to achieve, including among middle-aged and older Veterans, and nearly half of patients with OSA who begin PAP therapy discontinue use within a year.

Significance/Impact: Although OSA is a chronic condition, research to date has primarily focused on increasing initial PAP use in patients with newly diagnosed OSA. In addition, most research has not addressed PAP use in older adults, which is unfortunate given the high prevalence and important adverse effects of OSA on their health and well-being. Prior work suggests that behavioral interventions are effective in improving initial PAP use, but little is known of how to address insufficient PAP use over time.

Innovation: To address this problem, the investigators developed and pilot-tested a structured, manual-based behavioral treatment to address insufficient PAP use among middle-aged and older adults with previously diagnosed OSA. The intervention (5 individual virtual sessions over 8 weeks, then monthly brief telephone contact for up to 6 months) is designed so it can be provided by individuals ("sleep coaches") from various disciplines (supervised remotely by a psychologist) in a variety of settings for maximal implementation.

Specific Aims: Primary Aim 1 will test the efficacy of this intervention for improving PAP usage among middle-aged and older Veterans with previously diagnosed moderate or severe OSA who have insufficient PAP use. The hypotheses are that the intervention will increase objectively measured PAP use over 6-months follow-up, with effects sustained over 12 months. Secondary Aim 2 will test for effects on sleep quality, daytime sleepiness and sleep-related function; and Exploratory Aim 3 will test for effects on health-related quality of life. The hypotheses are that these outcomes will also improve at 6 months, and effects will be sustained at 12 months.

Methodology: The investigators are conducting a randomized, controlled trial to test this new intervention in middle-aged and older Veterans (N=106) with previously diagnosed OSA (moderate or severe) who were prescribed PAP, but have insufficient PAP use (defined as no PAP use over the prior 30 days). Participants will be randomized to one of two groups. Structured assessments at baseline, post-treatment (after session 5) and 6- and 12-months follow-up include objectively measured PAP use (via remote telemonitoring), sleep quality, daytime sleepiness, sleep-related function and health-related quality of life. The investigators will also collect participant experiences and attitudes related to the intervention, and implementation outcome measures (e.g., acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity and staff time as an estimate of cost) to inform future implementation.

Implementation/Next Steps: The long-term goal of this work is to effectively address insufficient PAP use among middle-aged and older Veterans with OSA to improve their sleep and quality of life. If successful, the investigators will develop an implementation package to promote wider implementation of this model of care into clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sleep Apnea

Keywords

  • sleep apnea
  • positive airway pressure
03

In context

Sleep Apnea Syndromes

2,162 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea Syndromes; 291 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 106 is above the median of 53 across 1,386 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Apnea Syndromes.

Browse Sleep Apnea Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,733 studies on the registry; 396 are open to participants now.

Of its 206 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 180 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (apnea hypopnea index [AHI] > or = 15)
  • Previously prescribed positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy
  • Insufficient PAP use (defined as no PAP use over the past 30 days)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe psychopathology (e.g., active psychosis) that precludes participation in the study
  • Severe unstable medical illness that precludes participation in the study
  • Significant cognitive impairment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
106 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PAP Adherence Program

    Manual-based behavioral treatment to improve PAP adherence and sleep.

    Behavioral: PAP Adherence Program

  • Active comparator
    Active Control

    Manual-based general sleep education program.

    Behavioral: Active Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralPAP Adherence Program

    Manual-based treatment focused on PAP adherence with behavioral strategies to improve PAP adherence and sleep. The intervention involves five individual virtual sessions provided by allied health personnel, with brief monthly telephone contact for up to 6 months. Allied health personnel have regular supervision with a behavioral sleep medicine psychologist.

  • BehavioralActive Control

    Manual-based general sleep education program. The active control involves five individual virtual sessions provided by allied health personnel, with brief monthly telephone contact for up to 6 months. Allied health personnel have regular supervision with a study clinician.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. PAP Adherence

    Mean hours of PAP use per night calculated for nights 1 to 180 (night 1 is the first night after randomization). Higher numbers indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Nights 1 to 180 following randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sleep Quality

    Total score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index will be used as a measure of sleep quality. Scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months following randomization

  2. Daytime Sleepiness

    Total score on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale will be used as a measure of daytime sleepiness. Score range from 0-24. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months following randomization

  3. Sleep-related Function

    Total score on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10) will be used as a measure of sleep-related function. Scores range from 5-20. Lower scores indicate worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months following randomization

07

Results

Posted Nov 18, 2025

Participant flow

Post-treatment
Participant flow — Post-treatment
MilestonePAP Adherence ProgramActive Control
Started5353
Completed5150
Not completed23
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: 1 refused assessment; 1 in residing in a nursing home; 1 assessment was missed by staff12
Six-month Assessment
Participant flow — Six-month Assessment
MilestonePAP Adherence ProgramActive Control
Started5353
Completed5152
Not completed21
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Death10
Withdrew: Refused01
12-month Assessment
Participant flow — 12-month Assessment
MilestonePAP Adherence ProgramActive Control
Started5253
Completed5051
Not completed22
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up21
Withdrew: Death01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPAP Adherence

Mean hours of PAP use per night calculated for nights 1 to 180 (night 1 is the first night after randomization). Higher numbers indicate a better outcome.

Time frame:
Nights 1 to 180 following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · hours per night
PAP Adherence
hours per nightPAP Adherence ProgramActive Control
PAP Adherence2.16 ± 0.260.87 ± 0.19
Statistical analysis
  • PAP Adherence Program vs Active Control · t-test, 2 sided · p = .0001 · Mean difference (final values): 1.28 · 95% CI 0.65 to 1.91The parameter estimate is the difference in means (treatment vs. control) during the first 180 nights following randomization.
SecondarySleep Quality

Total score on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index will be used as a measure of sleep quality. Scores range from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame:
6 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Sleep Quality
score on a scalePAP Adherence ProgramActive Control
Sleep Quality7.72 ± 0.608.01 ± 0.59
Statistical analysis
  • PAP Adherence Program vs Active Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.378 · Mean difference (net): -0.71 · 95% CI -2.29 to 0.87The parameter estimate is the improvement in the outcome from baseline to 6-months for the treatment group versus the same improvement in respect to the control group.
SecondaryDaytime Sleepiness

Total score on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale will be used as a measure of daytime sleepiness. Score range from 0-24. Higher scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame:
6 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Daytime Sleepiness
score on a scalePAP Adherence ProgramActive Control
Daytime Sleepiness6.11 ± 0.677.59 ± 0.67
Statistical analysis
  • PAP Adherence Program vs Active Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): -2.78 · 95% CI -4.09 to -1.27The parameter estimate is the improvement in the outcome from baseline to 6-months for the treatment group versus the same improvement in respect to the control group.
SecondarySleep-related Function

Total score on the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ-10) will be used as a measure of sleep-related function. Scores range from 5-20. Lower scores indicate worse outcome.

Time frame:
6 months following randomization
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Sleep-related Function
score on a scalePAP Adherence ProgramActive Control
Sleep-related Function14.65 ± 0.5015.67 ± 0.50
Statistical analysis
  • PAP Adherence Program vs Active Control · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.865 · Median difference (net): -0.11 · 95% CI -1.40 to 1.18The parameter estimate is the improvement in the outcome from baseline to 6-months for the treatment group versus the same improvement in respect to the control group.

Adverse events

Collected over One year following randomization.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PAP Adherence Program1/53 (1.9%)6/53 (11.3%)0/53 (0%)
Active Control1/53 (1.9%)1/53 (1.9%)0/53 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPAP Adherence ProgramActive Control
HospitalizationInfections and infestations3/530/53
HospitalizationCardiac disorders2/531/53
Mental health distressPsychiatric disorders1/530/53
HospitalizationGeneral disorders1/530/53
HospitalizationRenal and urinary disorders1/530/53

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PAP Adherence ProgramActive ControlTotal
Mean67.1 ± 9.765.5 ± 9.166.3 ± 9.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PAP Adherence ProgramActive ControlTotal
Female7512
Male464894
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PAP Adherence ProgramActive ControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino91625
Not Hispanic or Latino443781
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PAP Adherence ProgramActive ControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native224
Asian011
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander101
Black or African American211738
White222547
More than one race448
Unknown or Not Reported347
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index(units on a scale)PAP Adherence ProgramActive ControlTotal
Mean10.4 ± 4.59.9 ± 4.110.2 ± 4.3
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Epworth Sleepiness Scale(units on a scale)PAP Adherence ProgramActive ControlTotal
Mean9.5 ± 5.48.3 ± 4.98.9 ± 5.2
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 items
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire-10 items(units on a scale)PAP Adherence ProgramActive ControlTotal
Mean14.0 ± 3.514.9 ± 3.714.4 ± 3.6
08

Study locations

1 site
  • VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA
    Sepulveda, California 91343, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Oct 20, 2025
  • Informed consent form · May 6, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04868682
Lead sponsor
VA Office of Research and Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 3, 2021
Start date
Jan 10, 2022
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2025
Completion
Sep 30, 2025
Results posted
Nov 18, 2025
Last update
Nov 18, 2025

Study contacts

Cathy A. Alessi, MD
principal investigator · VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Sepulveda, CA

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion